Published July 19, 2023 | Version v2
Poster Open

Aphids curtail the impact of feeding damage by limiting oligogalacturonide release and suppressing cell wall associated immunity

Description

Aphids are insect pests that use piercing-sucking mouthparts to navigate into leaf tissues and feed from phloem sap. During feeding and probing, aphids penetrate the rigid plant cell walls and deliver effector proteins mixed with saliva into the host plant cells. Cell wall damage usually leads to the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), including oligogalacturonides (OGs), which promote pattern recognition receptor (PRR)-triggered immunity (PTI) against pathogens. Whether OG-induced plant defence responses play a role in aphid-plant interactions is not fully understood. Here we show that OGs are released in aphid-exposed leaves but less so than in non-treated plants, indicating that these insects may suppress the accumulation of OGs during feeding. Prior exposure of plants to OGs induces plant defense responses that reduce the ability of M. persicae to colonize plants. This plant defense is suppressed by the aphid effector Mp10 (also known as chemosensory protein 4 or CSP4) that is delivered by aphids into the cytoplasm of plant cells. Mp10 suppresses PTI responses to OGs and a variety of other elicitors. In understanding it’s mode of action we have found a possible role for Mp10 in the regulation of PTI via the trafficking of cell surface PRRs. Therefore, aphids actively manage the impact of feeding damage by limiting OG release and suppressing cell wall associated immunity.

Notes

Generation of schematics: The schematics in background panel ii, in Results panel 5, and in Conclusions panel, were created with BioRender.com. Acknowledgments: We thank Cyril Zipfel (The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK) for the bak1-5 bkk1-1 seeds and Jen Sheen (Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA) for cpk5 cpk6 cpk11 seeds. We are grateful to the John Innes Centre (JIC) Horticultural Services for growing plants, the JIC Entomology Facility for rearing aphid stocks, and the JIC Bioimaging Platform for helping with confocal experiments. This work was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) grants (Grant numbers: BB/R009481/1, BB/V008544/1, BBS/E/J/000PR9795, BBS/E/J/000PR9796 and BBS/E/J/000PR9797) and the John Innes Foundation. Additional support was received from Sapienza University "Progetti di Avvio alla Ricerca 2016" (Project number: AR21615506343970), EMBO Short-Term Fellowship (ASTF number: 477-2016) and PRIN 2017 (Grant number: 2017ZBBYNC).

Files

POSTER_MPMI2023_MG7pdf.pdf

Files (27.4 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:98240d1b6d0648d37c8878f61404a5dd
27.4 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

Recognition BBS/E/J/000PR9795
UK Research and Innovation
Resistance: DNA methylation and the evolution of pesticide-resistance genes in aphids BB/R009481/1
UK Research and Innovation
Susceptibility BBS/E/J/000PR9797
UK Research and Innovation
Response BBS/E/J/000PR9796
UK Research and Innovation
All Aphid Effectors on DEK BB/V008544/1
UK Research and Innovation

References

  • Bass et al. (2014). The evolution of insecticide resistance in the peach potato aphid, Myzus persicae. Biochem Mol Biol 51: 41-51.
  • Bos et al. (2010). A functional genomics approach identifies candidate effectors from the aphid species Myzus persicae (green peach aphid). PLoS Genetics 6(11): e1001216.
  • Mugford et al. (2016). An immuno-suppressive aphid saliva protein is delivered into the cytosol of plant mesophyll cells during feeding. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 29(11): 854-861.
  • Silva-Sanzana et al. (2019). Pectin methylesterases modulate plant homogalacturonan status in defenses against the aphid Myzus persicae. Plant Cell 31(8): 1913-1929.
  • Deshoux et al. (2022). Role of acrostyle cuticular proteins in the retention of an aphid salivary effector. Int J Mol Sci 23(23):15337.
  • Agrios (2005). Plant diseases caused by viruses. Plant Pathology (Fifth Edition), 723-824. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-047378-9.50020-8.
  • De Mori (2020). Molecular tools to investigate Sharka disease in Prunus species. Applied Plant Biotechnology for Improving Resistance to Biotic Stress, 203-223. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816030-5.00010-0.
  • Zitter and Murphy (2009). Cucumber mosaic. The Plant Health Instructor. DOI: 10.1094/PHI-I-2009-0518-01.