Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2022, 166(4):418-427 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2021.037

Modern diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in familial maculopathy with reference to North Carolina macular dystrophy

Jana Nekolovaa, Alexandr Stepanova, Bohdan Kousalb, c, Marketa Stredovaa, Nada Jiraskovaa
a Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
b Department of Ophthalmology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
c Research Unit for Rare Diseases, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

Aims: We present a familial hereditary macular dystrophy, resembling North Carolina Macular Dystrophy. In members of a family, we describe the development of diagnostic-therapeutic approaches and their impact on the prognosis of those whose vision was affected.

Methods: The macular dystrophy of varying degrees of severity was diagnosed in 3 consecutive generations in different family members, both men and women. Modern therapeutic tools were used for the diagnostics. In one patient of the youngest generation, the development of secondary choroidal neovascularization (CNV) was identified and treated with an anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) agent. DNA was isolated from venous blood and genome sequencing was performed in a proband.

Results: We analysed the data of 13 members of one family of three consecutive generations. Six of them had macular dystrophy. The first were two of three siblings, a woman (73 years old) and a man (67). The offspring of the afflicted man, a female (36) and a male (80), had maculopathy. The first daughter of the woman (12) revealed findings of maculopathy but with normal electrical activity of the retina. The second girl (18), developed secondary CNV which responded well to intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment. Genetic analysis excluded mutations previously reported to be pathogenic for NCMD.

Conclusion: If there is a maculopathy of unclear etiology in younger patients or in patients with unclear development or appearance, it is advisable to focus carefully on the family history and trace the occurrence of impaired vision in other family members.

Keywords: familial maculopathy, North Carolina Macular Dystrophy, anti-VEGF treatment
Grants and funding:

Supported by the programme PROGRES Q40/07 and by the grant AZVMZ CR NV 18-06-00484.
Genetic analysis was supported by the grant NU20-07-00182 from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic.

Received: March 3, 2021; Revised: June 3, 2021; Accepted: June 8, 2021; Prepublished online: June 22, 2021; Published: December 7, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nekolova, J., Stepanov, A., Kousal, B., Stredova, M., & Jiraskova, N. (2022). Modern diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in familial maculopathy with reference to North Carolina macular dystrophy. Biomedical papers166(4), 418-427. doi: 10.5507/bp.2021.037
Download citation

