Chonnam Med J. 2021 May;57(2):139-143. English.
Published online May 24, 2021.
© Chonnam Medical Journal, 2021
Original Article

Increasing Use of Cardiac PET/CT for Inflammatory and Infiltrative Heart Diseases in Korea

Jang Bae Moon,1 Sang-Geon Cho,2 Su Woong Yoo,1 and Hee-Seung Henry Bom1
    • 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.
    • 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Received March 18, 2021; Revised March 27, 2021; Accepted March 29, 2021.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Recently the incidence of inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases is increasing in Korea. Cardiac PET/CT is a useful technology evaluating inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases. This study analyzed trends in the use of cardiac PET/CT for evaluating inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases in the Chonnam National University Hospital and Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital. The general trend in Korea was also assessed based on the domestic nuclear medicine database. There was a common increasing trend in the number of F-18 FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases. A representative case with cardiac sarcoidosis is illustrated.

Keywords
Heart Diseases; Inflammation; Positron Emission Tomography

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) has many advantages over single photon emission computed tomography, which include lower radiation doses, better image quality and quantitation of absolute myocardial blood flow, and coronary flow reserves.1 Based on its diagnostic and prognostic values, myocardial perfusion imaging with PET has gained its clinical relevance in the management of coronary artery disease.2, 3, 4

The advantage of lower radiation exposure from PET ironically leads to the need for an on-site cyclotron. The requirement of representative short-living radioisotopes (RI) such as O-15 and N-13, the half-lives of which are 3 min and 10 min, respectively, limits its wide spread as the primary imaging study in the clinical fields. A Rb-82 with generator system may provide an answer, which is widely being used in the USA; but it has not been widely accepted in the Asian countries yet. Particularly in Korea, the cost of PET imaging and camera occupation (which is longer than oncology PET imaging) generally exceed the benefit from direct referral for invasive coronary angiography without functional testing. Moreover, the recent announcement of the negative results of the global large-scale prospective ISCHEMIA trial raised active controversies over the usefulness of functional testing itself in the management of coronary artery disease.5

On the other hand, non-perfusion PET using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is becoming more available in the fields of inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases. Recently their incidences are increasing in Korea.6 Despite the incremental clinical needs, the traditional diagnostic imaging tools are not sufficiently sensitive or specific to detect the molecular processes underlying these disease entities. To fill the unmet need, the recent clinical guidelines are being modified based on the clinical studies using FDG PET to detect infective endocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis.7, 8, 9

Despite the usefulness of FDG PET/CT in inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases, the actual clinical trends have not been elucidated in Korea.10 The purpose of this paper is to investigate the recent trend of cardiac PET/CT usage in Korea, and use of FDG PET/CT for inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases in the Chonnam National University Hospital (CNUH) and Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (CNUHH), and to discuss the further clinical applications of cardiac PET/CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Trends of cardiac PET/CT in Korea

The national-wide survey about the cardiac PET/CT was performed by the Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine (KSNM). This survey data includes information about the cardiac PET/CT in 32 different hospitals in Korea from the 1990s to 2020. Firstly, we analyzed the overall numbers of cardiac PET/CT in each year. Secondly, we further categorized the cardiac PET/CT according to the radiopharmaceuticals. The N-13 NH3 and F-18 FDG were used for cardiac PET/CT. We analyzed the proportional changes of both radiopharmaceuticals according to the year.

2. Trends of cardiac PET/CT for inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases in CNUH and CNUHH

In addition to the national-wide survey of KSNM, we further analyzed the number of cardiac PET/CT in CNUH and CNUHH. The cardiac PET/CT scans were sorted according to the examined purpose. The number of PET/CT scan for inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases was analyzed in the whole study period.

3. F-18 FDG cardiac PET/CT imaging in CNUH and CNUHH

All patients were instructed to take a low-carbohydrate and high-fat diet for 48 hours followed by 12-18 hours fasting before PET/CT scanning to suppress physiologic myocardial glucose uptake as recommended in cardiac FDG PET/CT guidelines.11 Blood glucose levels were measured to ensure that the glucose level did not exceed 150 mg/dL. The 50 IU/kg unfractionated heparin was injected 15 minutes before FDG injection. 3.7 or 5.55 MBq/kg of F-18 FDG were injected into the patients intravenously. All scans were performed on combined PET/CT systems (Discovery ST and Discovery ST 600, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA) at 50 minutes after F-18 FDG injection. Images were reconstructed using a conventional ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm.

