Air quality improvement during triple-lockdown in the coastal city of Kannur, Kerala to combat Covid-19 transmission

View article
Environmental Science

Introduction

Air pollution is a major environmental issue that affects people in developed and developing countries alike. Particulate matters (PM10 and PM2.5), oxides of nitrogen (NO and NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO) and volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) are the most common atmospheric air pollutants encountered in our daily life (Chen & Kan, 2008; Guo et al., 2019). At the ground level, O3 is a major secondary air pollutant and greenhouse gas, produced from its precursor gases in the presence of solar radiation, and it plays a crucial role in air quality (Yadav et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2018; Ding et al., 2020; Maji, Beig & Yadav, 2020; Resmi et al., 2020). Particulate matters are complex mixture of organic and inorganic substances found in the ambient air, and they play a vital role in the radiation budget of the atmosphere via the scattering and absorption processes (Qu et al., 2017, 2018). The major anthropogenic sources of PM10 and PM2.5 are vehicular emission, industry, building construction, quarrying and mining cement plants, ceramic industries and burning of fossil fuel power plants (Cheng et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2015). Guo et al. (2017) revealed that, in India more than one million people died in 2015 due to particulate matter pollution.

Carbon monoxide is an important trace pollutant that influences the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere, and the concentration of the surface O3 by removing hydroxyl radicals, the primary oxidant in the troposphere (Duncan & Logan, 2008; Yadav et al., 2019a). The main CO sources in the atmosphere are anthropogenic and natural (Lawrence & Lelieveld, 2010). Inhalation of CO is considered very toxic to humans because it can cause acute intoxication (Kinoshita et al., 2020). VOC’s emitted in the atmosphere consist of saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, and halogenated organic compounds (Liu et al., 2008; Montero-Montoya, Lopez-Vargas & Arellano-Aguilar, 2018). These are emitted into the atmosphere by a number of industrial activities such as petrochemical process, storage, distribution, paint, solvent, combustion processes and motor vehicle exhaust (Franco et al., 2015; Yadav et al., 2019b). Isoprene and monoterpenes are another reactive natural VOC’s commonly found in the lower atmosphere, which are mainly emitted by biogenic sources like trees and plants (Fuentes et al., 2000; Menchaca-Torre, Mercado-Hernandez & Mendoza-Domínguez, 2015). These hydrocarbons play a crucial role in the photochemical production of O3 and other oxidants in the lower atmosphere (Atkinson, 2000; Srivastava, Sengupta & Dutta, 2005).

Sulfur dioxide is released into the atmosphere through both natural and anthropogenic emissions. Natural sources are mainly by volcanic eruptions while anthropogenic sources include the combustion of all sulfur containing fuels like oil coal and diesel used for the power generation for industrial activities (Mallik & Lal, 2014; Zhang et al., 2017). Industrial and traffic emissions are the major ammonia (NH3) sources in an urban environment (Pandolfi et al., 2012; Phan et al., 2013).

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus-2 (SARS-CoV2) is the pathogenic agent of Covid-19, a disease first reported from Wuhan Hubei Province of China in December 2019. It was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 11 March 2020 (Al-Qahtani, 2020). The course of the disease is often mild undistinguishable from severe pneumonia which eventually lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and death (Lu, Stratton & Tang, 2020). India reported the first confirmed case of coronavirus infection on 30 January 2020 in the southern state of Kerala (Gautam & Hens, 2020). To stop the spread of the virus pandemic, many countries have decided to enforce lockdown measures, even as they caused a severely downturn on the global economy. Subsequently, the Government of India imposed a countrywide lockdown to implement the Break-the-Chain mission to curtail its spread for 21 days in its first phase, and extended up to a second spell of 19 days and a final third phase of 14 days up to May 17 for a total of 54 days. As a result, tightened restrictive measures (i.e., closure all academic institutes, industries, markets, malls and all public places, non-essential businesses, limitation of motorized transports, shut down of Indian railway network, cancelation of inbound and outbound flights) were implemented throughout the nation to impose social distancing.

