Transactions on Transport Sciences 2019, 10(2):53-63 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2019.013

The role of gender and age in autonomous mobility: general attitude, awareness and media preference in the context of Czech Republic

Darina Havlíčková, Vít Gabrhel, Eva Adamovská, Petr Zámečník
Transport Research Centre, Lisenská 33a, Brno, 63600, Czech Republic

One of the long-term goals of autonomous mobility is to achieve mobility for non-drivers or those with difficult access to mobility: for seniors, women, children or other groups of people who are not able to drive a car. However, previous surveys revealed that respondents in these subpopulations were rather reluctant to use connected and automated vehicles (CAVs). This discrepancy brings a paradox in the context of autonomous mobility because one of the main benefits of autonomous mobility is its use by groups that currently reject it the most. One of the reasons for this refusal may lie in the amount of available information on CAVs. Thus, this study focuses on the general attitude, the level of awareness and the preferred ways of new information obtaining on CAVs. Firstly, focus groups revealed preferred media channels for obtaining new information on CAVs. Consequently, a survey was conducted on perceptions and attitudes related to CAVs among the general population in the Czech Republic. Overall, 59 professional inquirers personally interviewed 1116 persons older than 15 years via computer (CAPI). Respondents were selected through the multistage probabilistic sampling procedure, based on the list of address points in the Czech Republic. In the sample, there were 573 (51%) women, the average age was 51 years (SD = 17 years). The results show that, on average, women declared more neutral and negatives attitude towards CAV in comparison to men regardless of age. Furthermore, men declared higher CAV awareness than women in all age groups. As for the preferred information channels, young men mostly chose internet or a "trial as a driver on the circuit". On the other hand, seniors declared the lowest willingness to receive new information about CAVs. However, if they wish to receive information on CAVs, they prefer TV or a "Trial during a social event at my neighbourhood". Results of this study are thus consistent with findings of previous studies as they all identify the importance of gender and age when it comes to the attitude on CAVs.

