DOI: 10.4244/EIJV10SUA17

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation with Tiara bioprosthesis

Anson Cheung1, MD; Dion Stub1, MBBS, PhD; Robert Moss1, MD; Robert H. Boone1, MD; Jonathon Leipsic1, MD; Stefan Verheye3, MD, PhD; Shmuel Banai2, MD; John Webb1*, MD

Abstract

Mitral valve surgery is the gold standard therapy for severe mitral regurgitation, but can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Percutaneous mitral leaflet repair has recently been established as a viable alternative to surgery, but many patients are ineligible and repair may not be optimal. Transcatheter mitral valve implantation may be an alternate therapeutic option, particularly for high-risk patients. We outline the initial preclinical and first-in-human experience with the Tiara transapical mitral valve implantation system, highlighting the ease of implantation, proven feasibility and excellent haemodynamic performance.

Introduction

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most prevalent valvular heart disease, present in over 9% of patients greater than 75 years of age1, and is a major contributor to cardiac morbidity and mortality. Although conventional surgical repair or replacement remains the gold standard treatment for severe MR, it is often deferred because of high surgical risk2. Following conventional mitral valve (MV) surgery, octogenarians may have a reported mortality and morbidity rate of 17.0% and 35.5%, respectively3. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) revolutionised the management of valvular aortic stenosis by providing a safe and efficacious alternative to surgical valve replacement in appropriate higher-risk patients4-6. Similarly, the risk and uncertain benefit of surgical MV repair or replacement in high-risk patients with severe MR has driven the search for new transcatheter MV therapies.

The structure and function of the mitral valve, however, are far more complex than the aortic valve. This complexity poses many challenges in the development of transcatheter mitral therapies: a D-shaped annulus, the lack of a fibrous annular structure, variability of leaflet and subvalvular apparatus anatomy, as well as the proximity of the MV to the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), circumflex coronary artery, and coronary sinus7.

The Tiara transapical mitral valve implantation system (Neovasc Inc., Richmond, Canada) is a novel, catheter-based technology for the treatment of severe MR. We provide an overview of the Tiara device, preclinical studies and early experience in high-risk patients with MR.

Tiara system

The Tiara valve is a self-expanding bioprosthesis with cross-linked bovine pericardial tissue leaflets mounted inside a metal alloy frame (Figure 1). It is implanted using a transapical approach. The valve is anatomically shaped to fit the asymmetric and D-shaped mitral annulus. The atrial portion of the Tiara is designed to facilitate seating of the prosthesis onto the atrial portion of the MV annulus. Ventricular anchoring structures are designed to secure the Tiara onto the fibrous trigones and posterior shelf of the annulus. These features firmly secure the Tiara preventing migration, minimising paravalvular leakage (PVL), LVOT obstruction and coronary vessels encroachment. The valve is loaded into a 32 Fr delivery device just prior to the procedure (Figure 2). The delivery device comprises a self-dilating tip with a turn knob mechanism and is designed to enter the LV apex directly without a delivery introducer sheath. Resheathing, repositioning and retrieval of the prosthesis are possible until the final stage of the deployment. The Tiara valve may be used for both functional and degenerative mitral regurgitation. Relative anatomical exclusions include very large annular dimensions and severe mitral and subvalvular calcification.

Figure 1. The Tiara transcatheter mitral valve prosthesis.

Figure 2. The Tiara transapical delivery system.

Preclinical trials

Preclinical assessment of the safety and feasibility of the Tiara valve, including an acute swine model, chronic ovine model and human cadaveric testing, has been extremely encouraging8,9. The acute animal model tested several implantation techniques, with minor modifications and alterations in the design of the prosthesis frame and delivery system. Healthy domestic swine were used. In the acute animal model, Tiara valves were successfully implanted in 29 of 36 (81%) swine with fluoroscopic and three-dimensional (3D) transoesophageal (TEE) guidance. Implantation was unsuccessful in seven animals because of improper positioning of the valve (n=3), failure of the valve anchors (n=2), and ventricular fibrillation (n=2). None of the valves migrated or embolised after implantation. Significant paravalvular leak was seen only in cases either of MV annulus-prosthesis mismatch or of failed implantation. There was a steady increase in the rate of successful implantation as the series progressed, with the final 12 animals all undergoing successful and uneventful implantation8.

A normal ovine animal model was used for longer-term evaluation of the device9. Seven animals were evaluated for 150 days after Tiara implantation. All animals had successful procedures and demonstrated clinically stable haemodynamics, maintenance of sinus rhythm and normal behaviour throughout follow-up. Echocardiographic assessment highlighted well-positioned Tiara valves, with excellent leaflet motion and coaptation. Six (86%) of the animals had mild or moderate PVL. The relatively high rate of PVL observed in the model has been attributed to the fact that only one size of the Tiara valve was available, making size mismatch between the native annulus and prosthetic device unavoidable7. In situ cardioscopy showed that the metal struts were homogeneously covered with fibrous tissue, along both the atrial and ventricular struts, indicative of appropriate healing. The pericardial leaflets were intact without tears, perforations or calcifications9.

A total of 31 human cadaveric hearts were also studied, in a combination of normal hearts (n=2), hearts with dilated cardiomyopathy (n=9) and hearts with mitral regurgitation (n=20). Implantation of the Tiara prosthesis showed appropriate geometric positioning with full circumferential coverage of the atrial aspect of the mitral annulus and good apposition and location of the ventricular anchoring system9.

