Korean Circ J. 2022 Oct;52(10):782-784. English.
Published online Sep 26, 2022.
Copyright © 2022. The Korean Society of Cardiology
Editorial

The Outcome of Long QT Syndrome: What is the Optimal Therapy?

Ji-Eun Ban, MD, PhD
    • Department of Pediatrics, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Received September 02, 2022; Accepted September 07, 2022.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) is an inherited primary arrhythmia characterized by a prolonged QT interval on surface electrocardiography and is associated with gene mutation encoding cardiac ion channels related to ventricular repolarization. It can lead to life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias-torsades de pointes ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. The clinical symptoms in patients with LQTS are manifested with syncope, generalized seizures, and sudden cardiac arrest, depending on the duration and severity of ventricular arrhythmias. Until now, at least 17 pathologic gene mutations of LQTS subtypes were idenitified. However, patients with LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3 with gene mutations involving KCNQ1, KCNH2, and SCN5A constitute more than 75% of patients with genetically identified LQTS.1), 2), 3), 4), 5)

Although the aggressive medical and interventional management improved clinical outcome of LQTS, therapeutic strategy should be indivisualized according to genotype and phenotype characteristics. Additionally, risk stratification of sudden cardiac death is essential to improve the prognosis.

In this issue of the Korean Circulation Journal, Ahn et al.6) investigated the clinical and genetic characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes of 105 patients with congenital LQTS in Korean single center study between 2000 and 2016 retrospectively. A total of 90 (71%) out of 105 patients with LQTS were performed genetic testing. Among them, LQTS types 1, 2, 3 account for approximately 60% of all congenital LQTS cases. And aborted cardiac arrest was documented in 30% of the symptomatic 70 patients. As initial treatment, ß-blockers were administered in 86% of patients. Among them, 27% of patients experienced breakthrough cardiac events (BCEs) in this cohort. Additionally, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (n=27, 39%) and left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) surgery (n=7, 10%) were performed. Only 1 patient died. The 10-year BCEs-free survival rate was 73.2% in this cohort.

We already have data supporting that prolonged QTc interval ≥480 ms increased the risk of cardiac events.3), 4), 5) There has been also good data supporting the role of β-blocker medication in preventing cardiac event in LQTS1 and LQTS2.7)

According to the HRS/EHRA/APHRS guidelines for LQTS management, there is no evidence to favor cardioselective or non-cardioselective beta-blockers. Long acting beta-blockers such as nadolol and propranolol have been recommended as the effective medication in patients who are symptomatic for syncope or documented ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation and/or asymptomatic with a QTc ≥470 ms.3)

However, non-responders still had BCEs during β-blocker treatment. The patients with LQTS type 3 and multiple mutations are not responsive to β-blocker treatment.6), 8)

Because arrhythmic events are manifestated with gene-specific pattern, genetically tailored therapy is highlighted. In high-risk patients with a LQTS, LCSD and/or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) are recommended. LCSD surgery and ICD implantation are effective in primary and secondary preventing cardiac arrhythmic events.3), 4), 5) Recently Niaz et al.9) reported about LCSD monotherapy in LQTS between 2005 and 2020. Among the 1,400 patients with LQTS, a total of 204 patients (15%) underwent LCSD. Sixty-four (31%) of 204 patients were treated with LCSD alone and only 3 patients have experienced a post-LCSD nonlethal BCEs during mean follow-up of 2.7±2.4 years. They concluded LCSD was safe and effective in selective patients who do not tolerate β-blockers.

ICD implantation is recommended for patients with survivors of a cardiac arrest in LQTS and is considered in patients with refractory BCEs under medications.3), 4), 5), 8) However, potential complications associated with ICD still remain in pediatric patients. Gaba et al.10) reported 170 patients (14%) with ICD implantation in LQTS (670 patients) and non-LQTS (557 patients). Among them, 12 of 1,227 (1%) had ICD removed because of inappropriate shocks, a device-related infection, and device malfunction. They emphasized unnecessary ICD placement due to overdiagnosis and overtreatment can be associated with high rate of complications in younger patients.

Gene-specific LQTS therapies including sodium channel blockers such as mexiletine, flecainide, and ranolazine have been reported in high-risk patients with LQTS type 3 or in patients with recurrent cardiac events despite ICD and LCSD therapies.3)

In the era of genetic testing, approximately 20–25% of patients with LQTS are diagnosed by the presence of an LQTS gene mutations without QTc prolongation.3)

Although outcomes have improved with various therapeutic modalities, the precise detection of concealed mutation of LQTS and further gene-specific treatment strategies are still needed.

Notes

Funding:The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of Interest:The author has no financial conflicts of interest.

Data Sharing Statement:The data generated in this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The contents of the report are the author’s own views and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Korean Circulation Journal.

References

    1. Garson A Jr, Dick M 2nd, Fournier A, et al. The long QT syndrome in children. An international study of 287 patients. Circulation 1993;87:1866–1872.
    1. Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Spazzolini C, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation in the long-QT syndrome: gene-specific triggers for life-threatening arrhythmias. Circulation 2001;103:89–95.
    1. Priori SG, Wilde AA, Horie M, et al. HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes: document endorsed by HRS, EHRA, and APHRS in May 2013 and by ACCF, AHA, PACES, and AEPC in June 2013. Heart Rhythm 2013;10:1932–1963.
    1. Wilde AA, Amin AS, Postema PG. Diagnosis, management and therapeutic strategies for congenital long QT syndrome. Heart 2022;108:332–338.
    1. Lankaputhra M, Voskoboinik A. Congenital long QT syndrome: a clinician’s guide. Intern Med J 2021;51:1999–2011.
    1. Ahn KJ, Song MK, Lee SY, et al. The outcome of Long QT syndrome, a Korean single center study. Korean Circ J 2022;52:771–781.
    1. Koponen M, Marjamaa A, Hiippala A, et al. Follow-up of 316 molecularly defined pediatric long-QT syndrome patients: clinical course, treatments, and side effects. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2015;8:815–823.
    1. Rohatgi RK, Sugrue A, Bos JM, et al. Contemporary outcomes in patients with long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:453–462.
    1. Niaz T, Bos JM, Sorensen KB, Moir C, Ackerman MJ. Left cardiac sympathetic denervation monotherapy in patients with congenital long QT syndrome. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2020;13:e008830
    1. Gaba P, Bos JM, Cannon BC, et al. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator explantation for overdiagnosed or overtreated congenital long QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm 2016;13:879–885.

Metrics
Share
ORCID IDs
PERMALINK