Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access March 6, 2014

Evolutionary Model of the Bank Size Distribution

  • Joachim Kaldasch EMAIL logo
From the journal Economics

Abstract

An evolutionary model of the bank size distribution is presented based on the exchange and creation of deposit money. In agreement with empirical results the derived size distribution is lognormal with a power law tail. The theory is based on the idea that the size distribution is the result of the competition between banks for permanent deposit money. The exchange of deposits causes a preferential growth of banks with a fitness that is determined by the competitive advantage to attract permanent deposits. While growth rate fluctuations are responsible for the lognormal part of the size distribution, treating the mean growth rate of banks as small, large banks benefit from economies of scale generating the Pareto tail.

JEL Classification: G21; L11; E11

References

Alhadeff, D. A., and Alhadeff, C.P. (1964). Growth of Large Banks 1930–1960. Review of Economics and Statistics, 46: 356–363. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1924043Search in Google Scholar

Berger, A. N., Hunter W. L., Timme S. G. (1993). The Efficiency of Financial Institutions: A Review and Preview of Research Past, Present and Future. Journal of Banking and Finance, 17: 221–249. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037842669390030H10.1016/0378-4266(93)90030-HSearch in Google Scholar

Berger, A. N., Demsetz R., Strahan P. H. (1999). The Consolidation of the Financial Services Industry: Causes, Consequences and Implications for the Future. Journal of Banking and Finance 24: 135–194. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbfina/v23y1999i2-4p135-194.html10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00125-3Search in Google Scholar

Benito E. (2008). Size Growth and Bank Dynamics. Documentos de Trabajo N.º 0801. Banco de Espana, Madrid. http://ideas.repec.org/p/bde/wpaper/0801.html10.2139/ssrn.1085977Search in Google Scholar

Bouchaud, J., and Mezard M. (2000). Wealth Condensation in a Simple Model of Economy. Physica A, 282: 536–545. http://lptms.u-psud.fr/membres/mezard/Pdf/00_BM_PA.pdf10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00205-3Search in Google Scholar

Ennis, H. M. (2001). On the Size Distribution of Banks. Economic Quarterly 87, 1–25. http://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedreq/y2001ifallp1-25.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Gabaix, X. (2008). Power Laws in Economics and Finance. Annual Review of Economics, 1: 255–294. http://ideas.repec.org/a/anr/reveco/v1y2009p255-294.html10.3386/w14299Search in Google Scholar

Gibrat, R. (1913). Les Inegalites Economiques, Sirey, Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Goddard, J. A., Mckillop D. G., and Wilson J. O. S. (2002). The Growth of US Credit Unions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26: 2327–2356. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037842660100203510.1016/S0378-4266(01)00203-5Search in Google Scholar

Goddard, J. A, Molineux P., and Wilson J. O. S. (2004). Dynamics of Growth and Profitability in Banking. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36: 1069–1090. http://www.jstor.org/stable/383910110.1353/mcb.2005.0015Search in Google Scholar

Janicki H.P., and Prescott E.S. (2006). Changes in the Size Distribution of U.S. Banks: 1960–2005. Economic Quarterly 94: 291–316. http://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedreq/y2006ifallp291-316nv.92no.4.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Kaldasch, J. (2012). Evolutionary Model of the Growth and Size of Firms. Physica A, 391: 3751–3769. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037843711200053210.1016/j.physa.2012.01.027Search in Google Scholar

Malevergne Y., Saichev A. and Sornette D. (2013) Zipf’s Law and Maximum Sustainable Growth, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37: 1195–1212. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/dyncon/v37y2013i6p1195-1212.html10.1016/j.jedc.2013.02.004Search in Google Scholar

Newman, M. E. J. (2005). Power Laws, Pareto Distributions and Zipf’s Law. Contemporary Physics, 46: 323–51. http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/041200410.1080/00107510500052444Search in Google Scholar

Rhoades, S. A., and Yeats A. J. (1974). Growth, Consolidation and Mergers in Banking. Journal of Finance, 29: 1397–1405. http://www.jstor.org/stable/297854510.1111/j.1540-6261.1974.tb03122.xSearch in Google Scholar

Richmond, P., and Solomon, S. (2000). Power Laws Are Boltzmann Laws in Disguise, eprint: cond-mat/0010222. http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0010222Search in Google Scholar

Saichev A., Sornette, D., and Malevergne, Y. (2011). Theory of Zipf’s Law and Beyond. Springer-Verlag Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Sornette D. (2006). Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Tschoegl, A. E. (1983). Size, Growth and Transnationality among the World’s Largest Banks. Journal of Business, 56: 187–201. http://www.jstor.org/stable/235282310.1086/296196Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, J. O. S., and Williams J. (2000). The Size and Growth of Banks: Evidence from Four European Countries. Applied Economics, 32: 1101–1109. http://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v32y2000i9p1101-1109.html10.1080/000368400404245Search in Google Scholar

Yeats, A. J., Irons E. D., and Rhoades S. A. (1975). An Analysis of New Bank Growth. Journal of Business, 48: 199–203. http://www.jstor.org/stable/235248310.1086/295735Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-10-11
Revised: 2014-01-23
Accepted: 2014-02-13
Published Online: 2014-03-06
Published in Print: 2014-12-01

© 2014 Joachim Kaldasch, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-10/html
Scroll to top button