Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.61(1) > 1007094

Lee, Lee, Lee, Kim, Jung, Choi, Kim, Kim, and Kwon: Efficacy of Entecavir Switching Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with Clevudine-in-duced Myopathy

Abstract

Background/Aims

Clevudine is a potent antiviral agent against HBV. However, long-term clevudine therapy may cause myopathy. This study was carried out to identify the efficacy of entecavir switching therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients experiencing clevudine-induced myopathy.

Methods

One hundred forty six patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with 30 mg of clevudine per day for 73 weeks (range, 36–132 weeks) were enrolled. Among them, clevudine-induced myopathy occurred in 21 patients (14.4%) which was diagnosed if the patients had symptoms related to myopathy with concurrent CK and AST elevation. All the patients who were diagnosed as clevudine-induced myopathy stopped the therapy, and 17 patients (81%) were switched to entecavir 0.5 mg.

Results

The patients with clevudine-induced myopathy were switched to entecavir 0.5 mg for median 68 weeks, and all of them showed disappearance of clinical myopathic symptoms and normalization of CK and AST level within median 2.2 months. Eight patients (47%) were HBeAg positive before entecavir treatment, and HBeAg seroconversion was achieved in 2 patients (25%). HBV DNA level was elevated in 3 patients (17.6%) at the time when the patients were diagnosed as myopathy, all of them achieved virological response with entecavir switching therapy. ALT level was elevated in 3 patients (17.6%) before entecavir treatment, all of them showed normalization of ALT level. During entecavir therapy, genotypic resistance to entecavir or virological breakthrough was not noted.

Conclusions

In chronic hepatitis B patients experiencing clevudine-induced myopathy, switching to entecavir 0.5 mg per day showed a resolution of myopathy and adequate viral suppression.

References

1. Shin JW, Park NH. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Korean J Med. 2009; 77:265–274.
2. Chen CJ, Yang HI, Su J, et al. REVEAL-HBV Study Group. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma across a biological gradient of serum hepatitis B virus DNA level. JAMA. 2006; 295:65–73.
crossref
3. Iloeje UH, Yang HI, Su J, Jen CL, You SL, Chen CJ. Risk Evaluation of Viral Load Elevation and Associated Liver Disease/Cancer-In HBV (the REVEAL-HBV) Study Group. Predicting cirrhosis risk based on the level of circulating hepatitis B viral load. Gastroenterology. 2006; 130:678–686.
crossref
4. Yang HI, Lu SN, Liaw YF, et al. Taiwan Community-Based Cancer Screening Project Group. Hepatitis B e antigen and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:168–174.
crossref
5. Korba BE, Furman PA, Otto MJ. Clevudine: a potent inhibitor of hepatitis B virus in vitro and in vivo. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2006; 4:549–561.
6. Lee HJ, Eun JR, Lee CH, et al. Longterm clevudine therapy in nucleos(t)ide-naïve and lamivudine-experienced patients with hepatitis B virus-related chronic liver diseases. Korean J Hepatol. 2009; 15:179–192.
crossref
7. Shin SR, Yoo BC, Choi MS, et al. A comparison of 48-week treatment efficacy between clevudine and entecavir in treatmentnaïve patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatol Int. 2011; 5:664–670.
crossref
8. Yoo BC, Kim JH, Kim TH, et al. Clevudine is highly efficacious in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B with durable off-therapy viral suppression. Hepatology. 2007; 46:1041–1048.
crossref
9. Zhu Y, Yamamoto T, Cullen J, et al. Kinetics of hepadnavirus loss from the liver during inhibition of viral DNA synthesis. J Virol. 2001; 75:311–322.
crossref
10. Summers J, Mason WS. Residual integrated viral DNA after hepadnavirus clearance by nucleoside analog therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101:638–640.
crossref
11. Yang HW, Lee BS, Lee TH, et al. Efficacy of initial treatment with clevudine in naive patients with chronic hepatitis B. Korean J Intern Med. 2010; 25:372–376.
crossref
12. Kim MH, Kim KA, Lee JS, et al. Efficacy of 48-week clevudine therapy for chronic hepatitis B. Korean J Hepatol. 2009; 15:331–337.
crossref
13. Tak WY, Park SY, Jung MK, et al. Mitochondrial myopathy caused by clevudine therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients. Hepatol Res. 2009; 39:944–947.
crossref
14. Seok JI, Lee DK, Lee CH, et al. Longterm therapy with clevudine for chronic hepatitis B can be associated with myopathy characterized by depletion of mitochondrial DNA. Hepatology. 2009; 49:2080–2086.
crossref
15. Kim BK, Oh J, Kwon SY, et al. Clevudine myopathy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2009; 51:829–834.
crossref
16. Kim HJ, Park DI, Park JH, et al. Comparison between clevudine and entecavir treatment for antiviral-naíve patients with chronic hepatitis B. Liver Int. 2010; 30:834–840.
crossref
17. Tak WY, Park SY, Cho CM, et al. Clinical, biochemical, and pathological characteristics of clevudine-associated myopathy. J Hepatol. 2010; 53:261–266.
crossref
18. Fleischer RD, Lok AS. Myopathy and neuropathy associated with nucleos(t)ide analog therapy for hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2009; 51:787–791.
crossref
19. Seifer M, Hamatake RK, Colonno RJ, Standring DN. In vitro inhibition of hepadnavirus polymerases by the triphosphates of BMS-200475 and lobucavir. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998; 42:3200–3208.
crossref
20. Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B: update 2009. Hepatology. 2009; 50:661–662.
crossref
21. Ono SK, Kato N, Shiratori Y, et al. The polymerase L528M mutation cooperates with nucleotide binding-site mutations, increasing hepatitis B virus replication and drug resistance. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107:449–455.
crossref
22. Chang TT, Gish RG, de Man R, et al. BEHoLD AI463022 Study Group. A comparison of entecavir and lamivudine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354:1001–1010.
crossref
23. Lai CL, Shouval D, Lok AS, et al. BEHoLD AI463027 Study Group. Entecavir versus lamivudine for patients with HBeAgnegative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354:1011–1020.
crossref
24. Ko SY, Kwon SY, Choe WH, Kim BK, Kim KH, Lee CH. Clinical and virological responses to clevudine therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients: results at 1 year of an open-labelled prospective study. Antivir Ther. 2009; 14:585–590.
25. Liaw YF, Gane E, Leung N, et al. GLOBE Study Group. 2-year GLOBE trial results: telbivudine Is superior to lamivudine in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2009; 136:486–495.
crossref
26. Zhang XS, Jin R, Zhang SB, Tao ML. Clinical features of adverse reactions associated with telbivudine. World J Gastroenterol. 2008; 14:3549–3553.
crossref
27. Heo J, Park JY, Lee HJ, et al. A 96-week randomizaed trial of switching to drug with a higher genetic barrier in chronic hepatitis B patients with partial virologic response to drug with a low genetic barrier. Hepatology. 2011; 54(Suppl 1):1029A–1030A. Poster 1410.
28. Chang TT, Lai CL, Kew Yoon S, et al. Entecavir treatment for up to 5 years in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2010; 51:422–430.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Cumulative incidence of biochemical, virologic, serologic responses and drug resistance during clevudine therapy.
kjg-61-30f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Cumulative incidence of clevudine myopathy. Clevudine-induced myopathy occurred in 21 patients (14.4%) as early as 18 weeks and gradually increased during the treatment of 64 weeks.
kjg-61-30f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Screening and follow-up of patients diagnosed as clevudine-induced myopathy.
kjg-61-30f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Changes of HBV DNA (log10 IU/mL) with entecavir switching therapy in HBV DNA-positive and HBV DNA-negative patients. (A) In 3 patients who had detectable HBV DNA at time point of myopathy, virologic response after entecavir switching therapy were noted. (B) Also 14 patients with virologic response with clevudine therapy maintained HBV DNA negativity during switching to entecavir therapy.
kjg-61-30f4.tif
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics of the Patients
Characteristic Value
Age (yr) 42.2±10.4 (22–76)
Gender (male) 90 (61.6)
BMI (kg/m2) 24.0±3.1 (17.5–32.7)
HBV DNA (log10 IU/mL) 7.4±7.2 (2.1–8.6)
HBeAg positive 84 (57.5)
Anti-HBe positive 59 (40.4)
AST (IU/L) 188.2±289.5 (27–2,817)
ALT (IU/L) 265.3±345.9 (16–2,357)
Albumin (g/dL) 4.1±0.5 (2.8–5.1)
Bilirubin (mg/dL) 2.0±3.8 (0.2–29.3)
Prothrombin time (sec) Platelet count (103/mm3) 13.1±2.0 (10.1–27.2)193.1±74.4 (13–383)
Liver cirrhosis 36 (23.5)