A substantial enhancement in the air quality in the lockdown period from all over the world were reported. Air pollution in China was significantly reduced as more people quarantined to prevent the social spread of Covid-19 (Dutheil, Baker & Navel, 2020; Muhammad, Long & Salman, 2020; Wang & Su, 2020). Bao & Zhang (2020) reported that the concentrations of SO2, PM2.5, PM10, NO2 and CO over 44 cities in northern China have decreased significantly by 6.76%, 5.93%, 13.66%, 24.67% and 4.58%, respectively due to vehicular restrictions during lockdown period. In addition to these, they conclude that these reduction in air pollutants caused a decrease in air quality index (AQI) by 7.80% over these cities in China. Likewise, Community Multi-scale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) analysis carried out by Wang et al. (2020) found that, PM2.5 concentration over different parts of urban areas in China were significantly reduced in lockdown period. The findings of Shi & Brasseur (2020) showed that particulate matter pollution decreased by an average of 35 percent and nitrogen dioxide decreased by an average of 60 percent in northern China after the lockdowns began on January 23. However, the study found the average surface O3 concentration increased by a factor of 1.5–2 over the same time period. Bauwens et al. (2020) also observed a substantial decrease of NO2 column by 40% over cities in China and 20–38% in Western Europe and USA.

Kanniah et al. (2020) reported that PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2 and CO concentrations were reduced to 26–31%, 23–32%, 63–64%, 9–20% and 25–31%, respectively in urban regions of Malaysia during the lockdown period. Further, they revealed that the restricted industrial activities imposed in lockdown period resulted a reduced concentrations of Aerosol Optical Depth and tropospheric NO2 over East Asian region. There were reports that air pollution was significantly reduced in Barcelona in Spain (Tobías et al., 2020) and European region (Sicard et al., 2020) due to the lockdown to prevent Covid-19 spread. A decline in NO2, NO and an increase in surface O3 was observed at Sao Paulo in Brazil during lockdown period (Dantas et al., 2020; Nakada & Urban, 2020). Air pollution levels have dropped significantly in India due to a massive dip in vehicular movement and industrial activity which have resulted in clean and fresh air (Gautam, 2020; Mahato, Pal & Ghosh, 2020; Sharma et al., 2020).

In the meantime, Kerala state government imposed a “triple-lockdown” in Kannur from 20 April for 20 days after identifying Kannur as a “hotspot” of Covid-19 and declared it a “red” zone in the state. The “triple-lockdown” involved a combination of technology and human surveillance and movement restrictions ple by providing one entry and exit point in all abodes leaving all other roads closed for traffic. People in red zones were not allowed to leave their houses and essential items were made available local authorities through specific requests. Further, guards were deployed to ensure that people in the containment zones stayed indoors during the entire period of the lockdown. During the general lockdown and triple-lockdown periods, the skies over the polluted cities quickly cleared and smelled of fresh air. This offered a rare occasion for investigating how the air pollution levels responded to an extraordinary development.

In this work, we describe the trend in air pollution via monitoring the variations of surface O3, NO and NO2, PM10 and PM2.5, CO, VOC’s including benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, xylene, o-xylene (collectively called BTEX), SO2, NH3, and meteorological parameters at the time of pre-lockdown, lockdown and triple-lockdown days at Kannur town in the Kerala state of South India.

Methodology

Observational site

Kannur was the British military headquarters on the west coast of India until 1987. Kannur has had its industrial importance from very early days. It was an important trading center of the 12th century with an active business relationship with European and Arab countries. When the state of Kerala was formed in 1957, it was named Kannur town, because administrative offices were established in the district. Kannur is the sixth-most urbanized district in Kerala, with more than 50% of its residents living in urban areas. The district is known for its high level of literacy and health care. Kannur experiences a summer season from March to the end of May. This is followed by the south-west monsoon until September. Even the smallest pollution in the atmosphere of Kannur affects the quality of the air and subsequently the health of the people here. In the first phase of Covid-19, Kannur district reported the highest number of cases in Kerala till 15 May. Ground based observations were carried out at Kannur town to investigate the variations of different trace pollutants in the atmosphere from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days. The observational site lies in a coastal belt along the Arabian Sea and is very close to the National Highway (NH 17). Observational site at Kannur town (11.87° N 75.37° E 3 m msl) in northern part of Kerala state. Kannur in south India is shown in the Fig. 1A and the aerial view of Kannur town and surroundings with observational site is shown in the Fig. 1B.

