메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터

주제분류

정기구독(개인)

소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.

회원혜택

로그인 회원이 가져갈 수 있는 혜택들을 확인하고 이용하세요.

아카루트

학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.

영문교정

영문 논문 작성에 도움을 드리기 위해, 영문 교정 서비스를
지원하고 있어요.

고객센터 제휴문의

...

저널정보

저자정보

표지
이용수
내서재
0
내서재에 추가
되었습니다.
내서재에서
삭제되었습니다.

내서재에 추가
되었습니다.
내서재에서
삭제되었습니다.

초록·키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to develop a standardized and valid scale to measure recreation specialization. To achieve the purpose, the research was carried out as follows. First of all, a vast literature review and in-depth interviews had been conducted. The data collected from the literature review and the in-depth interviews contributed to understanding the constructs of recreation specialization. From the literature review and in-depth interviews recreation specialization was conceptualized with 3 factors(7 sub-factors) which were cognitive(information, skill-knowledge), affective(importance, centrality, physical passion) and behavioral(skilled, experience). Secondly, based on the conceptualization, a recreation specialization scale had been developed. Data collected from 9 in-depth interviews and 30 open-ended questionnaires was made into 30 new items. From 6 representative recreation specialization scales, inappropriate and repeated items were screened out and 35 items were translated into Korean. The 65 items were classified into 7 factors through experts discussion. During 2 times panel researches, unclear or redundant 32 items were eliminated among the 65 questions. 33 items were made into a preliminary questionnaire. Thirdly, Data was collected from 120 outdoor recreation participants and 50 university students to verify question validity. 163 data were used. With descriptive statistics including the mean, the standard deviation, the skewness, and the kurtosis, confirmatory factor analysis(CFA), 33 items which can hinder the reliability and validity were reduced to 21 items and the 7 factor-21 item model was developed.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (45)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0