华北地区地震震源机制分区特征

林向东; 袁怀玉; 徐平; 杨选; 徐志国; 孙海霞; 侯丽娟; 徐晟涛; 奚冲霄

doi:10.6038/cjg20171206

华北地区地震震源机制分区特征

- 1.
  北京市地震局, 北京 100080
- 2.
  麦考瑞大学, 澳大利亚 2109
- 3.
  广东省地震局, 广州 510070
- 4.
  国家海洋环境预报中心, 北京 100081
基金项目:
中国地震局测震台网青年骨干专项(20140301)；中国地震局地震科技星火计划青年项目(XH16004Y)；国家自然科学基金(41474087，41604045)资助

详细信息

作者简介:
林向东, 男, 1981年生, 博士, 副研究员, 主要从事震源机制及应力场研究.E-mail:lin@bjseis.gov.cn

中图分类号: P315

收稿日期: 2016-08-30

修回日期: 2017-04-18

上线日期: 2017-12-05

Zonational characteristics of earthquake focal mechanism solutions in North China

- 1.
  Earthquake Administration of Beijing Municipality, Beijing 100080, China
- 2.
  ARC Centre of Excellence from Core to Crust Fluid Systems, Macquarie University, 2109, Australia
- 3.
  Earthquake Administration of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510070, China
- 4.
  National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Beijing 100081, China

Received Date: 30 August 2016

Revised Date: 18 April 2017

Available Online: 05 December 2017

摘要

摘要:
利用华北地区（北纬36°—42°；东经111°—125°范围）2010年1月至2014年6月≥M_L2.5的918个地震事件波形资料，采用FOCMEC方法计算震源机制，根据参与计算的清晰初动数量及振幅个数，以及在分别采用5°、10°、15°不同步长搜索震源机制解结果必须为同一组接近解的原则，我们共得到572个可靠的震源机制解.对于震级相对较大且波形低频部分信噪比较好的地震，同时采用TDMT全波形反演方法反演了矩张量，最终得到14个地震的矩张量，并与利用FOCMEC方法得到的震源机制解进行了比较.同时我们还搜集了1937年以来华北地区中强地震的震源机制解结果.根据震源机制类型特征及构造特点，我们从空间上对震源机制结果进行了分区分析.结果表明：研究区内中小地震的震源机制类型相对复杂，但仍能看出中小地震震源机制有显著的分区特征，震源机制主要类型是正断型和走滑型，并且大部分正断型震源机制分布在山西断陷带、唐山老震区、海城老震区内.该现象表明研究区内主要变形以平移和拉张为主；同时通过大于4级以上地震震源机制类型主要为走滑型可得出，走滑型应力在华北地区应力场上占绝对优势，但是局部地区的正断型应力也比较显著，比如山西断陷带、海城老震区、唐山老震区、渤海内（烟台—蓬莱段局部地区）.
- 华北地区 /
- 地震活动 /
- 震源机制分区特征
Abstract:
Using waveform data we applied the FOCMEC method to calculate focal mechanisms of 918 M_L ≥ 2.5 earthquakes occurred during the period of Jan. 2010 to Jun. 2014 in North China (latitude 36°-42°; longitude 111°-125°). Among the computed solutions, 572 were found robust based on their clear first motions and amplitudes in the event waveforms, and the similarities among solutions using different (5°, 10°, and 15°) step sizes. Using the TDMT full waveform inversion method, we further calculated the moment tensors for 14 large events which have higher signal-to-noise ratio at low frequencies, and compared the solutions with that by the FOCMEC method. In addition, we compiled focal mechanism solutions for moderate and large earthquakes since 1937 in North China. Based on the focal mechanism types and their correlation with surface tectonics, we characterized the focal mechanism solutions into several spatial clusters. Our results show the solutions for moderate and small earthquakes are generally complex in the study region, but some intriguing patterns can be recognized. The focal mechanisms of moderate and small earthquake have a clear zoning characteristic, and they are mainly normal and strike-slip fault types, suggesting that crustal deformation is dominated by translation and tension. Most of the normal type focal mechanisms are distributed in the Shanxi rift zone, Tangshan and Haicheng seismic zones. For major earthquakes (M_L≥4.0), we found that the focal mechanism type is mainly of strike-slip. We conclude that the horizontal stress is dominant in North China, while in localized regions such as the Shanxi rift zone, Tangshan and Haicheng seismic zones, and the Bohai sea (the local region of Yantai-Penglai section), the tensile stress may be prevailing.
- North China /
- Seismicity /
- Zonational characteristics of focal mechanisms

HTML全文

图 1

本研究所用台站分布图

Figure 1.

Seismic station used in this study

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2

华北地区2010年1月至2014年6月≥M_L2.5的地震震中分布图

Figure 2.

Epicenter distribution for magnitude≥M_L2.5 earthquakes occurred between Jan. 2010 and Jun. 2014 in North China

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3

计算2012年12月9日00时32分M_L2.8地震的震源机制所用TLK台SH, SV初动清晰的例子

Figure 3.

The waveform example for the Dec. 9, 2012 M_L2.8 earthquake recorded at TLK station used in the focal mechanism calculation. Sharp first motions are clear on both the SH (T component) and SV (R and Z components) channels

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4

2012年12月9日00时32分M_L2.8地震的震源机制解搜索示意图

Figure 4.

Focal mechanism search for the Dec. 9, 2012 M_L2.8 earthquake

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5

(a) 平原区模型，(b)山区模型, (c)辽宁地区模型

Figure 5.

1D velocity models used in the focal mechanism solution for: (a) the plain area; (b) the mountain area; and (c) Liaoning area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6

2012年5月28日10时22分唐山M_L5.1地震矩张量解

Figure 6.

The moment tensor solution for the May 28, 2012 Tangshan M_L5.1 earthquake

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7

利用FOCMEC方法计算得到的华北地区震源机制解空间分布图

Figure 7.

Spatial distribution for computed focal mechanisms in North China obtained by FOCMEC method in this study

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8

本研究所得的矩张量解的VR, DC, CLVD以及反演所使用台站数情况

Figure 8.

The VR, DC, CLVD distribution of each solution and the associated station number used in each inversion

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9

本研究用FOCMEC方法与TDMT方法得到同样地震的解的结果对比

Figure 9.

Comparison between the solutions obtained by FOCMEC and TDMT methods

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10

华北地区震源机制分区特征

Figure 10.

Focal mechanism zoning characteristics in North China, separated by yellow lines

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11

华北地区(a)正断层，(b)带有走滑分量的正断层，(c)走滑断层，(d)逆断层，(e)带有走滑分量的逆断层，(f)未知类型断层的震源机制解空间分布图

Figure 11.

Spatial distribution of the computed fault-type solutions: (a) normal fault type; (b) normal fault type with strike slip component; (c) strike slip fault type; (d) thrust fault type; (e) thrust fault type with strike slip component; (f) undetermined types

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12

华北地区≥M_L2.5地震震源机制P轴方位空间分布图

Figure 12.

P axis azimuth directions of the focal mechanism solutions for all the magnitude≥M_L2.5 seismic events

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13

华北地区≥M_L4地震震源机制特征

Figure 13.

Spatial distribution of focal mechanism solutions for magnitude ≥M_L4 seismic events in North China

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表附表 1

2010年1月—2014年6月利用FOCMEC方法得到的华北地震中小地震震源机制解

Table 附表 1.

Focal mechanisms of small and moderate earthquake obtained by FOCMEC method between Jan 2010 to Jun 2014 in North China

