Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019; 86(3):199-204 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2019/030

Injury of Medial Structures in Ankle Fractures - Epidemiological Aspects and Outcomes of TreatmentOriginal papers

J. JE®EK1,*, J. SKÁLA-ROSENBAUM1, P. ČECH1, F. SVATO©1, J. VRÁNOVÁ2, J. MARVAN1
1 Ortopedicko-traumatologická klinika Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady a 3. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy, Praha
2 Ústav lékařské biofyziky a lékařské informatiky 3. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy, Praha

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
Ankle fractures are characterised by a high variability of damage to bone and ligament structures which leads to diverse clinical conditions.
This study aims to analyse a group of patients with surgically treated ankle fractures, with a focus on evaluating the outcomes of treatment of ankle joint medial structure injuries (medial malleolar fracture, ligament lesions).

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
The analysed group included 186 patients (102 men and 84 women), in whom an ankle fracture surgery was performed in 2015 and 2016. The outcomes of the treatment were evaluated in 111 patients with type B and type C fractures, who underwent a follow-up examination at one year after the surgery consisting in subjective and objective assessment of the condition and an ankle radiograph.
The obtained outcomes were processed using the techniques of descriptive statistics and subsequently evaluated through the Pearson's chi-square test at 5% significance level, or the Fisher's exact test for low frequencies.

RESULTS:
The mean age of patients in the group was 48.6 years, while it was lower in men than in women (42.8 years compared to 53.9 years).
According to Weber classification, 1 % of fractures were classified as a type A fracture, 68 % as a type B, 27 % as a type C. The group of isolated medial malleolar fractures represented 4 % of cases. The medial side of the ankle joint more frequently suffered a ligament lesion (56 %) than a medial malleolar fracture (44 %). The mean age of the patients with a medial malleolar fracture was 51.9 years, whereas the mean age of the patients with a ligament lesion on the medial side of the ankle was 44.2 years. When evaluating the outcomes using the OMA score at one year postoperatively, a statistically significant difference was found (p = 0.002) between the patients with a medial malleolar fracture (OMA 79.9) and the patients with a ligament lesion at the medial side of the ankle joint (OMA 91.2).

DISCUSSION:
The aim of the study was to add more information on medial structures of ankle joint that are of major importance for ensuring stability of ankle fractures. In agreement with the literature, when managing the ankle fractures with an injury suffered on the medial side there is obviously a more uniform approach in cases with medial malleolar fractures. The situation is different in case of the deltoid ligament lesion, when historically there is a certain level of non-uniformity in indications for revision surgeries and treatment of the injured ligament structures.
In our group, in the case of ligament lesion on the medial side of the ankle joint an emphasis is put on the fluoroscopy control of the symmetry of tibiotalar joint space before the beginning of the surgery and also after the fibular fracture stabilisation. The revision surgery was indicated in cases where asymmetry of ankle fork was found.
The patients considered the treatment outcome better in cases with a ligament lesion than in cases with a medial malleolar fracture.

CONCLUSIONS:
Proper treatment of medial structures of the ankle joint is important for ensuring the stability of ankle fractures. The patients with type B fractures reported better results at one year postoperatively compared to the patients with type C fracture according to the Weber classification.
A statistically significantly better results after the ankle fracture surgery were achieved in patients with the presence of a medial ligament lesion compared to the patients with a medial malleolar fracture.

Keywords: ankle fracture, injury of medial structures, epidemiology, outcomes of treatment

Published: June 1, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
JE®EK J, SKÁLA-ROSENBAUM J, ČECH P, SVATO© F, VRÁNOVÁ J, MARVAN J. Injury of Medial Structures in Ankle Fractures - Epidemiological Aspects and Outcomes of Treatment. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech.. 2019;86(3):199-204. doi: 10.55095/achot2019/030. PubMed PMID: 31333184.
Download citation

