鲁甸MS6.5地震前地震活动性分析及川滇东边界中部未来地震危险性研究

刘月; 田勤俭; 吕晓健; 邵志刚; 李文巧

doi:10.6038/cjg20160912

鲁甸MS6.5地震前地震活动性分析及川滇东边界中部未来地震危险性研究

- 中国地震局地震预测研究所, 中国地震局地震预测重点实验室, 北京 100036

详细信息

作者简介:
刘月,女,博士,助理研究员,主要从事脆性介质破坏、地震力学与地震活动性等研究.E-mail:liuyue@cea-ies.ac.cn

中图分类号: P315

收稿日期: 2015-09-01

修回日期: 2016-05-06

上线日期: 2016-09-05

Analysis of the seismicity changes prior to the MS6.5 Ludian earthquake and study on the potential strong-earthquake risk for the middle part of eastern boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan

- Institute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100036, China

Received Date: 01 September 2015

Revised Date: 06 May 2016

Available Online: 05 September 2016

摘要

摘要: 本文努力探索地震活动性定量化前兆的检测方法，针对Region-Time-Length（RTL）算法在空间异常分析中的不足，根据新提出的综合衡量区域地震活动水平的物理参数——RTL面积分（IRTL），定量分析了2014年鲁甸MS6.5地震前地震活动时空变化，并与2012年彝良MS 5.7、5.6地震作了对比，研究结果显示这些地震前都检测到地震活动增强.彝良地震前地震活动增强异常主要分布在则木河断裂和昭通-莲峰断裂带西段的交汇区，鲁甸地震前异常主要分布在昭通-莲峰断裂带、马边断裂带及周边地区.以上地震活动增强异常区的IRTL随时间呈现由小变大，至峰值后回落的特征.彝良地震和鲁甸地震均发生于IRTL峰值后数月，这表明IRTL峰值对地震发生可能有一定的指示意义.鲁甸地震后，对周边地区地震活动跟踪研究检测到地震活动增强现象，且自2015年IRTL呈上升趋势，目前IRTL值已超过鲁甸地震前的峰值水平，也许更强的地震正在孕育，所以川滇交界东边界中部仍存在发生强震的可能.以上研究为我们认识鲁甸地震的孕震过程和地震前兆研究提供了新的认识.
- RTL算法 /
- RTL面积分 /
- 鲁甸地震 /
- 地震危险性分析
Abstract: For lacking physical parameters to analyze space anomalies of seismic activity which detected by Region-Time-Length (RTL) algorithm, an effort to explore the precursory parameter for quantifying seismic activity in space was conducted. The RTL algorithm and the new physical parameter-surface integral of RTL (IRTL), which could synthetically evaluate the space-time changes of seismicity in a region, were applied to analyze the seismicity changes prior to the 2014 Ludian MS 6.5 earthquake and the 2012 Yiliang MS5.7, MS5.6 earthquakes. An enhancement of seismic activity was detected prior to the above earthquakes. Space anomalies mainly distributed in Zemuhe fault and west part of Zhaotong-Lianfeng fault prior to Yiliang earthquakes. Before Ludian earthquake, anomalies were detected in Zhaotong-Lianfeng fault, Mabian fault and surrounding areas. The parameter IRTL of anomalous region changed from small to large, after reaching its peak value, then reduced. Several months after the peak points, Yiliang and Ludian earthquakes occurred. IRTL may be an indicator for earthquake occurrence. After Ludian earthquake, an enhancement of seismic activity was detected in the middle part of eastern boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan, and IRTL was increasing since January 2015. Now, the value of IRTL was larger than the peak value prior to Ludian earthquake. Perhaps a stronger earthquake may be preparing in the middle part of the eastern boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan in the future. The above studies may provide some new evidence for better understanding the seismogenic process of Ludian earthquake and earthquake precursors.
- Region-Time-Length (RTL) /
- Surface integral of RTL /
- Ludian Earthquake /
- Seismic risk analysis

HTML全文

参考文献(58)

