Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Volume: 15 Issue: 1 February 2017 - Supplement - 1

FULL TEXT

Infections After Renal Transplant in Recipients With Familial Mediterranean Fever:
A Life-Threatening Issue

Objectives: We evaluated long-term results and infections requiring hospitalization in kidney trans­plant patients with Familial Mediterranean Fever (associated amyloidosis-type).

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with familial Mediterranean fever with at least 1-year posttransplant follow-up. Kidney transplant recipients with primary glomer­ulonephritis and equivalent demography, immunity status, and follow-up comprised the control group.

Results: In 32 patients with familial Mediterranean fever versus 25 control patients (mean follow-up 82 ± 57 vs 79 ± 54 mo; P = .82), average serum creatinine values were 1.7 ± 0.9 versus 1.5 ± 1.0 mg/dL (P = .41) at discharge, 1.4 ± 0.4 versus 1.3 ± 0.5 mg/dL (P = .44) at 1 year, 1.4 ± 0.6 versus 1.3 ± 0.5 mg/dL (P = .63) at 3 years, and 2.0 ± 1.5 versus 2.1 ± 1.5 mg/dL (P = .92) at last follow-up. Groups were not statistically different regarding average inpatient and number of hospitalizations due to infections at 1 year; however, at last follow-up, 26 patients with familial Mediterranean fever (81%) had 8.6 average admissions and 13 control patients (52%) had 2.8 average admissions (P = .02, P < .01). Early posttransplant, both groups were taking a triple drug immunosuppression regimen. However, at 1 and 3 years posttransplant, withdrawal and/or minimization occurred in 40.6% and 83.3% of patients with familial Mediterranean fever and 28% and 55.5% of control patients (P < .05, P < .05). During follow-up, 6 familial Mediterranean fever patients (18.7%) and 2 control patients (8%) died (P = .23).

Conclusions: Although renal transplant patients with associated amyloidosis-type familial Mediterranean fever and those with glomerulonephritis have similar rejection and/or graft loss rates, hospital admissions due to infection and increased mortality are more common in the familial Mediterranean fever group, with immunosup­pression drug withdrawal or switch­ing due to infection more often required.


Key words : Kidney transplant, Mortality

Introduction

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an auto­inflammatory disease with autosomal recessive transition, principally affecting people with Mediterranean heritage. An ongoing subclinical inflammation and associated amyloidosis (AA type) are the most important complications of FMF.1,2 Amyloidosis most commonly involves the kidney, and the gradually developing renal failure is associated with poor outcomes.1-3

Kidney transplant is an important option for patients with FMF-AA-induced end-stage renal disease. In these patients, posttransplant lethal infections and recurrence of amyloidosis with cardiac involvement are serious complications.4,5 The pathogenesis of infections in renal transplant patients with FMF is not known exactly. However, it is postulated that mutations in the Mediterranean fever MEFV gene, by simultaneously reducing the ability of pyrin to control interleukin 1β activation, may lead to inflammation.6-8 So far, no studies in the literature have focused on infections after renal transplant and associated immunosuppressive drug regimens in FMF patients.

The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of infections requiring hospitalization together with the associated immunosuppressive drug protocols and to evaluate long-term graft and patient survival in renal transplant recipients with FMF.

Materials and Methods

Medical records of patients (from June 1999 to June 2015) with FMF-AA who received a kidney transplant at our center and who had at least 1-year follow-up after transplant were analyzed retrospectively. Kidney transplant recipients with primary glomerulonephritis and with similar demographics, immunologic profile, and follow-up constituted the control group. The definition and categorization of infections were based on the US Centers for Disease Control/National Healthcare Safety Network Surveillance Definitions for Specific Types of Infections.9

Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software for Windows (SPSS: An IBM Company, version 15.0, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Means and standard deviations of all values were calculated. Mean values of the 2 groups were compared by t test or by a nonparametric test if the data were not normally distributed. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The study group included 32 patients with FMF and the control group consisted of 25 kidney transplant patients with primary glomerulonephritis.