编号	时间/北京时	经度/(°E)	纬度/(°N)	深度/km	震级/M_L	走向/(°)	倾角/(°)	滑动角/(°)	类型
1	20100101/20/24/07	114.72	40.32	9	2.7	258.49	55.15	-83.9	NF
2	20100111/14/19/23	122.83	40.67	8	3.5	128.77	72.77	10.31	SS
3	20100115/13/52/09	120.37	41.67	7	2.9	310.99	74.81	-48.24	NS
4	20100122/07/31/07	123.03	40.53	8	2.9	275.08	76.43	-64.23	NF
5	20100123/06/30/16	123.03	40.53	9	3.2	125.69	63.94	-44.31	NS
6	20100126/08/47/09	122.92	40.65	13	2.6	87.45	36.22	-72.91	NF
7	20100127/12/28/25	111.78	37.20	8	3.4	119.43	85.67	59.91	U
8	20100128/11/23/14	118.88	39.97	12	2.7	214.56	85.02	84.98	U
9	20100205/19/26/25	122.75	40.67	11	2.8	24.88	17.96	-32.95	NF
10	20100206/03/36/19	122.82	40.67	16	2.5	179.08	46.92	-69.25	NF
11	20100208/07/22/22	113.42	38.00	9	3.4	309.47	29.36	43.03	TF
12	20100208/21/42/22	111.78	39.05	4	3.8	253.71	42.27	-67.37	NF
13	20100209/17/01/18	122.88	40.67	7	3	93.96	22.27	-62.73	NF
14	20100215/00/03/24	118.52	39.68	11	3.3	73.75	61.98	-49.48	NF
15	20100217/10/36/07	118.68	39.77	10	3.1	111.88	66.6	9.06	SS
16	20100219/22/50/04	120.98	38.23	9	2.6	83.17	20.59	13.47	U
17	20100301/07/01/07	114.42	36.98	13	3.3	316.5	75.23	-2.66	SS
18	20100301/17/11/25	116.35	40.65	10	2.8	284.56	81.11	-15.72	SS
19	20100304/14/04/08	113.38	36.52	4	2.5	320.72	57.2	40.12	TS
20	20100306/10/49/19	118.48	39.68	11	3.8	302.4	56.17	53	TF
21	20100306/11/00/47	118.50	39.70	10	4.8	18.49	55.15	-83.9	NF
22	20100306/11/08/05	118.65	39.73	7	2.7	325.63	56.17	53	TF
23	20100306/12/41/11	118.48	39.68	11	2.6	214.98	45.22	-82.95	NF
24	20100306/17/56/18	118.50	39.70	10	3.6	277.53	57.2	32.73	TS
25	20100306/18/14/08	118.50	39.68	11	2.6	306.06	43.96	60.48	TF
26	20100306/19/51/00	118.48	39.68	11	3.2	300.37	67.48	45.9	TS
27	20100306/21/52/58	118.48	39.68	11	2.8	277.05	45.22	4.98	U
28	20100307/01/29/02	118.52	39.68	6	3.2	91.96	71.11	-47.21	NS
29	20100307/11/59/12	118.50	39.68	11	2.7	241.11	57.39	-66.04	NF
30	20100316/20/44/01	112.27	37.37	9	3.2	119.43	85.67	59.91	U
31	20100319/00/52/12	113.37	36.50	8	2.8	141.39	80.34	74.78	TF
32	20100320/21/37/18	112.97	37.78	9	2.8	265.17	74.81	-48.24	NS
33	20100322/00/12/14	123.22	41.50	7	3	261.82	70.08	-84.68	NF
34	20100322/02/52/02	118.45	39.77	11	3	298.27	56.36	-71.89	NF
35	20100322/20/52/02	122.23	39.33	8	3	288.88	48.36	-62.76	NF
36	20100323/04/31/14	122.23	39.33	16	2.5	121.47	56.17	-53	NF
37	20100327/03/48/02	123.22	41.48	7	3	122.92	85.79	24.67	SS
38	20100327/04/50/04	122.22	39.33	5	2.8	117.89	48.44	-48.07	NF
39	20100327/10/18/12	113.30	39.93	8	2.7	82.39	65.82	-51.04	NF
40	20100328/12/45/24	111.78	36.47	7	2.5	260.74	71.94	-63.61	NF
41	20100331/01/17/25	114.95	37.40	12	2.6	132.9	35.31	81.33	TF
42	20100404/21/46/19	113.83	39.90	9	5	71.08	46.92	-69.25	NF
43	20100404/21/53/03	113.75	39.98	9	3.4	50.51	46.92	-69.25	NF
44	20100405/13/01/01	113.87	39.97	7	2.6	304.13	44.81	-35.53	NF
45	20100407/15/29/07	111.70	36.33	5	4.1	125.71	21.09	44.01	TF
46	20100409/18/52/00	118.07	39.47	12	4.6	339.89	86.79	-3.83	SS
47	20100409/18/59/03	118.07	39.48	12	3.1	319.88	65.41	78.99	TF
48	20100410/18/21/00	121.37	39.60	8	2.7	149.35	22.27	62.73	TF
49	20100412/00/35/25	113.42	41.38	8	3.2	332.89	80.15	79.85	TF
50	20100413/10/15/24	112.10	37.17	8	3.1	220.59	25.46	-78.3	NF
51	20100414/21/27/23	120.87	39.27	8	2.8	291.23	75.92	69.35	TF
52	20100415/08/46/05	123.53	40.03	7	2.5	293.73	24.81	51.92	TF
53	20100416/13/25/05	115.93	40.13	8	3.2	88.62	79.45	10.73	SS
54	20100429/05/08/44	112.73	38.50	8	2.5	100.7	65.82	-51.04	NF
55	20100430/02/36/05	115.03	37.52	11	3.9	95.51	65.1	2.33	SS
56	20100502/00/07/15	112.57	37.47	6	3.4	201.95	85.08	79.96	U
57	20100502/10/56/20	118.47	39.12	10	3.2	210	10	-90	NF
58	20100517/19/03/04	118.67	39.77	10	2.9	296.94	82.56	29.15	SS
59	20100517/20/02/14	120.57	38.38	10	4	316.8	83.72	13.65	SS
60	20100519/14/11/05	122.82	40.67	8	2.5	229.64	61.12	-72.81	NF
61	20100524/00/28/03	114.02	36.38	13	2.6	260	45	-90	NF
62	20100602/13/50/00	122.95	40.63	6	3.1	258.47	20.59	-75.65	NF
63	20100604/08/13/08	122.93	40.63	7	3.2	106.27	48.44	-48.07	NF
64	20100605/20/58/11	112.63	38.18	6	5	117.51	73.33	-31.23	SS
65	20100605/23/00/01	112.65	38.18	7	3.4	119	65.82	-51.04	NF
66	20100609/09/09/02	122.73	40.70	8	3	85.93	40.26	-82.25	NF
67	20100609/22/37/00	112.43	37.48	5	2.7	75.86	73.73	-53.31	NS
68	20100610/21/08/16	111.47	37.77	6	3.6	77.24	48.44	-48.07	NF
69	20100614/17/07/17	120.82	37.93	7	3.5	122.83	31.47	-16.74	U
70	20100618/18/59/05	121.17	37.23	8	3.8	121.08	44.81	-35.53	NF
71	20100619/11/40/20	112.32	37.47	6	2.8	103.35	26.81	-20.42	U
72	20100621/05/20/17	118.88	39.97	4	3.1	133.69	64.34	16.1	SS
73	20100623/12/30/23	111.83	37.13	5	2.5	84.84	52.84	-64.59	NF
74	20100623/19/29/25	113.52	39.45	5	2.9	118.46	61.98	49.48	TF
75	20100624/09/13/20	112.62	37.47	6	3.4	285.41	14.11	-44.56	NF
76	20100626/22/30/03	122.68	40.70	6	2.8	296.18	65.41	-78.99	NF
77	20100627/03/23/12	122.23	39.32	3	3.1	131.3	63.94	24.23	SS
78	20100628/15/20/13	122.23	39.33	7	3.5	332.44	58.68	60.35	TF
79	20100701/07/24/06	112.87	38.92	4	2.8	214.17	28.9	-57.62	NF
80	20100704/22/48/02	122.23	39.33	7	3.8	323.4	48.44	48.07	TF
81	20100705/00/16/29	111.92	37.05	6	3	74.26	74.24	37.25	SS
82	20100707/20/52/01	114.08	36.48	15	2.5	270.06	75.92	69.35	TF
83	20100709/18/10/05	113.18	39.23	8	3.5	281.47	51.13	-42.55	NF
84	20100709/23/57/22	122.22	39.32	6	2.7	143.29	60.22	54.82	TF
85	20100712/02/48/01	122.23	39.33	5	3	325.63	56.17	53	TF
86	20100712/07/21/07	118.08	39.52	8	2.5	249.9	70.32	79.37	TF
87	20100716/09/31/22	123.48	39.83	6	3	45.44	85.02	-84.98	U
88	20100718/11/44/08	122.23	39.33	10	3.5	304.76	54.37	-58.67	NF
89	20100720/08/17/21	114.62	40.42	9	2.6	71.86	65.6	-32.73	SS
90	20100720/17/52/10	111.17	37.82	6	2.8	103.96	17.96	55.73	TF
91	20100721/09/10/03	123.07	40.52	6	3.8	245	55	-90	NF
92	20100722/12/50/07	118.62	39.77	3	2.6	340.8	70.32	-79.37	NF
93	20100723/04/54/02	112.58	38.72	6	2.6	238.61	38.29	-36.2	NF
94	20100723/09/20/14	123.05	40.52	10	2.7	105.05	71.11	-47.21	NS
95	20100730/22/21/13	115.40	39.45	8	3.8	124.67	73.73	-53.31	NS
96	20100730/22/42/22	115.37	39.42	4	3.3	100.59	60.22	-54.82	NF
97	20100808/00/48/48	121.43	38.93	7	3	293.03	58.68	-16.48	SS
98	20100808/18/20/11	112.65	37.88	6	2.8	68.73	57.2	-40.12	NS
99	20100809/23/44/17	118.75	39.73	5	2.6	278.2	55.61	-77.85	NF
100	20100810/21/27/07	115.70	40.53	4	2.5	105.28	54.6	-29.84	NS
101	20100812/23/09/04	122.62	40.72	5	2.8	291.69	76.43	-64.23	U
102	20100814/01/03/03	122.80	40.67	9	2.5	132.72	79.2	28.16	SS
103	20100814/19/59/01	114.22	36.58	9	2.5	311.51	55.15	83.9	TF
104	20100816/17/06/03	114.47	40.72	14	2.9	52.17	14.11	-44.56	NF
105	20100816/20/35/22	122.72	40.68	7	3	111.88	66.6	9.06	SS
106	20100817/13/52/20	122.47	40.82	9	2.7	182.09	76.43	6.46	SS
107	20100831/18/47/08	112.98	38.77	5	2.5	289.12	80.04	84.92	TF
108	20100905/09/23/03	118.62	39.75	10	2.8	121.19	85.47	-64.92	U
109	20100911/04/43/06	118.83	39.87	7	2.7	126.58	50.73	-77.04	NF
110	20100913/13/58/13	113.67	36.73	9	2.7	293.93	41.03	-11.69	U
111	20100914/10/20/23	114.48	40.30	8	2.5	308.81	81.46	-12.38	SS
112	20100917/09/56/20	114.12	39.75	7	3.1	250.59	25.46	-78.3	NF
113	20100920/18/16/01	118.50	39.78	3	2.6	338.46	35.53	-30.64	U
114	20100922/08/01/08	123.05	40.53	5	3.6	278.91	67.48	-45.9	NS
115	20100925/10/47/04	122.90	40.63	9	2.6	23.82	31.47	70.57	TF
116	20100926/02/31/02	112.43	37.45	6	2.6	185.22	22.27	-62.73	NF
117	20100926/21/58/23	111.70	36.33	6	2.5	285.09	54.37	58.67	TF
118	20100927/11/28/01	113.80	39.90	8	3	244.63	36.22	-72.91	NF
119	20101007/21/19/24	112.97	37.53	6	2.8	283.32	73.73	-53.31	NS
120	20101009/04/56/04	113.85	40.25	14	2.7	295.79	56.36	-10.27	SS
121	20101012/16/20/03	111.68	36.22	5	3	113.68	90	15	SS
122	20101014/04/16/23	112.13	40.12	6	2.7	274.78	60.22	-54.82	NF
123	20101018/17/59/19	111.68	36.87	7	2.5	291.09	81.35	59.62	U
124	20101020/23/33/19	112.82	39.73	7	2.5	98.19	51.13	-34.36	NS
125	20101022/12/57/06	112.30	37.42	5	2.9	226.84	22.27	-25.51	U
126	20101102/00/11/12	111.97	36.67	6	3.1	124.44	85.67	-59.91	U
127	20101106/10/06/02	120.57	37.47	6	2.8	104.09	65.51	-17.89	SS
128	20101109/07/48/04	111.67	36.77	7	2.5	107.55	14.11	44.56	TF
129	20101121/20/27/09	111.72	37.17	5	3	102.02	71.94	63.61	TF
130	20101130/01/34/18	114.72	37.48	6	2.6	309.27	80.42	39.03	SS
131	20101130/06/18/04	118.37	39.73	6	3	105.45	39.67	-57.6	NF
132	20101207/17/58/14	112.33	37.53	6	2.5	312.5	55.61	77.85	TF
133	20101212/19/51/05	118.35	39.70	6	3.1	320.67	86.17	-49.89	U
134	20101218/04/29/18	118.52	39.75	6	2.5	324.06	54.6	45.28	TF
135	20101220/15/55/05	117.93	36.53	5	3.4	103.22	50.14	-56.6	NF
136	20101228/01/02/20	119.33	39.55	9	3.8	309.06	64.34	56.31	TF
137	20101229/15/53/03	120.80	38.17	8	3	297.2	26.81	-20.42	U
138	20101229/17/18/12	111.87	40.17	8	2.9	215	25	-90	NF
139	20101230/04/38/10	113.48	40.67	6	2.5	132.58	49.12	74.04	TF
140	20110101/08/26/00	113.65	40.73	6	2.6	287.16	17.96	-32.95	NF
141	20110105/19/43/11	112.12	40.18	8	2.7	230	60	-90	NF
142	20110109/13/23/22	114.00	36.63	5	2.8	314.83	56.17	22.76	SS
143	20110113/10/13/21	112.12	38.03	22	2.7	314.05	18.94	17.83	U
144	20110114/19/19/17	115.03	37.53	6	2.8	334.9	60.22	54.82	TF
145	20110119/06/51/01	113.87	39.68	2	2.6	317.05	22.27	-62.73	NF
146	20110122/23/36/21	112.57	37.67	4	2.5	324.56	85.02	84.98	U
147	20110124/01/08/18	118.50	39.68	6	3.4	306.97	81.35	-59.62	U
148	20110125/03/20/22	116.37	40.35	6	2.8	289.86	81.46	-12.38	SS
149	20110129/11/58/46	117.03	37.10	9	3.4	228.65	43.96	-60.48	NF
150	20110130/04/04/20	114.00	36.65	5	3.1	126.26	81.69	-23.66	SS
151	20110130/13/04/06	114.00	36.65	5	3.1	293.07	50.14	-22.91	NS
152	20110130/13/13/03	114.00	36.67	6	2.7	101.97	58.23	-47.57	NF
153	20110206/06/23/52	117.40	39.78	7	3.5	270	75	0	SS
154	20110211/07/23/13	117.20	40.48	6	3	314.72	62.97	30.68	TS
155	20110214/15/38/03	116.37	40.35	6	2.8	310.52	61.98	21.88	SS
156	20110224/16/38/01	122.70	40.68	8	2.7	106.34	54.23	-82.6	NF
157	20110226/03/21/00	116.58	40.13	8	2.8	301.6	28.9	-57.62	NF
158	20110307/01/51/36	111.77	39.02	6	4.5	29.75	55.61	-77.85	NF
159	20110307/13/27/11	118.75	39.73	7	3.1	129.54	89.13	-9.96	SS
160	20110308/23/19/14	112.72	41.97	7	4.5	306.19	72.61	-18.25	SS
161	20110315/21/02/03	113.88	36.02	5	2.5	294.79	50.18	-4.18	SS
162	20110316/02/03/07	122.70	40.68	8	2.6	276.23	63.94	-44.31	NS
163	20110319/16/40/14	114.85	37.30	8	2.9	329.8	36.22	13.93	U
164	20110329/05/28/03	113.83	39.93	13	3.1	63.66	52.84	-64.59	NF
165	20110403/06/07/08	122.65	40.70	7	2.6	241.82	70.08	-84.68	NF
166	20110404/10/31/22	122.73	40.72	8	2.5	15.6	77.05	59.13	U
167	20110413/13/02/29	114.72	39.88	6	2.6	64.33	80.34	-74.78	NF
168	20110416/18/37/07	113.78	37.72	6	2.5	229.25	70.32	-79.37	NF
169	20110421/00/15/17	112.93	36.08	8	3.7	303.79	65.6	32.73	SS
170	20110426/11/15/24	113.02	39.35	8	3.7	95.24	75.92	-69.35	NF
171	20110428/20/50/06	112.67	37.55	6	2.7	258.29	50.14	-56.6	NF
172	20110504/16/42/03	115.03	37.52	9	2.8	101.67	77.3	-38.26	SS
173	20110511/18/35/04	113.77	39.60	6	2.7	307.24	54.37	58.67	TF
174	20110519/18/28/30	112.58	37.87	8	2.7	248.6	65.91	-73.53	NF
175	20110520/18/32/04	118.95	36.23	6	3.7	255	40	-90	NF
176	20110524/23/42/00	121.55	40.92	8	2.6	250.93	40.26	-82.25	NF
177	20110603/02/30/19	114.72	40.52	6	2.9	72.45	14.11	-44.56	NF
178	20110612/03/33/36	118.75	40.52	6	2.6	275.44	21.09	-44.01	NF
179	20110612/04/04/19	118.77	39.73	8	2.5	114.98	44.81	-35.53	NF
180	20110615/03/34/25	118.65	39.77	6	2.7	35.08	46.92	-69.25	NF
181	20110620/05/49/10	113.38	36.52	6	2.5	321.03	49.12	38.97	TF
182	20110620/23/07/01	114.27	40.37	7	3.1	280.97	65.41	-78.99	NF
183	20110622/02/31/17	122.87	40.65	8	2.8	251.99	56.36	-71.89	NF
184	20110627/12/33/14	123.80	41.88	6	3.2	303.08	35.31	7.1	U
185	20110628/10/45/04	112.97	37.68	6	3.2	285.88	20	0	U
186	20110711/01/01/16	112.37	40.02	6	3.4	114.28	46.92	14.51	SS
187	20110716/20/24/14	113.08	39.37	5	2.8	265.44	65.82	-51.04	NF
188	20110717/22/59/20	112.40	37.97	18	2.6	240.4	65.41	-78.99	NF
189	20110726/19/08/07	122.10	37.42	10	3.3	281.4	86.17	-49.89	U
190	20110726/20/19/02	122.12	37.42	9	3.1	119.49	73.73	11.79	SS