[1]	AkiK. 1965. Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula logN=a-bM and its confidence limits. Bull. Earth. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 43(2):237-239. Chen C C, Wu Y X. 2006. An improved region-time-length algorithm applied to the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake. Geophys. J. Int., 166(3):1144-1148.
[2]	Chen S, Wang Q H, Wang Q S, et al. 2014. The 3D density structure and gravity change of Ludian M_S6.5 Yunnanepicenter and surrounding regions. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(9):3080-390, doi:10.6038/cjg20140933.
[3]	Gardonio B, Marsan D, Lengliné O, et al. 2015. Changesin seismicity and stress loading on subduction faults in the Kanto region, Japan, 2011-2014. J. Geophys. Res.:Solid Earth, 120(4):2616-2626.
[4]	Gentili S. 2010. Distribution of seismicity before the larger earthquakes in Italy in the time interval 1994-2004. Pure Appl. Geophys., 167(8-9):933-958.
[5]	Guo Z J, Qin B Y. 1991. Causes of Earthquakes and Earthquake Prediction (in Chinese). Beijing:Seismological Press, 177-178.
[6]	Gutenberg B, Richter C F. 1944. Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., 34(4):185-188.
[7]	He X H, Ni S D, Liu J. 2015. Rupture directivity of the August 3rd, 2014 Ludian earthquake (Yunnan, China). Science China:Earth Sciences, 58(5):795-804.
[8]	Huang Q H, Sobolev G A, Nagao T. 2001. Characteristics of the seismic quiescence and activation patterns before the M=7.2 Kobe earthquake, January 17, 1995. Tectonophysics, 337(1-2):99-116.
[9]	Huang Q H, Öncel A O, Sobolev G A. 2002. Precursory seismicity changes associated with the M_W=7.4 1999 August 17 Izmit (Turkey) earthquake. Geophys. J. Int., 151(1):235-242.
[10]	Huang Q H. 2008. Seismicity changes prior to the M_S8.0Wenchuan earthquake in Sichuan, China. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35(23), doi:10.1029/2008GL036270.
[11]	Ishibe T, Satake K, Sakai S, et al. 2015. Correlation between Coulomb stress imparted by the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake and seismicity rate change in Kanto, Japan. Geophys. J. Int., 201(1):112-134.
[12]	Jiang C S, Wu Z L. 2011. Intermediate-term medium-rangeaccelerating moment release (AMR) priori to the 2010 Yushu M_S7.1 earthquake. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 54(6):1501-1510, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.06.009.
[13]	Jiang H K, Hou H F, Zhou H P, et al. 2004a. Region-time-length algorithm and its application to the study of intermediate-short term earthquake precursor in North China. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 26(2):151-161.
[14]	Jiang H K, Hou H F, Zhou H P, et al. 2004b. Application study on Region-Time-Length algorithm for the site judgment of coming moderately strong earthquakes in North China area. Earthquake (in Chinese), 24(4):17-26.
[15]	Keilis-Borok V I, Knopoff L, Rotyain I M. 1980. Bursts of aftershocks, long-term precursors of strong earthquakes. Nature, 283(5744):259-263.
[16]	Li M F. 2002. Study on models & approaches and some associated theories of rapid internet service of earthquake loss estimation[Ph. D. thesis] (in Chinese). Beijing:Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration.
