Validation of Tropical Artificial Soil by Chronic Toxicity Studies on Eisenia fetida against Superphosphate

Article Preview

Abstract:

The research methodology recommended by the OECD (Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development) and ISO (International Organization for Standardization) guidelines for testing of chemicals meets the most criteria expected for ecotoxicological testing except the testing condition and the organic matter. The guidelines were initially developed by temperate countries, with testing conditions as 20 °C and the organic matter as sphagnum peat which is commonly available in those countries. But these two criterions are difficult to be followed in tropical countries. Thus there arises a need of modifying these criterions for toxicity studied in tropical regions. In this study a trial was made for substituting the fermented coir pith for sphagnum peat and the validation of the modified tropical artificial soil (TAS) was done by conducting chronic toxicity studies on Eisenia fetida against an inorganic fertilizer, superphosphate (SP) under tropical condition, i.e., 28 ±2 °C. The performed study showed that the SP determined lower earthworm mortality in TAS comparing to OECD soil for all tested concentration levels. The number of juveniles produced in OECD soil was also significantly reduced (p < 0.05) than in TAS. This may be due to the production of large amount of hydrogen ions when the temperature increases and making the medium acidic. The fermented coir pith was more suitable for ecotoxicity studies under tropical condition than sphagnum peat.

Info:

Pages:

31-40

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Lee B. T., Shin K. H., Kim J. Y., Ki K. W., Progress in earthworm ecotoxicology, in Advanced Environmental Monitoring, (2007) Springer Netherlands..

Google Scholar

[2] Arnaud C., Saint-Denis M., Narbonne J. F., Soler P., Ribera D., Soil Biol Biochem 32 (2000) 67-73.

Google Scholar

[3] Spurgeon D. J., Weeks J. M., Van Gestel C. A. M., Pedobiologia 47 (2003) 588-606.

Google Scholar

[4] Kuperman R. G., Checkai R. T., Simini M., Phillips C. T., Ecotox Environ Safety 57 (2004) 48-53.

Google Scholar

[5] Van Gestel C. A. M., Weeks J. M., Ecotox Environ Safety 57 (2004) 100-105.

Google Scholar

[6] Spurgeon D. J., Svendsen C., Kille P., Morgan A.J., Weeks J.M., Ecotox Environ Safety 57 (2004) 54-64.

Google Scholar

[7] ISO. International Organization for Standardization. ISO-11465: Geneve, Switzerland 1993b.

Google Scholar

[8] ISO. International Organization for Standardization. ISO-10390: Geneve, Switzerland 1994.

Google Scholar

[9] Abbiramy K. S., P. Ronald Ross, J. Paramanandham, Res J Chem Env Sci 2 (2014) 29-35.

Google Scholar

[10] OECD. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 222, Paris 2003.

Google Scholar

[11] ISO. ISO-11268-2: International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland 1998a.

Google Scholar

[12] Van Gestel C. A. M., Van Dis W. A., Dirven-van Breemen E. M., Sparenburg P. M., Baerselman R., Biol Fert Soils 12 (1991) 117-121.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00341486

Google Scholar

[13] Gibbs M. H., Wicker L. F., Stewart A., J. Environ Toxicol Chem 15 (1996) 360-368.

Google Scholar

[14] OECD. Adopted April 13 2004.

Google Scholar

[15] De Silva, PMCS. Ph.D. Thesis, VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands. (2009) 117.

Google Scholar

[16] Eijsackers H., Z Ang Ent 86 (1978) 349-372.

Google Scholar

[17] Eijsackers H., Neth J Zool 41 (1991) 277-303.

Google Scholar

[18] Subagja J., Snider R. J., Pedobiologia 22 (1981) 141-152.

Google Scholar

[19] Van Gestel C. A. M., Dirven-Van Breemen E. M., Baerselman R., Emans H. J. B., Janssen J. A. M., Postuma R., Van Vliet P. J. M., Ecotox Environ Safety 23 (1992) 206-220.

DOI: 10.1016/0147-6513(92)90059-c

Google Scholar

[20] Xiao H., Zhou Q. X., Liang J. D., Environ Geo chem Health 26 (2004) 277-283.

Google Scholar

[21] Eijsackers H., Soil ecotoxicology: Chapman & Hall, London, UK, (1997) 323-330.

Google Scholar

[22] Noguera P., Abad M., Noguera V., Puchades R., Maquieira A., Acta Hortic 517 (2000) 279-286. ( Received 21 March 2014; accepted 27 March 2014 )

DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2000.517.34

Google Scholar