Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:48:58.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Compact Prime Rings and their Rings of Quotients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Kwangil Koh*
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In [10], it is defined that a right (or left) ideal I of a ring R is very large if the cardinality of R/I is finite. It is also proven in [10, Theorem 3.4] that if R is a prime ring with 1 such that its characteristic is zero, then R is a right order in a simple ring with the minimum condition on one sided ideals if every large right ideal of R is very large. In the present note, we shall prove that if R is a prime ring with 1 such that its characteristic is zero and R is also a compact topological ring, then R is a right and left order in a simple ring with the minimum condition on one sided ideals, which is also a non-discrete locally compact topological ring if and only if every large right ideal of R is open. In particular, if R is an integral domain with 1 (not necessarily commutative) such that its characteristic is zero, then R is openly embeddable [13, p. 58] in a locally compact (topological) division ring if and only if every large right ideal of R is open. Following S. Warner [13], we shall say R is openly embeddable in a quotient ring Q(R) if there is a topology on Q(R) which is compatible with its structure, which induces on R its given topology and for which R is an open subset.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1968

References

1. Findlay, G.D. and Lambek, J., A generalized ring of quotients I. Can. Math. Bull. 1 (1958) 77–85.Google Scholar
2., A generalized ring of quotients IJ. Can. Math. Bull. 1 (1958) 155-166.Google Scholar
3. Hewitt, E. and Ross, K. A., Abstract harmonic analysis, Vol. I. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1963).Google Scholar
4. Jacobson, N., Structure of rings. (Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ., Vol. 37, 1964).Google Scholar
Johnson, R. E., The extended centralizer of a ring over a module. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 2 (1951) 891-895.Google Scholar
6., Quotient rings of rings with zero singular ideal. Pacific J. of Math. 11 (1961) 1385-1392.Google Scholar
7. Kaplansky, I., Topological rings. Amer. J, of Math. 69 (1947) 153-183.Google Scholar
8., Locally compact rings. Amer. J. of Math. 70 (1948) 447-459.Google Scholar
9., Topological methods in valuation theory. Duke Math. J. 14 (1947) 527-541.Google Scholar
10. Koh, K., On very large one sided ideals of a ring. Can. Math. Bull. 9 (1966) 191-196.Google Scholar
11. Lambek, J., Lectures on rings and modules (Blaisdell Publishing Company, Massachusetts, 1966).Google Scholar
12. Otobe, Y., On locally compact fields. Japanese J. of Math. 19 (1945) 189-202.Google Scholar
13. Warner, S., Compact rings. Math. Annalen 145 (1962) 52-63.Google Scholar