(A) Kannur in South India (B) aerial view of Kannur town and the observational site.

Figure 1: (A) Kannur in South India (B) aerial view of Kannur town and the observational site.

Experimental setup

Observations of trace pollutants were carried out using the respective ground based gas analyzers from Environment S.A France. The measurements of the O3 were made using a continuous O3 analyzer (Model O342e) with a detection limit of 0.2.ppbv. Its working principle is based on O3 detection by direct absorption in UV light. O3 absorption spectrum is intense in the 250 and 270 nm wavelength range. Thus, it corresponds to the maximum range of O3 absorption at 255 nm. NO, NO2 and NH3 were measured with the aid of gas analyzer (Model AC32e) with a detection limit of 0.2 ppbv. Its working principle is based on the NO chemiluminescence in the presence of highly oxidizing O3 molecules. The NO in the ambient air is oxidized by O3 to form excited NO2 molecules. The concentrations of NO, NO2 were measured based on the spectrum of the radiation emitted by NO2 molecules at the excited level. Particulate matters (PM10 and PM2.5) were measured by using suspended particulate beta gauge monitor (Model MP101M). Its working principle is based on the particle measurement by beta radiation attenuation. The measurement consists of calculating the absorption difference between a blank filter and a loaded filter, knowing that the beta ray absorption follows an exponential law and is independent of the physiochemical nature of the particles.

Measurements of CO were made by using an analyzer (Model CO12e) with a detection limit of 0.05 ppm. Its working principle is based on CO detection by absorption in infrared light. VOC’s (BTEX) were measured, based on gas chromatography coupled with a PID detector by using (VOC72e) analyzer. SO2 measurements were made by using a UV fluorescent sulfur dioxide analyzer (Model AF22e) with a detection limit of 0.4 ppbv. The ambient air to be analyzed is filtered by a hydrocarbon removing aromatic molecule device. The hydrocarbon molecule free sample to be analyzed is sent to a reaction chamber, to be irradiated by an UV radiation centered at 214 nm, which is the SO2 molecule absorption wavelength. All the gas analyzers have been calibrated by using sample gases on a regular basis. The total solar radiation was measured by LSI LASTEM Italia (DPA870) pyranometer and surface air temperature measured by an external Pt100 sensor.

Air Quality Index (AQI) calculation

The AQI is a scale designed to help us to understand the quality of the air we breathe and it also helps provide advice on how to improve air quality. Further, this index provides special awareness to the public who are sensitive to air pollution (Beig, Ghude & Deshpande, 2010). Normally air pollution levels may be higher in towns, near power plants and large stationary emission sources. To identify the overall improvement in air quality over Kannur, AQI was calculated and the details of AQI are available elsewhere (CPCB, 2014; Sharma et al., 2020). The AQI is divided into five categories: good (0–50), satisfactory (51–100), moderate (101–200), poor (201–300), very poor (301–400) and severe (401–500) respectively. The observed concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2, O3, CO and NH3 were converted into AQI using standard value. The AQI for each pollutant was calculated by the following formula given by Sahu & Kota (2017).

AQIi=IHIILOBreakHIBreakLO×(CiBreakLO)+ILO

Where Ci is the observed concentration of the pollutant “i”; BreakHI and BreakLO are breakpoint concentrations greater and smaller to Ci; and IHI and ILO are corresponding AQI ranges. Breakpoint concentration of different pollutants are provided by CPCB (2014) and is shown in Table 1.