References

  1. Ahmad Hafiz Z, Nazri MY, Azril MA, Kassim NA, Nordin N, Daraup S, Premchandran N. Ankle fractures. The operative outcome. Malays Orthop J. 2011;5:40-43. Go to original source...
  2. Arastu MH, Demcoe R, Buckley RE. Zlomeniny hlezna - přehled současných přístupů. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79:473-483. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bartoníček J, Heřt J. Základy klinické anatomie pohybového aparátu. 1. vyd., Maxdorf, Praha, 2004, pp.211-230.
  4. Bartoníček J, Jehlička D. Weberova klasifikace luxačních zlomenin hlezna, její interpretace a závěry pro klinickou praxi. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2000;67:259-268. Go to PubMed...
  5. Bartoníček J, ©vagr M, Naňka O. Poranění mediálních struktur hlezna. Rozh Chir. 2012;91:500-505.
  6. Herscovici D, Scaduto JM, Infante A. Conservative treatment of isolated fractures of the medial malleolus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:89-93 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Hintermann B, Knupp M, Pagenstert GI. Deltoid ligament injuries: diagnosis and management. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11:625-637. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Jehlička D, Bartoníček J, Svatoą F, Dobiáą J. Luxační zlomeniny hlezna u dospělých, I. část: Epidemiologické zhodnocení ročního souboru. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2002;69:243-247. Go to PubMed...
  9. Lötscher P, Lang TH, Zwicky L, Hintermann B, Knupp M. Osteoligamentous injuries of the medial ankle joint. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015;41:615-621. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Marvan J, Dľupa V, Bartoąka R, Kachlík D, Krbec M, Báča V. Transfixace nestabilních zlomenin hlezna Kirschnerovými dráty: indikace, technika provedení a výsledky. Acta Chir Orthop Tramatol Cech. 2015;82:216-221. Go to original source...
  11. Olerud C, Molander H. A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1984;103:190-194. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Pankovich AM, Shivaram MS. Anatomical basis of variability in injuries of the medial malleolus and the deltoid ligament. II. Clinical studies. Acta Orthop Scand. 1979;50:225-236. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Rammelt S. Management of ankle fractures in the elderly. EFORT Open Rev. 2016;1:239-246. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Shah NH, Sundaram RO, Velusamy A, Braithwaite IJ. Five-year functional outcome analysis of ankle fracture fixation. Injury. 2007;38:1308-1312 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Schuberth JM, Collman DR, Rush SM, Ford LA. Deltoid ligament integrity in lateral malleolar fractures: a comparative analysis of arthroscopic and radiographic assessments. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:20-29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Strömsöe K, Höqevold HE, Skjeldal S, Alho A. The repair of a ruptured deltoid ligament is not necessary in ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:920-921. Go to original source...
  17. Stufkens SAS, Knupp M, Lampert C, Van Dijk CN., Hintermann B. Long-term outcome after supination-external rotation type-4 fractures of the ankle. Bone Joint J. 2009;91-B:1607-1611. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Tejwani NC, Mclaurin TM, Walsh M, Bhadsavle S, Koval KJ, Egol KA. Are outcomes of bimalleolar fractures poorer than those of lateral malleolar fractures with medial ligamentous injury? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1438-1441. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Verhage SM, Schipper IB, Hoogendoorn JM. Long-term functional and radiographic outcomes in 243 operated ankle fractures. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015;8:45. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Wang X, Zhang C, Yin JW, Wang C, Huang JZ, Ma X, Wang CW, Wang X. Treatment of medial malleolus or pure deltoid ligament injury in patients with supination-external rotation type IV ankle fractures. Orthop Surg. 2017;9:42-48. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Wendsche P, Dráč P. Jsou operace malleolárních zlomenin snadné? Acta Chir Orthop Tramatol Cech. 2012;79:540-548. Go to original source...
  22. Winters K. Functional outcome of surgery for fractures of the ankle. N Z Med J. 2009;122:57-62.
  23. Woo SH, Bae SY, Chung HJ. Short-term results of a ruptured deltoid ligament repair during an acute ankle fracture fixation. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;39:35-45. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Zhao HM, Lu J, Zhang F, Wen XD, Li Y, Hao DJ, Liang XJ. Surgical treatment of ankle fracture with or without deltoid ligament repair: a comparative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18:543. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...