The purpose of this journal is to share and exchange the results of recent research by Asia-Pacific national researchers, and the purpose of the project is to publish the results of convergence research with the humanities and social sciences, including advanced research in specific fields.
[1] P. S. Rosenbaum, The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, Cambridge Mass.: M.I.T.Press, (1970)
[2] R. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, G.Leech, and J. Svartvik, A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London. Longman, (1985)
[3] Sonnenshein, A New English Grammar, Based on the Recommendations of the Joint Committee on Grammatical Terminology Part1-3, Clarendon Press, (1916)
[4] G. O. Curme, English Grammar, Boston:Heath, (1947)
[5] Seong-Sik Jo, A Grammar Theory of Otto Jespersen (Ⅱ), Phoennix, (1979)
[6] Otto Jespersen, A modern English Grammar on historical principles, London: George Allen&Unwin, (1909)
[7] Otto Jespersen, Analytic Syntax, New York. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (First published in 1937), (1969)
[8] J. Wright, An Elementary Middle Grammar, London: Oxford University Press, (1925)
[9] Seong-Sik Jo, The Theory of English Grammar, Seoul: Korea University Press, (1974)
[10] Otto Jespersen Kortfattet Engelsk Grammatik for Tale-og Skriftsproget, Kobenhavn: Carl Larsens Forlag, (1885)
[11] Otto Jespersen, The Philosophy of Grammar, London: Allen&Unwin, (1924)
[12] Otto Jespersen, A modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Vol. Ⅲ, Heidelberg: Carl Winter, (1927)
[13] Etsko Kruisinga, A Graamr of modern Dutch, Generic, (1924)
[14] Johan Vander Auwera, Relative that- a centennial dispute, Journal of Linguistics, (1985)
[15] George O. Curme, Syntax, New York: D.C. Heath and Co, (1931)
[16] H. W. Fowler, F. G. Fowler, The king’s English.3rd ed, Oxford: Clarendon Press, (1931)
[17] C. T. Onions, An Advanced English syntax. 6th ed, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, (1932)
[18] H. Poutsma, A Grammar of Late Modern English, Pt. Ⅱ, Noordhoff, (1926)
[19] P. Roberts, Understanding Grammar, New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, (1954)
[20] Jung-Sung Ihm, A Diachronic Study of Relative “that”, Gyeongnam University The Journal of Human Studies, (1992)
[21] Helgander John, The Relative Clause in English and Other Germanic Languages: A Historical and Analytical Survey, University of Gothenburg doctoral dissertation, (1971)
[22] Elizabeth Clossç Traugott, The History of English Syntax: A Transformationcal Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure, New York: Holt, Rinehart&Winston, (1972)
[23] Kazuo Araki, Pronoun or Conjunction? - Relative that, as, but than. In Araki. K(ed), Studies in English Grammar and Linguistics, Tokyo. Kenkyusha, (1958)
[24] Joseph Emonds, A Transformational Approach to English Syntax, New York: Academic Press, (1976)
[25] Etsko Kruisinga, Current letters and philology, philology English Studies, (1927)
[26] P. A. Erades, Contributions to Modern English Syntax, IV. Structure and character of attributive clauses in English, M.Spack, (1955)
[27] Bas Aarts, Oxford Modern English Grammar, New York: Oxford University Press Inc, (2011)
[28] Mun Goo Kang, Modern English Grammar, Seoul: Korean Munwhasa, (2017)
APA:
Lee, Y. J., Kang, M. K. (2023). Controversy Over the Relative Pronoun ‘That’ And the Complementizer ‘That’. Asia-pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange (APJCRI), ISSN: 2508-9080 (Print); 2671-5325 (Online), KCTRS, 9(1), 315-325. doi: 10.47116/apjcri.2023.01.26
MLA:
Lee, Yoon Jin, et al. “Controversy Over the Relative Pronoun ‘That’ And the Complementizer ‘That’.” Asia-pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange, ISSN: 2508-9080 (Print); 2671-5325 (Online), KCTRS, vol. 9, no. 1, 2023, pp. 315-325. APJCRI, http://fucos.or.kr/journal/APJCRI/Articles/v9n1/26.html.
IEEE:
[1] Y. J. Lee, M. K. Kang, “Controversy Over the Relative Pronoun ‘That’ And the Complementizer ‘That’.” Asia-pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange (APJCRI), ISSN: 2508-9080 (Print); 2671-5325 (Online), KCTRS, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 315-325, January 2023.