Random noise of seismic exploration in desert modeling and its applying in noise attenuation
-
摘要: 随机噪声是影响地震勘探有效信号的主要因素,其存在大大降低了地震记录的信噪比.在噪声压制方法不断被改进的同时,对随机噪声特性进行研究,了解噪声的产生机制是对其进行压制的先决条件,目前对噪声的研究主要是特性研究以寻找规律性,对其进行定性定量的分析还比较少.本文根据塔里木沙漠地区实际采集环境,考虑到噪声的连续性给计算带来的不便,假设各类噪声源以点源的形式分布在检波器周围,依据相应理论确定各类噪声源的源函数,其激发的噪声经由波动方程传播,将随机噪声作为各类噪声源共同作用的综合波场,建立随机噪声的理论模型.通过分析不同种噪声对地震记录的影响,选取合适的滤波方法对其进行压制,实验结果表明,通过建立沙漠地区随机噪声的理论模型,为选择有效的滤波方法,提高地震记录信噪比起到理论指导作用.Abstract: Random noise is one of key factors which influence valid signals of seismic exploration, and it weakens the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of seismic records seriously. It is the first request to study noise characteristics and generation while filtering methods are improved continuously. At this stage noise characteristics research emphasizes searching its regularity, but much less qualitative and quantitative analysis. In this paper, seismic random noise is classified into natural noise and cultural noise according to the reason that noise is generated. Considering convenience to the calculation, it is assumed that different kinds of noise sources are distributed around the geophones as point sources in their areas appointed. The noise source functions are decided according to the corresponding theories, experience and references. It is assumed that their excitation waves propagate by wave equation and seismic random noise is considered as a superposed wave-field excited by all of the source. The theoretical model of random noise is obtained by solving the non-homogeneous wave equations with different source functions and superposing all of the solutions. #br#The characteristics of different kinds of noise in the seismic records can be shown through modeling random noise. A simulated noise record is compared with a section of field seismic data in the desert in Tarim, including spectral feature, kurtosis, skewness, root-mean-square, etc. From the comparative results, it can be seen the simulated noise is similar with the real noise, which shows the feasibility of the modeling method.#br#The appropriate filtering method is chosen for noise attenuation according to analyzing all kinds of noise characteristics in seismic records. In the desert, near-field cultural noise is the key component of random noise, based on which, complex diffusion filtering is selected, and the filtered results including the artificial synthetic and actual seismic records are compared with the results of time frequency peak filtering which is a popular method in seismic random noise attenuation in recent years. The comparative results show that complex diffusion filtering is more suitable for the random noise in Tarim, which demonstrates that seismic random noise modeling can provide theoretical guidance to choosing appropriate filtering method.
-
Key words:
- Seismic exploration random noise /
- Wave equation /
- Noise modeling /
- Noise attenuation
-
[1] Asten M W. 1978. Geological control on the three-component spectra of Rayleigh-wave microseisms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 68(6):1623-1636.
[2] Asten M W, Henstridge J D. 1984. Array estimators and the use of microseisms for reconnaissance of sedimentary basins. Geophysics, 49(11):1828-1837.
[3] Barajas-Olade C, Ramadan A. 2011. Is it possible to conduct seismic wind noise experiments in a wind tunnel?.//Presented at the 73rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC. Vienna, Austria, 238.
[4] Boashash B, Mesbah M. 2004. Signal enhancement by time-frequency peak filtering. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 52(4):929-937.
[5] Bonnefoy-Claudet S, Cotton F, Brad P Y. 2006a. The nature of noise wavefield and its applications for site effects studies:a literature review. Earth-Science Reviews, 79(3-4):205-227.
[6] Bonnefoy-Claudet S, Cotton F, Brad P Y, et al. 2006b. H/V ratio:a tool for site effects evaluation. Results from 1-D noise simulations. Geophys. J. Int., 167(2):827-837.
[7] Buckingham M J. 1981. Spatial coherence of wind-generated noise in a shallow ocean channel. J. Acoust. Coc. Am., 70(5):1412-1420.
[8] Бреховских Л М. 1974. Ocean Acoustics. Underwater sound laboratory, Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Trans. 1980. Beijing:Science Press, 59-96.
[9] Chen X H, Mou Y G. 1996. 2-dimensional nonlinear wave equation inversion of seismic data. Acta Geophysica Sinica (in Chinese), 39(3):401-408.
[10] Cron B F, Sherman C H. 1962. Spatial-correlation functions for various noise models. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 34(11):1732-1736.
[11] Davenport A G. 1961. The spectrum of horizontal gustiness near the ground in high winds. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 87(372):194-211.
[12] Gao J H, He Y Y, Ma Y C. 2012. Comparison of the Rayleigh wave in elastic and viscoelastic media. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 55(1):207-218.
[13] Gilboa G, Sochen N, Zeevi Y Y. 2004. Image enhancement and denoising by complex diffusion processes. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 26(8):1020-1036.
[14] Guo X Y, Li F, Tie G P, et al. 2014. Overview of ocean ambient noise and application prospects. Physics (in Chinese), (11):723-731.
[15] Gutenberg B. 1958. Microseisms. Advances in Geophysics, 5:53-92.
[16] Hamson R M. 1985. The theoretical responses of vertical and horizontal line arrays to wind-induced noise in shallow water. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 78(5):1702-1712.
[17] Jin L, Li Y, Yang B J. 2005. Reduction of Random noise for seismic data by time frequency peak filtering. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 20(3):724-728.
[18] Kuperman W A, Ingenito F. 1980. Spatial correlation of surface generated noise in a stratified ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 67(6):1988-1996.