RESULTS

1. Trends in use of cardiac PET/CT in Korea

The use of cardiac PET/CT in clinical practice began in the 1990s, with the first official record in 1997, according to the Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine database. It continuously had grown 36-fold as of 2019 with 21 studies in 2000, 491 in 2010, and 749 in 2019. Cardiac FDG PET/CT had its highest clinical use in 2008 (1,192 studies) but showed a decreasing trend of usage until its nadir in 2011 (133 studies) (Fig. 1). The usage rebounded and gradually increased from 2012, reaching 637 studies in 2019. FDG became the main radiopharmaceutical in cardiac PET/CT as well as in oncology. This change mainly led the incremental trends of cardiac PET/CT use in Korea. Although FDG PET/CT is used to evaluate myocardial viability, it is less commonly used since cardiac magnetic resonance imaging has gained clinical relevance. The increase in the number of cardiac FDG PET/CT studies in Korea can be attributed to its use in inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases.

FIG. 1
Trends of cardiac PET/CT in Korea. The first cardiac PET study began in 1997. Parallel to its oncologic use, FDG PET (blue) peaked in 2008, most of which consisted of viability testing, and decreased to its nadir in 2011. It has again grown up to reach almost the second highest number of studies in 2019, mainly led by the incremental uses in inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases. The first perfusion PET (orange) appeared on official records in 2013 which peaked in 2016. However, it rapidly declined largely due to its limited availability.

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by PET/CT, on the other hand, is currently having its lowest utilization. Its clinical use first appeared in the official record in 2013 followed by a peak in 2016 (448 studies), but declined to 112 studies in 2019. The proportions of FDG PET/CT in cardiac PET/CT was 48% in 2013 (when perfusion PET first began). It decreased to 31% in 2016, when the number of MPI PET/CT was highest, but increased to 85% in 2019, reflecting the recent incremental use of FDG PET/CT in non-coronary heart diseases.

2. Trends in the use of cardiac PET/CT in inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases in CNUH and CNUHH

The first use of cardiac PET/CT in inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases was found in 2015, when only three studies were performed (Fig. 2). The number of cardiac PET/CT for inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases has constantly grown until it reached 37 in 2020. FDG PET/CT was used for evaluating cardiovascular inflammation (e.g. sarcoidosis, pericarditis) or infection (e.g., infective endocarditis, vascular graft infection) in all cases. A representative case of a female with systemic sarcoidosis and cardiac involvement is summarized in Fig. 3, for whom FDG PET/CT contributed not only to the diagnosis and disease activity evaluation, but also to the follow-up of treatment response.

FIG. 2
Number of F-18 FDG PET/CT studies for inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases in Chonnam National University Hospital and Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital.

FIG. 3
F-18 FDG PET/CT findings in a 56-year-old female with systemic sarcoidosis before (A) and after (B) corticosteroid treatment. (A) Multiple hypermetabolic lesions were observed in the mediastinal lymph node stations, heart, liver, and spleen, indicating the presence of active inflammation. (B) After 6 months of corticosteroid treatment, systemic inflammation was completely resolved.

DISCUSSION

The present study showed that the usage of cardiac PET/CT in inflammatory and infiltrative cardiac diseases has increased, which has paralleled the decreasing tendency of myocardial perfusion PET. This trend was mirrored in both domestic database and our institutional database.

The main cause of changing trend of cardiac diseases in Korea is the rapid aging of Korean population. Increases of valvular heart disease and arrhythmia were faster than that of coronary artery diseases. The number of patients with arrhythmia increased 57% in 7 years (from 232,547 in 2010 to 365,461 in 2017). The number of patients with valvular heart disease increased 55% in the same period (from 29,308 in 2010 to 45,581 in 2017). The increasing number is notable in aortic valve disease, which was 88% in the same period (from 14,058 in 2010 to 26,448 in 2017). An increase of patients with coronary artery diseases was only 30% in the same period.6 Non-rheumatic valvular heart diseases became the main cause of valvular heart diseases.12 In the nationwide database, the use of cardiac FDG PET/CT had two phases of rise in number. The first one was mainly based on its use for myocardial viability testing. This trend did not continue as the prospective clinical trials evaluating myocardial viability testing with FDG PET failed to show its value in the decision of revascularization for ischemic heart failure.13, 14 The use of cardiac FDG PET/CT, which was almost used for viability testing, decreased in the late 2000s and early 2010s. Another emerging imaging study, cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging also accelerated the decreasing use of FDG PET in viability testing, taking advantage of the late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging technique.