191	20110727/07/19/14	122.07	37.42	8	3.6	340.61	80.34	2.61	SS
192	20110729/23/28/04	112.57	37.83	6	3.1	122.85	24.81	-51.92	NF
193	20110731/22/04/17	111.95	40.15	6	2.8	295.67	80.34	74.78	TF
194	20110731/23/57/07	116.57	38.92	7	2.6	212.3	60.5	78.49	TF
195	20110802/19/57/15	112.03	36.52	19	4.2	253.24	65.82	-51.04	NF
196	20110807/00/24/13	123.63	40.23	5	2.5	94.17	35.53	-53.95	NF
197	20110819/20/49/19	118.88	39.98	8	2.5	120.93	40.26	-82.25	NF
198	20110826/23/14/10	111.58	38.97	9	2.8	250.7	61.98	-49.48	NF
199	20110901/03/14/20	120.57	38.45	8	4.1	123.99	71.25	23.86	SS
200	20110901/16/41/15	115.28	37.73	5	3.7	123.61	80.61	69.72	U
201	20110906/01/55/03	111.17	40.28	6	2.8	137.97	14.11	44.56	TF
202	20110911/13/30/50	113.93	36.23	5	2.5	128.68	85.02	-29.62	SS
203	20110911/16/19/08	113.92	36.23	6	2.8	139.44	75.97	-32.4	SS
204	20110920/12/29/06	112.62	37.90	21	3.3	245	30	-90	NF
205	20110923/07/16/59	111.78	37.20	2	2.7	269.92	86.79	-39.89	U
206	20110928/18/21/19	111.65	38.98	5	2.9	107.42	30	0	U
207	20110930/08/07/55	113.12	36.50	7	3.6	114.58	66.07	-39.32	NS
208	20111003/13/13/14	123.23	41.50	7	2.9	290.19	39.67	26.03	TS
209	20111006/08/47/00	112.87	39.22	6	2.6	258.54	55.15	3.49	U
210	20111007/04/41/18	112.87	39.22	7	3	82.5	80.15	28.48	SS
211	20111012/16/40/20	116.17	39.95	7	3	304.64	57.39	-66.04	NF
212	20111017/13/48/06	117.92	36.57	7	2.9	279.98	45.22	-82.95	NF
213	20111019/19/54/00	118.18	39.62	7	2.9	292.29	48.44	30.79	TS
214	20111021/14/02/10	122.87	40.65	8	2.5	333.5	68.53	-13.12	SS
215	20111022/11/22/11	118.72	39.77	6	2.7	293.68	54.37	-58.67	NF
216	20111108/16/01/15	122.38	36.78	9	2.6	335.06	20.59	-13.47	U
217	20111111/12/23/25	122.38	36.78	7	2.8	341.98	15.79	71.32	TF
218	20111112/14/44/04	114.02	36.43	7	2.6	140.87	90	40	U
219	20111116/19/16/05	113.22	39.28	4	2.5	229.54	50.14	-22.91	NS
220	20111119/00/07/17	112.03	40.52	8	3.2	264	42.27	-67.37	NF
221	20111121/09/41/13	111.97	37.48	8	2.7	255	65	-90	NF
222	20111123/01/53/13	118.87	39.98	6	2.6	296.41	75.92	-69.35	NF
223	20111124/06/08/08	118.47	39.75	6	2.5	25.08	54.6	45.28	TF
224	20111129/14/25/25	120.58	36.70	7	3.4	39.18	50.18	-83.48	NF
225	20111130/20/03/25	118.45	39.75	7	2.5	3.45	80.61	-69.72	U
226	20111201/04/15/00	117.37	39.82	6	2.8	312.86	44.81	44.81	TF
227	20111204/02/13/17	116.95	39.98	6	2.6	342.83	65.91	73.53	TF
228	20111204/22/17/02	116.18	40.47	8	2.9	132.82	58.68	16.48	SS
229	20111212/09/42/09	118.18	39.60	6	3.7	310.43	82.36	6.47	SS
230	20111223/07/06/31	116.60	38.87	7	3.4	66.57	37.7	-64.96	NF
231	20111224/07/56/01	114.30	40.42	7	2.7	167.65	80.95	-64.66	U
232	20111224/14/20/21	112.78	39.47	6	3.9	97.8	54.37	-19.53	SS
233	20111224/14/30/08	122.47	39.97	5	2.9	121.57	11.17	-26.3	U
234	20111224/14/47/12	112.78	39.48	6	2.6	313.65	83.72	-24.25	SS
235	20111227/22/50/18	112.60	36.97	14	2.6	100.22	68.53	-57.5	NF
236	20111228/15/26/04	111.68	36.35	7	3.4	277.41	72.77	-58.43	NF
237	20120101/19/50/14	120.02	37.10	5	3.2	290.18	48.36	18.88	SS
238	20120107/01/14/05	114.42	40.62	6	3	293.19	42.27	-17.14	U
239	20120108/05/47/18	121.02	37.77	8	2.5	262.41	48.36	-62.76	NF
240	20120112/05/36/10	114.08	36.38	6	2.6	302.4	39.67	26.03	TS
241	20120124/10/52/22	113.22	39.07	5	2.8	277.06	54.37	-58.67	NF
242	20120127/14/33/20	112.60	41.98	6	3.2	121.98	75.81	31.23	SS
243	20120131/13/06/11	114.92	40.38	10	2.6	106.21	35.53	-30.64	NF
244	20120131/14/59/03	114.92	40.38	5	2.6	103.39	47.85	-39.32	NF
245	20120202/05/16/57	122.40	40.50	9	4.7	129.31	46.03	-26.73	NS
246	20120202/05/43/05	122.42	40.48	6	4.3	135.03	51.13	-42.55	NF
247	20120202/08/14/51	122.42	40.48	10	3.5	110.57	41.03	-74.66	NF
248	20120202/16/34/23	122.42	40.48	5	3	120.71	41.03	-74.66	NF
249	20120206/10/19/19	122.42	40.48	8	2.9	94.59	35.53	-30.64	NF
250	20120209/07/43/17	113.60	39.82	14	2.7	66.98	80.61	-69.72	U
251	20120210/18/40/44	111.68	36.87	8	2.7	114.22	71.11	47.21	TS
252	20120215/06/03/43	113.03	38.87	5	3.3	273.8	60.5	-42.39	NS
253	20120215/20/04/15	118.65	39.77	5	2.7	255	55	-90	NF
254	20120217/23/14/02	113.57	39.40	9	3.2	141.08	85.79	-24.67	SS
255	20120228/05/37/51	121.53	37.05	7	3.2	115.47	84.92	19.37	SS
256	20120229/11/38/26	118.48	39.78	6	2.7	305	70	-90	NF
257	20120301/15/26/07	111.78	36.48	19	2.6	240.48	43.96	-22.18	NS
258	20120301/21/44/02	121.55	37.05	6	3.2	279.86	46.03	-26.73	NS
259	20120305/03/38/42	114.43	41.18	6	3.8	122.42	76	-14.43	SS
260	20120308/04/17/01	122.72	40.68	8	2.9	269.51	26.81	-20.42	U
261	20120309/21/20/03	112.52	37.70	8	3.2	100.59	60.22	-54.82	NF
262	20120317/08/21/03	113.82	36.03	7	2.7	141.14	71.25	68.83	TF
263	20120317/15/18/23	116.07	40.27	8	2.9	137.04	86.79	39.89	SS
264	20120318/22/16/34	112.40	37.83	8	2.6	150	70	90	TF
265	20120319/23/46/49	111.68	36.78	7	3.1	148.9	70.71	74.08	TF
266	20120321/10/50/24	121.08	36.95	8	3.6	126.47	85.15	10.99	SS
267	20120324/19/18/16	114.63	37.47	6	2.8	221.4	63.05	-61.7	NF
268	20120328/07/59/20	111.72	36.35	13	2.5	252.54	41.03	-74.66	NF
269	20120404/00/54/01	123.22	41.48	9	4.1	292.94	77.3	15.58	SS
270	20120405/02/08/16	121.55	37.05	7	3	302.8	61.98	11.17	SS
271	20120406/03/56/47	113.50	39.85	9	3.2	61.11	57.39	-66.04	NF
272	20120406/12/38/21	115.68	39.35	6	2.8	124.38	22.27	-62.73	NF
273	20120407/10/25/17	118.62	37.58	7	3.3	291.33	86.17	49.89	U
274	20120407/21/42/00	112.53	38.12	8	2.7	214.21	36.22	-72.91	NF
275	20120414/14/02/50	118.23	39.63	6	3.3	359.17	72.77	10.31	SS
276	20120416/06/51/21	122.75	40.72	8	3.3	299.74	78.69	-16.6	SS
277	20120417/13/44/56	112.78	38.52	15	2.6	100.84	84.81	59.86	U
278	20120418/11/44/23	123.57	41.18	6	3.6	311.52	57.39	13.47	SS
279	20120421/13/46/14	118.37	39.73	7	3.2	320.81	82.36	49.57	U
280	20120423/01/27/02	115.10	40.48	5	2.5	274.66	48.44	-48.07	NF
281	20120424/11/04/03	115.67	40.88	8	2.8	102.78	44.81	-35.53	NF
282	20120426/03/49/14	116.12	40.03	6	3	270	60	-90	NF
283	20120428/03/31/00	114.28	37.40	5	2.8	87.47	48.36	-18.88	SS
284	20120428/06/16/07	116.52	40.07	6	3	89.14	42.27	-67.37	NF
285	20120430/02/59/05	114.68	40.48	9	2.5	89.74	81.69	23.66	SS
286	20120512/00/51/21	114.30	37.40	6	2.6	263.94	48.36	-18.88	SS
287	20120514/01/09/24	123.55	41.20	6	2.5	116.44	60	-35.26	NS
288	20120518/21/56/04	122.70	40.68	7	2.8	273.84	77.3	-38.26	SS
289	20120520/10/49/15	114.95	37.40	6	2.5	299.91	85.67	-2.5	SS
290	20120522/01/38/02	122.62	40.72	5	3.2	82	37.7	-64.96	NF
291	20120522/20/29/06	118.47	39.78	7	2.7	323.99	56.36	-71.89	NF
292	20120524/09/27/05	118.50	39.75	6	3.1	300.04	46.03	54.04	TF
293	20120528/10/22/01	118.47	39.72	22	5.1	322.11	90	15	SS
294	20120529/05/00/16	118.48	39.78	7	3.7	156.9	71.25	-36.01	SS
295	20120607/19/18/24	114.67	39.98	6	2.7	230	20	-90	NF
296	20120610/03/27/11	113.25	36.50	11	2.6	139.27	54.07	37.45	TS
297	20120610/15/39/16	117.32	39.38	9	2.8	287.11	53.04	-42.64	NF
298	20120614/22/45/35	122.65	40.72	10	2.7	317.67	65.1	84.49	TF
299	20120618/03/05/12	117.57	39.62	5	4.5	320.43	83.59	7.69	SS
300	20120620/08/59/02	118.42	39.77	12	2.8	132.27	85.47	-64.92	U
301	20120622/23/01/04	115.68	40.87	9	2.5	288.44	71.94	-63.61	NF
302	20120629/12/44/05	114.27	40.38	2	3.1	272.5	80.15	28.48	SS
303	20120707/03/21/22	114.47	41.13	7	2.6	96.3	11.17	-63.26	NF
304	20120707/14/23/07	122.88	40.65	8	2.7	131.32	70.08	1.82	SS
305	20120712/20/21/24	122.40	40.48	9	4.2	95.33	31.47	-70.57	NF
306	20120712/20/25/35	122.42	40.48	7	3.6	107.42	24.81	-51.92	NF
307	20120713/02/41/09	120.02	37.10	7	3.3	127.05	45.86	76	TF
308	20120713/09/46/07	120.02	37.10	7	3.8	284.79	71.94	63.61	TF
309	20120715/12/36/22	122.38	40.48	6	3.7	355.88	80.04	-84.92	NF
310	20120723/20/28/21	112.98	37.92	8	2.6	191.69	41.03	-74.66	NF
311	20120725/02/55/00	122.62	40.72	6	2.6	292.99	82.95	-44.56	U
312	20120731/12/15/24	121.08	38.03	8	3	270	15	-90	NF
313	20120731/14/40/14	121.07	38.03	7	3.9	297.2	61.98	-11.17	SS
314	20120807/13/11/24	120.02	37.10	6	3.4	290.5	68.53	13.12	SS
315	20120808/17/48/56	120.03	37.12	4	3.9	124.12	80.04	84.92	TF
316	20120816/19/06/23	114.57	40.05	6	2.5	300	42.27	-67.37	NF
317	20120826/07/13/34	117.43	39.62	9	4	126.59	83.59	7.69	SS
318	20120830/00/14/01	114.82	40.70	6	3.7	97.73	74.24	37.25	SS
319	20120830/21/39/09	122.78	40.72	6	2.7	305.27	42.06	-50.89	NF
320	20120907/21/00/03	122.73	40.68	6	2.6	104.98	56.17	53	TF
321	20120908/08/25/05	115.02	37.52	7	2.6	122.08	80.15	-17.5	SS
322	20120909/07/07/00	118.92	40.80	5	3.2	275.59	25.46	-78.3	NF
323	20120909/16/10/19	122.72	40.70	6	2.7	287.99	57.2	40.12	TS
324	20120911/11/27/23	115.37	37.57	8	2.7	162.37	52.84	16.01	SS
325	20120912/06/13/14	117.18	41.95	4	2.5	280.08	70.79	-29.84	SS
326	20120915/08/54/16	122.42	40.50	6	3.2	100.4	35.53	-30.64	NF
327	20120915/19/24/06	122.72	40.68	6	3.4	90.93	40.26	-82.25	NF
328	20120917/10/43/15	112.37	37.57	6	3.8	76.34	75.06	-84.82	NF
329	20120924/20/01/02	118.52	39.78	6	2.5	130.88	80.04	-84.92	NF
330	20120928/15/01/03	112.33	37.58	4	3.5	83.22	65.41	-78.99	NF
331	20120928/19/12/25	112.12	40.62	24	3.5	78.19	72.61	-18.25	SS
332	20121005/08/25/16	111.73	36.50	23	3.2	135	10	90	TF
333	20121007/03/22/21	119.68	41.02	10	3	294.93	84.92	-19.37	SS
334	20121011/03/50/18	111.78	36.45	22	2.7	93.66	66.07	39.32	TS
335	20121017/03/55/59	122.82	40.67	8	2.5	179.41	25.46	78.3	TF
336	20121017/13/59/03	122.92	40.63	6	2.5	261.4	42.06	-31.11	NS
337	20121101/19/25/24	122.38	40.48	6	4	267.41	56.36	-71.89	NF
338	20121105/09/15/21	114.85	37.03	8	2.9	160	60	90	TF
339	20121105/17/44/01	123.53	41.18	6	2.7	301.72	58.68	-60.35	NF
340	20121111/07/53/00	120.27	41.75	7	3.8	123.69	48.44	-48.07	NF
341	20121119/23/06/11	114.90	40.12	8	2.8	128.66	61.98	-49.48	NF
342	20121120/16/14/00	115.23	41.47	8	3.7	282.47	80.34	-2.61	SS
343	20121122/07/45/23	114.65	39.98	9	3.2	253.02	15.79	-71.32	NF
344	20121123/00/46/08	121.02	41.62	8	3.1	134.1	82.36	-49.57	U
345	20121125/00/42/52	117.63	39.37	8	2.9	84	42.27	-67.37	NF
346	20121128/04/34/05	122.38	40.48	8	2.8	100.58	21.09	-44.01	NF
347	20121129/08/47/02	113.22	39.90	2	3.6	68.76	62.97	-30.68	NS
348	20121130/19/15/15	112.25	36.82	15	2.7	251.55	60.22	-54.82	NF
349	20121208/04/35/23	113.02	38.37	16	2.8	100.53	75.92	-69.35	NF
350	20121209/00/32/20	118.85	39.88	7	2.8	335.23	71.25	-7.1	SS
351	20121217/10/00/10	122.68	40.68	7	3.2	295.26	54.6	-45.28	NF
352	20121218/08/11/02	112.53	37.87	21	3.5	273	48.36	-62.76	NF
353	20121222/13/02/22	114.27	36.45	8	2.6	314.24	50.14	-22.91	NS
354	20130102/07/39/13	113.07	37.88	6	2.6	77.43	86.48	35.85	U
355	20130104/07/12/13	115.43	40.25	8	2.8	106.88	43.96	-60.48	NF
356	20130105/10/43/03	112.72	39.57	4	2.5	109.47	39.67	-26.03	NS
357	20130108/02/11/20	119.22	39.68	6	3.2	314.43	76	-43.22	SS
358	20130110/14/34/19	123.52	39.52	6	4.3	112.71	20.59	-13.47	U
359	20130111/02/36/07	113.17	39.38	2	2.8	194.04	80.61	-69.72	U
360	20130111/07/55/02	118.82	39.63	6	3.3	320.3	57.39	13.47	SS
361	20130116/16/21/25	122.68	40.68	6	3	295.59	25.46	-78.3	NF
362	20130116/16/57/12	122.68	40.68	8	2.9	295	25	-90	NF
363	20130122/20/43/10	111.95	37.17	4	2.6	114.89	35.31	-7.1	U
364	20130123/12/18/15	123.20	41.50	10	5.5	100.07	88.29	4.7	SS
365	20130124/02/01/02	118.60	37.57	10	4.1	130	60	0	SS
366	20130130/14/18/20	123.18	39.67	6	3.4	299.2	46.92	69.25	TF
367	20130131/14/31/25	117.87	36.63	8	3.1	114.62	74.81	-48.24	NS
368	20130201/10/38/09	111.67	40.32	6	2.5	93.06	57.2	-32.73	NS
369	20130203/16/52/22	122.62	40.72	6	3.2	282.78	63.94	-44.31	NS
370	20130203/16/57/00	122.62	40.72	5	2.7	107.82	85.67	59.91	U
371	20130207/15/15/19	111.82	37.28	3	2.7	248.82	20	0	U
372	20130208/10/03/25	122.93	40.63	6	3.3	265.99	54.37	-58.67	NF
373	20130213/00/35/08	123.05	40.53	6	2.9	275.59	25.46	-78.3	NF
374	20130217/06/16/08	118.47	39.78	7	2.9	338.49	34.78	-42.19	NF
375	20130218/10/14/19	122.87	40.63	6	2.9	259.18	50.18	-83.48	NF
376	20130219/03/11/01	112.42	39.85	15	3.2	270.3	86.16	-14.51	SS
377	20130220/08/03/19	112.77	38.73	15	2.7	230.51	46.92	-69.25	NF
378	20130222/12/02/03	113.82	39.88	8	4.1	85	90	0	SS
379	20130225/04/31/18	118.17	39.57	6	2.8	268.06	55.61	-77.85	NF
380	20130225/14/07/03	113.77	40.72	8	2.6	143.96	24.81	35.42	TF
381	20130227/09/49/07	122.62	40.70	5	3.4	283.4	81.82	-54.59	U
