Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative study of intramedullary interlocking nailing and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in extra articular distal tibial fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background:

Extraarticular distal tibial fractures are among the most challenging fractures encountered by an orthopedician for treatment because of its subcutaneous location, poor blood supply and decreased muscular cover anteriorly, complications such as delayed union, nonunion, wound infection, and wound dehiscence are often seen as a great challenge to the surgeon. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and intramedullary interlocking nail (IMLN) are two well-accepted and effective methods, but each has been historically related to complications. This study compares clinical and radiological outcome in extraarticular distal tibia fractures treated by intramedullary interlocking nail (IMLN) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO).

Materials and Methods:

42 patients included in this study, 21 underwent IMLN and 21 were treated with MIPO who met the inclusion criteria and operated between June 2014 and May 2015. Patients were followed up for clinical and radiological evaluation.

Results:

In IMLN group, average union time was 18.26 weeks compared to 21.70 weeks in plating group which was significant (P < 0.0001). Average time required for partial and full weight bearing in the nailing group was 4.95 weeks and 10.09 weeks respectively which was significantly less (P < 0.0001) as compared to 6.90 weeks and 13.38 weeks in the plating group. Lesser complications in terms of implant irritation, ankle stiffness, and infection, were seen in interlocking group as compared to plating group. Average functional outcome according to American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score was measured which came out to be 96.67.

Conclusion:

IMLN group was associated with lesser duration of surgery, earlier weight bearing and union rate, lesser incidence of infection and implant irritation which makes it a preferable choice for fixation of extra-articular distal tibial fractures. However, larger randomized controlled trials are required for confirming the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schatzker J, Tile M. The Rationale of Operative Fracture Care. 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005. p. 475–6.

  2. Bucholz R, Court-Brown C, Rockwood C. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. New York: Lippincott; 2015. p. 98.

  3. Müller M, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Duda GN, Mandruzzato F, Heller M, Goldhahn J, Moser R, Hehli M, et al. Mechanical boundary conditions of fracture healing: Borderline indications in the treatment of unreamed tibial nailing. J Biomech 2001;34:639–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Habernek H, Kwasny O, Schmid L, Ortner F. Complications of interlocking nailing for lower leg fractures: A 3-year follow up of 102 cases. J Trauma 1992;33:863–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Borrelli J Jr., Prickett W, Song E, Becker D, Ricci W. Extraosseous blood supply of the tibia and the effects of different plating techniques: A human cadaveric study. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:691–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nork SE, Schwartz AK, Agel J, Holt SK, Schrick JL, Winquist RA. Intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1213–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Johner R, Wruhs O. Classification of tibial shaft fractures and correlation with results after rigid internal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; Sep; (178):7–25.

  9. Mushtaq A, Shahid R, Asif M, Maqsood M. Distal tibial fracture fixation with locking compression plate (LCP) using the minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2009;35:159–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar D, Ram GG, Vijayaraghavan PV. Minimally invasive plate versus intramedullary interlocking nailing in distal third tibia fractures. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2014;13:15–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ram GG, Kumar D, Phagal VV. Surgical dilemma’s in treating distal third leg fractures. Int Surg J 2014;1:13–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Y, Liu L, Tang X, Pei F, Wang G, Fang Y, et al. Comparison of low, multidirectional locked nailing and plating in the treatment of distal tibial metadiaphyseal fractures. Int Orthop 2012;36:1457–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Patterson BM. Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2011;25:736–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pawar ED, Agrawal SR, Patil AW, Choudhary S, Asadi G. A comparative study of intramedullary interlocking nail and locking plate fixation in the management of extra articular distal tibial fractures. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2014;3:6812–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guo JJ, Tang N, Yang HL, Tang TS. A prospective, randomised trial comparing closed intramedullary nailing with percutaneous plating in the treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:984–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yao Q, Ni J, Peng LB, Yu DX, Yuan XM. Locked plating with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nailing of distal extra-articular tibial fracture: A retrospective study. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2013;93:3748–51.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jorgensen TE. The influence of the intact fibula on the compression of a tibial fracture or pseudoarthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 1974;45:119–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Richmond J, Colleran K, Borens O, Kloen P, Helfet DL. Nonunions of the distal tibia treated by reamed intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18:603–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmidt AH, Finkemeier CG, Tornetta P 3rd. Treatment of closed tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:352–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Teitz CC, Carter DR, Frankel VH. Problems associated with tibial fractures with intact fibulae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:770–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vallier HA, Le TT, Bedi A. Radiographic and clinical comparisons of distal tibia shaft fractures (4 to 11 cm proximal to the plafond): Plating versus intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:307–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ronga M, Longo UG, Maffulli N. Minimally invasive locked plating of distal tibia fractures is safe and effective. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:975–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ehlinger M, Adam P, Gabrion A, Jeunet L, Dujardin F, Asencio G; Sofcot. Distal quarter leg fractures fixation: The intramedullary nailing alone option. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010;96:674–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bahari S, Lenehan B, Khan H, McElwain JP. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation of distal tibia fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 2007;73:635–40.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Redfern DJ, Syed SU, Davies SJ. Fractures of the distal tibia: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. Injury 2004;35:615–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Collinge C, Kuper M, Larson K, Protzman R. Minimally invasive plating of high-energy metaphyseal distal tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2007;21:355–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Silchar Medical College, Silchar, Assam, India

    Arup K. Daolagupu, Ashwani Mudgal & Kaushik K. Dutta

  2. T-289, Indira Colony, 110 040, Narela, New Delhi, India

    Vikash Agarwala

Authors
  1. Arup K. Daolagupu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashwani Mudgal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vikash Agarwala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kaushik K. Dutta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daolagupu, A.K., Mudgal, A., Agarwala, V. et al. A comparative study of intramedullary interlocking nailing and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in extra articular distal tibial fractures. IJOO 51, 292–298 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.205674

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.205674

Key words

Search

Navigation