透過您的圖書館登入
IP:52.14.174.133
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

從冤錯案救援觀點評謝志宏案再審無罪判決

A Review of Hsieh Chih-Hung's Verdict of Innocence from the Perspective of a Campaigner for His Exoneration

摘要


臺灣高等法院臺南分院歷經一年多的再審審理,在2020年5月15日這一天宣判謝志宏無罪(臺灣高等法院臺南分院108年度再字第1號判決),終於讓這位無辜者擺脫掉糾纏多年的死刑誤判。這份無罪判決,得來不易。本文作者作為死囚謝志宏救援團隊之成員,從冤錯案救援視角就這份再審無罪判決輔以歷次關鍵開庭之現場觀察提出若干評論。本文從冤錯案救援觀點認為,謝志宏再審無罪判決有三個關鍵即:社會各界的共同救援、司法及國家機關的協力合作,以及對於潛在冤錯案死囚未執行死刑等。

關鍵字

謝志宏 死刑 再審 錯誤自白 冤錯案

並列摘要


On May 15, 2020, Hsieh Chih-Hung was acquitted by the Tainan High Court after a year-long retrial (see the Judgment of Tainan High Court (2019) Zai Zih No.1). This verdict, which finally overturned the death sentence that haunted Hsieh for years, is hard to come by. As a member of the team that helped exonerating Hsieh, the author reviewed this not-guilty verdict as well as critical moments during the court sessions from the perspective of a campaigner for Hsieh's innocence, rendering a conclusion that the verdict is a result of three key factors: the civil society's joint efforts, the collaboration between the judicial and administrative branches, and a halt in executions of possibly innocent death row inmates.

參考文獻


尤伯祥(2008)。保障刑事人權,是防止冤案的不二法門。律師雜誌,348,1-4。http://doi.org/10.7030/TBJ.200809.0001。
林超駿(2015)。從發動機制著手之非常救濟變革:英國刑案審查委員會之例。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,44(1),263-354。http://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2015.44.01.05。
林裕順、施志鴻、張家維、葉姿君(2020)。我國建立完善刑事證物保管制度之研究。刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊,26,171-210。http://doi.org/10.6460/CPCP.202012_(26).04。
邱顯智(2011)。司法能多正確?從德國冤假錯案看我國死刑及再審制度。司法改革雜誌,85,53-54。http://doi.org/10.30138/SFGGZJ.201108.0025。
馬躍中、戴伸峰、王正嘉、謝國欣(2020)。我國設立「司法錯案研究中心」可行性之研究。刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊,26,125-169。http://doi.org/10.6460/CPCP.202012_(26).03。

延伸閱讀