NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Sections

 

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Daniel Bilar conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate, collect or analyse any raw data or code.

Funding

The author received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
 
1

As far as I could understand, the concept of "optimization" is used in a peculiar way in the paper. The optimization of the "finite numbers" recorded online unbeknownst to final users appears to be something negative but the reason of it is not clear as well as the peculiar meaning of "optimization" in such sense.

read more, vote or answer

waiting for moderation
Ask a question
2,222 Visitors 3,082 Views 956 Downloads