Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using one diagonal fusion cage with unilateral pedicle screw fixation for treatment of massive lumbar disc herniation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Large lumbar or lumbosacral (LS) disc herniations usually expand from the paramedian space to the neuroforamen and compress both the transversing (lower) and the exiting (upper) nerve roots, thus leading to bi-radicular symptoms. Bi-radicular involvement is a statistically significant risk factor for poor outcome in patients presenting with far lateral or foraminal disc herniation after facet preserving microdecompression. There is evidence showing that patients suffering from large lumbar disc herniations treated with interbody fusion have significant superior results in comparison with those who received a simple discectomy We report our experiences on managing large LS disc herniation with bi-radicular symptoms by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using one diagonal fusion cage with unilateral pedicle screw/rod fixation.

Materials and Methods: Twenty-three patients who suffered from single level lumbar or LS disc herniation with bi-radicular symptoms treated with unilateral decompression and TLIF using one diagonal fusion cage with ipsilateral pedicle screw/rod fixation operated between January 2005 and December 2009, were included in this study. Operation time and blood loss were recorded. The pain and disability status were pre- and postoperatively evaluated by the visual analog score (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Interbody bony fusion was detected by routine radiographs and computed tomography scan. Adjacent segment degeneration was detected by routine radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging examination. Overall outcomes were categorized according to modified Macnab classification.

Results: The patients were followed up for an average of 44.7 months. Pain relief in the VAS and improvement of the ODI were significant after surgery and at final followup. No severe complications occurred during hospital stay. Interbody bony fusion was achieved in every case. No cage retropulsion was observed, while 3 cases experienced cage subsidence. Adjacent segment degeneration occurred at 3 discs cephalic to the fusion segment at followup. No patients underwent revised surgery. Overall outcome was excellent in 5 patients (21.7%), good in 13 (56.5%), fine in 4 (17.5%), and poor in 1 (4.3%).

Conclusions: TLIF using one cage with ipsilateral pedicle screw/rod fixation is an effective treatment option for massive lumbar or LS disc herniation with bi-radicular involvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdullah AF, Wolber PG, Warfield JR, Gunadi IK. Surgical management of extreme lateral lumbar disc herniations: Review of 138 cases. Neurosurgery 1988;22:648–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang SB, Lee SH, Ahn Y, Kim JM. Risk factor for unsatisfactory outcome after lumbar foraminal and far lateral microdecompression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:1163–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Hara LJ, Marshall RW. Far lateral lumbar disc herniation. The key to the intertransverse approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:943–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiltse LL, Spencer CW. New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988;13:696–706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kutlay M, Topuz K, Colak A, Simsek H, Cetinkal A, Demircan MN. Management of disc herniations with bi-radicular symptoms via combined lateral and interlaminar approach. Neurosurg Rev 2010;33:97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paolini S, Ciappetta P, Raco A, Missori P, Delfini R. Combined intra-extracanal approach to lumbosacral disc herniations with bi-radicular involvement. Technical considerations from a surgical series of 15 cases. Eur Spine J 2006;15:554–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Satoh I, Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Ohwada T, Fuji T, Yoshikawa H. Indication of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:104–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1873–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bambakidis NC, Feiz-Erfan I, Klopfenstein JD, Sonntag VK. Indications for surgical fusion of the cervical and lumbar motion segment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30 (16 Supp):S2–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Esses SI, Huler RJ. Indications for lumbar spine fusion in the adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;279:87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Luk KD, Chow DH, Holmes A. Vertical instability in spondylolisthesis: A traction radiographic assessment technique and the principle of management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:819–27.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, Eck JC, Murphy RB, Covington LA. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:567–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao J, Hou T, Wang X, Ma S. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using one diagonal fusion cage with transpedicular screw/rod fixation. Eur Spine J 2003;12:173–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chitnavis B, Barbagallo G, Selway R, Dardis R, Hussain A, Gullan R. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision disc surgery: Review of 50 cases in which carbon fiber cages were implanted. J Neurosurg 2001;95 2 Suppl: 190–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kabins MB, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Found EM, Goei VK, Woody J, et al. Isolated L4-L5 fusions using the variable screw placement system: Unilateral versus bilateral. J Spinal Disord 1992;5:39–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Anandjiwala J, Seo JY, Ha KY, Oh IS, Shin DC. Adjacent segment degeneration after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: A prospective cohort study with a minimum five-year followup. Eur SpineJ 2011;20:1951–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Buchowski JM, Daubs MD, Kim Y, et al. Adjacent segment disease followinglumbar/ thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: A minimum 5-year followup. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:2253–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Okuda S, Iwasaki M, Miyauchi A, Aono H, Morita M, Yamamoto T. Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:1535–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wai EK, Santos ER, Morcom RA, Fraser RD. Magnetic resonance imaging 20 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:1952–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lai PL, Chen LH, Niu CC, Fu TS, Chen WJ. Relation between laminectomy and development of adjacent segment instability after lumbar fusion with pedicle fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:2527–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Najarian S, Dargahi J, Heidari B. Biomechanical effect of posterior elements and ligamentous tissues of lumbar spine on load sharing. Biomed Mater Eng 2005;15:145–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen Z, Zhao J, Xu H, Liu A, Yuan J, Wang C. Technical factors related to the incidence of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation after transpedicular instrumentation in the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2008;17:1476–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D. Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur SpineJ 2001;10:314–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lazennec JY, Ramaré S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B, et al. Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: Relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 2000;9:47–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, P. R. China

    Chang-Qing Zhao, Kai Zhang &  Jie Zhao

  2. Department of Orthopaedics, Jiangyin People’ Hospital, Jiangyin, 214400, P. R. China

    Wei Ding

Authors
  1. Chang-Qing Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kai Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jie Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Zhao.

Additional information

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, CQ., Ding, W., Zhang, K. et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using one diagonal fusion cage with unilateral pedicle screw fixation for treatment of massive lumbar disc herniation. IJOO 50, 473–478 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.189595

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.189595

Key words

MeSH terms

Search

Navigation