The Royal Society
Browse
rsos170681_si_001.docx (182.69 kB)

CBM supplement; Figure 1; Figure 2; Figure 3 from Cognitive bias modification for facial interpretation: a randomized controlled trial of transfer to self-report and cognitive measures in a healthy sample

Download (182.69 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-11-24, 03:38 authored by S. E. Peters, J. Lumsden, O. H. Peh, I. S. Penton-Voak, M. R. Munafò, O. J. Robinson
includes: CONSORT diagram and means/sds;Task schematics. A. Bias modification happy face morph (faces 3-5 on 15 face positive-neutral to negative-neutral spectrum) and a sad face (face 12). B. Example bias modification trial with feedback (correct/incorrect window; in the training phase only). Baseline and test phases follow the identical structure but do not provide feedback. C. Example of a successful hard task selection in EEfRT task. D. Two words differing in emotional valence (threat/neutral) were presented simultaneously (500ms), followed by a probe (> or <) that replaced either I. the neutral word or II. the threat word. E. Participants pressed the space bar as quickly as possible in response to frequent “go” stimuli (“=”) and inhibited their response to infrequent “no-go” stimuli (“O”).; Mean baseline phase balance point for intervention and control participants across eight CBM sessions. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM).; The simple effects across baseline and post-training for A. Daily Stress Inventory (DSI) average impact rating, B. DSI frequency measure. Error bars represent SEM. C. Correlations between stress-SART threat-potentiated (threat condition minus safe condition) shift (time 2 minus time 1) and baseline trait anxiety in the FIBM group.

History