Published online Apr 25, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.2.189
A case of maxilla implant overdenture using Pekkton telescopic attachment with severe alveolar bone resorption
Abstract
It is necessary to set the correct occlusal plane and to distribute the occlusal force uniformly considering the state of the opposing dentition during the prosthetic of the single edentulous patient with severe alveolar bone resorption. Implant supported overdenture is superior to complete denture in terms of maintenance and stability, and limited implants are used in fully edentulous patients with high alveolar bone resorption. Telescopic attachments using a newly introduced material based on poly-aryl-ether-ketone (PAEK) have the advantages of typical telescopic copping, excellent abrasion resistance, and are lighter and more economical than conventional implant overdentures. In this case, we restored maxillary arch with a implant retained overdenture using the telescopic attachment made of Pekkton and the mandible was restored with fixed implant prosthesis. Through these procedures esthetic aspects and functional outcomes were satisfactorily achieved.
Fig. 1
(A) Pretreatment intraoral frontal view, (B) Pretreatment intraoral occlusal view.
Fig. 2
Panoramic radiograph before treatment.
Fig. 3
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) views with radiographic stent before implant installation. (A) area #14, (B) #13, (C) #23, (D) #24, (E) #25. Width and height of alveolar bone of #14, 13, 23, 24 and 25 were insufficient.
Fig. 4
Panoramic radiograph after implant installation.
Fig. 5
Fabrication of Pekkton telescopic attachment with CAD/CAM. (A) Stone model, (B) Design of telescopic abutment on CAD, (C) Design of telescopic coping on CAD, (D) Occlusal view of telescopic abutment try in (E) wax denture, (F) Final prosthesis.
Fig. 6
Final panoramic radiograph.
Fig. 7
Definitive restorations (frontal view).
References
-
Chan MF, Närhi TO, de Baat C, Kalk W. Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with implant-supported overdentures: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:7–15.
-
-
Palmqvist S, Sondell K, Swartz B. Implant-supported maxillary overdentures: outcome in planned and emergency cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:184–190.
-
-
Kwon JU, Cho JH. Causes of failed implant attachments and application of double crown implant overdenture in one patient. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2018;56:368–374.
-
-
Seo JG, Cho JH. Causes of failures of long-term used double crown denture and new rehabilitation with dental implant and tooth combined denture using remaining teeth and implants. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2018;56:384–390.
-
-
Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT Jr, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24–25, 2002. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:413–414.
-