The Japanese Journal of Urology
Online ISSN : 1884-7110
Print ISSN : 0021-5287
ISSN-L : 0021-5287
ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS IN TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE
Masaya TsugawaHideaki HashimotoKoichi MondenHiromi KumonHiroyuki Ohmori
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1998 Volume 89 Issue 4 Pages 453-459

Details
Abstract

(Objective) A prospective trial was performed to propose a suitable antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P).
(Subjects and Methods) Patients who underwent TUR-P due to symptomatic prostatic hyperplasia between April 1995 and February 1996 were included. Based on the results of urinalysis obtained within preoperative 3 days, the patients were classified into Group I (less than 5WBC/hpf and bacterial count of less than 104CFU/ml in urine specimen), and Group II (5 or more WBC/hpf or bacterial count of 104 or more CFU/ml in urine specimen). Furthermore, each group was randomly subdivided into Group A and Group B according to the period of antimicrobial administration. As prophylactic antimicrobials, cefazolin (CEZ) was used in Group I and CEZ or cef otiam (CTM) in Group II. The antimicrobial was administered only on the day of operation in Group IA (n=92), for 3 days in Group TB (n=96), 2 days in Group IIA (n=37), and 4 days in Group IIB (n=30). On the day of operation, the antimicrobial was infused immediately before the operation.
The presence or absence of pyuria, bacteriuria and febrile infection, and the period required for normalization of the urinalysis were the major points evaluated here.
(Results) No significant differences were observed in any parameters with respect to the period of administration of antimicrobial between the groups, but in both Group I and Group II, the incidence of febrile infection was higher in the groups with shorter antimicrobial administration periods. The mean period for normalization of the urinalysis required 68.4, 68.6, 65.2 and 58.2 days in Group IA, Group IB, Group IIA and Group IIB, respectively.
(Conclusion) It is concluded that 3 or 4-day administration of first or second generation parenteral cephems is generally acceptable regimen for antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing TUR-P.

Content from these authors
© Japanese Urological Association
Next article
feedback
Top