Published online Jan 25, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2017.55.1.9
Effects of abutment angulation and type of connection on the fracture strength of zirconia abutments
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture strength of straight and angled zirconia abutments for internal hex and external hex implants.
Materials and methods
Twenty internal hex implants and 20 external hex implants were prepared. The prefabricated straight zirconia abutments and 17-degree-angled zirconia abutments were connected to those 40 implants. The specimens were classified into 4 groups depending on the connection type and abutment angulation; internal hex implant/straight abutment, group INS; internal hex implant/angled abutment, group INA; external hex implant/straight abutment, group EXS; external hex implant/angled abutment, group EXA. All specimens were loaded at a 30-degree angle with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min using universal testing machine. The fracture loads were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and independent t-test (α= .05).
Results
The mean fracture load for INS was 955.91 N, 933.65 N for INA, 1267.20 N for EXS, and 1405.93 N for EXA. External hex implant showed a significantly higher fracture load, as compared to internal hex implant (P < .001). No significant differences in fracture loads were observed between the straight and angled abutment in internal hex implants (P = .747) and external hex implants (P = .222). Internal hexes of abutments were fractured horizontally in internal connection implants, while lingual cervical neck portions were fractured in external connection implants.
Conclusion
The zirconia abutments with external hex implants showed significantly higher fracture strength than those with internal hex implants. However there was no difference in fracture strength between the straight and 17-degree-angled zirconia abutment connected to both implant systems.
Fig. 1
Schematic drawing of zirconia abutment configuration. (A) ZioCera abutment with internal hex, (B) ZioCera angled abutment with internal hex, (C) ZioCera abutment with external hex, (D) ZioCera angled abutment with external hex, (E) Internal hex dimension, (F) External hex dimension.
Fig. 2
Four types of specimens with different connection type and abutment angulation. (A) INS, internal hex implant/straight abutment, (B) INA, internal hex implant/angled abutment, (C) EXS, external hex implant/straight abutment, (D) EXA, external hex implant/angled abutment.
Fig. 3
(A) Fracture load test using universal testing machine, (B) Schematic diagram of loading on straight abutment specimen, (C) Schematic diagram of loading on angled abutment specimen.
Fig. 4
Fracture modes of zirconia abutments. (A) Internal hex and vertical fracture of INS specimen, (B) Internal hex fracture of INA specimen, (C) Vertical fracture of EXS specimen, (D) Cervical fracture of EXA specimen.
Fig. 5
Scanning electron micrographs of specimens (×18). (A) Fractured internal hex, (B) Fractured external hex.
Table 1
Classification of experimental groups
Table 2
Summary of fracture load in experimental groups (N)
Table 3
Results for two-way ANOVA
This study was partially supported by Wonkwang University 2017.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Osstem for its generous support to make specimens.
References
-
Albosefi A, Finkelman M, Zandparsa R. An in vitro comparison of fracture load of zirconia custom abutments with internal connection and different angulations and thickness: part I. J Prosthodont 2014;23:296–301.
-
-
Moon SJ, Heo YR, Lee GJ, Kim HJ. Axial wall thickness of zirconia abutment in anterior region. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2015;53:345–351.
-
-
Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:850–858.
-
-
Cavallaro J Jr, Greenstein G. Angled implant abutments: a practical application of available knowledge. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:150–158.
-
-
Segundo RM, Oshima HM, da Silva IN, Burnett LH Jr, Mota EG, Silva LL. Stress distribution of an internal connection implant prostheses set: a 3D finite element analysis. Stomatologija 2009;11:55–59.
-
-
Thulasidas S, Givan DA, Lemons JE, O'Neal SJ, Ramp LC, Liu PR. Influence of implant angulation on the fracture resistance of zirconia abutments. J Prosthodont 2015;24:127–135.
-
-
Sethi A, Kaus T, Sochor P. The use of angulated abutments in implant dentistry: five-year clinical results of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:801–810.
-
-
Saab XE, Griggs JA, Powers JM, Engelmeier RL. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:85–92.
-
-
Canullo L, Coelho PG, Bonfante EA. Mechanical testing of thin-walled zirconia abutments. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21:20–24.
-
-
Kajiwara N, Masaki C, Mukaibo T, Kondo Y, Nakamoto T, Hosokawa R. Soft tissue biological response to zirconia and metal implant abutments compared with natural tooth: microcirculation monitoring as a novel bioindicator. Implant Dent 2015;24:37–41.
-
-
Hjerppe J, Lassila LV, Rakkolainen T, Narhi T, Vallittu PK. Load-bearing capacity of custom-made versus prefabricated commercially available zirconia abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:132–138.
-
-
Aboushelib MN, Salameh Z. Zirconia implant abutment fracture: clinical case reports and precautions for use. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:616–619.
-
-
Yilmaz B, Salaita LG, Seidt JD, McGlumphy EA, Clelland NL. Load to failure of different zirconia abutments for an internal hexagon implant. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:373–377.
-
-
Waltimo A, Könönen M. A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:171–175.
-
-
Ribeiro CG, Maia ML, Scherrer SS, Cardoso AC, Wiskott HW. Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19:413–420.
-
-
Freitas AC Jr, Bonfante EA, Rocha EP, Silva NR, Marotta L, Coelho PG. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns. Eur J Oral Sci 2011;119:323–330.
-
-
Karl M, Kelly JR. Influence of loading frequency on implant failure under cyclic fatigue conditions. Dent Mater 2009;25:1426–1432.
-