Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation

  • Knee Symposium
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Tibial platfond fractures are usually associated with massive swelling of the foot and ankle, as well as with open wounds. This swelling may cause significant decrease of the blood flow, so the state of the soft tissue is determinant for the surgical indication and the type of implant. This retrospective study compares the union times in cases of tibial plafond fractures managed with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure versus those managed with a two stage strategy with final plate fixation.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study in a polytrauma referral hospital was performed between 2005 and 2011. Patients with a tibial plafond fracture, managed with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure or managed with a two stage strategy with the final plate fixation were included in the study. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated by two senior surgeons. Fracture healing was defined as callus bridging of one cortex, seen on both lateral and anteroposterior X-ray. The clinical outcome was evaluated by means of 11 points Numerical Rating Scale for pain and The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle score, assessed at the last followup visit. Thirteen patients had been managed with a hybrid external fixation and 18 with a two-stage strategy with the final plate fixation. There were 14 males and 17 females with a mean age of 48 years (range 19–82 years). The mean followup was 24 months (range 24–70 months).

Results

The mean time from surgery to weight bearing was 7 ± 6.36 days for the hybrid fixation group and 57.43 ± 15.46 days for the plate fixation group (P < 0.0001); and the mean time from fracture to radiological union was 133.82 ± 37.83) and 152.8 ± 72.33 days respectively (P = 0.560).

Conclusion

Besides the differences between groups regarding the baseline characteristics of patients, the results of this study suggest that in cases of tibial plafond fractures, the management with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure might involve a faster union than a two-stage management with final plate fixation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tang X, Liu L, Tu CQ, Li J, Li Q, Pei FX. Comparison of early and delayed open reduction and internal fixation for treating closed tibial pilon fractures. Foot Ankle Int 2014;35:657–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rommens PM, Claes P, Broos PL. Therapeutic strategy in pilon fractures type C2 and C3: Soft tissue damage changes treatment protocol. Acta Chir Belg 1996;96:85–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huebner EJ, Iblher N, Kubosch DC, Suedkamp NP, Strohm PC. Distal tibial fractures and pilon fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2014;81:167–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: Retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:453–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Testroote M, Stigter WA, Janssen L, Janzing HM. Low molecular weight heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with lower-leg immobilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;4:CD006681.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P 3rd, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopaedic surgeons. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16 (8):562–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grimmer-Somers K, Vipond N, Kumar S, Hall G. A review and critique of assessment instruments for patients with persistent pain. J Pain Res 2009;2:21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Checketts RG, Otterburn M, Mac Eachern AG. Pin track infection; Definition, incidence and prevention. Int J Orthop Trauma 1993;3:16–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ristiniemi J. External fixation of tibial pilon fractures and fracture healing. Acta Orthop Suppl 2007;78:3, 5-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bacon S, Smith WR, Morgan SJ, Hasenboehler E, Philips G, Williams A, et al. A retrospective analysis of comminuted intra-articular fractures of the tibial plafond: Open reduction and internal fixation versus external Ilizarov fixation. Injury 2008;39:196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giotakis N, Panchani SK, Narayan B, Larkin JJ, Al Maskari S, Nayagam S. Segmental fractures of the tibia treated by circular external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:687–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Calori GM, Tagliabue L, Mazza E, de Bellis U, Pierannunzii L, Marelli BM, et al. Tibial pilon fractures: Which method of treatment? Injury 2010;41:1183–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gao H, Zhang CQ, Luo CF, Zhou ZB, Zeng BF. Fractures of the distal tibia treated with polyaxial locking plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:831–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kääb MJ, Frenk A, Schmeling A, Schaser K, Schütz M, Haas NP. Locked internal fixator: Sensitivity of screw/plate stability to the correct insertion angle of the screw. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18:483–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Richard RD, Kubiak E, Horwitz DS. Techniques for the surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2014;45:295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Blauth M, Bastian L, Krettek C, Knop C, Evans S. Surgical options for the treatment of severe tibial pilon fractures: A study of three techniques. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:153–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tornetta P 3rd, Weiner L, Bergman M, Watnik N, Steuer J, Kelley M, et al. Pilon fractures: Treatment with combined internal and external fixation. J Orthop Trauma 1993;7:489–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pugh KJ, Wolinsky PR, McAndrew MP, Johnson KD. Tibial pilon fractures: A comparison of treatment methods. J Trauma 1999;47:937–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wyrsch B, McFerran MA, McAndrew M, Limbird TJ, Harper MC, Johnson KD, et al. Operative treatment of fractures of the tibial plafond. A randomized, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:1646–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lerner A, Stein H. Hybrid thin wire external fixation: An effective, minimally invasive, modular surgical tool for the stabilization of periarticular fractures. Orthopedics 2004;27:59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang D, Xiang JP, Chen XH, Zhu QT. A meta-analysis for postoperative complications in tibial plafond fracture: Open reduction and internal fixation versus limited internal fixation combined with external fixator. J Foot Ankle Surg 2014;Aug 12. pii: S1067-2516 (14) 00273-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas. 2014.06.007. [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stein H, Lerner A. Is rigid fixation of the fibula indicated in tibial plafond fractures? Orthopedics 2005;28:438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Natera Cisneros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cisneros, L.N., Gómez, M., Alvarez, C. et al. Comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation. IJOO 50, 123–130 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.177577

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.177577

Key words

MeSH terms

Navigation