[19] Li Y, Lin H B, Yang B J, et al. 2009. The influence of limited linearization of time window on TFPT under the strong noise background. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 52(7):1899-1906,doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2009.07.025.
[20] Lin H B. 2007. Time-frequency peak filtering de-noise technique and its application in seismic exploration[Ph. D. thesis] (in Chinese). Changchun:Jilin University.
[21] Lin H B, Li Y, Yang B J. 2007. Recovery of seismic events by time-frequency peak filtering.//Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process. San Antonio, TX:IEEE, 5:V-441-V-444.
[22] Lin H B, Li Y, Xu X C. 2011. Segmenting time-frequency peak filtering method to attenuation of seismic random noise. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 54(5):1358-1366,doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.05.025.
[23] Lin J H, Li X J, Chang D Q, et al. 2001. A model of wind-generated ocean ambient noise. Technique Acoustic (in Chinese), 20(S1):67-69.
[24] Lin J H. 2002. Theoretical model of wind-generated ocean ambient noise [Ph. D. thesis] (in Chinese). Beijing:Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
[25] McNamara D E, Buland R P. 2004. Ambient noise levels in the Continental United States. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 94(4):1517-1527.
[26] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China (MOHURD). 2012. Load Code for the Design of Building Structures GB 50009-2012. Beijing:China Building Industry Press.
[27] Osher S, Rudin L I. 1990. Feature-oriented image enhancement using shock filters. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 27(4):919-940.
[28] Pang W D, Yang R H, Zheng D C, et al. 2012. Deconvolution method research on extracting green's function from the ambient-noise in the frequent earthquake region. Journal of Seismological Research (in Chinese), 35(1):29-36.
[29] Ritzwoller M H, 2009.Ambient noise seismic imaging. Recent Development in World Seismology, 9(31):315-328.
[30] Perkins J S, Kuperman W A, Ingenito F, et al. 1985. Modeling ambient noise in three-dimensional ocean environments. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 93(3):739-752.
[31] Shinozaka M, Jan C M. 1972. Digital simulation of random processes and its applications. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 25(1):111-128.
[32] Sorrells G G, McDonald J A, Der Z A, et al. 1971. Earth motion caused by local atmospheric pressure changes. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 26(1-4):83-98.
[33] Wen W, Miao F. 2012. Complex field of donlinear diffusion methods in image processing. Microelectronics & Computer (in Chinese), 29(6):57-60.
[34] Yan S, Zheng W. 2005. Wind load simulation by superposition of harmonic. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University (Natural Science) (in Chinese), 21(1):1-4.
[35] Yi X J, Lin J H, Yuan Q L. 2005. Model of wind-generated ocean ambient noise. Technique Acoustic (in Chinese), (8):153-156.
[36] Zhu L B, Wang Q D. 2011. An expression of the cross-correlation of ambient seismic noise:a derivation based on the surface-wave theory. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 54(7):1835-1841,doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.07.017.
[37] Ritzwoller M H. 2009. 利用背景噪声进行地震成像. 左玉玲 译. 国际地震动态, (9):15-20.
[38] 布列霍夫斯基. 1974. 海洋声学. 中国科学院声学研究所水声研究室译. 1980. 北京:科学出版社, 59-96.
[39] 陈小宏, 牟永光. 1996. 二维地震资料波动方程非线性反演. 地球物理学报, 39(3):401-408.
[40] 高静怀, 何洋洋, 马逸尘. 2012. 黏弹性与弹性介质中Rayleigh面波特性对比研究. 地球物理学报, 55(1):207-218.
[41] 郭新毅, 李凡, 铁广朋等. 2014. 海洋环境噪声研究发展概述及应用前景. 物理, (11):723-731.
[42] 金雷, 李月, 杨宝俊. 2005. 用时频峰值滤波方法消减地震勘探资料中随机噪声的初步研究. 地球物理学进展, 20(3):724-728.
[43] 李月, 林红波, 杨宝俊等. 2009. 强随机噪声条件下时窗类型局部线性化对TFPF技术的影响. 地球物理学报, 52(7):1899-1906, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2009.07.025.
[44] 林红波. 2007. 时频峰值滤波随机噪声消减技术及其在地震勘探中的应用[博士论文]. 长春:吉林大学.
[45] 林红波, 李月, 徐学纯. 2011. 压制地震勘探随机噪声的分段时频峰值滤波方法. 地球物理学报, 54(5):1358-1366,doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.05.025.
[46] 林建恒, 李学军, 常道庆等. 2001. 风动海洋环境噪声模型. 声学技术, 20(增刊):67-69.
[47] 林建恒. 2002. 风关海洋环境噪声理论模型[博士论文]. 北京:中国科学院声学研究所.
[48] 庞卫东, 杨润海, 郑定昌等. 2012. 地震频发区域背景噪声提取格林函数的反褶积方法研究. 地震研究, 35(1):29-36.
[49] 文武, 苗放. 2012. 复数域非线性扩散滤波在图像处理中的应用. 微电子学与计算机, 29(6):57-60.
[50] 阎石, 郑伟. 2005. 简谐波叠加法模拟风谱. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 21(1):1-4.
[51] 衣雪娟, 林建恒, 苑泉乐. 2005. 风关海洋环境噪声模型及预报结果. 声学技术, (8):153-156.
[52] 朱良保, 王清东. 2011. 地震背景噪声互相关函数的面波理论表达形式. 地球物理学报, 54(7):1835-1841,doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.07.017.
计量
- 文章访问数: 1830
- PDF下载数: 2462
- 施引文献: 0