透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.111.9
  • 學位論文

我國協商制度的發展及運作之研究

Research on the development and operation of negotiation system of R.O.C.

指導教授 : 管高岳
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


近年來,司法人員之工作量有增無減,司法制度原本是為了保障人民權益而存在,司法制度亦具有維護社會秩序及增進公共利益之功能,但卻有可能因為司法人員之工作量過大,而影響司法審判之速度及裁判之品質,導致司法制度應有之功能無法有效發揮,也影響司法機關之公信力。有鑑於此,本文乃以認罪協商制度為研究之重心,冀望能從其中找尋到更符合我國刑事訴訟之程序。 本文在第一章略述前言及研究之動機與目的、研究之範圍與方法。 第二章乃以美國之認罪協商制度為中心,藉以探討認罪協商制度之理論架構,並研究美國之刑事訴訟制度及其認罪協商制度之發展背景,暨瞭解認罪協商制度在美國實施的情形。 第三章則自比較法之觀點,比較德國及日本相似於認罪協商制度之訴訟程序其發展概況。 第四章爰以我國刑事訴訟制度及簡易訴訟程序中之協商規範為研究重心,並探討其發展之背景。另就簡易訴訟程序之立法規範加以探討,並分析其法律上之基礎。 第五章則以我國刑事訴訟制度中之協商程序,其現行之運作方式為研究重點,內容包括協商程序之概述、立法背景之探討、現行協商程序之規範內容、協商程序之流程、協商程序之本質等。 第六章針對認罪協商制度及我國現行協商規範加以檢討,並提出相關修正建議。首先,探討現行協商規範於實務運作之情況;其次,就認罪協商制度在本質上所具有之爭議及其優缺點加以分析;最後,檢討現行協商規範之相關問題並提出建議。 第七章結論部份,彙總各章節探討研究所發掘之問題,並提出筆者之修正改進建議,供實務上運用及日後修法之參考。

並列摘要


In recent years work load of the judicial personnel increased, the legal system originally was for safeguard the people's rights and interests to exist, the legal system also had function of the maintenance social order and promotes the public interest, but actually, heavy work of judicial personnel had the possibility of influence judicature decision, then causes function of the legal system to be unable the effective utilization. Because of this reason, this article which is research of “Plea Bargaining”, hope can find the better method for our country's criminal procedure. In the first chapter, it tells the foreword, motives, goals, methods, and range of the research. In the second chapter, it describes the Plea Bargaining of United States, and studies its theory of construction, criminal procedure system and Plea Bargaining development background, discuss its situation which implements in US. In the third chapter, it compared with Germany and Japan similar to Plea Bargaining of legal procedure and development. In the fourth chapter, from our country’s criminal procedure and the summary procedure, discusses background of its development for the research, and analyzes in law foundation. In the fifth chapter, it discusses the negotiation procedure operation on our country’s criminal procedure system, including brief of negotiation procedure, background of lawmaking; process of negotiation procedure and essence of negotiation procedure. In the sixth chapter, it suggests and discusses of Plea Bargaining and negotiation procedure; first, discuss operation of negotiation standard, second, focus on the controversy of Plea Bargaining and analysis its advantage and deficiency. In the seventh chapter, summarizes various chapters to discuss each kind of question and give some suggestion for reference of the future.

參考文獻


3. 林秉暉,認罪協商法制之研究,中原大學財經法律研究所碩士論文,2001年7月。
11. 林鈺雄,刑事訴訟法 (下) ,2003年9月,初版。
20. 李震山,人性尊嚴之憲法意義,律師通訊,第150期,1992年3月。
76. 蔡兆誠,刑事訴訟法修正的幾點檢討,律師雜誌,第220期,1998年1月。
12. 何賴傑,論我國刑事簡易程序與德國「簡化之刑事程序」之比較研究,國立中正大學

延伸閱讀


  • 林朝舜(2007)。我國地方預算協商機制之研究〔碩士論文,國立暨南國際大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6837/NCNU.2007.00090
  • 朱鎮明(2005)。中國與地方政策協調機制建立之研究中國地方自治58(10),16-38。https://doi.org/10.6581/lsgc.2005.58(10).03
  • 張弘勳(2003)。我國教育組織集體協商之研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2603200719135043
  • 黎昌憲(2006)。我國物業管理機制之建構研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0006-1508200612322800
  • Khodabakhshi, M., Lotfi, F. H., Zhang, X., Li, S., Nasseri, S. H., Aryavash, K., & Moghaddam, R. T. (2013). Operational Research. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013(), 153-154-217. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/318439