Recently, inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases have become the novel targets of cardiac FDG PET/CT. Inflammatory changes follow many pathologic processes including valvular heart diseases and some infiltrative heart diseases such as cardiac sarcoidosis. Infective endocarditis particularly following prosthetic valve insertion is a deadly disease.15 Recently, FDG PET/CT is being increasingly used for detection and treatment response evaluation in inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases. Clinical and imaging guidelines on such diseases stresses the use of cardiac PET/CT and its genuine values in their recommendations. These disease entities include infective endocarditis (particularly prosthetic valve endocarditis), infected cardiac implantable electronic devices, vascular graft infection, large vessel vasculitis, atherosclerosis and valvular disease, cardiac sarcoidosis, and cardiac amyloidosis.7, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21

Cardiac MR can be a valuable alternative for evaluating inflammatory and infiltrative heart disease.22 The LGE of cardiac MR can detect small myocardial involvement lesions in a patient with cardiac sarcoidosis.23 Therefore, the international expert consensus statement suggests cardiac MR or FDG PET as an advanced imaging technique to patient where cardiac sarcoidosis with abnormal initial screening test results is suspected.24 In addition, the diffuse subendocardial LGE of cardiac MR is the distinct pattern in cardiac amyloidosis.25, 26 Not only the diagnostic impact, but the presence of transmural LGE is also an independent poor prognostic marker of cardiac amyloidosis patients.27

The most important practical consideration for imaging inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases is suppression of physiologic myocardial FDG uptake. Low-fat high-carbohydrate dietand prolonged fasting for at least for 12 hours were sometimes combined with heparin injection are key factors for suppression of myocardial glucose uptake.7, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 This imaging technique is well accepted in the Korean community of cardiologists and cardiac surgeons as demonstrated in this paper.

The illustrated case shows that FDG PET/CT clearly shows cardiac involvement of sarcoidosis, and the response to steroid therapy (Fig. 2). Although sarcoidosis mostly involves the lungs, cardiac involvement develops in 25% and becomes major cause of death.28 If the sarcoidosis patient has one or more abnormalities, such as palpitation, syncope, abnormal electrocardiographic or echocardiographic findings, the patient is indicated to undergo imaging studies including FDG PET/CT.24 FDG PET/CT is mandatory when isolated cardiac sarcoidosis is suspected without evidence of systemic involvements.29

This paper has limitations. First of all, the number of cardiac PET/CT is small in authors' institutions and also in Korea. Only data from CNUH and CNUHH was analyzed for inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases. Analysis of nationwide data is through the use of radiopharmaceutical, which can be reasonably used to assume the application of cardiac PET/CT for inflammatory and infiltrative diseases because FDG is the main radiopharmaceutical for this purpose. Secondly, a comparative analysis with global data was not done. We cited references instead of direct comparison. Despite these limitations we could show an increasing use of cardiac PET/CT for inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases in Korea. Third, the nationwide survey in Korea is based on voluntary data collection from the domestic institutions, without obligation on strict data quality control. We authors categorized the studies in a highly specific manner, but potential biases during the data input had not been excluded.

In conclusion, cardiac PET/CT tailored for detection of inflammatory processes is useful for both detection and therapy while monitoring inflammatory and infiltrative heart disease. Fusion imaging of PET and CT enhances localization and characterization of even small lesions. Clinical use of cardiac PET/CT for inflammatory and infiltrative heart diseases is increasing in Korea.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT:None declared.