In the FMF group versus the control group, average patient age was 39 ± 12 versus 40 ± 11 years (P = .92), with female-to-male ratio of 53% versus 56% (P = .86) and mean follow-up of 82 ± 57 months (range, 12-200 mo) versus 79 ± 54 months (range, 12-180 mo) (P = .82). The percentages of those who received deceased- or living-donor donations and the incidence of delayed graft function in both groups were also similar (Table 1).

Of the study patients, 87% of those with FMF and 84% of control patients received induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (P = .74). The maintenance immunosuppression therapy for all patients in both groups was a triple drug regimen. The number of patients who received calcineurin inhibitor or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based triple immunosuppression therapy was 25 versus 7 in the FMF group and 18 versus 7 (P = .60) in the control group. The choice of antiproliferative agent was azathioprine for 8 patients (25%) with FMF and for 6 patients (24%) in the control group. The remaining patients in both groups received either mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolic acid.

There were no statistically significant differences between serum creatinine values and rejection rates for the 2 groups (Table 1). The numbers of patients with an infection episode and hospitalization due to infection in the first year were 19 patients (59.3%) with an average of 1.94 times in the FMF group and 9 patients (36%) with an average of 1.8 times in the control group (P = .153, P = .283). In the third year, these rates increased to 22 patients (68.7 %) with an average of 6.1 times versus 9 patients (36%) with an average of 2.5 times in the FMF versus control group (P = .01, P < .01). This difference was more pronounced at last follow-up, reaching to 26 patients (81%) versus 13 patients (52%) and average of 8.6 times versus 2.8 times in the FMF versus control group (P = .02, P < .01).

In the FMF versus control group, the number of patients with upper and lower respiratory tract infections and urinary tract infection were 9 (48%), 5 (26%), and 5 (26%) versus 4 (45%), 2 (22%), and 3 (33%). In addition, esofagial candidiasis was present in 1 patient with FMF and cytomegalovirus disease was diagnosed in 1 patient in the control group.

Although all of the patients in both groups initially received a triple immunosuppressive regimen, percentages of patients who continued this protocol at 1 and 3 years posttransplant were at 81% and 56% in the FMF group and 88% and 79% in the control group (P = .27, P = .09).

Immunosuppresive drug dose modifications at 1 and 3 years posttransplant occurred in 27% and 73.3% of patients in the FMF group and 22.7% and 40% of patients in the control group (P < .05, P < .05). Immunosuppressive drug withdrawal and/or mini­mization at 1 and 3 years posttransplant occurred in 40.6% and 83.3% of patients in the FMF group and in 28% and 55.5% of patients in the control group (P < .05 and P < .05).

During follow-up, 6 patients (18.7%) died and 3 patients (9.3%) returned to dialysis in the FMF group and 2 patients (8%) died and 4 patients (16%) have required hemodialysis in the control group (P = .56, P = .23). In the FMF group, the cause of death was infection in 3 patients, cerebral malignant tumor and gastrointestinal bleeding each in 1 patient, and unidentified in 1 patient.

Discussion

In this study, increased hospitalization rates due to infections and the importance of associated com­pli­cations were reported in kidney transplant recipients with FMF-AA. Indeed, within the average 7-year follow-up, the rate of hospitalization due to infection progressively increased to 81% in patients with FMF but remained at 52% in the control group (P = .02). More importantly, neither significant modifications in the applied doses of the immunosuppressive drugs nor immunosuppresive drug withdrawal at 1 and 3 years posttransplant caused reductions in the incidence of infections. Although not statistically significant, the infection episodes in our series resulted with increased mortality in the FMF group (18.7% vs 8%). In the literature, there are many studies with different primary outcome measures that have identified infection as the most important cause of death after transplant in patients with FMF. In 3 different studies, severe sepsis was responsible for 60% to 100% of all deaths with a functioning graft in kidney recipients with FMF or systemic amyloidosis.10-12 In addition, as also shown in our study, in some series infection-related deaths were frequently observed late after transplant, indicating the effects of long-term exposure to immuno­suppression rather than intense immunosuppression during the early phase posttransplant.12,13

In Turkey, kidney transplant procedures for the treatment of end-stage renal failure due to FMF-AA began in 1985.14 Investigations about the best treatment modality in FMF-AA patients revealed the superiority of kidney transplant to hemodialysis, and this has increased the number of organ transplants in the subsequent years. In addition, even patients with amyloid recurrence after transplant had better long-term survival rates than patients who continued hemodialysis.10 In many studies, graft and patient survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years after transplant were similar in patients with FMF and other end-stage kidney disease causes, and graft outcome rates at 1 and 10 years have been reported as over 90% and 70% in all series without exception.4,11-13,15 In our series, within the average 7-year follow-up, graft survival (censored for death) was over 90%.

