Abstract
Arguments about the appropriate discount rate often start by assuming a Utilitarian social welfare function with isoelastic utility, in which the consumption discount rate is a function of the (constant) elasticity of marginal utility along with the (much discussed) utility discount rate. In this model, the elasticity of marginal utility simultaneously reflects preferences for intertemporal substitution, aversion to risk, and aversion to (spatial) inequality. While these three concepts are necessarily identical in the standard model, this need not be so: well-known models already enable risk to be separated from intertemporal substitution. Separating the three concepts might have important implications for the appropriate discount rate, and hence also for long-term policy. This paper investigates these issues in the context of climate-change economics, by surveying the attitudes of over 3000 people to risk, income inequality over space and income inequality over time. The results suggest that individuals do not see the three concepts as identical, and indeed that preferences over risk, inequality and time are only weakly correlated. As such, relying on empirical evidence of risk or inequality preferences may not necessarily be an appropriate guide to specifying the elasticity of intertemporal substitution.
References
Allais, M. (1953). Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel Devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’école Américaine. Econometrica 21: 503–546.Search in Google Scholar
Anthoff, D., R. S. J. Tol and G. W. Yohe (2008). Risk Aversion, Time Preference and the Social Cost of Carbon. ESRI Working Paper No. 252. Dublin, Economic and Social Research Institute.Search in Google Scholar
Atkinson, T. and A. Brandolini (2007). On Analysing the World Distribution of Income, Oxford University.Search in Google Scholar
Barsky, R.B., F.T. Juster, M.S. Kimball and M.D. Shapiro (1997). Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Study. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2): 537–579.Search in Google Scholar
Bateman, I.J., A.P. Jones, S. Jude and B.H. Day (2006). Reducing Gains/Loss Asymmetry: a Virtual Reality Choice Experiment (VRCE) Valuing Land Use Change. CSERGESearch in Google Scholar
Working Paper EDM 06-16. Norwich, UK, University of East Anglia. Beckerman, W. and C. Hepburn (2007). Ethics of the Discount Rate in the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. World Economics 8(1): 187–210.Search in Google Scholar
Broome, J. (1991). Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty, and Time. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Broome, J. (1992). Counting the Cost of Global Warming. Cambridge, White Horse Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, T. C., G. L. Peterson and B. E. Tonn (1995). The Values Jury to Aid Natural-Resource Decisions. Land Economics 71(2): 250–260.Search in Google Scholar
Bukszar, E., and J.L. Knetsch (1997). Fragile Redistribution Choices Behind a Veil of Ignorance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14: 63–74.Search in Google Scholar
Cameron, T. A. and G. R. Gerdes (2007). Discounting Versus Risk Aversion: Their Effects on Individual Demands for Climate Change Mitigation. Mimeo. Eugene, Oregon, University of Oregon.Search in Google Scholar
Carlsson, F., D. Daruvala O. and Johansson-Stenman (2005). Are People Inequality Averse, or Just Risk-Averse? Economica 72: 375–396.10.1111/j.0013-0427.2005.00421.xSearch in Google Scholar
Cline, W.R. (1992). The Economics of Global Warming. Washington, DC, Institute for International Economics.Search in Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. (2007). Discounting Climate Change. Mimeo. Cambridge, University of Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
De Vaus, D.A. (2002). Surveys in Social Research. London, Unwin Hyman.Search in Google Scholar
Dietz, S., C. Hepburn and N. Stern (2008). Economics, Ethics and Climate Change. Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honour of Amartya Sen (Volume 2: Society, Institutions and Development). K. Basu and R. Kanbur. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 2: 365–386.Search in Google Scholar
Dietz, S., C. Hope and N. Patmore (2007). Some Economics of ‘Dangerous’ Climate Change: Reflections on the Stern Review. Global Environmental Change 17(3–4): 311–325.Search in Google Scholar
Dikhanov, Y. (2005). Trends in Global Income Distribution, 1970-2000, and Scenarios for 2015. Human Development Report Office Occasional Paper. New York, NY, UNDP.Search in Google Scholar
Di Tella R. and R. MacCulloch (2006). Some Uses of Happiness Data in Economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(1): 25–46.Search in Google Scholar
Epstein, L. G. and S.E. Zin (1989). Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: a Theoretical Framework. Econometrica 57(4): 937–968.Search in Google Scholar