References

  1. Lang G. Retinal Dystrophies. Ophthalmology, 2nd edition. Germany: Thieme; 2004, p. 354.
  2. Michaelides M, Hunt DM, Moore AT. The genetics of inherited macular dystrophies. J Med Genet 2003;40:641-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Lefler VH, Wadsworth JAC and Sidbury JB. Hereditary macular degeneration and aminoaciduria. Am J Ophthalmol 1971;71:224-30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. McKusick VA. North Carolina Macular Dystrophy (Macular Dystrophy of the Retina Locus I), created 1986 Apr 6, updated Bocchini CA 2019 Oct 29, [Internet]. OMIM Entry; Available from: https://www.omim.org/entry/136550.
  5. McCulloch DL, Marmor MF, Brigell MG, Hamilton R, Holder GE, Tzekov R, Bach M. ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). Doc Ophthalmol 2015;130:1-12. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2010;26:589-95. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C, Poplin R, Del Angel G, Levy-Moonshine A, Jordan T, Shakir K, Roazen D, Thibault J, Banks E, Garimella KV, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, DePristo MA. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2013;43:11.10.1-11.10.33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Thorvaldsdottir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Briefings Bioinf 2013;14:178-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, Collins RL, Laricchia KM, Ganna A, Birnbaum DP, Gauthier LD, Brand H, Solomonson M, Watts NA, Rhodes D, Singer-Berk M, England EM, Seaby EG, Kosmicki JA, Walters RK, Tashman K, Farjoun Y, Banks E, Poterba T, Wang A, Seed C, Whiffin N, Chong JX, Samocha KE, Pierce-Hoffman E, Zappala Z, O'Donnell-Luria AH, Minikel EV, Weisburd B, Lek M, Ware JS, Vittal C, Armean IM, Bergelson L, Cibulskis K, Connolly KM, Covarrubias M, Donnelly S, Ferriera S, Gabriel S, Gentry J, Gupta N, Jeandet T, Kaplan D, Llanwarne C, Munshi R, Novod S, Petrillo N, Roazen D, Ruano-Rubio V, Saltzman A, Schleicher M, Soto J, Tibbetts K, Tolonen C, Wade G, Talkowski ME; Genome Aggregation Database Consortium, Neale BM, Daly MJ, MacArthur DG. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 2020;581:434-43. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Small KW, DeLuca AP, Whitmore SS, Rosenberg T, Silva-Garcia R, Udar N, Puech B, Garcia CA, Rice TA, Fishman GA, Héon E, Folk JC, Streb LM, Haas CM, Wiley LA, Scheetz TE, Fingert JH, Mullins RF, Tucker BA, Stone EM. North Carolina Macular Dystrophy Is Caused by Dysregulation of the Retinal Transcription Factor PRDM13. Ophthalmology 2016;123(1):9-18. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Spaide RF, Jaffe GJ, Sarraf D, Freund KB, Sadda SR, Staurenghi G, Waheed NK, Chakravarthy U, Rosenfeld PJ, Holz FG, Souied EH, Cohen SY, Querques G, Ohno-Matsui K, Boyer D, Gaudric A, Blodi B, Baumal CR, Li X, Coscas GJ, Brucker A, Singerman L, Luthert P, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Grossniklaus HE, Wilson DJ, Guymer R, Yannuzzi LA, Chew EY, Csaky K, Monés JM, Pauleikhoff D, Tadayoni R, Fujimoto J. Consensus Nomenclature for Reporting Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Data. Consensus on Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Nomenclature Study Group. Ophthalmology 2020;127:616-36. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Sohn EH, Mullinns RF, Stone EM. Macular Dystrophies. In: Ryan SJ, editor. Retina 5th ed., Philadelphia:Saunders;2013.p.852-86. Go to original source...
  13. Audere M, Rutka K, Inaskina I, Peculis R, Sepetiene S, Valeina S, Lāce B. Genetic linkage studies of a North Carolina macular dystrophy family. Medicina 2016;52(3):180-86. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Small KW, Weber JL, Roses A, Lennon F, Vance JM, Pericak-Vance MA. North Carolina macular dystrophy maps to chromosome 6. Genomics 1992;13:681-85. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Small KW. North Carolina macular dystrophy: clinical features, genealogy, and genetic linkage analysis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1998;96:925-61. Go to PubMed...
  16. Michaelides M, Moore A. North Carolina Macular Dystrophy and North Carolina Macular Dystrophy-like Disorders in Querques G, Souied E. Macular Dystrophies, US:Springe;2016. p.55-62. Go to original source...
  17. Bowne SJ, Sullivan LS, Wheaton DK, ocke KG, Jones KD, Koboldt DC, Fulton RS, Wilson RK, Blanton SH, Birch DG, Daiger SP. North Carolina macular dystrophy (MCDR1) caused by a novel tandem duplication of the PRDM13 gene. Mol Vis 2016;22:1239-47.
  18. Rosenberg T, Roos B, Johnsen T, Bech N, Scheetz TE, Larsen M, Stone EM, Fingert JH. Clinical and genetic characterization of a Danish family with North Carolina macular dystrophy. Mol Vis 2010;16:2659-68.
  19. North Carolina macular dystrophy. [Internet]. Genetic and Rare Disease Information Center.Available from: https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/9179/north-carolina-macular-dystrophy.
  20. Michaelides M, Johnson S, Tekriwal AK, Holder GE, Bellmann C, Kinning E, Woodruff G, Trembath RC, Hunt DM, Moore AT. An early-onset autosomal dominant macular dystrophy (MCDR3) resembling North Carolina macular dystrophy maps to chromosome 5. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44(5):2178-83. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Franics PJ, Johnson S, Edmunds B, Kelsell RE, Sheridan E, Garrett C, Holder GE, Hunt DM, Moore AT. Genetic linkage analysis of a novel syndrom comprising North Carolina-like macular dystrophy and progressive sensorineural hearing loss. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87(7):893-98. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Godey BF, Tiffin PAC, Evans K, Kelsell RE, Hunt DM, Bird AC. Clinical Features of Progressive Bifocal Chorioretinal Atrophy. A retinal dystrophy linked to Chromosome 6q. Ophthalmology 1996;103(6):893-98. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Klein R, Chou CF, Klein BE, Zhang X, Meuer SM, Saaddine JB. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the US population. Arch Ophthalmol 2011;129(1):75-80. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Heiferman MJ, Fawzi AA. Progression of subclinical choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. PLoS One 2019;14(6):e0217805. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Stavrev VN, Sivkova NP, Koleva-Georgieva DN. Optical Coherence Tomography-Angiography of Different Choroidal Neovascularization Subtypes in Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2019;61(2):317-26. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Bae K, Kim HJ, Shin YK, Kang SW. Predictors of neovascular activity during neovascular age-related macular degeneration treatment based on optical coherence tomography angiography. Sci Rep 2019;9(1):19240. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Ohno-Matsui K, Ikuno Y, Lai TYY, Gemmy Cheung CM. Diagnosis and treatment guideline for myopic choroidal neovascularization due to pathologic myopia. Prog Retin Eye Res 2018;63:92-106. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Pascual-Camps I, Andreu-Fenoll M, Ruiz-Moreno JM, Dolz-Marco R, Gallego-Pinazo R. Prognostic Tomographic Classification of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2018;49(10):775-79. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Cheung CMG, Arnold JJ, Holz FG, Park KH, Lai TYY, Larsen M, Mitchell P, Ohno-Matsui K, Chen SJ, Wolf S, Wong TY. Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Review, Guidance, and Consensus Statement on Management. Ophthalmology 2017;124(11):1690-711. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Gu X, Yu X, Dai H. Therapeutic effects of ranibizumab in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. BMC Ophthalmol 2019;19(1):153. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Dansingani KK, Gal-Or O, Sadda SR, Yannuzzi LA, Freund KB. Understanding aneurysmal type 1 neovascularization (polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy): a lesson in the taxonomy of 'expanded spectra' - a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018;46(2):189-200. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Cheung CMG, Lai TYY, Ruamviboonsuk P, Chen SJ, Chen Y, Freund KB, Gomi F, Koh AH, Lee WK, Wong TY. Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: Definition, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management. Ophthalmology 2018;125(5):708-24. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Blinder KJ. Management of neovascular ocular histoplasmosis: Past and Present Retina 2019;39(2):226-34. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Makri OE, Tsapardoni FN, Plotas P, Pallikari A, Georgakopoulos CD. Intravitreal aflibercept for choroidal neovascularization secondary to angioid streaks in a non-responder to intravitreal ranibizumab. Int Med Case Rep J 2018;11:229-31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Chatziralli I, Saitakis G, Dimitriou E, Chatzirallis A, Stoungioti S, Theodossiadis G, Theodossiadis P. Angioid streaks: A Comprehensive Review from Pathophysiology to Treatment. Retina 2019;39(1):1-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Wang JC, McKay KM, Sood AB, Laíns I, Sobrin L, Miller JB. Comparison of choroidal neovascularization secondary to white dot syndromes and age-related macular degeneration by using optical coherence tomography angiography. Clin Ophthalmol 2018;13:95-105. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Murro V, Mucciolo DP, Giorgio D, Sodi A, Passerini I, Virgili G, Rizzo S. OCTA Imaging of Choroidal Neovascularization Treated Using Photodynamic Therapy in a Young Patient With Best Macular Dystrophy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2018;49(12):969-73. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Battaglia Parodi M, Romano F, Marchese A, Arrigo A, Llorenç V, Cicinelli MV, Bandello F, Adán A. Anti-VEGF treatment for choroidal neovascularization complicating pattern dystrophy-like deposit associated with pseudoxanthoma elasticum. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019;257(2):273-78. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Gulkilik G, Erdur SK, Eliacik M, Odabasi M, Ozsutcu M, Demirci G, Kocabora MS. A case of cone dystrophy associated with choroidal neovascularization. Retin Cases Brief Rep 2018;12(2):111-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Kobat SG, Gul FC, Yusufoglu E. Bietti crystalline dystrophy and choroidal neovascularization in childhood. Int J Ophthalmol 2019;12(9):1514-16. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Cohen SY, Laroche A, Leguen Y, Soubrane G, Coscas GJ. Etiology of choroidal neovascularization in young patients. Ophthalmology 1996;103(8):1241-44. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Small KW. North Carolina macular dystrophy, revisited. Ophthalmology 1989;96:1747-54. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Rhee DY, Reichel E, Rogers A, Strominger M. Subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in a 3-year-old child with North Carolina macular dystrophy. J AAPOS 2007;11:614-15. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Bakall B, Bryan JS 3rd, Stone EM, Small KW. Choroidal neovascularization in north carolina macular dystrophy responsive to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Retin Cases Brief Rep 2018; Oct 31 [Epub ahead of print].
  45. de Carlo TE, Romano A, Waheed NK, Duker JS. A review of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Int J Retina Vitreous 2015;1:5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  46. Spaide RF, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK, Sadda SR, Staurenghi G. Optical coherence tomography angiography. Prog Retin Eye Res 2018;64:1-55. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  47. Tan ACS, Tan GS, Denniston AK, Keane PA, Ang M, Milea D, Chakravarthy U, Cheung CMG. An overview of the clinical applications of optical coherence tomography angiography. Eye 2018;32(2):262-86. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. Ong SS, Patel TP, Singh MS. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Imaging in Inherited Retinal Diseases. J Clin Med 2019;8(12).pii:E2078. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Johnson AA, Guziewicz KE, Lee CJ, Kalathur RC, Pulido JS, Marmorstein LY, Marmorstein AD. Bestrophin 1 and retinal disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 2017;58:45-69. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  50. Tsang SH, Sharma T. North Carolina Macular Dystrophy. Adv Exp Med Biol 2018;1085:109-10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  51. Tandon M, Barnett C, Taranath D. Case report: North Carolina macular dystrophy misdiagnosed as congenital ocular toxoplasmosis. Mol Vis 2019;25:731-33.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.