382	20130228/02/36/02	122.63	40.72	5	2.7	276.1	55.15	3.49	U
383	20130306/23/19/11	122.78	40.67	5	2.7	326.61	80.34	-74.78	NF
384	20130312/00/21/07	112.93	38.88	6	2.5	340.01	45.86	76	TF
385	20130313/05/04/24	116.58	39.68	7	2.6	298.51	88.71	-14.95	SS
386	20130317/04/49/00	122.93	40.63	5	3.1	139.74	80.95	64.66	U
387	20130317/16/44/03	120.97	38.18	8	3	324.78	80.61	69.72	U
388	20130317/19/21/11	120.98	38.18	8	3.1	297.99	40.66	9.42	U
389	20130319/03/46/11	113.33	36.43	7	3	285	60.5	-28.34	SS
390	20130320/10/18/08	122.95	40.63	6	2.8	251.08	46.92	-69.25	NF
391	20130330/08/19/03	122.42	40.50	6	3.2	347.5	80.15	-28.48	SS
392	20130330/14/05/13	122.42	40.48	8	4	122.1	35.31	-81.33	NF
393	20130331/12/53/01	122.42	40.48	8	3.9	247.7	35.53	-53.95	NF
394	20130401/15/45/06	112.45	37.85	19	2.7	126.63	50.14	56.6	TF
395	20130404/19/01/04	112.47	37.52	13	3.1	65.94	46.92	-69.25	NF
396	20130406/05/53/05	112.47	37.52	13	2.5	64.03	60.5	-78.49	NF
397	20130407/18/29/25	122.63	40.72	9	2.6	278.04	77.76	54.06	U
398	20130412/14/36/12	122.87	40.67	8	3.3	110.16	60.5	-42.39	NS
399	20130416/00/45/13	122.42	40.52	6	3.8	110.93	40.26	-82.25	NF
400	20130424/01/37/15	122.38	40.50	6	3.2	167.32	90	80	U
401	20130424/02/07/14	122.40	40.50	6	3.1	155	90	85	U
402	20130424/03/45/12	122.38	40.50	7	3.7	138.65	43.96	-60.48	NF
403	20130424/03/52/18	122.38	40.48	8	3	136.36	57.49	47.15	TF
404	20130424/19/39/00	122.40	40.50	6	3.5	141.97	90	80	U
405	20130428/11/30/21	122.63	40.72	6	3.2	146.21	86.6	-19.72	SS
406	20130501/09/53/12	118.50	39.77	7	2.7	0.92	46.92	69.25	TF
407	20130502/14/42/01	121.00	38.17	9	3.6	55.65	46.92	-69.25	NF
408	20130503/14/16/13	117.93	39.33	8	2.9	324.98	85.02	-0.44	SS
409	20130504/01/50/17	117.78	37.83	11	2.6	192.66	17.96	-55.73	NF
410	20130509/12/00/02	116.50	38.68	7	2.6	82.8	68.53	-57.5	NF
411	20130520/05/55/09	112.43	37.43	14	2.8	53.07	52.84	-64.59	NF
412	20130520/19/40/13	111.77	37.08	10	3.2	244.58	21.09	-44.01	NF
413	20130523/22/39/10	112.48	39.02	12	2.9	210	35	-90	NF
414	20130524/20/46/14	116.52	38.50	8	3.1	128.85	81.35	-5.04	SS
415	20130525/22/35/16	114.27	37.63	5	2.6	277.95	70.71	-74.08	NF
416	20130527/05/26/20	111.93	37.02	7	2.7	92.24	62.97	-30.68	NS
417	20130530/14/29/24	117.97	39.35	8	2.7	194.88	43.96	60.48	TF
418	20130603/02/02/02	118.50	39.80	6	3.1	329.92	50.73	8.29	U
419	20130603/12/02/03	114.27	37.63	5	3.2	284.21	90	15	SS
420	20130603/16/16/12	111.57	40.17	7	2.9	306.01	71.25	-23.86	SS
421	20130605/19/48/07	112.55	39.02	13	2.9	227.28	38.29	-47	NF
422	20130607/00/16/06	114.32	38.98	8	2.5	101.85	89.13	-9.96	SS
423	20130608/00/27/10	118.48	39.77	8	2.5	317.46	57.2	-40.12	NS
424	20130610/21/36/04	114.87	40.58	10	2.5	256.23	46.92	-69.25	NF
425	20130612/17/03/03	112.37	37.50	14	2.8	68.82	51.62	-70.72	NF
426	20130612/17/35/12	112.07	40.18	6	3.2	225.34	45.86	-76	NF
427	20130615/00/39/12	111.22	36.28	19	3.5	166.74	31.61	36.26	TF
428	20130617/23/36/08	114.82	39.92	5	3.1	122.19	46.92	-14.51	SS
429	20130620/13/21/06	111.75	38.52	15	2.9	256.23	46.92	-69.25	NF
430	20130621/05/23/22	120.57	37.07	9	3.4	115.6	56.17	-22.76	SS
431	20130623/10/27/25	111.70	36.22	8	2.8	121.71	42.27	67.37	TF
432	20130623/16/52/12	118.38	39.72	6	2.8	136.43	48.44	-30.79	NF
433	20130625/14/22/12	117.73	36.17	7	3.4	295.6	56.17	-22.76	SS
434	20130628/01/11/25	114.72	37.17	6	3.1	97.8	14.11	-44.56	NS
435	20130629/05/15/21	122.83	39.05	8	3.6	271.96	77.76	-8.74	NF
436	20130702/08/10/07	120.37	39.03	8	3.2	179.39	58.23	25.7	NS
437	20130703/07/23/08	123.03	37.18	15	2.8	64.89	7.07	-44.89	NF
438	20130703/08/27/00	123.03	40.22	8	3	156.64	35.31	7.1	U
439	20130704/20/12/15	122.92	40.58	6	3.3	87.6	75.97	20.91	U
440	20130708/09/25/23	111.78	36.43	2	3.1	153.06	50.14	-56.6	NF
441	20130709/18/39/14	118.88	38.63	9	3.6	90.26	31.47	-70.57	NF
442	20130712/21/21/03	122.75	40.77	8	2.6	137.78	71.11	-47.21	TF
443	20130714/15/59/20	122.82	40.77	6	3.1	158.41	63.94	-44.31	NF
444	20130715/11/11/14	113.42	39.92	7	2.7	74.98	27.99	-43.22	NF
445	20130720/04/35/15	111.78	36.57	19	3.3	90.09	87.5	4.33	NF
446	20130721/18/31/14	122.88	40.63	8	2.9	116.72	75.92	-5.24	SS
447	20130731/22/58/00	118.52	38.23	18	2.9	285.51	80.42	-39.03	U
448	20130803/17/23/01	118.68	39.78	6	2.8	115.88	80.04	-84.92	SS
449	20130803/17/29/17	120.98	39.82	7	3.5	83.9	22.27	-25.51	SS
450	20130805/08/15/23	114.42	41.87	6	3	167.1	80.34	74.78	TS
451	20130809/18/37/13	116.35	40.68	6	2.8	86.89	46.92	-14.51	TF
452	20130815/09/23/23	113.38	39.07	12	2.7	211.2	77.76	8.74	NF
453	20130817/23/08/26	118.48	37.73	14	2.9	258.58	17.96	-55.73	TF
454	20130817/23/53/14	118.50	40.72	9	2.5	160.12	70.08	1.82	NF
455	20130818/07/32/11	118.65	40.68	8	3.3	254.86	21.09	-44.01	TS
456	20130821/09/58/02	118.48	39.97	8	2.6	82.94	63.05	-61.7	TF
457	20130823/16/57/21	118.50	39.93	9	2.6	255.32	28.9	-57.62	TS
458	20130823/18/55/15	118.50	39.93	7	3.2	257.58	31.47	-70.57	U
459	20130901/07/37/16	118.48	40.67	11	2.6	282.49	79.45	-44.01	NS
460	20130912/21/11/00	118.48	38.22	6	3.2	87.8	54.6	-45.28	NF
461	20130913/15/56/19	118.52	38.78	18	2.7	238.59	71.94	-63.61	U
462	20130915/06/45/02	118.50	40.48	6	2.9	330.37	72.77	10.31	TF
463	20130919/23/48/04	112.27	41.17	6	2.8	132.82	58.68	16.48	NS
464	20131001/12/07/04	113.37	36.83	7	3.8	286.46	61.98	-67.2	NF
465	20131003/13/59/19	112.97	40.07	8	2.7	118.91	79.71	-22.91	NF
466	20131005/03/49/11	123.22	36.83	7	2.7	284.36	66.6	-68.12	NF
467	20131005/11/30/02	118.45	36.83	9	3.2	283.59	48.36	-62.76	NF
468	20131007/07/32/06	122.23	37.88	12	2.9	240.04	71.25	-68.83	SS
469	20131008/23/44/03	122.23	40.13	7	2.6	345.44	73.32	47.85	NF
470	20131009/22/13/16	123.22	40.68	5	2.6	99.01	85.17	-74.95	NF
471	20131017/01/35/12	122.22	37.52	7	2.6	173.02	40.26	5.93	NF
472	20131017/03/55/20	113.30	36.83	7	2.9	104.33	87.5	-29.91	TF
473	20131022/19/08/07	111.78	37.92	22	3.6	121.28	56.36	10.27	SS
474	20131027/03/32/02	114.95	39.72	7	3.9	271.71	74.81	-48.24	NF
475	20131109/08/47/08	113.83	39.28	15	3.8	230.59	25.46	-78.3	NF
476	20131114/20/05/01	113.75	39.77	6	2.7	145.45	54.07	-37.45	TF
477	20131115/07/57/00	113.87	39.93	7	3.1	267.5	42.06	-31.11	SS
478	20131120/23/15/05	111.70	40.65	6	2.7	294.5	78.56	-49.02	TF
479	20131121/04/38/10	118.07	40.72	8	2.7	109.57	90	40	TF
480	20131123/12/20/06	118.07	37.08	6	3.3	135	45	90	TF
481	20131123/13/24/22	121.37	37.08	6	3.4	125	60	90	NF
482	20131123/13/44/10	120.02	37.10	10	4.9	298.12	45.86	9.85	U
483	20131126/18/14/15	112.10	39.73	6	2.5	302.41	63.94	-44.31	TF
484	20131127/05/15/11	120.87	40.55	5	3.5	89.86	80.42	-39.03	SS
485	20131128/08/13/10	123.53	36.48	6	2.8	334.52	70.71	-74.08	NF
486	20131202/05/52/02	115.93	39.97	7	3.1	120.6	72.61	-42.19	SS
487	20131206/01/17/22	112.73	37.12	6	3	112.89	34.78	42.19	U
488	20131206/17/45/08	115.03	38.08	13	4.2	103.42	62.97	30.68	TS
489	20131206/18/33/03	112.57	39.83	7	2.6	270	40	-90	SS
490	20131209/13/38/03	118.47	36.83	6	3.2	323.66	75.06	84.82	SS
491	20131211/14/48/57	118.67	37.12	6	3.6	127.05	45.86	76	NF
492	20131212/14/24/02	120.57	40.33	6	2.7	299.8	68.23	3.22	NF
493	20131213/07/35/08	122.82	39.93	11	3.4	71.99	77.8	-27.62	NF
494	20131223/15/04/12	114.02	39.37	6	2.8	112.67	47.24	-56.36	NF
495	20131226/05/11/08	122.95	37.82	6	2.6	91.72	82.36	49.57	SS
496	20131226/18/11/23	122.93	39.75	8	2.7	344.76	65.82	-51.04	NF
497	20131231/05/34/11	112.63	40.72	8	2.8	301.1	51.13	-34.36	NF
498	20140101/21/08/13	114.02	36.38	9	3.2	302.44	55.15	3.49	U
499	20140104/14/51/12	122.32	40.47	8	3.4	82.24	55.61	-6.93	SS
500	20140105/00/48/20	114.38	40.68	8	2.6	59.62	32.22	6.37	U
501	20140107/22/24/06	121.67	36.82	7	4.7	300.86	15	0	U
502	20140108/02/39/02	121.70	36.83	7	2.6	292.62	76.43	64.23	TF
503	20140109/16/54/05	121.68	36.83	8	3.5	292.33	80.15	79.85	TF
504	20140110/19/45/04	121.70	36.83	5	2.8	264.71	90	70	U
505	20140112/18/31/17	122.78	40.72	8	3.3	287.5	80.15	-28.48	SS
506	20140112/18/48/13	113.05	38.60	8	2.8	69.21	50.73	-8.29	U
507	20140114/01/40/06	118.43	39.75	7	3.4	153.99	71.25	23.86	SS
508	20140118/16/43/23	116.72	39.75	8	3.0	325.1	87.13	4.1	SS
509	20140119/08/35/17	119.62	40.42	9	2.8	194.2	60.5	42.39	TS
510	20140123/12/23/03	111.87	40.42	6	2.5	265	15	-90	NF
511	20140125/11/57/03	118.50	39.80	6	3.0	124.89	52.24	-26.57	NS
512	20140125/22/48/23	122.83	40.67	9	2.6	299.29	75.23	2.66	SS
513	20140201/02/43/03	122.32	40.47	8	2.5	270	75	0	SS
514	20140207/14/39/09	122.32	40.47	6	3.1	95	90	0	SS
515	20140209/13/45/02	122.32	40.47	8	2.7	311.15	50.73	77.04	SS
516	20140209/19/58/16	122.63	40.72	7	2.6	289.42	73.73	-53.31	NS
517	20140210/20/10/16	112.43	37.82	18	2.9	254.79	44.81	44.81	TF
518	20140211/09/15/08	122.32	40.47	9	3.6	85.06	56.36	-10.27	SS
519	20140211/16/51/04	118.78	39.87	8	2.8	253	35.53	-53.95	NF
520	20140213/03/22/22	112.57	39.82	13	3.4	124.13	54.6	29.84	TS
521	20140214/02/49/14	122.3	40.47	10	3	273.92	80.15	17.5	SS
522	20140217/15/20/25	122.13	39.92	9	3.2	317.66	81.82	-5.78	SS
523	20140224/10/30/13	122.32	40.47	12	3.6	270.83	82.21	16.28	SS
524	20140225/01/50/03	121.68	36.82	4	3.5	283.91	85.91	54.9	U
525	20140225/13/13/07	112.23	37.28	12	2.5	240	70	-90	NF
526	20140301/21/08/03	122.32	40.47	12	2.6	316.22	50.73	77.04	TF
527	20140303/11/30/04	122.32	40.47	8	3.4	273.01	85.54	-47.84	U
528	20140308/15/23/08	122.78	40.67	6	2.9	90	30	0	U
529	20140308/23/44/06	113.43	39.70	9	3.2	108.68	85.02	-29.62	SS
530	20140314/12/45/23	122.83	40.67	8	2.6	293.57	74.24	-37.25	SS
531	20140314/18/16/18	115.92	40.03	7	3.4	87.62	66.07	-26.34	NS
532	20140322/17/38/24	112.47	38.18	14	2.5	245.63	45.86	-76	NF
533	20140325/01/03/10	111.72	36.32	14	3.2	73.08	65.41	-78.99	NF
534	20140326/03/28/09	122.32	40.48	8	3.7	293.47	67.48	62.77	TF
535	20140327/16/26/18	122.32	40.48	8	2.5	277.48	70.79	29.84	U
536	20140328/02/46/08	122.32	40.47	9	3.1	90.56	83.72	-13.65	SS
537	20140329/13/26/20	122.3	40.47	6	3.2	266.01	71.25	-23.86	SS
538	20140401/21/30/08	122.32	40.47	9	2.8	293.73	24.81	51.92	TF
539	20140403/03/24/08	122.32	40.47	8	3.2	86.91	77.28	-18.1	SS
540	20140404/00/12/16	121.67	36.83	5	4.7	119.18	56.17	22.76	SS
541	20140404/00/39/22	121.68	36.83	5	2.7	329.47	65.82	51.04	TF
542	20140404/23/16/14	112.22	37.27	15	4.1	272.1	35.31	-81.33	NF
543	20140405/01/37/04	121.15	37.93	8	3.7	129.5	48.44	-48.07	NF
544	20140408/00/22/03	121.72	36.80	3	3	116.31	90	65	U
545	20140408/19/07/17	122.3	40.47	9	3	108.15	29.6	-18.09	U
546	20140409/06/52/00	121.68	36.83	6	2.7	108.47	59.16	30.06	TS
547	20140413/06/34/19	122.32	40.47	8	2.5	265.01	85.02	-8.68	SS
548	20140414/01/59/06	121.72	36.83	8	2.9	321.81	31.61	36.26	TF
549	20140414/13/42/05	122.3	40.48	8	2.5	298.5	48.69	61.5	TF
550	20140415/10/42/10	121.68	36.83	8	3.3	292.99	82.95	-44.56	U
551	20140416/18/45/08	114.58	36.82	20	3.1	108.8	78.69	-33.34	SS
552	20140417/16/19/15	122.87	40.65	6	3.2	103.71	48.44	-30.79	NS
553	20140418/09/07/01	122.32	40.47	8	3.7	75.73	41.41	-40.89	NF
554	20140424/23/15/08	122.85	40.65	8	3.1	122.12	68.37	-34.5	SS
555	20140430/12/27/14	122.32	40.47	9	2.8	86.09	54.6	45.28	TF
556	20140507/00/46/14	122.32	40.47	6	2.7	92.69	50.73	-8.29	U
557	20140509/12/49/08	122.32	40.47	9	2.9	83.41	46.03	26.73	TS
558	20140510/00/42/07	118.48	39.78	6	2.5	95.34	65.6	-32.73	NS
559	20140511/10/57/06	122.4	40.48	10	2.9	308.43	44.81	-44.81	TF
560	20140515/13/16/01	118.27	40.70	16	2.5	110.79	50.73	8.29	U
561	20140518/21/20/01	121.68	36.83	7	3	292.97	43.96	22.18	TS
562	20140521/11/02/17	112.98	37.78	17	3.5	50.93	40.26	-82.25	NF
563	20140526/04/03/06	120.8	38.38	5	3.9	120.81	55.81	-44.71	NF
564	20140529/12/30/04	112.42	37.52	16	2.8	280.93	40.26	-82.25	NF
565	20140531/15/39/11	112.87	38.63	4	2.5	245	45	-90	NF
566	20140603/02/42/08	122.68	40.68	8	2.7	134.74	81.69	18.26	SS
567	20140605/02/11/17	122.32	40.47	8	2.9	79.67	80.34	74.78	TF
568	20140605/02/13/22	122.32	40.47	8	3.1	296.34	52.84	64.59	TF
569	20140608/15/46/14	122.32	40.48	9	2.7	82.24	55.61	-6.93	SS
570	20140610/07/44/07	122.32	40.48	7	3	271.52	70.71	5.38	SS
571	20140612/06/59/14	118.35	39.7	7	2.8	194.43	31.61	36.26	TF
572	20140615/11/53/18	113.17	39.55	6	2.6	76.84	43.96	-22.18	NS
注：NF, NS, TF, TS, SS, U代表震源机制不同类型，见表 1.

