Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-30T04:46:49.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Minimising number killed in long-term vertebrate pest management programmes, and associated economic incentives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

B Warburton*
Affiliation:
Landcare Research, PO Box 40, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand
DM Tompkins
Affiliation:
Landcare Research, Private Bag 1930, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
D Choquenot
Affiliation:
Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
P Cowan
Affiliation:
Landcare Research, Private Bag 11052, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: warburtonb@landcareresearch.co.nz

Abstract

Management of invasive vertebrate species often requires the use of lethal control tools such as toxins, traps, or shooting. However, because these pest species are sentient and have the capacity to suffer, the application of such tools raises concerns about welfare impacts. To address such concerns, research, policy and regulation have focused most often on the welfare impacts (humaneness) of the tools at the individual animal level (ie the ‘quality’ of the impact) with no attempt to assess welfare at the population level (ie the ‘quantity’ of the impact). Because control programmes often target large numbers of animals, we suggest that when the welfare costs of pest control operations and strategies are being evaluated, the numbers of individuals involved should be considered in addition to the intensity and duration of individual suffering. We explore this concept using a modelling framework and three New Zealand case studies (brushtail possums [Trichosurus vulpecula], ship rats [Rattus rattus], and Bennett's wallabies [Macropus rufogriseus]) to assess the extent to which typical control strategies used by land managers influence the numbers of animals killed. We test whether a predicted relationship between numbers killed and position on the population growth curve holds across these scenarios, and identify whether it would be economically viable for end-users to adopt more welfare-friendly control strategies (ie those that kill fewer individuals to achieve the required management outcomes) for these pest species, or whether some form of incentive would be required. Computer modelling showed that for four simulated brushtail possum control strategies, the number of animals killed on a 1,000-ha area over 30 years ranged from approximately 13,000 to 26,000. Similarly, for two ship rat control strategies, numbers killed over a 20-year period were 977 for an aerial strategy versus 1,517 for a ground-based strategy. For both species, the strategies that killed fewest animals generally also cost the least. For Bennett's wallabies, because farmers only carry out control for production benefits, the control strategy they are most likely to select would result in the highest number of wallabies killed. To reduce the number of wallabies killed while allowing farmers to achieve some production benefits, farmers would need to receive some additional financial benefit. The concept of welfare incentive then raises questions such as ‘what willingness is there to pay for increased welfare’ and ‘to what extent can reducing control costs substitute for incentive payments in reducing numbers killed?’

