J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2019 Apr;57(2):189-194. Korean.
Published online Apr 25, 2019.
© 2019 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
Case Report

A case of maxilla implant overdenture using Pekkton telescopic attachment with severe alveolar bone resorption

Ha Eun Park, Won Sup Lee, Cheol Won Lee and Su Young Lee
    • Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul St. Mary's Dental Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Received December 04, 2018; Revised January 22, 2019; Accepted January 23, 2019.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

It is necessary to set the correct occlusal plane and to distribute the occlusal force uniformly considering the state of the opposing dentition during the prosthetic of the single edentulous patient with severe alveolar bone resorption. Implant supported overdenture is superior to complete denture in terms of maintenance and stability, and limited implants are used in fully edentulous patients with high alveolar bone resorption. Telescopic attachments using a newly introduced material based on poly-aryl-ether-ketone (PAEK) have the advantages of typical telescopic copping, excellent abrasion resistance, and are lighter and more economical than conventional implant overdentures. In this case, we restored maxillary arch with a implant retained overdenture using the telescopic attachment made of Pekkton and the mandible was restored with fixed implant prosthesis. Through these procedures esthetic aspects and functional outcomes were satisfactorily achieved.

Keywords
Overdenture; Telescopic coping; Telescopic denture; Polyetheretherketone

Figures

Fig. 1
(A) Pretreatment intraoral frontal view, (B) Pretreatment intraoral occlusal view.

Fig. 2
Panoramic radiograph before treatment.

Fig. 3
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) views with radiographic stent before implant installation. (A) area #14, (B) #13, (C) #23, (D) #24, (E) #25. Width and height of alveolar bone of #14, 13, 23, 24 and 25 were insufficient.

Fig. 4
Panoramic radiograph after implant installation.

Fig. 5
Fabrication of Pekkton telescopic attachment with CAD/CAM. (A) Stone model, (B) Design of telescopic abutment on CAD, (C) Design of telescopic coping on CAD, (D) Occlusal view of telescopic abutment try in (E) wax denture, (F) Final prosthesis.

Fig. 6
Final panoramic radiograph.

Fig. 7
Definitive restorations (frontal view).

References

    1. Ellinger CW, Rayson JH, Henderson D. Single complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1971;26:4–10.
    1. Prombonas AE, Vlissidis DS. Analysis of stresses in complete upper dentures with flat teeth at differing inclinations. Med Eng Phys 2009;31:314–319.
    1. Chan MF, Närhi TO, de Baat C, Kalk W. Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with implant-supported overdentures: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:7–15.
    1. Sadowsky SJ, Zitzmann NU. Protocols for the maxillary implant overdenture: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:s182–s191.
    1. Palmqvist S, Sondell K, Swartz B. Implant-supported maxillary overdentures: outcome in planned and emergency cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:184–190.
    1. Sadowsky SJ. The implant-supported prosthesis for the edentulous arch: design considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:28–33.
    1. Kwon JU, Cho JH. Causes of failed implant attachments and application of double crown implant overdenture in one patient. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2018;56:368–374.
    1. Fanuscu MI, Caputo AA. Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture. J Prosthodont 2004;13:214–220.
    1. Seo JG, Cho JH. Causes of failures of long-term used double crown denture and new rehabilitation with dental implant and tooth combined denture using remaining teeth and implants. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2018;56:384–390.
    1. Park C, Jun DJ, Park SW, Lim HP. Use of polyaryletherketone (PAEK) based polymer for implant-supported telescopic overdenture: A case report. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:74–76.
    1. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT Jr, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24–25, 2002. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:413–414.
    1. Shahmiri R, Das R. Finite element analysis of implant-assisted removable partial denture attachment with different matrix designs during bilateral loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:e116–e127.
    1. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013;101:1209–1216.
    1. Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60:12–19.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 7

PERMALINK