Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_66_18
Medical oncology in India: Workload, infrastructure, and delivery of care
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.
Abstract
Background: The growing burden of cancer within India has implications across the health system including operational delivery of cancer care and planning for human health resources. Here, we report the Indian results of a global survey of medical oncology (MO) workload in comparison to medical oncologists (MOs) in other low-middle- income countries (LMICs). Methods: An online survey was distributed through a snowball method through national oncology societies to chemotherapy-prescribing physicians in 22 LMICs. The survey was distributed to Indian MOs by the Indian Society of Medical and Pediatric Oncology and the National Cancer Grid of India. The workload was measured as the annual number of new cancer patient consults seen per oncologist. Results: One hundred and forty-seven oncologists from LMICs completed the survey; 82 from India and 65 from other LMICs. About 59% (48/82) of Indian MOs reported working exclusively in the private health system compared to 23% (15/65) of MOs in other LMICs (P < 0.001). The median number of annual consults per MO was 475 in India compared with 350 in other LMICs. The proportion of MOs seeing >1000 new consults/year was 24% (20/82) in India and 20% (13/65) in other LMICs (P = 0.530). The median number of patients seen in a full-day clinic was 35 in India and 25 in other LMCs (P = 0.003); 26% of Indian MO reported seeing >50 patients per day. Compared to other LMICs, Indian MOs worked more days/week (median 6 vs. 5, P < 0.001) and hours/week (median 51–60 vs. 41–50, P = 0.004) and had less annual leave for vacation (3 weeks vs. 4, P = 0.017). Conclusion: Indian MOs have higher clinical volumes and workload than MOs in other LMICs and substantially higher workload than MOs in high-income countries. Indian health policymakers should consider alternative models of care and increasing MO workforce supply to address the growing burden of cancer.
Publication History
Article published online:
08 June 2021
© 2019. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Sharma DC. Cancer data in India show new patterns. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: e272
- 2 Mallath MK, Taylor DG, Badwe RA, Rath GK, Shanta V, Pramesh CS. et al. The growing burden of cancer in India: Epidemiology and social context. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: e205-12
- 3 Bidwell S, Simpson A, Sullivan R, Robinson B, Thomas W, Jackson C. et al. A workforce survey of New Zealand medical oncologists. N Z Med J 2013; 126: 45-53
- 4 Balch C, Ogle JD, Senese JL. The national practice benchmark for oncology: 2015 report for 2014 data. J Oncol Pract 2016; 12: e437-75
- 5 Blinman PL, Grimison P, Barton MB, Crossing S, Walpole ET, Wong N. et al. The shortage of medical oncologists: The Australian medical oncologist workforce study. Med J Aust 2012; 196: 58-61
- 6 Fundytus A, Sullivan R, Vanderpuye V, Seruga B, Lopes G, Hammad N. et al. Delivery of global cancer care: An international study of medical oncology workload. J Glob Oncol 2017; 4: 1-11
- 7 Government of Ontario: Cancer Care Ontario 2000. The Systemic Therapy Task Force Report. Available from: https://www.archive.cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/UserFile.aspx?fileId=14436. [Last accessed on 2017 Dec 18].
- 8 World Bank. World Bank Country and Lending Groups 2017. Available from: https://www.datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups. [Last accessed on 2017 Dec 18].