메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터

주제분류

정기구독(개인)

소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.

회원혜택

로그인 회원이 가져갈 수 있는 혜택들을 확인하고 이용하세요.

아카루트

학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.

영문교정

영문 논문 작성에 도움을 드리기 위해, 영문 교정 서비스를
지원하고 있어요.

고객센터 제휴문의

...

저널정보

저자정보

표지
이용수
내서재
2
내서재에 추가
되었습니다.
내서재에서
삭제되었습니다.

내서재에 추가
되었습니다.
내서재에서
삭제되었습니다.

초록·키워드

오류제보하기
From the beginning of its history, trade union has made its continuous advance toward the goal of political empowerment. In other words, the entity of trade union necessarily involves political features and functions and such makes trade union impossible to repudiate itself from the political actions. However, the Establishment of society has never have felt comfortable with such political empowerment of trade union and has unceasingly tried to introduce legislative grounds to control and restrict it. Korean lawmakers as well implemented legal control and restriction over (ⅰ) the political actions such as election campaign and political funding, (ⅱ) the amount of union dues, (ⅲ) the legal capacity of union executives, (ⅳ) the intervention of third parties, and (ⅴ) the finance and general management. The law makers also have introduced and maintained the (ⅵ) dissolution order to trade union for a long time.
Each item of restriction above may seem remote or unconnected to one another at a glance. However, when we study some concrete intentions expressed during the process of the legislation, it is hard to miss that the lawmakers have looked at trade union with deep distrust. In particular, it is believed that lawmakers used to think that ‘trade union will surely be contaminated by impure forces and eventually fail to fulfill its inherent functions if not put under relevant restrictions’. Accordingly, lawmakers have built up some supervisory and restrictive measures on trade union in the name of its political neutrality or democratic operation. Under the influence of such restrictive measures, trade union had to undergo many difficulties in making its advance toward the political empowerment throughout the history of labor law.
The restrictive measures above have gradually been abolished since the June Movement in 1987 and the enactment of Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act in 1997. Thus, considerable portion of the restrictive mechanism is no longer functional as of now. However, due to the inertia of former legislations that have applied for few decades, the political actions and political empowerment of trade union are still considered taboos in Korean society. However, the advance of trade union to the political fields is believed to be a consistent flow. And restrictive legislations on the political actions of trade union do not seem to be ultimate and feasible measures to promote the fulfillment of its inherent purpose: protection of workers’ right. It is desired that some meaningful improvement in the labor related law should take place to sufficiently and substantially guarantee trade union with the opportunities to its political actions.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 노동조합의 정치활동 통제에 관한 규율
Ⅲ. 노동조합의 조합비에 관한 통제
Ⅳ. 노동조합 임원 자격 관련 통제
Ⅴ. 노동조합 조직·운영에 대한 제3자 개입금지
Ⅵ. 노동조합 재정 및 운영에 대한 통제
Ⅶ. 노동조합에 대한 해산명령
Ⅷ. 나오며
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0