Fankhauser, S., R.S.J. Tol and D.W. Pearce (1997). The Aggregation of Climate Damages: A Welfare Theoretic Approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 10: 249–266.Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, A.M., III. (1979) The Benefits of Environmental Improvement: Theory and Practice. Baltimore, MD, published for Resources for the Future by Johns Hopkins Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gollier, C. (2006). Institute Outlook: Climate Change and Insurance: An Evaluation of the Stern Report on the Economics of Climate Change, Barbon Institute.Search in Google Scholar
Ha-Duong, M. and N. Treich (2004). Risk Aversion, Intergenerational Equity and Climate Change. Environmental and Resource Economics 28: 195–207.Search in Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J.C. (1955). Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility. The Journal of Political Economy 63(4): 309–321.Search in Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J.C. (1976). Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation. Dordrecht, Holland, D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-9327-9Search in Google Scholar
Hartog, J., A. Ferrer-i-Carbonell and N. Jonker (2002). Linking Measured Risk Aversion to Individual Characteristics. Kyklos 55(1): 3–26.Search in Google Scholar
IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007—Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jianakoplos, N.A. and A. Bernasek (1998). Are Women More Risk Averse? Economic Inquiry 36(4): 620–630.10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01740.xSearch in Google Scholar
Johansson-Stenman, O., F. Carlsson and D. Daruvala (2002). Measuring Future Grandparents’ Preferences for Equality and Relative Standing. Economic Journal 112: 362–383.Search in Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: 297–323.Search in Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and J. Knetsch (1992). Valuing Public Goods: the Purchase of Moral Satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22: 57–70.Search in Google Scholar
Kapteyn, A. and F. Teppa (2003). Hypothetical Intertemporal Consumption Choices. The Economic Journal 113: C140–C152.Search in Google Scholar
Kenyon, W., N. Hanley and C. Nevin (2001). Citizens’ Juries: An Aid to Environmental Valuation? Environment and Planning C 19: 557–566.10.1068/c4sSearch in Google Scholar
Kreps, D.M. and E.L. Porteus (1978). Temporal Resolution of Uncertainty and Dynamic Choice. Econometrica 46: 185–200.Search in Google Scholar
Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London, Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. and D. Prelec (1993). Preferences for Sequences of Outcomes. Psychological Review 100(1): 91–108.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1992). Distributive Justice: What the People Think. Ethics 102(3): 555–593.Search in Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. (1994). Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. (2007). A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. Journal of Economic Literature 45(3): 686–702.Search in Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. and J.G. Boyer (2000). Warming the World: the Economics of the Greenhouse Effect. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Office of National Statistics (2004): Focus on Social Inequality – Summary Report. Available at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/Product.asp?vlnk=13488. [Accessed 02.06.09]Search in Google Scholar
Office of National Statistics (2005). Age Structure: Average Age Rose to 38.6 Years in 2004. Available at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/CCI/nugget.asp?ID=1308&Pos=1&ColRank=2&Rank=224. [Accessed 02.06.09]Search in Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1928). A Mathematical Theory of Saving. Economic Journal 38: 543–559.Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Oxford, Oxford University Press.10.4159/9780674042605Search in Google Scholar
Selden, L.R. (1978). A New Representation of Preference Over ‘Certain x Uncertain’ Consumption Pairs: the ‘Ordinal Certainty Equivalent’ Hypothesis. Econometrica 46(5): 1045–1060.Search in Google Scholar
Starmer, C. (2000). Developments in Nonexpected-Utility Theory: the Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice Under Risk. Journal of Economic Literature 38: 332–382.Search in Google Scholar
Stern, N. (1977). Welfare Weights and the Elasticity of the Marginal Valuation of Income. Studies in Modern Economic Analysis. M. Artis and A.R. Nobay. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817434Search in Google Scholar
Tol, R.S.J. (1997). “On the Optimal Control of Carbon Dioxide Emissions: an Application of FUND. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 2: 151–163.Search in Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Weil, P. (1990) Nonexpected Utility in Macroeconomics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 105(1): 29–42.10.2307/2937817Search in Google Scholar
Weitzman, M. L. (2007). A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. Journal of Economic Literature 45(3): 703–724.Search in Google Scholar
© 2009 Giles Atkinson et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