[17]	Liu C L, Zheng Y, Xiong X, et al. 2014. Rupture process of M_S6.5 Ludian earthquake constrained by regional broadband seismograms.Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(9):3028-3037, doi:10.6038/cjg20140927.
[18]	Liu P X, Lü X J. 2012. On foreshock identification and short-term predictability of the 2010 Yushu M_S7.1 earthquake. Earthquake (in Chinese), 32(3):47-51.
[19]	Liu Y, Lü X J, Tian Q J. 2016. Seismicity changes prior to the M_S7.0 Lushan earthquake and the application of regional seismic activity parameter I_RTL. Earth Science Frontiers (in Chinese),http://epub.cnki.net/KNS/brief/result.aspx?dbprefix=CJFQ.
[20]	Lü J, Zheng X F, Xiao J, et al. 2013. Rupture characteristics and seismogenic structures of the M_S5.7 and M_S5.6 Yiliang earthquakes of Sep.7, 2012. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 56(8):2645-2654, doi:10.6038/cjg20130814.
[21]	Mei X P, Liu X F. 2013. Retrospective test on application of region-time-length algorithm to monitoring moderate earthquakes inGansu province and its surrounding areas. Northwestern Seismological Journal (in Chinese), 35(S1):61-66.
[22]	Mogi K. 1979. Two kinds of seismic gaps. Pure Appl. Geophys., 117(6):1172-1186.
[23]	Ogata Y, Imoto M, Katsura K. 1991. 3-D spatial variation of b-values of magnitude-frequency distribution beneath the Kanto district, Japan. Geophys. J. Int., 104(1):135-146.
[24]	Sobolev G A, Tyupkin Y S. 1997. Low-seismicity precursors of large earthquakes in Kamchatka. Volc. Seismol., 18(4):433-446.
[25]	Sobolev G A, Tyupkin Y S. 1999. Precursory phases, seismicity precursors, and earthquake prediction in Kamchatka. Volc. Seismol., 20(6):615-627.
[26]	Wang W L, Wu J P, Fang L H, et al. 2014. Double difference location of the Ludian M_S6.5 earthquake sequences in Yunnan province in 2014. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(9):3042-3051, doi:10.6038/cjg20140929.
[27]	Wen X Z, Fan J, Yi G X, et al. 2008. A seismic gap on the Anninghe fault in western Sichuan, China. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 51(10):1375-1387.
[28]	Wen X Z, Du F, Yi G X, et al. 2013. Earthquake potential of the Zhaotong and Lianfeng fault zones of the eastern Sichuan-Yunnan border region. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 56(10):3361-3372, doi:10.6038/cjg20131012.
[29]	Wiemer S, Wyss M. 2000. Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs:examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan. Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., 90(4):859-869.
[30]	Xu L S, Zhang X, Yan C, et al. 2014. Analysis of the Love waves for the source complexity of the Ludian M_S6.5 earthquake. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(9):3006-3017, doi:10.6038/cjg20140925.
[31]	Xu T, Zhang M H, Tian X B, et al. 2014. Upper crustal velocity of Lijiang-Qingzhen profile and its relationship with the seismogenicenvironment of the M_S6.5 Ludian earthquake. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(9):3069-3079, doi:10.6038/cjg20140932.
[32]	Xu X W, Jiang G Y, Yu G H, et al. 2014. Discussion on seismogenic fault of the Ludian M_S6.5 earthquake and its tectonic attribution. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese),57(9):3060-3068, doi:10.6038/cjg20140931.
[33]	Yi G X, Wen X Z, Su Y J. 2008. Study on the potential strong-earthquake risk for the eastern boundary of the Sichuan-Yunnan active faulted-block, China. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 51(6):1719-1725.