下载: 导出CSV

表 1

根据P、B、T轴倾角判断应力类型的方法(Zoback, 1992)

Table 1.

Stress regime characterization based on plunge (pl) of P, B, and T axes (Zoback, 1992)

倾角			类型
P	B	T	类型
pl≥ 52°		pl≤35°	NF
40°≤pl＜52°		pl≤20°	NS
pl＜40°	pl≥45°	pl≤20°	SS
pl≤20°	pl≥45°	pl＜40°	SS
pl≤20°		40°≤pl＜50°	TS
pl≤35°		pl≥52°	TF
注：NF为正断型震源机制；NS为正走滑型震源机制；TF为逆断型震源机制；TS为逆走滑型震源机制；SS为走滑型震源机制；U为无法确定型震源机制.

下载: 导出CSV

表 2

研究区震源机制分类的结果

Table 2.

Classification of focal mechanism solutions in the research area

NF	NS	TF	TS	SS	U
206	44	81	20	139	83
36%	7.7%	14.2%	3.5%	24.3%	14.5%
注：NF, NS, TF, TS, SS, U代表震源机制的不同类型，见表 1.

下载: 导出CSV

表 3

华北地区地震矩张量解

Table 3.

Moment tensor solutions of North China

序号	日期	时间/北京时	纬度/(°E)	经度/(°N)	H(cat)/km	H(M_T)/km	M_L	M_W	Strike/(°)	Dip/(°)	Rake/(°)	M₀ /(N·m)	类型(T)
21	20100306	110047	39.70	118.50	10	13	4.8	4.31	44	50	-79	3.6×10¹⁵	NF
42	20100404	214619	39.90	113.83	9	7	5.0	4.4	216	53	-109	4.9×10¹⁵	NF
46	20100409	185200	39.47	118.07	12	5	4.6	4.03	152	78	28	1.40×10¹⁵	SS
64	20100605	205811	38.18	112.63	6	9	5.0	4.49	109	78	-58	6.80×10¹⁵	U
199	20110901	031420	38.45	120.57	8	7	4.1	3.71	221	90	-148	4.50×10¹⁴	U
245	20120202	051657	40.50	122.40	9	12	4.7	4.06	246	66	-131	1.50×10¹⁵	NS
246	20120202	054305	40.48	122.42	6	7	4.3	3.79	237	61	-143	5.90×10¹⁴	NS
293	20120528	102201	39.72	118.47	22	11	5.1	4.5	232	78	-163	6.90×10¹⁵	SS
299	20120618	030512	39.62	117.57	5	10	4.5	3.84	237	81	-158	7.20×10¹⁴	SS
305	20120712	202124	40.48	122.40	9	9	4.2	3.83	258	48	-81	6.90×10¹⁴	NF
364	20130123	121815	41.50	123.20	10	7	5.5	4.67	107	89	6	1.30×10¹⁶	SS
482	20131123	134410	37.10	120.02	10	6	4.9	4.19	199	81	170	2.40×10¹⁵	SS
488	20131206	174508	38.08	120.07	13	12	4.2	3.83	19	77	156	6.80×10¹⁴	SS
540	20140404	001216	36.83	121.67	5	12	4.7	4.08	291	87	-6	1.60×10¹⁵	SS
注：H(cat)是来自中国地震台网中心的震源深度.H(M_T)是本研究进行反演迭代时得到的深度.NF, NS, TF, TS, SS, U代表震源机制的不同类型，见表 1.

下载: 导出CSV

表附表 2

来自GCMT的矩张量解

Table 附表 2.

