A Case of Intrapancreatic Accessory Spleen Mistaken as a Pancreatic Mass due to Different Enhancing Pattern from Normal Spleen

Jun Seok Park; Wan Jung Kim; Yeong Gyu Jeong; Youn Sun Park; Hyun Cheol Koo; Tae Il Lee; Gyo Chang Choi; Sook Kim

doi:10.4166/kjg.2011.58.6.357

Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.58(6) > 1006895

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Park, Kim, Jeong, Park, Koo, Lee, Choi, and Kim: A Case of Intrapancreatic Accessory Spleen Mistaken as a Pancreatic Mass due to Different Enhancing Pattern from Normal Spleen

Case Report

Korean J Gastroenterol 2011;58(6):357-360.

Published online: 4 October 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2011.58.6.357

A Case of Intrapancreatic Accessory Spleen Mistaken as a Pancreatic Mass due to Different Enhancing Pattern from Normal Spleen

Jun Seok Park, Wan Jung Kim, Yeong Gyu Jeong, Youn Sun Park, Hyun Cheol Koo, Tae Il Lee, Gyo Chang Choi¹, Sook Kim²

Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Gumi, Korea

¹Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Gumi, Korea

²Department of Pathology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Gumi, Korea

Correspondence to: Wan Jung Kim, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, 250, Gongdan-dong, Gumi 730-030, Korea. Tel: +82-54-468-9053, Fax: +82-54-468-9051, E-mail: netstars@empas.com

Received 28 June 2011 Accepted 30 August 2011

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Most cases of accessory spleen show similar features as normal spleen in imaging studies. However, some accessory spleen has unusual scan feature which can be misdiagnosed. We present a case of intrapancreatic accessory spleen that was discovered incidentally during a workup for abdominal pain in a 47-year-old woman. CT and MRI revealed a different enhancing pattern from that of the spleen. Further evaluation with endoscopic ultrasonography failed to identify the pancreatic mass. Therefore, it was surgically removed and diagnosed pathologically as an accessory spleen.

Keywords: Accessory spleen, Pancreas, Pancreatic neoplasms

References

1. Sica GT, Reed MF. Case 27: intrapancreatic accessory spleen. Radiology. 2000; 217:134–137.

2. Buetow PC, Buck JL, Pantongrag-Brown L, Beck KG, Ros PR, Adair CF. Solid and papillary epithelial neoplasm of the pancreas: imaging-pathologic correlation on 56 cases. Radiology. 1996; 199:707–711.

3. Adsay NV, Basturk O, Klimstra DS, Klöppel G. Pancreatic pseudo-tumors: non-neoplastic solid lesions of the pancreas that clinically mimic pancreas cancer. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2004; 21:260–267.

4. Movitz D. Accessory spleens and experimental splenosis. Principles of growth. Chic Med Sch Q. 1967; 26:183–187.

5. Halpert B, Gyorkey F. Lesions observed in accessory spleens of 311 patients. Am J Clin Pathol. 1959; 32:165–168.

6. Kim SH, Lee JM, Han JK, et al. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: findings on MR Imaging, CT, US and scintigraphy, and the pathologic analysis. Korean J Radiol. 2008; 9:162–174.

7. Tozbikian G, Bloomston M, Stevens R, Ellison EC, Frankel WL. Accessory spleen presenting as a mass in the tail of the pancreas. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2007; 11:277–281.

Fig. 1.

CT with contrast enhancement of the patient. A 1 cm-sized, oval- shaped, and well-enhanced mass was detected in the tail of the pancreas. (A, B) The pancreatic tail mass exhibited a different enhancement pattern in the arterial phase compared to that of the spleen (arrows). (C, D) In the delayed phase, the pancreatic mass was highly enhanced and distinguished from the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma (arrows).

Fig. 2.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the patient. A 1 cm-sized pancreatic mass was detected in the tail of the pancreas. (A) The signal intensity of the mass was lower than that of the pancreatic parenchyma in the T1-weighted image (arrow). (B) The mass had higher signal intensity than the pancreas in the T2-weighted image (arrow). (C, D) With Gadolinium enhancement, the mass was enhanced in the arterial phase and became isointense in the delayed phase. It exhibited different signal intensity from the spleen (arrows).

Fig. 3.

Endoscopic ultrasonography imaging of the patient. The pancreatic mass exhibited heterogeneous hyperechogenicity (circle).

Fig. 4.

Gross specimen and microscopic finding of intrapancreatic accessory spleen. (A) The pancreatic mass was surgically removed by laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. A relatively dark 1 cm-sized mass was detected in the tail of the pancreas. (B) The splenic tissue, on the left side of picture, was distinguished from the pancreatic tissue (H&E, ×100).

TOOLS

Similar articles