Table 1:
Breakpoint of different pollutants for AQI calculation, by CPCB (2014).
AQI category (Range) PM10 24-h PM2.5 24-h NO2 24-h SO2 24-h NH3 24-h O3 8-h CO 8-h
Good (0–50) 0–50 0–30 0–40 0–40 0–200 0–50 0–1.0
Satisfactory (51–100) 51–100 31–60 41–80 41–80 201–400 51–100 1.1–2.0
Moderate (101–200) 101–250 61–90 81–180 81–380 401–800 101–168 2.1–10
Poor (201–300) 251–350 91–120 181–280 381–800 801–1200 169–208 10.1–17
Very poor (301–400) 351–430 121–250 281–400 801–1600 1,200–1,800 209–748 17.1–34
Severe (401–500) 430+ 250+ 400+ 1,600+ 1,800+ 748+ 34+
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9642/table-1

Results and discussion

Diurnal variation of surface O3, NO, NO2

In order to study the impact of lockdown on the variation of trace pollutants over Kannur, the study period was divided into three spans; namely pre-lockdown period of 32 days (1–24 March 2020 and 10–17 May 2020), lockdown period of 25 days (25 March–19 April 2020), and a triple-lockdown period of 20 days (20 April–9 May 2020). O3 concentration at Kannur town was very low (8–20 ppbv) at night time and high (15–55 ppbv) during the day time.

Figure 2A depict a diurnal variation of O3 in Kannur town, and it shows that O3 was observed to be high during afternoon hours due to the photolysis NO2 in the presence of VOC’s, CO and CH4. The observed low concentration at night-time was mainly due to the loss of O3 by the titration with NO (Nishanth et al., 2014). Diurnal variation of O3 showed a similar pattern in pre-lockdown days, lockdown days, and triple-lockdown days but with differences in their concentrations. The maximum concentration of O3 observed on pre-lockdown 4.74 (ppbv), lockdown days and triple-lockdown days were (45.64 ± 4.74 days), (49.58 ± 3.1 ppbv) and (55.66 ± 2.61 ppbv) respectively. Thus, an enhancement in O3 concentration was observed over Kannur from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown and this increase is 22%.

Diurnal variation of (A) surface ozone (B) NO, (C) NO2, (D) j(NO2) between 1 March and 17 May, 2020.

Figure 2: Diurnal variation of (A) surface ozone (B) NO, (C) NO2, (D) j(NO2) between 1 March and 17 May, 2020.

The diurnal variations of NO and NO2 are shown in the Figs. 2B and 2C respectively. NO concentration was observed high in night and early morning hours and found to be low during afternoon hours. The diurnal average concentrations of NO observed during pre-lockdown, lockdown and triple-lockdown days were (5.4 ± 1.2 ppbv), (3.5 ± 1.1 ppbv) and (2.1 ± 0.82 ppbv) respectively. Thus, the concentration of NO was found to be declined considerably from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days, and the decrease was 61%. The domination of O3 titration in the presence of high concentration of NO is the primary reason for the observed low concentration of O3 during pre-lockdown days.

In pre-lockdown days, NO2 concentration was found to increase in daytime due to enhanced emissions from vehicles and industries. The diurnal average concentrations of NO2 observed during pre-lockdown, lockdown and triple-lockdown days were (9.6 ± 2.1 ppbv), (4.9 ± 1.8 ppbv), and (2.8 ± 0.88 ppbv) respectively. Hence, the concentration of NO2 was found to be decreased significantly from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days and the observed decrease was 71%. Conversely, O3 concentrations observed were higher on triple-lockdown and lockdown period than pre-lockdown period, even in the absence of industrial activities and low traffic. Certainly, relatively lesser release of NO during lockdown and triple-lockdown days reduces the O3 scavenging, and hence improved the photochemical production of O3 from its other precursors.

At city-scale, VOC-NOx ratio is the key factor of O3 formation (Pusede & Cohen, 2012). The urban areas are characterized by a low value of this ratio due to high NOx concentrations (Beekmann & Vautard, 2010). In an environment with “VOC-limited” conditions, VOCs concentration is highly sensitive in O3 formation in an environment with high NOx emission. Likewise, the ratio of (NO2)/(NO) that depends on the local concentration of O3, since it is produced by the photodissociation of NO2 and its sink is titration with NO. Thus, O3 increase is due to a lower titration of O3 by NO due to the strong reduction in local NOx emissions by road transport (Sicard et al., 2020). However, the presence of VOC’s and NOx allows the formation of O3 through NO2 photolysis through a complex chemistry (Monks et al., 2015).