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, G, Drucker, AC, Glenn, P, Edwards, B, William, K and Saalfeld, B 2010 Economics of camel control in central Australia. The Rangeland Journal 32: 117127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RJ09046Google Scholar
Animal Health Board 2001 Bovine Tuberculosis National Pest Management Strategy 2001-2013. Animal Health Board: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Arjo, WM, Shwiff, S and Kirkpatrick, K 2009 Short-term evaluation of two integrated pest management programs for mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa). Crop Protection 28: 703709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, ND 1991 Control of endemic bovine Tb in New Zealand possum populations: Results from a simple model. Journal of Applied Ecology 28: 794809. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2404208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, ND and Clout, MN 1983 A comparison of 3-parameter, single-species population models, in relation to the management of brushtail possums in New Zealand. Oecologia 60: 250258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00379528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, PWJ, McCarthy, MA, Possingham, HP, Menkhorst, PW and McLean, N 2006 Accounting for management costs in sensitivity analyses of matrix population models. Conservation Biology 20: 893905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00378.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxter, PWJ, Sabo, JL, Wilcox, C, McCarthy, MA and Possingham, HP 2008 Cost-effective suppression and eradication of invasive predators. Conservation Biology 22: 8998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00850.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackwell, GL, Potter, MA and Minot, EO 2001 Rodent and predator population dynamics in an eruptive system. Ecological Modelling 25: 227245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00327-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caley, P, Hickling, GJ, Cowan, PE and Pfeiffer, DU 1999 Effects of sustained control of brushtail possums on levels of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle and brushtail possum populations from Hohotaka, New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 47: 133142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00480169.1999.36130CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caughley, G 1977 Analysis of Vertebrate Populations. Wiley-Interscience: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Choquenot, D and Parkes, J 2001 Setting thresholds for pest control: how does pest density affect resource viability? Biological Conservation 99: 2946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00186-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choquenot, D and Warburton, B 2006 Modelling the cost-effectiveness of wallaby control in New Zealand. Wildlife Research 33: 7783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR05008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, JD 1988 Distribution, prevalence, and epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis in brushtail possums, Trichosurus vulpecula, in the Hohonu Range, New Zealand. Wildlife Research 15: 651663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR9880651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, MM, Jackson, R, Coleman, JD and Alley, MR 1995 Naturally occurring tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium bovis in brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) II. Pathology. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 43: 315321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00480169./1995.35912CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniel, MJ 1972 Bionomics of the ship rat (Rattus r. rattus) in a New Zealand indigenous forest. New Zealand Journal of Science 15: 313341Google Scholar
Daniel, MJ 1978 Population ecology of ship rats and Norway rats in New Zealand. In: Dingwall, PR, Atkinson, IAE and Hay, C (eds) The Ecology and Control of Rodents in New Zealand Nature Reserves pp 145152. Department of Lands and Survey: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Drucker, AG, Edwards, GP and Saalfeld, WK 2010 Economics of camel control in central Australia. The Rangeland Journal 32: 117127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RJ09046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efford, M 2000 Possum density, population structure and dynamics. In: Montague, TL (ed) The Brushtail Possum: Biology, Impact and Management of an Introduced Marsupial pp 4761. Manaaki Whenua Press: Lincoln, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Elliott, GP and Suggate, R 2007 Operation Ark Three Year Report. Department of Conservation: Christchurch, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Getz, WM and Haight, RG 1989 Population Harvesting: Demographic Models of Fish, Forest, and Animal Resources. Princeton University Press: Princeton, USAGoogle Scholar
Gregory, NG 2004 Physiology and Behaviour of Animal Suffering. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare Series. Blackwell Science: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hone, JM 2007 Wildlife Damage Control. CSIRO: Collingwood, Victoria, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Innes, JG 1990 Ship rat. In: King, CM (ed) The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals, 1st Edition pp 206225. Oxford University Press: Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Innes, JG, Hay, R, Flux, I, Bradfield, P, Speed, H and Jansen, P 1999 Successful recovery of North Island kokako Callaeas cinerea wilsoni populations, by adaptive management. Biological Conservation 87: 201214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00053-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, GJE, Hunter, M and Rush, A 2005 The eradication of bovine tuberculosis from infected wildlife populations: a New Zealand scenario. Proceedings of the 11th Wildlife Damage Management Conference pp 111.16-19 May 2005, Lincoln, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Littin, KE, Mellor, DJ, Warburton, B and Eason, CT 2004 Animal welfare and ethical issues relevant to the humane control of vertebrate pests. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 52: 110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G and Littin, KE 2003 The humaneness of rodent pest control. Animal Welfare 12: 138Google Scholar
Maunder, MN 2002 The relationship between fishing methods, fisheries management and the estimation of maximum sustainable yield. Fish and Fisheries 3: 251260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2979.2002.00089.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monks, A 2007 Climatic prediction of seedfall in Nothofagus, Chionochloa and Climatic prediction of seedfall in Nothofagus, Chionochloa and Department of Conservation: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Montague, T and Warburton, B 2000 Non-toxic techniques for possum control. In: Montague, TL (ed) The Brushtail Possum: Biology, Impact and Management of an Introduced Marsupial pp 164174. Manaaki Whenua Press: Lincoln, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D and Hickling, G 2000 Techniques for poisoning possums. In: Montague, TL (ed) The Brushtail Possum: Biology, Impact and Management of an Introduced Marsupial pp 143153. Manaaki Whenua Press: Lincoln, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Parkes, JP, Robley, A, Forsyth, DM and Choquenot, D 2006 Adaptive management experiments in vertebrate pest control in New Zealand and Australia. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34: 229236. http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[229:AMEIVP]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patergnani, M, Gras, LM, Poglayen, G, Gelli, A, Pasqualucci, F, Farina, M and Stancampiano, L 2010 Environmental influence on urban rodent bait consumption. Journal of Pest Science 83: 347359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10340-010-0304-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, D and Efford, M 2005 Eliminating Tb: results from a spatially explicit stochastic model. Landcare Research Contract Report LC0405/118. Landcare Research: Lincoln, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, DSL and Efford, MG 2010 Management of bovine tuberculosis in brushtail possums in New Zealand: predictions from a spatially explicit, individual-based model. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 911919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01839.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, D, Efford, M, Ball, S and Nugent, G 2005 The evaluation of indices of animal abundance using spatial simulation of animal trapping. Wildlife Research 32: 229237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR03119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabo, JL 2005 Stochasticity, predator-prey dynamics, and trigger harvest or non-native predators. Ecology 86: 23292343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/04-1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, K 1998 Management of populations in conservation, harvesting and control. Tree 13: 371374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01381-0Google ScholarPubMed
Shivik, JA, Martin, DJ, Pipas, MJ, Turman, J and Deliberto, TJ 2005 Initial comparison: jaws, cables, and cage-traps to capture coyotes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33: 13751383. http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[1375:ICJ-CAC]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompkins, DM and Ramsey, D 2007 Optimising bait-station delivery of fertility control agents to brushtail possum populations. Wildlife Research 34: 6776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR05109Google Scholar
Tompkins, DM and Veltman, CJ 2006 Unexpected consequences of vertebrate pest control: Predictions from a four-species community model. Ecological Applications 16: 10501061. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1050:UCOV-PC]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warburton, B 1990 Bennett's wallaby. In: King, CM (ed) The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals, 1st Edition pp 4451. Oxford University Press: Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Warburton, B and Frampton, C 1991 Bennett's wallaby control in south Canterbury. Forest Research Institute Contract Report No. FWE91/59. Landcare Research: Christchurch, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Warburton, B and Norton, B 2009 Towards a knowledge-based ethic for lethal control of nuisance wildlife. Journal of Wildlife Management 73: 158164. http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2007-313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warburton, B, Gregory, NG and Morriss, G 2000 Effect of jaw shape in kill-traps on time to loss of palpebral reflexes in brushtail possums. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 36: 9296CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wardle, JA 1984 The New Zealand Beeches: Ecology, Utilization and Management. New Zealand Forest Service: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar