Published online Feb 25, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2009.50.2.165
Long-Term Results of Immediate Surgical Treatment of Penile Fracture
Abstract
Purpose
Penile fracture is a rare but serious urological condition. Immediate surgical repair is widely accepted as the treatment of choice in penile fracture. The aim of this study is to investigate the long-term outcome of immediate surgical treatment of penile fracture.
Materials and Methods
This is a retrospective study of 12 men with penile fracture who were treated in the Department of Urology, Sanggyepaik Hospital, Seoul, Korea from January 2000 to June 2005. Diagnosis was made clinically and was confirmed by cavernosography in all our patients. All patients underwent immediate surgical repair, within two days after trauma, using a degloving incision. The long term results of the immediate surgical repair were evaluated using questionnaire on outpatient department visiting or telephoning.
Results
The median patient age was 43 years (range, 18 to 57 years). The median follow-up was 32 months (range, 14 to 60 months). Of these patients, 8 (66.7%) patients were injured during sexual intercourse, whereas 4 (33.3%) patients were injured during masturbation. All patients were treated by immediate surgery. All patients reported satisfactory, painless erectile function; two developed penile curvature and one had a penile nodule.
Conclusions
Immediate surgical repair of penile fracture is effective, restores erectile function, and the incidence of complications is low.
Fig. 1
Corpus cavernosography shows extravasation.
Fig. 2
Retrograde urethrography shows rupture of penile urethra.
Table 1
Characteristics and operative findings of rupture of corpus cavernosum in 12 patients
Table 2
Operative findings and complications
References
-
Shin DJ, Cheon MW, Kim MK, Park JK. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of penile fracture. Korean J Urol 2002;43:49–51.
-
-
Nicolaisen GS, Melamud A, Williams RD, McAninch JW. Rupture of the corpus cavernosum: surgical management. J Urol 1983;130:917–919.
-
-
Wespes E, Libert M, Simon J, Schulman CC. Fracture of the penis: conservative versus surgical treatment. Eur Urol 1987;13:166–168.
-
-
Paparel P, Ruffion A. Rupture of copora cavernosa: clinical practice. Ann Urol 2006;40:267–272.
-
-
Bae C, Lee YT. Penile fracture: a report of 6 cases. Korean J Urol 1991;32:623–628.
-
-
Ko HS, Rha KC, Kim JS, Choi DY, Han YT. Penile fracture: a report of 4 cases. Korean J Urol 1999;40:245–249.
-
-
Milles S, McAninch JW. In: Penile fracture and soft tissue injury in traumatic and reconstructive urology. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1996. pp. 693-698.
-
-
Mostafa H. Rupture of the dorsal artery of the penis as a result of sexual intercourse. J Urol 1967;97:314.
-
-
Tsang T, Demby AM. Penile fracture with urethral injury. J Urol 1992;147:466–468.
-
-
Jeong HH, Choi JB, Lee JB. Different clinical manifestations of penile fracture according to patients age. Korean J Urol 2004;45:168–172.
-
-
Morris SB, Miller MA, Anson K. Management of penile fracture. J R Soc Med 1998;91:427–428.
-
-
Cheon J, Kim JJ. Fracture of the penis: results of early surgical treatment. Korean J Urol 1991;32:428–430.
-
-
Hwang SW, Cho SP, Lee JB. Penile injury during erection: the clinical manifestations and results of operative treatment. Korean J Urol 1997;38:1229–1234.
-