The day time average concentrations of (NO2/NO) during pre-lockdown, lockdown and triple-lockdown days were estimated to be (1.82 ± 0.8 ppbv), (1.38 ± 0.6 ppbv) and (0.86 ± 0.5 ppbv) which indicated a reduction of (NO2/NO) by 47% from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days. The ratio between average concentrations of BTEX and NOx were found to be (1.2 ± 1.6 ppbv), (1.65 ± 1.1 ppbv) and (1.96 ± 0.82 ppbv) during pre-lockdown, lockdown and triple-lockdown days respectively; with an increase of 63% from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown. During the lockdown period, O3 lapse rate due to the titration of NO might be less than its photochemical production from its precursors, and this may be the primary reason for the enhancement in O3 observed. Further, a strong possibility of VOCs emission from home (e.g., cleaning fireplaces, painting) and garden activities (e.g., biomass burning) may also have contributed to the O3 increase (Su, Mukherjee & Batterman, 2003; Murphy et al., 2007; Wolff, Kahlbaum & Heuss, 2013) in triple-lockdown days. Thus, the reduced concentration in NOx, and any enhancement of biogenic VOC’s and their transport may have played a promising role in the enhancement of O3 during triple-lockdown in Kannur town like other cities, which could be confirmed only after further investigations.

Diurnal variation of photo-dissociation rate coefficient j(NO2) was computed to estimate the strong dependance of NO2 on the observed enhancement of O3, during lockdown and triple-lockdown days as shown in Fig. 2D. The j(NO2) values exhibited the typical pattern of increasing gradually after sunrise, attaining a maximum value during noontime and decreasing during evening-time. The values of j(NO2) gradually increasing in tune with the intensity of solar radiation reaching on the surface. During pre-lockdown days, O3 concentration was increasing in full harmony with the variation of j(NO2). Therefore, a positive correlation is observed between O3 and j(NO2) during day time hours and the photo-dissociation coefficients were low due to the reduced concentration of NO2 in lockdown and triple-lockdown periods. It was further observed that j(NO2) values were decreased in pre-lockdown days and triple-lockdown days by a percentage of 16%. This reveals that the O3 production was the result of photo-dissociation of NO2 in the presence of biogenic VOCs during lockdown and triple-lockdown days.

Diurnal variation of particulate matters (PM10 and PM2.5)

The diurnal variations PM10 and PM2.5 during the study period are shown in the Figs. 3A and 3B. During pre-lockdown days PM10 and PM2.5 showed two peaks; of which one peak in the morning (07:00–10:00) hours and the other one in the late evening to night time (19:00–22:00) hours. Further, moderate levels were observed from night till the early morning hours due to shallow boundary layer (Yadav et al., 2014; Qu et al., 2018). Concentrations of particulate matters showed a morning peak followed by a decline in the afternoon on pre-lockdown days. The observed low concentrations of particulate matters during the afternoon hours can be attributed primarily to the dilution of particles linked with broaden boundary layer and also lesser traffic (Stafoggia et al., 2019).

Diurnal variation of (A) PM10 (B) PM2.5 and the scatter plot showing the linear correlation between (C) PM10 and solar radiation (D) PM10 and surface O3.

Figure 3: Diurnal variation of (A) PM10 (B) PM2.5 and the scatter plot showing the linear correlation between (C) PM10 and solar radiation (D) PM10 and surface O3.

In the lockdown days, the vehicular emissions were considerably reduced, and the observed magnitude of the morning peak was fairly small; whereas in triple-lockdown days the peak was absent due to the roads were deserted. The diurnal average concentration of PM10 observed on pre-lockdown days, lockdown days and triple-lockdown days were (127.8 ± 21 µg/m3), (70.96 ± 12.6 µg/m3) and (50.2 ± 10.11 µg/m3) respectively. The concentration of PM10 was found to decrease significantly from pre-lockdown days to lockdown days (45%) and lockdown days to triple-lockdown days (29%). Likewise, the diurnal average concentration of PM2.5 on pre-lockdown days, lockdown days and triple-lockdown days were (69.4 ± 17 µg/m3), (45.5 ± 8 µg/m3) and (32.5 ± 7.5 µg/m3) respectively. The concentration of PM2.5 was found to be decrease extensively from pre-lockdown days to lockdown days (34%) and lockdown days to triple-lockdown days (29%).

Linear negative correlations are obtained between PM10 and solar radiation (Fig. 3C) and surface O3 (Fig. 3D). The higher concentration of particulate matters on pre-lockdown days can reduce the photolysis rate j(NO2) in the lower troposphere and it can decrease photochemical production of O3 on these days. During pre-lockdown days, the observed low concentration of O3 indicates the different impacts of particulate matters on photolysis frequencies. A strong negative correlation coefficient (−0.91) between PM10 and solar radiation reveals the active daytime photochemistry over Kannur town.

Diurnal variation of solar radiation, air temperature, and relative humidity observed over Kannur during the study period is shown in the Figs. 4A4C respectively. Intensity of solar radiation and temperature were increase by 7% and 4% from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days and relative humidity decreased by 8%. The increase in solar flux is attributed to the decline in the concentration of particulate matters (Li et al., 2011) in lockdown and triple-lockdown days, and this enhanced atmospheric temperature and declined relative humidity at this site.

Diurnal variation of (A) solar radiation (B) air temperature (C) relative humidity.

Figure 4: Diurnal variation of (A) solar radiation (B) air temperature (C) relative humidity.

Diurnal variation of CO, BTEX, SO2 and NH3

Diurnal variation of CO, BTEX, SO2 and NH3 observed during the observational period are shown in the Figs. 5A5D respectively. In pre-lockdown days, the diurnal variation of CO, BTEX and SO2 shows two distinct peaks; one peak during morning (08:00–11:00) hours and other at late evening. The small duration of the morning peak was due to the expansion of boundary layer height whereas the large evening peak due to the shallow boundary layer. These peaks were associated with high traffic during the morning and evening hours. During lockdown days, a small peak observed in the morning was due to the presence of few vehicles; while the peak was absent in triple-lockdown days due to the roads were deserted.

Diurnal variation of (A) CO, (B) BTEX (C) SO2 (D) NH3 observed during the period.

Figure 5: Diurnal variation of (A) CO, (B) BTEX (C) SO2 (D) NH3 observed during the period.

The maximum concentration of CO observed in day time on pre-lockdown days, lockdown days, and triple-lockdown days were (642 ± 115 ppbv), (368 ± 79 ppbv) and (210 ± 70 ppbv) respectively. The concentration of CO was found to decrease significantly from pre-lockdown days to lockdown days, and lockdown days to triple-lockdown days. The maximum concentration of BTEX observed in day time on pre-lockdown days, lockdown days and triple-lockdown days were (9.5 ± 1.4 ppbv), (6.7 ± 1.1 ppbv) and (3.7 ± 0.8 ppbv) respectively. The concentration of BTEX was found to be decreased from pre-lockdown days to lockdown days, and lockdown days to triple-lockdown days due to absence of vehicular and industrial emissions.

The diurnal variation of SO2 was most pronounced during traffic hours over Kannur town. The maximum concentration of SO2 observed in day time on pre-lockdown days, lockdown days, and triple-lockdown days were (2.86 ± 0.72 ppbv), (1.82 ± 0.45 ppbv) and (1.08 ± 0.32 ppbv) respectively. Thus the concentration of SO2 was found to be decrease considerably from pre-lockdown days to lockdown days, and lockdown days to triple-lockdown days. During pre-lockdown period, the daily averaged NH3 concentrations varied from 5.1 to 5.8 ppbv. Daily NH3 exhibited a temporal variation with higher concentrations on the noon time hours; due to higher air temperatures and lower wind speeds. High air temperatures will favor NH3 volatilization, and the low wind speeds support the accumulation of air pollutants (Wang et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2016). The maximum concentration of NH3 observed in day time on pre-lockdown days, lockdown days, and triple-lockdown days were (5.84 ± 0.52 ppbv), (5.32 ± 0.41 ppbv) and (4.91 ± 0.32 ppbv) respectively. Like other trace pollutants, the concentration of NH3 was also found to be decreased from pre-lockdown period to triple-lockdown days due to complete shutdown of traffic and industrial activities in Kannur district.