[34]	Zhang G M, Ma H S, Wang H, et al. 2005. Boundaries between active-tectonic blocks and strong earthquakes in the China mainland. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 48(3):602-610.
[35]	Zhang G W, Lei J S, Liang S S, et al. 2014. Relocations and focal mechanism solutions of the 3 August 2014 Ludian, Yunnan M_S6.5 earthquake sequence. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(9):3018-3027, doi:10.6038/cjg20140926.
[36]	Zhang Y, Chen Y T, Xu L S, et al. 2015. The 2014 M_w6.1 Ludian, Yunnan, earthquake:A complex conjugated ruptured earthquake. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 58(1):153-162, doi:10.6038/cjg20150113.
[37]	陈石, 王青华, 王谦身等. 2014. 云南鲁甸M_S6.5地震震源区和周边三维密度结构及重力场变化. 地球物理学报, 57(9):3080-390, doi:10.6038/cjg20140933.
[38]	郭增建, 秦保燕. 1991. 地震成因和地震预报. 北京:地震出版社, 177-178.
[39]	何骁慧, 倪四道, 刘杰. 2015. 2014年8月3日云南鲁甸M6.5地震破裂方向性研究. 中国科学:地球科学, 45(3):253-263.
[40]	蒋长胜, 吴忠良. 2011. 2010 年玉树M_S7.1地震前的中长期加速矩释放(AMR)问题. 地球物理学报, 54(6):1501-1510, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.06.009.
[41]	蒋海昆, 侯海峰, 周焕鹏等. 2004a. "区域-时间-长度算法"及其在华北中强地震中短期前兆特征研究中的应用. 地震学报, 26(2):151-161.
[42]	蒋海昆, 侯海峰, 周焕鹏等. 2004b. "区域-时间-长度算法"在华北地区中强地震地点判定中的应用研究. 地震, 24(4):17-26.
[43]	李闽峰. 2002. 震害预测快速服务平台的模型与方法及一些相关理论的研究[博士论文]. 北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所.
[44]	刘成利, 郑勇, 熊熊等. 2014. 利用区域宽频带数据反演鲁甸M_S6.5级地震震源破裂过程. 地球物理学报, 57(9):3028-3037, doi:10.6038/cjg20140927.
[45]	刘蒲雄, 吕晓健. 2012. 2010年青海玉树7.1级地震的前震识别及短临预报可能性研究. 地震, 32(3):47-51.
[46]	刘月, 吕晓健, 田勤俭. 2016. 芦山M_S7.0地震前地震活动性分析及区域地震活动水平参数I_RTL的应用. 地学前缘, http://epub.cnki.net/KNS/brief/result.aspx?dbprefix=CJFQ.
[47]	吕坚, 郑秀芬, 肖健等. 2013. 2012年9月7日云南彝良M_S5.7、M_S5.6地震震源破裂特征与发震构造研究. 地球物理学报, 56(8):2645-2654, doi:10.6038/cjg20130814.
[48]	梅秀苹, 刘小凤. 2013. "区域-时间-长度算法"用于甘肃及邻近地区中强地震预测的回溯性检验. 西北地震学报, 35(S1):61-66.
[49]	王未来, 吴建平, 房立华等. 2014. 2014年云南鲁甸M_S6.5地震序列的双差定位. 地球物理学报, 57(9):3042-3051, doi:10.6038/cjg20140929.
[50]	闻学泽, 范军, 易桂喜等. 2008. 川西安宁河断裂上的地震空区. 中国科学, 38(7):797-807.
[51]	闻学泽, 杜方, 易桂喜等. 2013. 川滇交界东段昭通、莲峰断裂带的地震危险背景. 地球物理学报, 56(10):3361-3372, doi:10.6038/cjg20131012.
[52]	许力生, 张旭, 严川等. 2014. 基于勒夫波的鲁甸M_S6.5地震震源复杂性分析. 地球物理学报, 57(9):3006-3017, doi:10.6038/cjg20140925.
[53]	徐涛, 张明辉, 田小波等. 2014. 丽江-清镇剖面上地壳速度结构及其与鲁甸M_S6.5级地震孕震环境的关系. 地球物理学报, 57(9):3069-3079, doi:10.6038/cjg20140932.
[54]	徐锡伟, 江国焰, 于贵华等. 2014. 鲁甸6.5级地震发震断层判定及其构造属性讨论. 地球物理学报, 57(9):3060-3068, doi:10.6038/cjg20140931.
[55]	易桂喜, 闻学泽, 苏有锦. 2008. 川滇活动地块东边界强震危险性研究. 地球物理学报, 51(6):1719-1725.
[56]	张国民, 马宏生, 王辉等. 2005. 中国大陆活动地块边界带与强震活动. 地球物理学报, 48(3):602-610.
[57]	张广伟, 雷建设, 梁姗姗等. 2014. 2014年8月3日云南鲁甸M_S6.5级地震序列重定位与震源机制研究. 地球物理学报, 57(9):3018-3027, doi:10.6038/cjg20140926.
[58]	张勇, 陈运泰, 许力生等. 2015. 2014年云南鲁甸M_W6.1地震:一次共轭破裂地震. 地球物理学报, 58(1):153-162, doi:10.6038/cjg20150113.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 1689
PDF下载数: 2772
施引文献: 0

鲁甸MS6.5地震前地震活动性分析及川滇东边界中部未来地震危险性研究

作者简介: 刘月,女,博士,助理研究员,主要从事脆性介质破坏、地震力学与地震活动性等研究.E-mail:liuyue@cea-ies.ac.cn

Analysis of the seismicity changes prior to the MS6.5 Ludian earthquake and study on the potential strong-earthquake risk for the middle part of eastern boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan

计量

出版历程

目录

作者简介:
刘月,女,博士,助理研究员,主要从事脆性介质破坏、地震力学与地震活动性等研究.E-mail:liuyue@cea-ies.ac.cn