Today, an organ transplant is the best treatment for patients with FMF-AA-induced kidney failure. Although kidney transplant patients with FMF and those with primary glomerulonephritis have similar rejection and/or graft loss rates, hospital admissions due to infection and associated mortality are more frequent in the FMF group. Therefore, close moni­toring and modification of maintenance immuno­suppression must always be considered in transplant patients with FMF to prevent infections and associated death.


References:

  1. Lachmann HJ, Goodman HJ, Gilbertson JA, et al. Natural history and outcome in systemic AA amyloidosis. New Engl J Med. 2007;356(23):2361-2371.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  2. Zadeh N, Getzug T, Grody WW. Diagnosis and management of familial Mediterranean fever: integrating medical genetics in a dedicated interdisciplinary clinic. Genet Med. 2011;13(3):263-269.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  3. Sarı İ, Birlik M, Kasifoğlu T. Familial Mediterranean fever: An updated review. Eur J Rheum. 2014;1(1):21-33.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  4. Keven K, Sengul S, Kutlay S, et al. Long-term outcome of renal transplantation in patients with familial Mediterranean fever amyloidosis: a single-center experience. Transplant Proc. 2004;36(9):2632-2634.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  5. Kofman T, Grimbert P, Canouï-Poitrine F, et al. Renal transplantation in patients with AA amyloidosis nephropathy: results from a French multicenter study. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(11):2423-2431.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  6. Bonyadi M, Esmaeili M, Jalali H, et al. MEFV mutations in Iranian Azeri Turkish patients with familial Mediterranean fever. Clin Gen. 2009;76(5):477-480.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  7. Guz G, Kanbay M, Ozturk AM. Current perspectives on familial Mediterranean fever. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2009;22(3):309-315.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  8. Yesilada E, Taskapan H, Gulbay G. Prevalence of known mutations and a novel missense mutation (M694K) in the MEFV gene in a population from the Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. Gene. 2012;511(2):371-374.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  9. US Centers for Disease Control. CDC/NHSN surveillance definitions for specific types of infections. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/17pscNosInfDef_current.pdf. January 2016. Accessed January 17, 2017.
  10. Ozdemir BH, Ozdemir FN, Sezer S, Sar A, Haberal M. Among therapy modalities of end-stage renal disease, renal transplantation improves survival in patients with amyloidosis. Transplant Proc. 2006;38(2):432-434.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  11. Hartmann A, Holdaas H, Fauchald P, et al. Fifteen years’ experience with renal transplantation in systemic amyloidosis. Transpl Int. 1992;5(1):15-18.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  12. Altindal M, Turkmen E, Yildirim T, et al. Kidney transplantation for end-stage renal disease secondary to familial Mediterranean fever. Clin Tranplant. 2016;30(7):787-790.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  13. Erdem E, Karatas A, Kaya C, et al. Renal transplantation in patients with familial Mediterranean fever. Clin Rheum. 2012;31(8):1183–1186.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  14. Kiliçturgay S, Haberal M. Transplantation for renal amyloidosis. Renal Fail. 1993;15(5):629-633.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  15. Sherif AM, Refaie AF, Sobh MA, Mohamed NA, Sheashaa HA, Ghoneim MA. Long-term outcome of live donor kidney transplantation for renal amyloidosis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(2):370-375.
    CrossRef - PubMed



Volume : 15
Issue : 1
Pages : 240 - 243
DOI : 10.6002/ect.mesot2016.P113


PDF VIEW [197] KB.

From the 1Department of Nephrology, the 2Department of General Surgery, and the 3Department of Biochemistry, Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
Acknowledgements: This study was not funded by any company, and the authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Corresponding author: Erhan Tatar, Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Division of Nephrology, 9035170, Karabaglar, Izmir, Turkey
Phone: +90 232 250 5050
E-mail: etatar@hotmail.com