Studies on the Effect of EMS and Colchicine in M1 Generation of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Var. TMV3

Article Preview

Abstract:

Seeds of sesame (Sesamum indicum L), genotypeTMV3 were treated with various concentrations of EMS and Colchicine like 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8 and 2.0 % and the LD50 values observed at 1.0 % of EMS and 0.6 % of Colchicine. Based on their LD50 values appreciable concentrations only selected for further study and their effects on various morphological characters such as plant height per plant, number of branches per plant, number of leaves per plant, days to first flowering, number of capsules per plant, number of seeds per capsule and seed yield per plant (g) were measured quantitatively and the results showed that all the characters were consequently or significantly reduced when compared to control and also EMS showed more effective than colchicine.

Info:

Pages:

209-214

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Anuvainola, Euphytica 112, 239(2000) 473- 497.

Google Scholar

[2] Ashri A. (1998). Induced mutations in sesame breeding. Proc. Third FAO/IAEA Res, Co- ord. Meet. On induced mutations for sesame improvement. 6-10 April, Bangkok, Thailand.

Google Scholar

[3] Banu M. R., A. Kalamani, S. Ashok, S. Makesh, Advance in plant sci. 18(2) (2005) 505-510.

Google Scholar

[4] Baydar H., I. Turgut, K. Turgut. Tr. J. Agric. For. 23 (1999) 431-441.

Google Scholar

[5] Bedigian D., Econ. Bot. 5 (2004) 329 - 353.

Google Scholar

[6] Ganesan J. (1995). Induction mutations for sesame improvement. IAEA Res. Rept. 1. p.38.

Google Scholar

[7] Ganesan J. (1998). Induced mutations for sesame improvement. Proc. Third FAO/IAEA Res. Co - ord. Meet. On induced mutations for sesame improvement. 6-10 April, Bangkok, Thailand.

Google Scholar

[8] Jayamary R., N. Jayabalan, Crop. Improv. 22(22) (1995) 1170-1174.

Google Scholar

[9] Khan S., M. R. Wani, Ad. plant sci. 18(11) (2005) 533-535.

Google Scholar

[10] Menash J. K., B. O. Obadoni, P. A. A. komeah, B. Ikhajiagbe, Ajibolu Janet, African J. of Biotech. 6(5) (2007) 534-538.

Google Scholar

[11] Okagaki R. J., M. G. Neer, S. R. Wessler, Genetics 127 (1991) 425-431.

Google Scholar

[12] Pavadai P., D. Dhanavel, Research 28(1-3) (2004) 118-120.

Google Scholar

[13] Prabhakar L. V. (1985). Studies on induced mutagenesis in Sesamum indicum L. M.Sc (Ag) Thesis, Tamil nadu Agrl. Univ., Coimbatore.

Google Scholar

[14] Rahman A., M. L. Das (1998). Evolution of improved varieties of sesame through induced mutations. Proc. Third FAO/IAEA Res, Co - ord. Meet. On induced mutations for sesame improvement. 6-10 April, Bangkok, Thailand.

Google Scholar

[15] Rajathi M. (2008). Induced mutation and variability studies in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) M. phil. (Bot) Thesis. Annamalai Uni., Annamalainagar, Tamilnadu.

Google Scholar

[16] Rangaswamy M. (1973). Induced mutagenesis in gingelly (Sesamum indicum L.) with gamma rays and ethyl methane sulphonate. M.Sc.(Ag). Thesis, Tamilnadu Agrl. Univ., Coimbatore.

Google Scholar

[17] Sasi A., P. Pavadai, D. Dhanavel, Crop Res. 30(2) (2005) 255-258.

Google Scholar

[18] Savant K. D., V. S. Kothekar. Journal of Phytology 3(12) (2011) 01-03.

Google Scholar

[19] Suja K. P., J. T. Abraham, S. N. Thamiz, A. Jayalekshmy, C. Arumugam. Food chem. 84 (2004) 393-400.

Google Scholar

[20] Verma P. S., V. K. Agarwal (2009). Genetics. S.Chand and Company Ltd. Ram Nagar, New Delhi, p.638. ( Received 24 May 2014; accepted 30 May 2014 )

Google Scholar