Keywords: Connected and automated vehicles, CAVs, attitude, media, gender, age

Received: July 1, 2019; Accepted: December 5, 2019; Prepublished online: December 28, 2019; Published: January 17, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Havlíčková, D., Gabrhel, V., Adamovská, E., & Zámečník, P. (2019). The role of gender and age in autonomous mobility: general attitude, awareness and media preference in the context of Czech Republic. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 10(2), 53-63. doi: 10.5507/tots.2019.013
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. American Automobile Association (2016). Vehicle Technology Survey Fact Sheet. Retrieved from: https://newsroom.aaa.com/tag/vehicle-technology/
    2. American Automobile Association (2017). Vehicle Technology Survey - Phase II Fact Sheet. Retrieved from: https://newsroom.aaa.com/tag/vehicle-technology/
    3. Becker, F. & Axhausen, K. (2017). Literature review on behavioural experiments for autonomous vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
    4. Berk, R. (2009). Teaching strategies for the net generation. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal. 3.
    5. Boagey, R. (2016). Who's behind the wheel? Professional Engineering. Vol. 29 Issue 8, p22-26.
    6. Bomey, N. (2016b). NTSB probes Tesla Autopilot crash that killed driver. USA Today. 07/13/2016.
    7. Bomey, N. (2017). NTSB: Tesla 'limitations' had role in deadly crash. USA Today. 09/13/2017.
    8. Boudette, N. E. (2017). Tesla's Self-Driving Tech Cleared in Crash Inquiry. New York Times. Vol. 166 Issue 57483, pB1-B6.
    9. Burt, J. (2016). Tesla, Mobileye to End Partnership Following Fatal Crash. eWeek. 7/29/2016, p1-1.
    10. Carlson, M., Desai, M., Drury, J., Kwak, H., & Yanco, H. (2014). Identifying Factors that Influence Trust in Automated Cars and Medical Diagnosis Systems. In The Intersection of Robust Intelligence and Trust in Autonomous Systems: Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium, Stanford University, 24 -26 March 2014 (pp. 20-27). Palo Alto, California, US: AAAI Spring Symposium Series.
    11. Casley, S. V., Jardim, A. S., & Quartulli, A. M. (2013). A study of public acceptance of autonomous cars (Bachelor of Science), Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA. .
    12. Cyganski, R., Fraedrich, E. & Lenz, B. (2014). Travel-time valuation for automated driving: a use-case driven study. Washington: TRB.
    13. Czech Statistical Office. (2018, March 9). Average wages - 4th quarter of 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/ari/average-wages-4-quarter-of-2017
    14. Delbosc, A., Circella, G., McDonald, N., Lee, Y., Stoke, G & Lucas, C. (2019). Millennials in Cities: Comparing travel behaviour trends across six case study regions. Cities. 90. 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.023. Go to original source...
    15. Delbosc A. & Currie G. (2013). Causes of Youth Licensing Decline: A Synthesis of Evidence, Transport Reviews, 33:3, 271-290, DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2013.801929 Go to original source...
    16. Charness, N., Yoon J. S., Souders, D., Stothart C. & Yehnert, C. (2018). Predictors of Attitudes Toward Autonomous Vehicles: The Roles of Age , Gender , Prior Knowledge , and Personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-9. Go to original source...
    17. Dixit, V. V., Chand, S. & Nair, D. J. (2016). Autonomous Vehicles: Disengagements, Accidents and Reaction Times. PLoS ONE. Vol. 11 Issue 12, p1-14. Go to original source...
    18. Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 215-229. Go to original source...
    19. Evans, L. (2008). Death in Traffic: Why Are the Ethical Issues Ignored? Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, Volume 2, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1941-6008, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1014. Go to original source...
    20. Faulhaber, A. K., Dittmer, A., Blind, F., Wächter, M. A. ; Timm, S., Sütfeld, L. R. …König, P. (2019). Human Decisions in Moral Dilemmas are Largely Described by Utilitarianism: Virtual Car Driving Study Provides Guidelines for Autonomous Driving Vehicles. Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (2):399-418. Go to original source...
    21. Favarò, F. M., Nader, N., Eurich, S. O., Tripp, M. & Varadaraju, N. (2017). Examining accident reports involving autonomous vehicles in California. PLoS ONE. Vol. 12 Issue 9, p1-20. Go to original source...
    22. Haboucha, C. J., Ishaq, R., & Shiftan, Y. (2017). User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 78, 37-49. Go to original source...
    23. Hand, S. & Lee Y. (2018). Who Would Put Their Child Alone in an Autonomous Vehicle? Preliminary Look at Gender Differences. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2018 Annual Meeting, 62, 256-259. Go to original source...
    24. Havelke, A. & Nida-Rumelin, J. (2015). Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis Science and Engineering Ethics. 21. 619-630. Go to original source...
    25. Hefferon, K., & Gil-Rodriguez, E. (2011). Reflecting on the rise in popularity of interpretive phenomenological analysis. The Psychologist, 24 (10), 756-759.
    26. Hohenberger, C., Spörrle, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2016). How and why do men and women differ in their willingness to use automated cars? The influence of emotions across different age groups. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 374-385. Go to original source...
    27. Junco, R. & Mastrodicasa, J. (2007). Connecting to the net generation: What higher education professionals need to know about today's students. Washington, DC, NASPA.