Values are presented as mean±SD (range) or number (%).

Table 2.
Comparisons of Baseline Characteristics between Patients with Clevudine-induced Myopathy and without Myopathy
Characteristic Myopathy(+) (n=21) Myopathy(−) (n=125) p-value
Age (yr) 43±8.7 (27–58) 41.8±10.5 (22–76) 0.38
Gender (male) 9 (42.8) 81 (64.8) 0.18
BMI (kg/m2) 24.1±2.82 (19.4–28.2) 24.0±3.23 (17.5–32.7) 0.48
HBV DNA (log10 IU/mL) 7.4±7.4 (3.2–8.6) 7.4±7.1 (2.1–8.6) 0.65
HBeAg positive 16 (76.2) 68 (54.4) 0.12
Anti-HBe positive 6 (28.6) 53 (42.4) 0.12
AST (IU/L) 160.5±141.8 (27–640) 201±332.8 (28–2,817) 0.24
ALT (IU/L) 243.6.3±259.1 (34–1,373) 269.7±140 (16–2,357) 0.21
Albumin (g/dL) 4±0.47 (2.8–5.0) 4.6±0.47 (3.0–5.1) 0.29
Bilirubin (mg/dL) 1.2±0.8 (0.4–4.5) 2.3±4.4 (0.2–29.3) 0.13
Prothrombin time (sec) 12.8±1.1 (10.1–16.0) 13.2±2.2 (10.1–27.2) 0.38
Platelet count (103/mm3) 195.1±72.0 (72–383) 192.2±75.7 (13–382) 0.84
Liver cirrhosis 4 (19.0) 32 (25.6) 0.32
Clevudine resistance 0 (0) 21 (16.8) 0.04

Values are presented as mean±SD (range) or number (%).

Table 3.
Characteristics of the 17 Patients at the Time Point of Clevudine-induced Myopathy
Characteristic Value
Creatine kinase (IU/L) 551.4±314.5 (210–1,262)
AST (IU/L) 54.4±46.3 (27–221)
ALT (IU/L) 31.5±15.5 (17–79)
HBeAg, positive Anti-HBe, positive 8 (47) 9 (53)
HBV DNA (IU/mL) 45,358±15,686 (0–493,353)

Values are presented as mean±SD (range) or number (%).

TOOLS
Similar articles