Early clinical experience

The first two cases of human Tiara valve implantation were performed in January and February 2014 at St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada10. Both patients had severe ischaemic cardiomyopathy with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 20-30%, severe functional MR and significant comorbidities (Table 1). The patients were assessed by three cardiologists, and two independent cardiac surgeons deemed with a consensus that the risk with conventional mitral valve surgery was prohibitive. Cardiac multislice computed tomography imaging was performed to delineate mitral valve structures, allow accurate measurement of cardiac dimensions and facilitate preoperative planning of fluoroscopic implant angles. Permission to proceed with transcatheter mitral valve replacement using the Tiara system was granted by the Health Canada Special Access Program.

The procedures were performed in a hybrid operating theatre under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Invasive systemic arterial and pulmonary arterial monitoring was initiated. Implantations were performed by a multidisciplinary team including a cardiac surgeon and interventional cardiologist, and guided by simultaneous TEE and high-definition fluoroscopy. Patients were positioned supine. Using jugular access the coronary sinus was cannulated with a radiopaque 0.035 inch wire to facilitate fluoroscopic identification of the mitral annular plane. A 4 cm mini anterior thoracotomy was performed to access the LV apex with the placement of two octagonal pledgeted sutures securing the LV apex. Systemic heparinisation was initiated to achieve an activated clotting time greater than 300 seconds. Needle puncture of the LV apex was performed, followed by the introduction of a 0.035 inch J wire across the mitral valve and into the left atrium under TEE and fluoroscopic guidance. A 7 Fr sheath was then utilised to introduce a 0.035 inch Amplatz Extra-Stiff wire (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA). The Tiara delivery system was inserted into the LV directly and across the MV into the mid LA (Figure 3A and Figure 3B). This was followed by the release of the atrial portion of the Tiara (Figure 4A and Figure 4B). Orientation of the flat portion of the D-shaped Tiara to the LVOT, coaxiality and alignment were confirmed with 3D TEE in the mid left atrium (Figure 5). After full deployment of the atrial skirt, the Tiara valve was rotated until the flat portion of the D-shaped frame corresponded with the LVOT. Seating of the Tiara valve onto the atrial annulus was achieved by gentle traction towards the LV. Rapid ventricular pacing at a rate of 180 beats per minute was initiated and the ventricular anchoring mechanism was released with capture of the anterior and posterior native mitral leaflets (Figure 5).

Figure 3. Positioning of the Tiara system across the mitral valve into the left atrium.

Figure 4. Deployment of the atrial portion of the Tiara bioprosthesis in the left atrium.

Figure 5. Tiara valve deployed. A, B) Full deployment and release from the delivery catheter. C) Coronary angiogram showed a patent and uncompressed circumflex artery. D) Transoesophageal echocardiography documented a well-seated Tiara bioprosthesis. In both cases the Tiara device was rapidly and easily deployed on the first attempt. TEE confirmed secure seating of the prosthesis with normal valvular function, trivial PVL and a transvalvular gradient of 2-3 mmHg. LV angiography confirmed the absence of significant MR and invasive pressure measurement confirmed an unobstructed LVOT. Selective left coronary injection confirmed a patent and uncompressed circumflex artery. Both patients were haemodynamically stable throughout the procedure. An increase in systemic pressure and a reduction of pulmonary pressure were evident post-implant. There were no LV apical access issues. Neither patient required blood transfusions. Patients were extubated in the operating theatre and transferred in stable condition to the post-surgical intensive care unit.

Both patients made good recoveries and repeat transthoracic echocardiograms at four weeks demonstrated normal valve function, with trivial PVL in the initial patient and no PVL in the second patient. Transvalvular gradient remained low at 2 and 3 mmHg respectively, with no left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. The first patient, however, had persistent symptoms related to congestive heart failure and chronic renal failure leading to death 69 days post-procedure. The second patient remains well at five months, with a significant improvement in dyspnoea and improvement in functional status from NYHA IV to NYHA II and BNP falling from 833 ng/L to 482 ng/L.

Conclusions

There remains a significant unmet clinical need in the management of MR, particularly in high-risk patients who may not be suitable candidates for open surgery or percutaneous leaflet repair. The Tiara is a catheter-based mitral implantation system specifically designed to treat mitral regurgitation. Transapical access offers clear advantages in terms of ease of access to the mitral valve and controlled device delivery, with the clinical caveats common to all apical transcatheter interventions. Implantation was relatively easily accomplished and uncomplicated. The Tiara valve has specific features that accommodate the complex structures of the mitral valve apparatus, preventing migration, and sealing paravalvular leaks. This very early experience suggests the adaptability of the Tiara device to the mitral valve apparatus with stable positioning and absence of paravalvular leak or LVOT obstruction, paving the way for wider clinical experience and future trials.

Conflict of interest statement

A. Cheung and S. Banai are consultants for Neovasc Inc. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

Volume 10 Supplement U
Sep 27, 2014
Volume 10 Supplement U
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00010 Apr 15, 2024
Timing of revascularisation in acute coronary syndromes with multivessel disease – two sides of the same coin
Stähli B and Stehli J
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00016 Apr 15, 2024
Can artificial intelligence help Heart Teams make decisions?
Koch V
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00006 Apr 15, 2024
The miracle of left ventricular recovery after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Dauerman H and Lahoud R
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00643 Apr 15, 2024
A study of ChatGPT in facilitating Heart Team decisions on severe aortic stenosis
Salihu A et al

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00836 Apr 15, 2024
Renal denervation in the management of hypertension
Lauder L et al
free
Trending articles
337.28

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
284.93

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.15

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
150.28

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
118

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00718 Jun 5, 2023
Preclinical evaluation of the degradation kinetics of third-generation resorbable magnesium scaffolds
Seguchi M et al
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved