J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2015 Oct;53(4):318-324. Korean.
Published online Oct 28, 2015.
Copyright © 2015 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
Original Article

Evaluation of shear-bond strength between different self-adhesive resin cements with phosphate monomer and zirconia ceramic before and after thermocycling

Ji-Hun Lee, Min-Kyung Kim, Jung-Jin Lee, Seung-Geun Ahn, Ju-Mi Park and Jae-Min Seo
    • Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Received July 17, 2015; Revised August 19, 2015; Accepted August 19, 2015.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

This study compared shear bond strengths of five self-adhesive cements with phosphate monomer to zirconium oxide ceramic with and without airborn particle abrasion.

Materials and methods

One hundred zirconia samples were air-abraded (50 µm Al2O3). One hundred composite resin cylinders were fabricated. Composite cylinders were bonded to the zirconia samples with either Permacem 2.0 (P), Clearfil™ SA Luting (C), Multilink® Speed (M), RelyX™ U200 Automix (R), G-Cem LinkAce™ (G). All bonded specimens were stored in distilled water (37℃) for 24 h and half of them were additionally aged by thermocycling (5℃, 55℃, 5,000 times). The bonded specimens were loaded in shear force until fracture (1 mm/min) by using Universal Testing Machine (Model 4201, Instron Co, Canton, MA, USA). The failure sites were inspected under field-emission scanning electron microscopy. The data was analyzed with ANOVA, Tukey HSD post-hoc test and paired samples t-test (α=.05).

Results

Before and after thermocycling, Multilink® Speed (M) revealed higher shear-bond strength than the other cements. G-Cem LinkAce™ (G) showed significantly lower bond strengths after thermocycling than before treatment (P<.05), but the other groups were not significantly different (P>.05).

Conclusion

Most self-adhesive cements with phosphate monomer showed high shear bond strength with zirconia ceramic and weren't influenced by thermocycling, so they seem to valuable to zirconia ceramic bonding.

Keywords
Self-adhesive resin cements; Phosphate monomer; Zirconia ceramic; Shear bond strength; Thermocycling

Figures

Fig. 1
Zirconia specimen.

Fig. 2
Composite resin cylinder.

Fig. 3
Mean shear bond strength (*: Statistically significant with P<.05).

Fig. 4
Failure mode before and after thermocycling (-1 : before thermocycling, -2 : after thermocycling).

Fig. 5
Scanning electron microscope image of zirconia surface (×5,000 magnification). (A) polished with 1 µm diamond paste, (B) sandblasting with 50 µm Al2O3.

Fig. 6
Scanning electron microscope image of zirconia surface after shear-bond strength test (×2,000 magnification, -1: before thermocycling, -2: after thermocycling). (A) P: Permacem 2.0, (B) C: Clearfil™SA Luting, (C) M: Multilink® Speed, (D) R: RelyX™U200, (E) G: G-Cem LinkAce™

Tables

Table 1
Self-adhesive resin cements used in this study

Table 2
Mean shear bond strength (MPa) with SD

Table 3
The results of Tukey HSD post hoc test (before thermocycling)

Table 4
The results of Tukey HSD post hoc test (after thermocycling)

References

    1. Anusavice KJ. Recent developments in restorative dental ceramics. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:72–74. 76–78, 80–84.
    1. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18–32.
    1. Lin J, Shinya A, Gomi H, Shinya A. Effect of self-adhesive resin cement and tribochemical treatment on bond strength to zirconia. Int J Oral Sci 2010;2:28–34.
    1. Luthardt RG, Sandkuhl O, Reitz B. Zirconia-TZP and alumina--advanced technologies for the manufacturing of single crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1999;7:113–119.
    1. Passos SP, May LG, Barca DC, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Adhesive quality of self-adhesive and conventional adhesive resin cement to Y-TZP ceramic before and after aging conditions. Oper Dent 2010;35:689–696.
    1. Derand T, Molin M, Kvam K. Bond strength of composite luting cement to zirconia ceramic surfaces. Dent Mater 2005;21:1158–1162.
    1. Anusavice KJ. In: Phillips science of dental materials. 11th ed. Saunders, Missouri, USA: 2003. pp. 443-494.
    1. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Hughie ML, Brown JS. Comparison of shear bond strengths of two resin luting systems for a base and a high noble metal alloy bonded to enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:457–461.
    1. In HS, Park JI, Choi JI, Cho HW, Dong JK. The study of shear bond strength of a self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2008;46:535–543.
    1. Miragaya L, Maia LC, Sabrosa CE, de Goes MF, da Silva EM. Evaluation of self-adhesive resin cement bond strength to yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramic (Y-TZP) using four surface treatments. J Adhes Dent 2011;13:473–480.
    1. Komine F, Kobayashi K, Saito A, Fushiki R, Koizumi H, Matsumura H. Shear bond strength between an indirect composite veneering material and zirconia ceramics after thermocycling. J Oral Sci 2009;51:629–634.
    1. Ikemura K, Jogetsu Y, Shinno K, Nakatsuka T, Endo T, Kadoma Y. Effects of a newly designed HEMA-free, multi-purpose, single-bottle, self-etching adhesive on bonding to dental hard tissues, zirconia-based ceramics, and gold alloy. Dent Mater J 2011;30:616–625.
    1. Kim AJ, Yu SH, Oh SH, Bae JM. Effect of self-adhesive resin cements on the shear bond strengths between bovine teeth and composite resin block. J Korean Soc Dent Mater 2013;40:367–372.
    1. Lüthy H, Loeffel O, Hammerle CH. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2006;22:195–200.
    1. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater 2007;23:45–50.
    1. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:295–314.
    1. Oyagüe RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio E, Ferrari M, Osorio R. Effect of water aging on microtensile bond strength of dualcured resin cements to pre-treated sintered zirconium-oxide ceramics. Dent Mater 2009;25:392–399.
    1. D'Amario M, Campidoglio M, Morresi AL, Luciani L, Marchetti E, Baldi M. Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength between dual-cured resin cements and zirconium-oxide ceramics. J Oral Sci 2010;52:425–430.
    1. Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Yamauti M, Pashley DH, Tay F. Durability of resin-dentin bonds: effects of direct/indirect exposure and storage media. Dent Mater 2007;23:885–892.
    1. Fischer J, Grohmann P, Stawarczyk B. Effect of zirconia surface treatments on the shear strength of zirconia/veneering ceramic composites. Dent Mater J 2008;27:448–454.
    1. Chung KH, Greener EH. Correlation between degree of conversion, filler concentration and mechanical properties of posterior composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:487–494.
    1. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater 1998;14:51–56.
    1. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:356–362.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 6

Tables

1 / 4

PERMALINK