The moment tensor solutions from GCMT

序号	时间/世界时	经度/(°E)	纬度/(°N)	深度/km	震级	走向/(°)	倾角/(°)	滑动角/(°)	M₀/(N·m)	类型
g₁	19760727194254.60	117.98	39.57	23	M_S7.9	229	43	-163	2.77×10²⁰	U
g₂	19760728104535.20	118.40	39.66	26	M_S7.4	72	44	-110	3.58×10¹⁹	NF
g₃	19761115135300.60	117.69	39.44	15	M_S6.3	318	56	-9	4.32×10¹⁸	SS
g₄	19770512111753.10	117.71	39.27	22	M_S5.4	322	52	8	5.30×10¹⁷	SS
g₅	19771126224652.20	117.94	39.47	33	M_b5.1	250	45	-90	3.26×10¹⁶	NF
g₆	19780518123334.00	122.53	40.67	33	M_S5.2	23	60	-177	2.04×10¹⁷	SS
g₇	19790619041516.50	111.85	37.16	33	M_S4.9	278	30	-63	4.70×10¹⁶	NF
g₈	19811108180103.80	115.02	37.28	14	M_S5.5	31	72	162	3.48×10¹⁷	SS
g₉	19821019124602.50	118.95	39.85	33	M_b5.0	116	61	-5	3.16×10¹⁶	SS
g₁₀	19831106210943.90	115.21	35.23	10	M_S5.3	142	44	71	2.04×10¹⁷	TF
g₁₁	19891018145722.30	113.84	39.90	10	M_S5.4	204	76	-176	1.42×10¹⁷	SS
g₁₂	19891018170135.30	113.96	40.08	10	M_S5.7	200	75	-175	3.34×10¹⁷	SS
g₁₃	19891018182047.30	113.92	40.09	10	M_S5.3	92	44	-39	1.45×10¹⁷	NF
g₁₄	19910325180241.90	113.95	40.06	10	M_S5.3	106	82	7	1.62×10¹⁷	SS
g₁₅	19940725174150.40	124.43	34.97	10	M_S5.0	196	90	-180	7.14×10¹⁶	SS
g₁₆	19950920031435.40	118.07	34.87	33	M_S4.7	308	69	-7	4.80×10¹⁶	SS
g₁₇	19980110035041.60	114.50	41.08	30	M_S5.7	207	54	135	4.48×10¹⁷	TF
g₁₈	19990311131809.30	114.66	41.13	33	M_S5.2	295	65	-9	5.90×10¹⁶	SS
g₁₉	19991101132516.50	113.98	39.90	10	M_S5.3	122	72	-7	9.14×10¹⁶	SS
g₂₀	20000111234356.50	122.99	40.50	10	M_S4.7	27	43	-178	4.93×10¹⁶	U
g₂₁	20130420232129.50	124.45	35.16	10	M_b4.8	25	81	-178	2.09×10¹⁶	SS
g₂₂	20130422091156.80	122.33	42.86	27	M_b5.0	313	65	11	3.74×10¹⁶	SS
g₂₃	20130517220225.80	124.53	37.63	10	M_b4.8	287	74	-5	3.13×10¹⁶	SS
g₂₄	20140331194836.40	124.46	36.94	18	M_S5.0	236	49	-138	2.29×10¹⁶	NF
注：NF, NS, TF, TS, SS, U代表震源机制不同类型，见表 1.

下载: 导出CSV

表附表 3

1937—1975年华北地区利用初动方法计算得到的强震震源机制解以及利用CAP方法得到的2006年文安地震震源机制解

Table 附表 3.

Focal mechanisms of the North China strong earthquake between 1937 to 1975 obtained by first motion method, and focal mechanism of 2006 Wen′an earthquake that obtained by CAP method

编号	时间/北京时	经度/(°E)	纬度/(°N)	深度/km	震级	走向/(°)	倾角/(°)	滑动角/(°)	类型
c₁	19750204193606	122.9	40.65	12	M_S7.3	110.23	80.58	-15.36	SS
c₂	19370801	115.3	35.2	地壳内	M_S7.0	99.29	69.61	-8.28	SS
c₃	19660308	114.9	37.4	10	M_S6.8	293.84	80.24	15.73	SS
c₄	19660322	115.1	37.5	9	M_S6.7	194.64	85.18	159.33	SS
c₅	19660322	115.1	37.5	9	M_S7.2	281.65	86.5	5	SS
c₆	19660326	115.3	37.6	17	M_S6.2	271.16	71.13	-63.33	NF
c₇	19660329	114.9	37.5	25	M_S6.0	227.78	72.18	140.59	TS
c₈	19670327	116.5	38.5	30	M_S6.3	107.66	85.33	29.53	SS
c₉	19690728	119.4	38.2	35	M_S7.4	20.14	80.85	169.32	SS
c₁₀	200607041156	116.28	38.898	15	M_S5.1	210	80	-150	SS
注：NF, NS, TF, TS, SS, U代表震源机制不同类型，见表 1.

下载: 导出CSV

表 4

研究区内震源机制分类结果(包含本研究，以及GCMT，中国地震局资料)

Table 4.

Classification of focal mechanism solutions in the research area (including the data of GCMT, CEA, and this research)

NF	NS	TF	TS	SS	U
211	45	83	19	162	86
34.8%	7.4%	13.7%	3.1%	26.7%	14.2%
注：NF, NS, TF, TS, SS, U代表震源机制的不同类型，见表 1.

下载: 导出CSV

表 5

分区内2010年1月—2014年6月中小地震及1937年以来研究区强震震源机制统计结果

Table 5.

Statistics of focal mechanism solutions in each zone for small and moderate earthquakes from Jan. 2010 to Jun. 2014 and major earthquakes since 1937

区域名称及分区编号		震源机制类型						子分区内地震总数
区域名称及分区编号		NF	NS	SS	TF	TS	U	子分区内地震总数
张家口渤海地震带	a	11	1	15	13	2	13	55
	b	0	0	1	0	0	0	1
	c	28	8	21	13	3	12	85
	d	5	1	11	1	1	0	19
	e	11	1	9	1	0	2	24
山西断陷带	f	38	6	26	5	1	6	82
山西断陷带	g	54	7	7	15	2	19	104
唐山—河间—磁县地震带	h	6	3	20	8	5	7	49
	i	2	0	4	1	0	0	7
		滦县—宁河段与张家口渤海段C区重合，故在此略去
辽宁区域	j	4	0	3	6	1	1	15
	k	41	13	35	13	2	19	123
	l	2	1	4	1	1	1	10
注：NF, NS, TF, S, SS, U代表震源机制的不同类型，见表 1.

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(177)

