Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparision of Ilizarov Ring Fixator and Rail Fixator in Infected Nonunion of Long Bones: A Retrospective Followup Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

About 70 million trauma injuries that occur annually, around the world. More than 4.5 million open fractures occur per year in India. Long bone fractures nonunion (NU) rate varies from 2% to 7%. The management of open fracture is challenging for the orthopedic surgeon. The conventional protocol of management of compound fracture are debridement, temporary stabilization by external fixators, wound and definitive management. Very few prospective studies have been done comparing Illizarov and RF in infected nonunion. Thus we performed a retrospective study to compare the acceptance, complications, and functional outcome of Ilizarov ring fixator (IRF) and rail fixator (RF) in the treatment of infected NU.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cohort study of fifty infected long bone NU patients, who consulted Orthopedics Department of a tertiary care hospital of North-India from 2010 to 2014 was undertaken. Patients were divided into two Groups (Gp) of 25 each: one group was treated with IRF, another with RF and both followed for one year. Results were analyzed as per the ASAMI criteria (Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Illizarov) and complications as per Paley’s classification. Patient’s satisfaction was assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 mm.

Results

Majority of the patients were in age group of 31- 45 years males with right sided involvement with previously treated infected NU of tibia involving distal one-third. According to VA S score, patients had mild to moderate pain in 13 cases in Gp-IRF and in 16 cases in Gp-RF, whereas severe pain was present in 12 cases of Gp-IRF and 9 cases of Gp-RF. Pin tract infection and pain were the commonest complication. Mean bone gap was 7.76 cm and 5.78 cm; average total treatment time was 17.64 and 13.40 months in Gp-IRF and Gp-RF, respectively. Duration of IRF application was more than RF (P < 0.01). Both the limbs were equated in 20 cases (80%) in Gp-IRF and 18 cases (72%) in Gp-RF. Results were found to be excellent in 7 (28%) and 8 (32%), good in 8 (32%) and 13 (52%), and fair in 10 (40%) and 4 (16%) cases in Gp-IRF and Gp-RF, respectively. Bony union achieved in 100% cases. Treatment index was 68.45 days/cm and 64.29 days/cm in Gp-IRF and Gp-RF, respectively.

Conclusion

In view of the patient acceptance, functional outcome and complications, rail fixator shows a better result than Ilizarov.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paley D, Catagni MA, Argnani F, Villa A, Benedetti GB, Cattaneo R, et al. Ilizarov treatment of tibialnonunions with bone loss. ClinOrthopRelat Res 1989;241:146–65.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cross WW 3rd, Swiontkowski MF. Treatment principles in the management of open fractures. Indian J Orthop. 2008 oct; 42(4):377–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Canale ST, Beaty JH. Nonunion. In: Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2013. p. 2981–95.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pal CP, Kumar H, Kumar D, Dinkar K.S, Mittal V, Singh NK. Comparative study of the results of compound tibial shaft fractures treated by Ilizarov ring fixators and limb reconstruction system fixators. ChineseJ Traumatology 2015;18:347–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh B, Aggarwal RK, Chohan S, Singh N. Infected nonunion tibia treated with monorail fixator and effect of early weight bearing on union and regenerate. Punjab J Orthop 2013;1:43–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paley D, Mora R. Nonunion of the Long Bones: Diagnosis and Treatment with Compression - Distraction Techniques. Italy: Springer Science & Business Media; 2006. p. 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Golyakhovsky V, Frankel VH. Biomechanics of the Ilizarov external fixator. In: Textbook of Ilizarov Surgical Techniques Bone Correction and Lengthening. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2010. p. 1–8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR. The mechanics of external fixation. HSS J 2007;3:13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jain AK, Sinha S. Infected nonunion of the long bones. ClinOrthopRelat Res 2005;431:57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paley D, Fleming B, Catagni M, Kristiansen T, Pope M. Mechanical evaluation of external fixators used in limb lengthening. ClinOrthopRelat Res 1990;250:50–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shahid M, Hussain A, Bridgeman P, Bose D. Clinical outcomes of the Ilizarov method after an infected tibial nonunion. Arch Trauma Res 2013;2:71–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta SKV, Govindappa CVS, Reddy MR. Treatment of infected nonunion of diaphyseal fractures with Ilizarov external fixator. OA Orthop 2014;2:4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arora S, Batra S, Gupta V, Goyal A. Distraction osteogenesis using a monolateral external fixator for infected nonunion of the femur with bone loss. J OrthopSurg (Hong Kong) 2012;20:185–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seenappa HK, Shukla MK, Narasimhaiah M. Management of complex long bone nonunions using limb reconstruction system. Indian J Orthop 2013;47:602–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cattaneo R, Catagni M, Johnson EE. The treatment of infected nonunions and segmental defects of the tibia by the methods of Ilizarov. ClinOrthopRelat Res 1992;280: 143–52.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vignes GS, Arumugan S, Ramabadran P. Functional outcome of infected nonunion tibia treated by Ilizarov fixation. Int JSci Stud 2014;2:7:87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Blum AL, Bongiovanni JC, Morgan SJ, Flierl MA, dos Reis FB. Complications associated with distraction osteogenesis for infected nonunion of the femoral shaft in the presence of a bone defect: A retrospective series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:565–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shabir M, Arif M, Satar A, Inam M. Distraction osteogenesis in segmental bone defects in tibia by monoaxial external fixator. J Postgrad Med Inst 2010;24:134–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eralp L, Kocaoğlu M, Polat G, Baş A, Dirican A, Azam ME, et al. A comparison of external fixation alone or combined with intramedullary nailing in the treatment of segmental tibial defects. ActaOrthopBelg 2012;78:652–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rohilla R, Wadhwani J, Devgan A, Singh R, Khanna M. Prospectiverandomizedcomparison of ring versus rail fixator in infected gap nonunion of tibia treated with distraction osteogenesis. BoneJointJ 2016;98-B: 1399–1405.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Krishnan A, Pamecha C, Patwa JJ. Modified Ilizarov technique for infected nonunion of the femur: The principle of distraction-compression osteogenesis. J OrthopSurg (Hong Kong) 2006;14:265–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Paley D, Harry F, John E. Ilizarov technology. AdvOperOrthop 1990;1:243–87.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mudiganty S, Daolagupu AK, Sipani AK, Das SK, Dhar A, Gogoi PJ. Treatment of infected nonunion with segmental defects with a rail fixation system. Strat Traum Limb Recon 2017;12:45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Guru Nanak Hospital, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India

    Jaspal Singh, Rajesh Kapila & Randhir S. Boparai

  2. Department of Orthopedics, Rajindra Hospital, Government Medical College, Patiala, India

    Ravisha Bhardwaj

Authors
  1. Ravisha Bhardwaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaspal Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rajesh Kapila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Randhir S. Boparai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravisha Bhardwaj.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhardwaj, R., Singh, J., Kapila, R. et al. Comparision of Ilizarov Ring Fixator and Rail Fixator in Infected Nonunion of Long Bones: A Retrospective Followup Study. JOIO 53, 82–88 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_77_17

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_77_17

Keywords

Search

Navigation