References

    1. Singh V, Di Carli MF. SPECT versus PET myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with equivocal CT. Curr Cardiol Rep 2020;22:43
    1. Fiechter M, Ghadri JR, Gebhard C, Fuchs TA, Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou RN, et al. Diagnostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion PET: added value of myocardial flow reserve. J Nucl Med 2012;53:1230–1234.
    1. Patel KK, Spertus JA, Chan PS, Sperry BW, Al Badarin F, Kennedy KF, et al. Myocardial blood flow reserve assessed by positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging identifies patients with a survival benefit from early revascularization. Eur Heart J 2020;41:759–768.
    1. Murthy VL, Bateman TM, Beanlands RS, Berman DS, Borges-Neto S, Chareonthaitawee P, et al. Clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow using PET: joint position paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC. J Nucl Cardiol 2018;25:269–297.
    1. Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, Bangalore S, O'Brien SM, Boden WE, et al. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1395–1407.
    1. Healthchosun [Internet]. Seoul: Healthchosun; c2019 [cited 2021 Mar 11].
    1. Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta JP, Del Zotti F, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: the Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J 2015;36:3075–3128.
    1. Terasaki F, Azuma A, Anzai T, Ishizaka N, Ishida Y, Isobe M, et al. JCS 2016 guideline on diagnosis and treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis - digest version. Circ J 2019;83:2329–2388.
    1. Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, Bryant WJ, Callans DJ, Curtis AB, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:e91–e220.
    1. Slart RHJA, Glaudemans AWJM, Gheysens O, Lubberink M, Kero T, Dweck MR, et al. Procedural recommendations of cardiac PET/CT imaging: standardization in inflammatory-, infective-, infiltrative-, and innervation- (4Is) related cardiovascular diseases: a joint collaboration of the EACVI and the EANM: summary. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;21:1320–1330.
    1. Dorbala S, Di Carli MF, Delbeke D, Abbara S, DePuey EG, Dilsizian V, et al. SNMMI/ASNC/SCCT guideline for cardiac SPECT/CT and PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med 2013;54:1485–1507.
    1. Jang SY, Ju EY, Seo SR, Choi JY, Park SJ, Kim DK, et al. Changes in the etiology of valvular heart disease in the rapidly aging Korean population. Int J Cardiol 2014;174:355–359.
    1. Velazquez EJ, Lee KL, Deja MA, Jain A, Sopko G, Marchenko A, et al. Coronary-artery bypass surgery in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1607–1616.
    1. Bonow RO, Maurer G, Lee KL, Holly TA, Binkley PF, Desvigne-Nickens P, et al. Myocardial viability and survival in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1617–1625.
    1. Thuny F, Grisoli D, Collart F, Habib G, Raoult D. Management of infective endocarditis: challenges and perspectives. Lancet 2012;379:965–975.
    1. Erba PA, Lancellotti P, Vilacosta I, Gaemperli O, Rouzet F, Hacker M, et al. Recommendations on nuclear and multimodality imaging in IE and CIED infections. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:1795–1815.
    1. Chakfé N, Diener H, Lejay A, Assadian O, Berard X, Caillon J, et al. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 clinical practice guidelines on the management of vascular graft and endograft infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2020;59:339–384.
    1. Slart RHJA. FDG-PET/CT(A) imaging in large vessel vasculitis and polymyalgia rheumatica: joint procedural recommendation of the EANM, SNMMI, and the PET Interest Group (PIG), and endorsed by the ASNC. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:1250–1269.
    1. Bucerius J, Hyafil F, Verberne HJ, Slart RH, Lindner O, Sciagra R, et al. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) on PET imaging of atherosclerosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016;43:780–792.
    1. Slart RHJA, Glaudemans AWJM, Lancellotti P, Hyafil F, Blankstein R, Schwartz RG, et al. A joint procedural position statement on imaging in cardiac sarcoidosis: from the Cardiovascular and Inflammation & Infection Committees of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol 2018;25:298–319.
    1. Dorbala S, Ando Y, Bokhari S, Dispenzieri A, Falk RH, Ferrari VA, et al. ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI expert consensus recommendations for multimodality imaging in cardiac amyloidosis: part 2 of 2-Diagnostic criteria and appropriate utilization. J Nucl Cardiol 2020;27:659–673.
    1. Patel AR, Kramer CM. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance in the diagnosis and prognosis of nonischemic cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10(10 Pt A):1180–1193.
    1. Smedema JP, Snoep G, van Kroonenburgh MP, van Geuns RJ, Dassen WR, Gorgels AP, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1683–1690.
    1. Birnie DH, Sauer WH, Bogun F, Cooper JM, Culver DA, Duvernoy CS, et al. HRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias associated with cardiac sarcoidosis. Heart Rhythm 2014;11:1305–1323.
    1. Vogelsberg H, Mahrholdt H, Deluigi CC, Yilmaz A, Kispert EM, Greulich S, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in clinically suspected cardiac amyloidosis: noninvasive imaging compared to endomyocardial biopsy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1022–1030.
    1. Maceira AM, Joshi J, Prasad SK, Moon JC, Perugini E, Harding I, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation 2005;111:186–193.
    1. Fontana M, Pica S, Reant P, Abdel-Gadir A, Treibel TA, Banypersad SM, et al. Prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation 2015;132:1570–1579.
    1. Silverman KJ, Hutchins GM, Bulkley BH. Cardiac sarcoid: a clinicopathologic study of 84 unselected patients with systemic sarcoidosis. Circulation 1978;58:1204–1211.
    1. Terasaki F, Yoshinaga K. New guidelines for diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis in Japan. Ann Nucl Cardiol 2017;3:42–45.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 3

PERMALINK