	Balakina L M, Savarensky E F, Vvedenskaya A V. 1961. On determination of earthquake mechanism. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 4:211-238. doi: 10.1016/0079-1946(61)90006-4
	Bassin C, Laske G, Masters G. 2000. The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America. EOS, 81:F897. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256197686_The_current...
	Chen W P, Nábelek J. 1988. Seismogenic strike-slip faulting and the development of the North China Basin. Tectonics, 7(5):975-989. doi: 10.1029/TC007i005p00975 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47279708_Seismic_strike...
	Chu Q Z, Wang L M. 1994. The correlation of tectonic stress field and fault slip rate with strong earthquakes in North China. North China Earthquake Sciences (in Chinese), 12(1):9-20. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HDKD401.001.htm
	Data Management Centre of China National Seismic Network. 2007. Waveform data of China National Seismic Network:Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, doi:10.11998/SeisDmc/SN, http://www.seisdmc.ac.cn.
	Deng Q D, You H C. 1985. Mechanism and structural activity of Ordos basin.//Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration. Study on the Modern Crustal Movement (1) (in Chinese). Beijing:Seismological Press, 58-78.
	Diao G L, Yu L M, Ning J Y, et al. 1993. The body breaking characteristic of Datong earthquake swarm at 1989. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (Acta Geophysica Sinica) (in Chinese), 36(3):360-368. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=3778323
	Diao G L, Hu X L, Zhang X, et al. 2007. Analysis on the interaction between the focal fault of Hongtong and Linfen earthquake and its earthquake tendency. North China Earthquake Sciences (in Chinese), 25(2):1-4. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11589-010-0756-0
	Dong F F, Deng H, Hu R, et al. 2016. Study on source location and focal mechanism of Ruichang-Yangxin magnitude 4.6 earthquake sequence. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics (in Chinese), 36(12):1047-1051. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-JDXG201307008.htm
	Dong R S, Ren G Q, Ran H L. 1998. The prediction and restudy to the Zhangbei-Shangyi earthquake by using seismicity analysis. Seismology and Geology (in Chinese), 20(2):122-130. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296152939_The_prediction...
	Dreger D, Helmberger D. 1991. Source parameters of the Sierra Madre earthquake from regional and local body waves. Geophys. Res. Lett., 18(11):2015-2018. doi: 10.1029/91GL02366 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247593816_Source...
	Dreger D S, Helmberger D V. 1990. Broadband modeling of local earthquakes. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 80(5):1162-1179. https://www.mendeley.com/research-papers/broadband-modeling-local-earthquakes/
	Dreger D S, Helmberger D V. 1993. Determination of source parameters at regional distances with three-component sparse network data. J. Geophys. Res., 98(B5):8107-8125. doi: 10.1029/93JB00023 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Don_Helmberger/publication/...
	Fang Y, Zhang J. 2009. Study of the segmentary activities in the Zhangjiakou-Bohai fault system. Earthquake (in Chinese), 29(3):136-140. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298502619_Study_of_the...
	Fu W Z, Yang B J, Liu C, et al. 1998. Study on the seismology in Manzhouli-Suifenhe geoscience transect of China. Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology (in Chinese), 28(2):206-212. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284482826_Synthesized...
	Gao Y, Wu J, Yi G X, et al. 2010. Crust-mantle coupling in North China:Preliminary analysis from seismic anisotropy. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(31):3599-3605. doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-4135-y https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11434-010-4135-y
	Gao Z W. 2001. A study on characteristics of earthquake geology of the Zhangjiakou-Penglai Fault zone[Ph. D. thesis] (in Chinese). Beijing:Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration.
	Gu H D, Chen Y T, Gao X L, et al. 1976. Focal mechanism of Haicheng, Liaoning province, earthquake of February 4, 1975. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (Acta Geophysica Sinica) (in Chinese), 19(4):270-285. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX197604005.htm
	Guo X Y. 2014. Small and moderate earthquakes focal mechanism solutions measurement and its application in earthquake tendency analysis[Master's thesis] (in Chinese). Beijing:Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration.
	Han K Y. 2009. Research on the segmentation and seismic activity characteristics of Zhangjiakou-Bohai structural zone[Master's thesis] (in Chinese). Beijing:Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration.
	Han X F, Yang Y Q. 2012. Characteristics of focal mechanisms in Bohai Sea and its adjacent areas. South China Journal of Seismology (in Chinese), 32(3):53-59. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HNDI201203007.htm
	Han Z J, Xu J, Ran Y K, et al. 2003. Active blocks and strong seismic activity in North China region. Science in China (Series D), 46(S):153-167. https://rd.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1360/03dz0012.pdf
	Hardebeck J L, Shearer P M. 2002. A new method for determining first-motion focal mechanisms. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 92(6):2264-2276. doi: 10.1785/0120010200 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228766056_A_New_Method...
	Hardebeck J L, Shearer P M. 2003. Using S/P amplitude ratios to constrain the focal mechanisms of small earthquakes. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 93(6):2434-2444. doi: 10.1785/0120020236 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242447070_Using_SP...
	Hu X P, Cui X F. 2013. Study on earthquake relocation and tectonic stress field in Central North China. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention (in Chinese), 8(4):351-360. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11589-010-0735-5.pdf
	Huang J P, Ni S D, Fu R S, et al. 2009. Source mechanism of the 2006 M_W5.1 Wen'an earthquake determined from a joint inversion of local and teleseismic broadband waveform data. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 52(1):120-130. doi: 10.1002/cjg2.v52.1
	Jiang W L, Zhang Y L. 1997. Characteristics of NW trending surface fractures of strong earthquakes and activity of the Holocene faults of the Boundary of North China Plain. Earthquake Research in China (in Chinese), 13(2):263-270. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1360/03yd0073
	Kisslinger C. 1980. Evaluation of S to P amplitude rations for determining focal mechanisms from regional network observations. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 70(4):999-1014. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-abstract/70/4/999/118034/evaluation-of-s-to-p-amplitude-rations-for?redirectedFrom=fulltext
	Lan C X, Xing C Q, Miao C L, et al. 2005. The focal mechanism solutions and their characteristics for moderate and small earthquakes in Capital Area in recent years. North China Earthquake Sciences (in Chinese), 23(4):21-25. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-HDKD200504004.htm
	Li D S, Li W J, Wang Y R, et al. 2016. Seismic moment tensor inversion of 2014 Zhuolu M4.3 earthquake. North China Earthquake Sciences (in Chinese), 34(1):36-40. http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~resnik/temp/ne_wikipedia/wikilex...
	Li L, Song M Q, Liu S Z, et al. 2015. Spatial-temporal characteristics of the consistency parameter of focal mechanisms in Shanxi Area. Earthquake (in Chinese), 35(2):43-50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282954887_Spatial...
	Li Q Z, Jin Y M, Yu X C. 1982. Focal mechanisms and crustal stress field in North China. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 4(1):55-61. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB198201005.htm
	Li W J, Wang P D, Chen Q F. 2006. Moment tensor inversion of focal mechanism for the aftershock sequence of 1982 Lulong M_S6.1 earthquake. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 28(2):111-118. http://www.academia.edu/4124870/Regional_moment_tensor_inversion_for...
	Liang S H, Li Y M, Shu P Y, et al. 1984. On the determining of source parameters of small earthquakes by using amplitude ratios of [AKP-] and [AKS-] from regional network observations. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (Acta Geophysica Sinica) (in Chinese), 27(3):249-257. http://www.geophy.cn/CN/abstract/abstract5116.shtml
	Liaoning Geological Survey Brigade. 1989. Regional Geology of Liaoning Province (in Chinese). Beijing:Geological Publishing House.
	Lin X D, Ge H K, Xu P, et al. 2013. Near field full waveform inversion:Lushan magnitude 7.0 earthquake and its aftershock moment tensor. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 56(12):4037-4047, doi:10.6038/cjg20131209. http://manu39.magtech.com.cn/Geophy/EN/Y2013/V56/I12/4037
	Luo Y. 2010. Source parameters study of small to moderate earthquakes[Ph. D. thesis] (in Chinese). Hefei:University of Science and Technology of China.
	Luo Z L, Li J M, Li X J, et al. 2005. Discussion on the formation, evolution and problems of the Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition) (in Chinese), 35(6):699-706. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285795063_Discussion_on...
	Lü R, Dong C L, Liu S Z, et al. 2014. Focal mechanism solutions of earthquakes with M_L ≥ 3.0 in Shanxi province. Earthquake Research in Shanxi (in Chinese), (3):1-4, 16. http://www.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/94190/5/9789240691865_eng.epub
	Ma S Q, Li L D, Yue X X. 2001. Researches on earthquake focus mechanism in Tianjin and nearby during 1999~2000. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research (in Chinese), 22(3):17-22. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02893469.pdf
	Minson S E, Dreger D S. 2008. Stable inversions for complete moment tensors. Geophys. J. Int., 174(2):585-592, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03797.x. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/174/2/585/567235/Stable...
	Nakamura M. 2002. Determination of focal mechanism solution using initial motion polarity of P and S waves. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 130(1-2):17-29. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9201(01)00306-5 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031920101003065
	Qu J H, Liu R F, Li J, et al. 2014. Inversion of the focal mechanisms of the 2014 M4.2 and M4.0 earthquakes in Rushan, Shandong using the CAP method. China Earthquake Engineering Journal (in Chinese), 36(4):1076-1080. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=zbdz201404051&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	Shan C L, Li Y H, Li X, et al. 2007. Characteristics of the focal mechanism for parts of moderate and small earthquakes in Shandong and its neighboring region. North China Earthquake Sciences (in Chinese), 25(4):27-30, 41. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_hbdzkx200704005.aspx
	Sheng S Z, Wan Y G, Huang J C, et al. 2015. Present tectonic stress field in the Circum-Ordos region deduced from composite focal mechanism method. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 58(2):436-452, doi:10.6038/cjg20150208. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279292583_Present...
	Snoke J A. 1990. Clyde and the Gopher:a preliminary analysis of the 12 May 1990 Sakhalin Island event. Seism. Res. Lett., 61:161. http://www.geophys.geos.vt.edu/snoke/publications.html
	Snoke J A. 2009. Traveltime tables for iasp91 and ak135. Seism. Res. Lett., 80(2):260-262. doi: 10.1785/gssrl.80.2.260 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242097116_Traveltime...
	Song M Q, Zheng Y, Ge C, et al. 2012. Relocation of small to moderate earthquakes in Shanxi province and its relation to the seismogenic structures. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 55(2):513-515, doi:10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.02.014. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279296994_Relocation_of...
	Song M Q, Li H Y, Han L B, et al. 2013. Focal mechanism of the M_S4.6 Yangqu earthquake of June 5, 2010, determined from the CAP method. China Earthquake Engineering Journal (in Chinese), 35(3):692-697. https://ar.scribd.com/document/183035022/Domestic-May-2010-PDF
	Sun G C, Guo X Y, Ma L J. 2015. Focal mechanism solution characteristics of moderate and small earthquakes in North-central Shanxi seismic belt. North China Earthquake Sciences (in Chinese), 33(1):52-56. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11589-008-0573-x.pdf
	Sun Q, Li S Y. 2015. Stress filed inversion in Puyang area using focal mechanism solutions of small earthquakes. North China Earthquake Sciences (in Chinese), 33(4):14-19. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-HDKD201504003.htm
	Tang F T. 2003. A study on the characteristics of recent tectonic deformation and earthquake activity in North China[Ph. D. thesis] (in Chinese). Beijing:Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration.
	The Research Group on Active Fault System around Ordos Massif, SSB. 1988. Active Fault System around Ordos Massif (in Chinese). Beijing:Seismological Press.
	Wan G M, Tang L J, Jin W Z, et al. 2009. Progresses and problems in the study of Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone. Geological Review (in Chinese), 55(2):251-259. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283993038_Progresses_and...
	Wang H J, Liu B H, Li X S. 2011. Activity of the faults in the southern part of Bohai Sea since the Late Pleistocene. Advances in Earth Science (in Chinese), 26(5):556-564. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201105013.htm
	Wang T, Bai Y. 2010. Fault plane solution to Tangshan earthquake area based on the data of small earthquakes around Beijing. Journal of Institute of Disaster Prevention (in Chinese), 12(3):69-73. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-FZJS201003015.htm
	Wang X S, Diao G L, Feng X D, et al. 2011. Dynamic images of stress field during genesis and occurrence of the 2006 Wen'an earthquake. Journal of Seismological Research (in Chinese), 34(3):266-270. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZYJ201103003.htm
	Wu M J, Lin X D, Xu P. 2011. Analysis of focal mechanism and tectonic stress field features in northern part of North China. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics (in Chinese), 31(5):39-43. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DKXB201105008.htm
	Xu J, Niu L F, Wang C H, et al. 1996. Tangshan-Hejian-Cixian newly-generated seismotectonic zone. Seismology and Geology (in Chinese), 18(3):193-198. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293385884_Tangshan-Hejian...
	Xu J, Dong R S, Wang R B, et al. 1998. The report of newly generated seismotectonic zones and regional seismotectonic structure of North China (in Chinese). Beijing:Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration.
	Xu J, Song C Q, Gao Z W, et al. 1999. The preliminary analysis of newly generated seismotectonic zones and regional seismotectonic structure of North China.//Ma Z J, Yang Z E, Wu Z W eds. (in Chinese).Beijing:Seismological Press, 252-257.
	Xu J S, Yuan J R, Gao S J, et al. 1999. Research on the present tectonic stress field in North China with GPS observations. Crustal Deformation and Earthquake (in Chinese), 19(2):81-89. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DKXB902.011.htm
	Xu L S, Jiang C S, Chen Y T, et al. 2007. Moment tensor inversion of the 2004 small-moderate size earthquakes in the capital region. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 29(3):229-239. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11589-007-0243-4
	Xu X W, Cheng G L, Ma X Y, et al. 1994. Rotation model and dynamics of blocks in North China and its adjacent areas. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences (in Chinese), 19(2):129-138. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX199402000.htm
	Xu X W, Wu W M, Zhang X K, et al. 2002. Crust Newly Tectonic Deformation and Earthquake in Capital Zone (in Chinese). Beijing:Science Press.
	Xu Y, Wang S, Meng X C. 2016. Tomographic evidence of the Tan-Lu fault zone in the Bohai Sea of eastern China. Chinese Science Bulletin (in Chinese), 61(8):891-900. http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-KXTB201608013.htm
	Xu Z H, Yan M, Zhao Z H. 1983. Evaluation of the direction of tectonic stress in North China from recorded data of a large number of small earthquakes. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 5(3):268-279. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB198303001.htm
	Xu Z H. 2001. A present-day tectonic stress map for eastern Asia region. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 23(5):492-501. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dzxy200105004&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	Xu J. 1986. The relationship between seismic activity and extensional structures of the rift basin in North China Plain[Ph. D. thesis] (in Chinese). Beijing:Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration.
	Yan J G, Wang L B, Sun Q. 2008. Focal mechanism characteristics of small and medium earthquakes in border area of Shanxi, Hebei, Shandong and Henan. Earthquake Research in Shanxi (in Chinese), (4):1-6, 35. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_sxdz200804001.aspx
	Ye H, Zhang W Y. 1980. The characteristics of intraplate earthquake faults in North China and their relationship to the dynamical processes in earth's crust and uppermost mantle. Seismology and Geology (in Chinese), 2(1):27-38. https://rd.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00410-004-0558-2.pdf
	Yu C Q, Tao K, Cui X F, et al. 2009. P-wave first-motion focal mechanism solutions and their quality evaluation. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 52(5):1402-1411, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2009.05.030.
	Zhang H Y, Xie F R, Cui X F, et al. 2009. Research on heterogeneity of the present tectonic stress field at the overland part of the Zhangjiakou-Bohai fault zone. Earthquake Research in China (in Chinese), 25(3):314-324. http://doi.wanfangdata.com.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2009.03.010
