New Diagnostic Methods for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection

Dong Ho Shin

doi:10.5124/jkma.2006.49.9.773

Journal List > J Korean Med Assoc > v.49(9) > 1080685

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Shin: New Diagnostic Methods for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection

Special Issue

Tuberculosis

Journal of the Korean Medical Association

Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2006; 49(9): 773-780.

Published online: 30 September 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2006.49.9.773

New Diagnostic Methods for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection

Dong Ho Shin, MD

Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Korea. shindh@hanyang.ac.kr

Abstract

Rapid and accurate diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in symptomatic patients is important for the global tuberculosis control strategies. Despite the enormous global burden of TB and the overall low rates of case detection worldwide, conventional diagnostic approaches have relied on tests that have several major limitations until recently, and standard treatment regimens have not changed for more than 30 yr. Recently remarkable progress in the basic science of immunology and molecular biology is ongoing to upgrade the speed and quality of diagnostic service and probably the strategy of the treatment of tuberculosis. In this review, we focus on strengths and limitations of newer tests that are available for the diagnosis of latent and active tuberculosis and the rapid detection of drug resistance, specifically, tests to measure of IFN-γ released from T-cell by stimulation with M. tuberculosis specific antigens, tests to amplify the nucleic acid for identification of M. tuberculosis complex, and rapid tests to detect drug resistance.

Keywords: Diagnosis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Drug resistance

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Strip layout of line probe assay for mycobacterium (INNO-LiPA Rif-TB. by Innogenetics)

Figure 2

Overview of phage amplification assays (11)

Figure 3

Overview of luciferase reporter phage (LRP) assays (11)

Table 1

Comparison of Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) and RD1-based IFN-γ assays (4)

Table 2

Percentage sensitivity and specificity of nucleic-acid amplification tests in different clinical samples (10)

Amplicor, Amplicor Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Test (Roche Diagnostic Systems Inc, New Jersey, USA); AMTD, Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test (Gen-Probe, California, USA); BD Probe Tec, BD Probe Tec ET Direct TB System (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Maryland, USA); PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

References

1. Jasmer RM, Nahid P, Hopewell PC. Clinical practice: latent tuberculosis infection. N Engl J Med. 2002. 347:1860–1866.

2. Pai M, Riley LW, Colford JM Jr. Interferon-gamma assays in the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004. 4:761–776.

3. Dheda K, Udwadia ZF, Huggett JF, Johnson MA, Rook GA. Utility of the antigen-specific interferon-gamma assay for the management of tuberculosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2005. 11:195–202.

4. Pai M. Alternatives to the tuberculin skin test: Interferon-gamma assays in the diagnosis of mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2005. 23:151–158.

5. Kang YA, Lee HW, Yoon HI, Cho BL, Han SK, Yim JJ, et al. Discrepancy between the tuberculin skin test and the whole-blood interferon assay for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in an intermediate tuberculosis-burden country. JAMA. 2005. 293:2756–2761.

6. McHugh TD, Pope CF, Ling CL, Patel S, Billington OJ, Gillespie SH, et al. Prospective evaluation of BDProbeTec strand displacement amplification (SDA) system for diagnosis of tuberculosis in non-respiratory and respiratory samples. J Med Microbiol. 2004. 53:1215–1219.

7. Brodie D, Schluger NW. The diagnosis of tuberculosis. Clin Chest Med. 2005. 26:247–271.

8. Lemaitre N, Armand S, Vachee A, Capilliez O, Dumoulin C, Courcol RJ. Comparison of the real-time PCR method and the Gen-Probe amplified M. tuberculosis direct test for detection of M. tuberculosis in pulmonary and nonpulmonary specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2004. 42:4307–4309.

9. Broccolo F, Scarpellini P, Locatelli G, Zingale A, Brambilla AM, Malnati MS, et al. Rapid diagnosis of mycobacterial infections and quantitation of M. tuberculosis load by two realtime calibrated PCR assays. J Clin Microbiol. 2003. 41:4565–4572.

10. Palomino JC. Nonconventional and new methods in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: feasibility and applicability in the field. Eur Respir J. 2005. 26:339–350.

11. Hazbon MH. Recent advances in molecular methods for early diagnosis of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis. Biomedica. 2004. 24:Suppl. 149–162.

12. Morgan M, Kalantri S, Flores L, Pai M. A commercial line probe assay for the rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in M. tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2005. 5:62.

13. Hillemann D, Weizenegger M, Kubica T, Richter E, Niemann S. Use of the genotype MTBDR assay for rapid detection of rifampin and isoniazid resistance in M. tuberculosis complex isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2005. 43:3699–3703.

14. Gryadunov D, Mikhailovich V, Lapa S, Roudinskii N, Donnikov M, Mirzabekov A, et al. Evaluation of hybridisation on oligonucleotide microarrays for analysis of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005. 11:531–539.

15. Ruiz M, Torres MJ, Llanos AC, Arroyo A, Palomares JC, Aznar J. Direct detection of rifampin- and isoniazidresistant M. tuberculosis in auramine-rhodamine-positive sputum specimens by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2004. 42:1585–1589.

16. Pai M, Kalantri S, Pascopella L, Riley LW, Reingold AL. Bacteriophage based assays for the rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in M. tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. J Infect. 2005. 51:175–187.

17. Hazbon MH, Guarin N, Ferro BE, Rodriguez AL, Labrada LA, Jacobs WR Jr, et al. Photographic and luminometric detection of luciferase reporter phages for drug susceptibility testing of clinical M. tuberculosis isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2003. 41:4865–4869.

TOOLS

Similar articles