    28. König, M., & Neumayr, L. (2017). Users' resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 44, 42-52. Go to original source...
    29. KPMG. (2013). Self-driving cars: Are we ready? Retrieved from: https://home.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2013/10/self-driving-cars-are-we-ready.pdf
    30. Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R. & De Winter, J.C.F. (2015). Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international question- naire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 127-140. Go to original source...
    31. Lavieri, P., S., Garikapati, V.M., Bhat, C.R., Pendyla, R.M., Astroza, S. & Dias, F.F. (2017). Modeling individual preferences for ownership and sharing of autonomous vehicle technologies. In: Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. Go to original source...
    32. Lee, C., Ward, C., Raue, M., D'Ambrosio, L. & Coughlin, J.F. (2017). Age differences in acceptance of self-driving cars: a survey of perceptions and attitudes. In: International Conference on Human Aspects of it for the Aged Population. Springer, pp. 3-13. Go to original source...
    33. Litman, T. (2017). Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions Implications for Transport Planning. 8 September 2017. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Available from: https://www.vtpi.org/avip.pdf.
    34. "The Challenge and Promise of "Generation I"" (Press release). Microsoft. 28 October 1999. Retrieved 13 December 2009.
    35. McDonald, N. (2015). Are Millennials Really the "Go-Nowhere" Generation? Journal of the American Planning Association. 81. 1-14. 10.1080/01944363.2015.1057196. Go to original source...
    36. Missel, J. (2014). Ipsos MORI Loyalty automotive survey. .
    37. Murray, Ch. (2016). Tesla's Fatal Autopilot Accident: Time to Rethink Autonomous Cars? Design News. Vol. 71 Issue 8, p14-15
    38. Navarro, D. J. (2015). Learning statistics with R: A tutorial for psychology students and other beginners. Adelaide: University of Adelaide.
    39. Nielsen, T., A., S. & Haustein, S. (2018). On sceptics and enthusiasts: What are the expectations towards self driving cars? Transport Policy. Vol. 66, pp. 49-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.03.004. Go to original source...
    40. Nordhoff, S., van Arem, B. & Happee, R. (2016). A conceptual model to explain, predict, and improve use acceptance of driverless vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. Go to original source...
    41. Nyholm, S. & Smids, J. (2016). The Ethics of Accident-Algorithms for Self-Driving Cars: an Applied Trolley Problem? Ethic Theory Moral Prac. 19: 1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9745-2. Go to original source...
    42. Pakusch, C. &Bossauer, P. (2017). User Acceptance of Fully Autonomous Public Transport. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications,Madrid, Spain, 24-26 July 2017 (pp. 52-60). Go to original source...
    43. Payre, W., Cestac, J. & Delhomme, P. (2014). Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation Research : Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2 (27), 252-253. Go to original source...
    44. Pew Research Center (2017). Americans´attitudes toward driverless vehicles. Retrieved from: https://www.pewinternet.org/2017/10/04/americans-attitudes-toward-driverless-vehicles/
    45. Power, J. D. (2012). 2012 U.S. Automotive emerging technologies study results. .
    46. Power, J. D. (2013). 2013 U.S. automotive emerging technologies study results. .
    47. R Core Team (2018, December 20). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
    48. Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2014). A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. Michigan, USA. Retrieved from: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/108384/103024.pdf
    49. Schoettle, B. & Sivak, M. (2015). Motorists' Preferences for Different Levels of Vehicle Automation.( Report No. UMTRI-2015-22). University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI), Ann Arbor, Michigan. Retrieved from: https://www.gomobilemichigan.org/cm/dpl/downloads/content/99/UM_Study_-_Motorists_Pref_for_Levels_of_Vehicle_Automotion.pdf
    50. Smith, A. & Anderson, M. (2017). Automation in Everyday Liffe. Pew Research Center. 202.419.4372.
    51. Smith, B. W. (2013, December 18). SAE levels of driving automation. Retrieved from: http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2013/12/sae-levels-driving-automation
    52. Smith, J. A. (Ed.). (2007). Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. SAGE Publications Limited.
    53. Spector, M. & Dugan, I. J. Tesla Draws Scrutiny After Autopilot Feature Linked to a Death. Wall Street Journal (Online). 7/2/2016, p1.
    54. Stepp, E. (2018). AAA: American Trust in Autonomous Vehicles Slips. News Room. May 22.
    55. Vitale, J., Craig, A.G.,Pingitore, G., Robinson, R., Schmith, S. & Gangula, B. (2017). What's ahead for fully autonomous driving. Consumer opinions on advanced vehicle technology. Perspectives from Deloitte's Global Automotive Consumer Study. Deloitte.
    56. Wickham, H., & Bryan, J. (2018, December 19). readxl: Read Excel Files. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readxl
    57. Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., & Müller, K. (2018, November 10). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
    58. Zmud, J., Sener,I.N. & Wagner, J. (2016). Consumer Acceptance and Travel Behavior Impacts of Automated Vehicles. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Transportation Policy Research Center, College Station.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content