AQI during the study period

The overall AQI of a day is the maximum AQI of the constituent pollutant, and the corresponding pollutant is the dominating pollutant. Figure 6 represents the variation of AQI during the study period over Kannur town. The highest index of 235 ± 32 which refers to poor air quality was observed in pre-lockdown period from 1 to 5 in March, during which the vehicular traffic was quite normal. From the figure, it is observed that the AQI was declining from 25th March coincides with the beginning of lockdown. In the first 5 days of the lockdown its average value was changed to 128 ± 22 and then to 118 ± 20 in the following days. Since the triple-lockdown in Kannur was implemented on 20th April, the value of AQI further come down and reached its lowest level at 48 ± 10 due to the ban of complete vehicles on the road. As a result, air pollution was highly reduced by which the air became unpolluted at this site. Thus, the enhanced air quality resulted from the triple-lockdown may prevent the virus spread in Kannur district.

Air quality index for pre-lockdown, lockdown and triple lockdown period.

Figure 6: Air quality index for pre-lockdown, lockdown and triple lockdown period.

Conclusion

The present study revealed a drastic reduction in air pollution over Kannur a town in north of Kerala state India, which was identified as one of the “first hotspots” of COVID 19 by the Government of India. Subsequently, a triple-lockdown was implemented from 20 April for further twenty days that restricted the movement of people. A considerable reduction in atmospheric air pollutants over this region was observed during the lockdown and triple-lockdown periods at this site. The highlights of the observation are the following:

  • Surface O3 concentration was increased to 22% in triple-lockdown period while NO and NO2 concentrations were decreased to 61% and 71% from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days. The primary reason for the increase in O3 is due to the reduction in titration of O3 with NO. The sensitivity of VOC’s (both biogenic and industrial) could be confirmed by measuring them on a long-term basis. The calculated diurnal profile of j(NO2) values showed a maximum reduction in triple-lockdown period due to the decrease in NO2.

  • The concentration of CO, VOC’s (BTEX), SO2 and NH3 were declined to 67%, 61%, 62% and 16% respectively from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days.

  • The concentration of PM10 and PM2.5 were decreased to 61% and 53% respectively. Further, the increase in solar flux observed was mainly due to the absence of scattering and absorption of aerosols present in the atmosphere due to lockdown.

  • The AQI analysis revealed that the air quality in Kannur was quite improved during lockdown period.

The dramatic decline in air pollution during this lockdown has significant immediate consequences. Exposure to high levels of particulate matters and trace gases has substantial detrimental effects on human health. Many researchers have hypothesized that the drop in air pollution levels may currently be saving a significant amount of lives, not only by reducing individuals’ susceptibility to COVID-19, but also by preventing world’s seven million annual deaths due to air pollution exposure.

Yao et al. (2020) analyzed the death rate due to COVID-19 and spatial correlation of PM10 and PM 2.5 in China, and they revealed that higher concentration of PM10 and PM2.5 had a positive correlation with deaths caused by COVID-19. Wu et al. (2020) suggested that, long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) induced a risk of COVID-19. Further, they found that an increase of 1 μg/m3 in PM2.5 enhanced 8% morbidity due to COVID-19 in the United States. Fattorini & Regoli (2020) suggested that, chronic exposure of particulate matters (PM10 and PM2.5) could aggravate the susceptibility of COVID-19 infection. A positive correlation exhibited between concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, CO and COVID-19 outbreak in California (Bashir et al., 2020). It is reported, that air pollution has a positive association with COVID-19 confirmed cases in China (Zhu et al., 2020). Thus, this improvement in air quality during lock down might have played a vital role in bringing reduced susceptibility of virus getting infected into the lungs. The enhancement in the air quality induced by triple-lockdown might be one of the prime reasons by which Kerala could flatten the transmission curve for the first time in India. This association of air quality and spread of COVID if confirmed by future studies suggest that air quality should also be considered as part of an integrated approach towards human health protection and prevention of the epidemic spreads.

Supplemental Information

Raw data: taken from the continuous monitoring of trace gases over the observational site.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9642/supp-1
32 Citations   Views   Downloads