[1]
L. Cao, Ch. Liu, Q. Zhao, M. Jiang, Effect of Al2O3 modification on enrichment and stabilization of chromium in stainless steel slag, J. Iron Steel Res., Int. 24 (2017) 258-265.
DOI: 10.1016/s1006-706x(17)30038-9
Google Scholar
[2]
H.-Ch. Chuang, W.-S. Hwang, Sh.-H. Liu, Effects of basicity and FeO content on the softening and melting temperatures of the CaO–SiO2–MgO–Al2O3 slag system, Mater. Trans. 50 (2009) 1448-1456.
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.mra2008372
Google Scholar
[3]
R.A.M. Almeida, D. Vieira, W.V. Bielefeldt, A.C.F. Vilela, MgO saturation analisys of CaO–SiO2–FeO–MgO–Al2O3 slag system, Mater. Res. 21 (2018) e20170041.
DOI: 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-0041
Google Scholar
[4]
M.A. Tayeb, A.N. Assis, S. Sridhar, R.J. Fruehan, MgO solubility in steelmaking slags, Metall. Mater. Trans. B. 46 (2015) 1112-1114.
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-015-0352-8
Google Scholar
[5]
J. Li, A. Xu, D. He, Q. Yang, N. Tian, Effect of FeO on the formation of spinel phases and chromium distribution in the CaO–SiO2–MgO–Al2O3–Cr2O3 system, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 20 (2013) 253-258.
DOI: 10.1007/s12613-013-0720-9
Google Scholar
[6]
F. Engström, D. Adolfsson, C. Samuelsson, Å. Sandström, B. Björkman, A study of the solubility of pure slag minerals, Miner. Eng. 41 (2013) 46-52.
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2012.10.004
Google Scholar
[7]
P. Yan, B.A. Webler, P.C. Pistorius, R.J. Fruehan, Nature of MgO and Al2O3 dissolution in metallurgical slags, Metall. Mater. Trans. B. 46 (2015) 2414-2418.
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-015-0440-9
Google Scholar
[8]
J.H. Park, D.S. Kim, Effect of CaO–Al2O3–MgO slags on the formation of MgO–Al2O3 inclusions in ferritic stainless steel, Metall. Mater. Trans. B. 36 (2005) 495-502.
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-005-0041-0
Google Scholar
[9]
G.G. Mikhailov, B.I. Leonovich, Yu.S. Kuznetsov, Thermodynamics of Metallurgical Processes and Systems, Moscow Institute of Steel and Alloys Publishing house, Moscow, (2009).
Google Scholar
[10]
O.V. Samoilova, L.A. Makrovets, G.G. Mikhailov, E.A. Trofimov, Thermodynamic analysis of the Cu–Si–Ni–O system, Russ. J. Non-ferrous Metals. 53 (2012) 223-228.
DOI: 10.3103/s1067821212030182
Google Scholar
[11]
O.V. Samoilova, L.A. Makrovets, E.A. Trofimov, Thermodynamic simulation of the phase diagram of the Cu2O–Na2O–K2O system, Moscow Univ. Chem. Bull. 73 (2018) 105-110.
DOI: 10.3103/s0027131418030057
Google Scholar
[12]
O. Kubaschewski, C.B. Alcock, Metallurgical Thermochemistry, Pergamon Press Ltd Publ., Oxford, (1979).
Google Scholar
[13]
L.S. Darken, R.W. Gurry, The system iron–oxygen. II. Equilibrium and thermodynamics of liquid oxide and other phases, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 68 (1946) 798-816.
DOI: 10.1021/ja01209a030
Google Scholar
[14]
H. Schenck, W. Pfaff, Das system eisen(II)–oxyd–magnesiumoxyd und seine verteilungsgleichgewichte mit flüssigem eisen bei 1520 bis 1750 °C, Arch. Eisenhüttenwes. 32 (1961) 741-751.
DOI: 10.1002/srin.196103268
Google Scholar
[15]
R. Scheel, Gleichgewichte im system CaO–MgO–FeOn bei gegenwart von metallischem eisen, Sprechsaal für Keramik, Glas, Baustoffe, 108 (1975) 685-686.
Google Scholar
[16]
W.A. Fischer, A. Hoffmann, Das zustandsschaubild eisenoxydul–aluminiumoxyd, Arch. Eisenhüttenwes. 27 (1956) 343-346.
DOI: 10.1002/srin.195601412
Google Scholar
[17]
K. Rosenbach, J.A. Schmitz, Untersuchungen im dreistoffsystem eisen (II)-oxid–chrom (III)-oxid–tonerde, Arch. Eisenhüttenwes. 45 (1974) 843-847.
DOI: 10.1002/srin.197403968
Google Scholar
[18]
I.A. Novokhatskiy, B.F. Belov, A.V. Gorokh, A.A. Savinskaya, To the phase equilibrium diagram of the FeO–Al2O3 system, J. Phys. Chem. 39 (1965) 2806-2808.
Google Scholar
[19]
A.M. Alper, R.N. McNally, P.H. Ribbe, R.C. Doman, The system MgO–MgAl2O4, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 45 (1962) 263-268.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1962.tb11141.x
Google Scholar
[20]
D. Viechnicki, F. Schmid, J.W. McCauley, Liquidus-solidus determinations in the system MgAl2O4–Al2O3, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 57 (1974) 47-48.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb11367.x
Google Scholar
[21]
A. Ono, Fe–Mg partitioning between spinel and olivine, J. Japan Assoc. Min. Petr. Econ. Geol. 78 (1983) 115-122.
DOI: 10.2465/ganko1941.78.115
Google Scholar