	Zhang H Z, Diao G L, Zhao Y P, et al. 2004. The focal mechanisms of earthquakes before and after Zhangbei main event in the area. Seismological Research of Northeast China (in Chinese), 20(3):1-7. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DDYJ200403001.htm
	Zhang H Z, Diao G L, Zhao Y P, et al. 2007. Recent focal mechanism in Xingtai region. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics (in Chinese), 27(6):91-95. http://www.oalib.com/paper/1553270
	Zhang H Z, Diao G L, Chen Q F, et al. 2008. Focal mechanism analysis of the recent earthquakes in Tangshan seismic region of M7.6 in 1976. Journal of Seismological Research (in Chinese), 31(1):1-6. http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZYJ200801002.htm
	Zhang P, Jiang X Q. 2000. Study of focal mechanism solutions and stress field characteristics in Liaoning region. Seismological Research of Northeast China (in Chinese), 16(1):1-7. http://en.cnki.com.cn/article_en/cjfdtotal-ddyj200001000.htm
	Zhang P, Yu L W, Li Y, et al. 2003a. An analysis on the focal mechanism solutions of small earthquakes and the record characteristics before the Xiuyan-Haicheng earthquake of 5.4. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research (in Chinese), 24(1):29-38. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DZGJ200301004.htm
	Zhang P, Yu L W, Li A M, et al. 2003b. Aftershock focal mechanism of Xiuyan-Haicheng M_S5.4 earthquake. Seismological Research of Northeast China (in Chinese), 19(2):28-35. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DDYJ200302004.htm
	Zhang P, Wang L S, Zhong K, et al. 2007. Research on the segmentation of Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone. Geological Review (in Chinese), 53(5):586-591. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DZLP200705001.htm
	Zhang P, Jiao M R, Li F, et al. 2011. Focal mechanism solution analysis of M_L ≥ 4.0 earthquakes in Northeast China. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research (in Chinese), 32(5):9-14. http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DZGJ201105002.htm
	Zhang P Z, Wang Q, Ma Z J. 2002. GPS velocity field and active crustal blocks of contemporary tectonic deformation in continental China. Earth Science Frontiers (in Chinese), 9(2):430-441. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200202034.htm
	Zhang P Z, Deng Q D, Zhang Z Q, et al. 2013. Active faults, earthquake hazards and associated geodynamic processes in continental China. Scientia Sinica Terrae (in Chinese), 43(10):1607-1620. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306204410_Active_faults...
	Zhang W Y, Li Y H, Ma F C, et al. 1981. On the mechanical mechanism of the formation of graben. Scientia Geologica Sinica (in Chinese), (1):1-11. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX198101000.htm
	Zhang X K, Zhu Z P, Zhang C K, et al. 1998. Crust and upper mantle structure of the Zhangjiakou-Bohai seismic zone.//Institute of Geology, CSB eds. Research on Active Fault (6) (in Chinese). Beijing:Seismological Press, 11-16.
	Zhang Y G, Wang Y Z, Yin B J, et al. 2013. The Tangshan M_S4.8 earthquake on May 28, 2012 in Hebei Province. Earthquake Research in China (in Chinese), 29(2):219-229. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZD201302007.htm
	Zhang Y M, Wang L M. 1980. The Meso-Cenozoic tectonic characteristics and its dynamic problems of Huabei block.//The Formation and Develop of Huabei Block (in Chinese). Beijing:Science Press, 170-178.
	Zhang Z L, Li Q Z, Gu J C, et al. 1980. The fracture processes of the Tangshan earthquake and its mechanical analysis. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 2(2):111-129. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB198002000.htm
	Zheng J C, Zhao J H, Wang P, et al. 2012. Focal mechanism inversion of the Puyang M_L4.2 earthquake on 15 January 2010. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research (in Chinese), 33(5-6):18-23. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/178/1/303/644403/Seismo...
	Zheng J C, Li D M, Wang P, et al. 2015a. A preliminary discussion on the focal mechanism and seismic tectonic feature of the 2013 Laizhou M4.6 earthquake sequence. Seismology and Geology (in Chinese), 37(2):384-398. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ201502004.htm
	Zheng J C, Lin M, Wang P, et al. 2015b. Error analysis for focal mechanisms from CAP method inversion:An example of 2 moderate earthquakes in Jiaodong Peninsula. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 58(2):453-462, doi:10.6038/cjg20150209. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279292584_Error_analysis...
	Zheng X F, Ouyang B, Zhang D N, et al. 2009. Technical system construction of Data Backup Centre for China Seismograph Network and the data support to researches on the Wenchuan earthquake. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 52(5):1412-1417, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2009.05.031.
	Zhou C Y, Hua A J, Jiang H K, et al. 2003. Focal mechanism solutions obtained by grid points test method for contemporary moderate and small earthquakes in Shandong area. Seismological Research of Northeast China (in Chinese), 19(1):1-11. http://doi.wanfangdata.com.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8565.2003.01.001
	Zhu A L, Diao G L, Zhang S C, et al. 1999. Three-dimensional characteristic of focus faults of the two earthquakes at Datong Yanggao in 1989 and 1991. Earthquake Research in Shanxi (in Chinese), (3-4):15-20. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SXDZ199201004.htm
	Zhu L P, Helmberger D V. 1996. Advancement in source estimation techniques using broadband regional seismograms. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86(5):1634-1641. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.482.6036
	Zoback M L. 1992. First-and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere:The world stress map project. J. Geophys. Res., 97(B8):11703-11728. doi: 10.1029/92JB00132 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.456.330
	楚全芝, 汪良谋. 1994.华北地区构造应力场、断层滑动速率与强震的关系.华北地震科学, 12(l):9-20. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=hdkd401.001&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	邓起东, 尤惠川. 1985. 鄂尔多斯周缘断陷盆地带的构造活动特征及其形成机制. //国家地震局地质研究所. 现代地壳运动研究(1). 北京: 地震出版社, 58-78.
	刁桂苓, 于利民, 宁杰远等. 1993. 1989年大同震群的体破裂特征.地球物理学报, 36(3):360-368. http://www.geophy.cn/CN/abstract/abstract4408.shtml
	刁桂苓, 胡新亮, 张骁等. 2007.洪洞临汾大震震源断层的相互作用和地震趋势分析.华北地震科学, 25(2):1-4. http://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/9b6a9ac576eeaeaad1f330a8.html
	董非非, 邓辉, 胡睿等. 2016.瑞昌-阳新4.6级地震序列震源位置及震源机制研究.大地测量与地球动力学, 36(12):1047-1051. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dkxb201612003&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	董瑞树, 任国强, 冉洪流. 1998.利用地震活动性分析对张北-尚义地震进行预测与震后反思.地震地质, 20(2):122-130. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dzdz802.006&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	方颖, 张晶. 2009.张家口-渤海断裂带分段活动性研究.地震, 29(3):136-140. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/92280X/200903/31077172.html
	傅维洲, 杨宝俊, 刘财等. 1998.中国满洲里-绥芬河地学断面地震学研究.长春科技大学学报, 28(2):206-212. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=ccdz802.016&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	高原, 吴晶, 易桂喜等. 2010.从壳幔地震各向异性初探华北地区壳幔耦合关系.科学通报, 55(29):2837-2843. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=kxtb201029009&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	高战武. 2001. 张家口-蓬莱断裂带地震地质特征研究[博士论文]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所.http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Thesis/Y400991
	顾浩鼎, 陈运泰, 高祥林等. 1976. 1975年2月4日辽宁省海城地震的震源机制.地球物理学报, 19(4):270-285. http://www.geophy.cn/CN/abstract/abstract5496.shtml
	国家测震台网数据备份中心. 2007. 国家测震台网地震波形数据. 北京: 中国地震局地球物理研究所, doi: 10. 11998/SeisDmc/SN, http://www.seisdmc.ac.cn.
	国家地震局《鄂尔多斯周缘活动断裂系》课题组. 1988.鄂尔多斯周缘活动断裂系.北京:地震出版社.
	郭祥云. 2014. 中小地震震源机制解的测定及其在地震趋势分析中的应用[硕士论文]. 北京: 中国地震局地球物理研究所.http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/article/cdmd-85401-1014405977.htm
	韩孔艳. 2009. 张家口-渤海构造带的分段性与地震活动特征研究[硕士论文]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所.http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-85402-2009251658.htm
	韩晓飞, 杨雅琼. 2012.渤海及其邻区震源机制解特征.华南地震, 32(3):53-59. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96488X/201203/43943858.html
	韩竹军, 徐杰, 冉勇康等. 2003.华北地区活动地块与强震活动.中国科学(D辑), 33(增刊), 108-117. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=jdxk2003s1011&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	胡幸平, 崔效锋. 2013.华北地区中部地震精定位与构造应力场研究.震害防御技术, 8(4):351-360. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/88497X/201304/48691702.html
	黄建平, 倪四道, 傅容珊等. 2009.综合近震及远震波形反演2006文安地震(M_W5.1)的震源机制解.地球物理学报, 52(1):120-130. http://www.geophy.cn/CN/abstract/abstract878.shtml
	江娃利, 张英礼. 1997.华北平原周边北西向强震地表地震断层及全新世断裂活动特征.中国地震, 13(2):263-270. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95750X/199703/2627136.html
	兰从欣, 邢成起, 苗春兰等. 2005.近年首都圈地区中小地震震源机制解及其特征分析.华北地震科学, 23(4):21-25. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96861X/200504/20876963.html
	李冬圣, 李文军, 王艳荣等. 2016. 2014年河北涿鹿M4.3地震矩张量反演.华北地震科学, 34(1):36-40. http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~resnik/temp/ne_wikipedia/wikilex...
	李丽, 宋美琴, 刘素珍等. 2015.山西地区震源机制一致性参数时空特征分析.地震, 35(2):43-50. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/92280X/201502/664426866.html
	李钦祖, 靳雅敏, 于新昌. 1982.华北地区的震源机制与地壳应力场.地震学报, 4(1):55-61. http://www.doc88.com/p-1418081190452.html
	李文军, 王培德, 陈棋福. 2006. 1982年卢龙M_S6.1地震余震序列震源机制的矩张量反演.地震学报, 28(2):111-118. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dzxb200602000&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	梁尚鸿, 李幼铭, 束沛镒等. 1984.利用区域地震台网波振幅比资料测定小震震源参数.地球物理学报, 27(3):249-257. http://www.geophy.cn/CN/abstract/abstract5116.shtml
	辽宁省地质矿产局. 1989.辽宁省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社.
	林向东, 葛洪魁, 徐平等. 2013.近场全波形反演:芦山7.0级地震及余震矩张量解.地球物理学报, 56(12):4037-4047, doi:10.6038/cjg20131209. http://www.geophy.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9991.shtml
	罗艳. 2010. 中小地震震源参数研究[博士论文]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学.http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10358-2010133346.htm
	罗志立, 李景明, 李小军等. 2005.试论郯城-庐江断裂带形成、演化及问题.吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 35(6):699-706. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/dl/Detail/Periodical?id=...
	吕睿, 董春丽, 刘素珍等. 2014.山西地区M_L ≥ 3.0地震震源机制解研究.山西地震, (3):1-4, 16. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=sxdz201403001&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	马淑芹, 栗连弟, 岳秀霞. 2001.天津及邻区1999~2000年地震震源机制研究.地震地磁观测与研究, 22(3):17-22. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96509X/200103/5259515.html
	曲均浩, 刘瑞峰, 李金等. 2014. CAP方法反演2014年山东乳山M4.2、M4.0地震震源机制解.地震工程学报, 36(4):1076-1080. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=zbdz201404051&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	山长仑, 李永红, 李霞等. 2007.山东及附近区域部分中小地震震源机制特征分析.华北地震科学, 25(4):27-30, 41. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/dl/Detail/Periodical?id=...
	盛书中, 万永革, 黄冀超等. 2015.应用综合震源机制解法推断鄂尔多斯块体周缘现今地壳应力场的初步结果.地球物理学报, 58(2):436-452, doi:10.6038/cjg20150208. http://www.geophy.cn/CN/abstract/abstract11246.shtml
	宋美琴, 郑勇, 葛粲等. 2012.山西地震带中小震精确位置及其显示的山西地震构造特征.地球物理学报, 55(2):513-525, doi:10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.02.014. http://www.geophy.cn/CN/abstract/abstract8425.shtml
	宋美琴, 李华玥, 韩立波等. 2013.用CAP方法反演2010年6月5日山西阳曲M_S4.6地震震源机制.地震工程学报, 35(3):692-697. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=zbdz201303046&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	孙贵成, 郭祥云, 马利军. 2015.山西带中北部地区中小地震震源机制解特征.华北地震科学, 33(1):52-56. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96861X/201501/665036842.html
	孙晴, 李守勇. 2015.利用小震震源机制解反演濮阳地区应力场.华北地震科学, 33(4):14-19. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=hdkd201504003&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	唐方头. 2003. 华北地块近期构造变形和强震活动特征研究[博士论文]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所.http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-85402-2004096207.htm
	万桂梅, 汤良杰, 金文正等. 2009.郯庐断裂带研究进展及存在问题探讨.地质论评, 55(2):251-259. http://www.docin.com/p-450105352.html
	王洪聚, 刘保华, 李西双. 2011.晚更新世以来渤海南部海域断裂活动性.地球科学进展, 26(5):556-564. http://www.adearth.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract8750.shtml
	王婷, 白玉. 2010.利用首都圈小震资料求解唐山震区震源机制解.防灾科技学院报, 12(3):69-73. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=fzjs201003015&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	王晓山, 刁桂苓, 冯向东等. 2011. 2006年文安地震孕育、发生的应力场动态图像.地震研究, 34(3):266-270. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZYJ201103003.htm
	武敏捷, 林向东, 徐平. 2011.华北北部地区震源机制解及构造应力场特征分析.大地测量与地球动力学, 31(5):39-43. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95685A/201105/39680229.html
	徐杰. 1986. 华北平原新生代裂陷区的伸展构造及与地震活动的关系[博士论文]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所.
	徐杰, 牛娈芳, 王春华等. 1996.唐山-河间-磁县新生地震构造带.地震地质, 18(3):193-198. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/DZDZ603.000.htm
	徐杰, 董瑞树, 王若柏等. 1998. 华北地区新生地震构造带和区域地震构造格局研究结题报告. 北京: 中国地震局地质所.
	徐杰, 宋长青, 高战武等. 1999. 华北地区新生地震构造带和区域地震构造格局的初步研究. //马宗晋, 杨主恩, 吴正文. 构造地质学-岩石圈动力学研究进展. 北京: 地震出版社, 252-257.
	徐菊生, 袁金荣, 高士钧等. 1999.利用GPS观测结果研究华北地区现今构造应力场.地壳形变与地震, 19(2):81-89. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dkxb902.011&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	许力生, 蒋长胜, 陈运泰等. 2007. 2004年首都圈地区中小地震的矩张量反演.地震学报, 29(3):229-239. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/93548X/200703/24552138.html
	徐锡伟, 程国良, 马信垣等. 1994.华北及其邻区块体转动模式和动力来源.地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 19(2):129-138. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX199402000.htm
	徐锡伟, 吴卫民, 张先康等. 2002.首都圈地区地壳最新构造变动与地震.北京:科学出版社.
	胥颐, 汪晟, 孟晓春. 2016.渤海海域郯庐断裂带的地震层析成像特征.科学通报, 61(8):891-900. http://csb.scichina.com:8080/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?...
	许忠淮, 阎明, 赵仲和. 1983.由多个小地震推断的华北地区构造应力场的方向.地震学报, 5(3):268-279. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dzxb198303001&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	许忠淮. 2001.东亚地区现今构造应力图的编制.地震学报, 23(5):492-501. http://www.oalib.com/references/19014525
	闫俊岗, 王利兵, 孙晴. 2008.晋冀鲁豫相邻地区中小地震震源机制特征分析.山西地震, (4):1-6, 35. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_sxdz200804001.aspx
	叶洪, 张文郁. 1980.初论华北板内地震断层特征及其与地壳、上地幔动力学过程的关系.地震地质, 2(1):27-38. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dzdz198001005&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	俞春泉, 陶开, 崔效锋等. 2009.用格点尝试法求解P波初动震源机制解及解的质量评价.地球物理学报, 52(5):1402-1411, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2009.05.030. http://www.geophy.cn/CN/abstract/abstract1036.shtml
	张红艳, 谢富仁, 崔效锋等. 2009.张渤带陆地段现代构造应力场的非均匀特征.中国地震, 25(3):314-324. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=zgzd200903009&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	张宏志, 刁桂苓, 赵英萍等. 2004.张北地区震前、震时和震后的震源机制.东北地震研究, 20(3):1-7. http://doi.wanfangdata.com.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8565.2004.03.001
	张宏志, 刁桂苓, 赵英萍等. 2007.邢台地区近年的震源机制.大地测量与地球动力学, 27(6):91-95. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95685A/200706/26071332.html
	张宏志, 刁桂苓, 陈祺福等. 2008. 1976年唐山7.8级地震震区现今地震震源机制分析.地震研究, 31(1):1-6. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/92537X/200801/26508428.html
	张萍, 蒋秀琴. 2000.辽宁地区震源机制解及应力场特征的研究.东北地震研究, 16(1):1-7. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=ddyj200001000&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	张萍, 于龙伟, 李涯等. 2003a.岫岩-海城5.4级地震前小震震源机制解与记录特征分析.地震地磁观测与研究, 24(1):29-38. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dzgj200301004&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	张萍, 于龙伟, 李爱民等. 2003b.岫岩-海城M_S5.4地震余震震源机制研究.东北地震研究, 19(2):28-35. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=ddyj200302004&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	张鹏, 王良书, 钟锴等. 2007.郯庐断裂带的分段性研究.地质论评, 53(5):586-591. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dzlp200705001&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	张萍, 焦明若, 李芳等. 2011.东北地区M_L ≥ 4.0地震震源机制特征分析.地震地磁观测与研究, 32(5):9-14. http://engine.scichina.com/doi/10.1360/N972015-00602
	张培震, 王琪, 马宗晋. 2002.中国大陆现今构造运动的GPS速度场与活动地块.地学前缘, 9(2):430-441. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dxqy200202034&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	张培震, 邓起东, 张竹琪等. 2013.中国大陆的活动断裂、地震灾害及其动力过程.中国科学:地球科学, 43(10):1607-1620. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=jdxk201310005&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	张文佑, 李荫槐, 马福臣等. 1981.地堑形成的力学机制.地质科学, (1):1-11. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dzkx198101000&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	张先康, 祝治平, 张成科等. 1998. 张家口-渤海地震带及其两侧地壳上地幔构造与速度结构研究. //国家地震局地质研究所. 活动断裂研究(6). 北京: 地震出版社, 11-16.http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-ZGDW199610001227.htm
	张跃刚, 王玉珍, 尹宝军等. 2013. 2012年5月28日河北省唐山4.8级地震.中国地震, 29(2):219-229. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=zgzd201302007&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	张裕明, 汪良谋. 1980. 华北断块区中、新生代构造特征及其动力学问题. //中国科学院地质研究所, 国家地震局地质研究所. 华北断块区的形成与发展. 北京: 科学出版社, 170-178.
	张之立, 李钦祖, 谷继成等. 1980.唐山地震的破裂过程及其力学分析.地震学报, 2(2):111-129. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dzxb198002000&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	郑建常, 赵金花, 王鹏等. 2012. 2010年1月15日濮阳4.2级地震震源机制反演.地震地磁观测与研究, 33(5-6):18-23. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dzgj2012z2006&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	郑建常, 李冬梅, 王鹏等. 2015a. 2013年莱州M4.6地震序列震源机制与发震构造初探.地震地质, 37(2):384-398. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dzdz201502004&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	郑建常, 林眉, 王鹏等. 2015b. CAP方法反演震源机制的误差分析:以胶东半岛两次显著中等地震为例.地球物理学报, 58(2):453-462, doi:10.6038/cjg20150209. http://www.geophy.cn/CN/abstract/abstract11247.shtml
	郑秀芬, 欧阳飚, 张东宁等. 2009. "国家数字测震台网数据备份中心"技术系统建设及其对汶川大地震研究的数据支撑.地球物理学报, 52(5):1412-1417, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2009.05.031. http://www.geophy.cn/CN/abstract/abstract1034.shtml
	周翠英, 华爱军, 蒋海昆等. 2003.以格点尝试法求取的山东地区现代中小地震震源机制解.东北地震研究, 19(1):1-11. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=ddyj200301001&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
	朱艾斓, 刁桂苓, 张四昌等. 1999. 1989年和1991年大同-阳高两次地震震源断层的三维特征.山西地震, (3-4):15-20. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=sxdz1999z1002&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