A Comparative Study of the Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steels Obtained by Powder Metallurgy Techniques for Application in Dental Prosthesis

Rogério Albuquerque Marques; Adonis M. Saliba-Silva; Sizue Ota Rogero; Maria de Fátima Montemor; Isolda Costa

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.660-661.617

Paper Titles

Solidification of Eutectic Bi_32.5In₅₁Sn_16.5 Alloy under Microgravity Using a Drop Tube
p.587

Pyrolysis of Sugarcane Bagasse: A Consecutive Reactions Kinetic Model from TGA Experiments
p.593

Plasma Etching of Stearic Acid in Ar and Ar-O₂ DC Discharges
p.599

Cost Reductions - Materials
p.605

A Comparative Study of the Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steels Obtained by Powder Metallurgy Techniques for Application in Dental Prosthesis
p.617

Effect of Compacting Pressure on Liquid Phase Sintering of ASTM 2124 Alloy
p.623

Preparation and Characterization of YSZ Closed-End Tubes for Oxygen Sensors
p.631

Strontium Dopant Concentrations Influence on Nd_1-xSr_xMnO_3±δ Structural and Electrical Conductivity
p.636

Microstructure, Crystalline Phase, and Dielectric Property Analyses of TiO₂ Composition with ZrO₂ Addition
p.641

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vols. 660-661A Comparative Study of the Corrosion Resistance of...

A Comparative Study of the Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steels Obtained by Powder Metallurgy Techniques for Application in Dental Prosthesis

Abstract:

- Ferromagnetic stainless steels (SS) produced by powder metallurgy (PM) techniques have been investigated as potential candidates for dental prosthesis applications in replacement of magnetic attachments made of noble and expensive alloys. Two SS were investigated: SS 17-4 PH produced by powder injection (PIM) and SS PM2000 obtained by mechanical alloying. In vitro cytotoxicity analysis of the two SS showed no cytotoxic effects. The magnetic retention force of both tested SS was also evaluated and they were comparable to noble commercially available material that is in use at the moment. The corrosion resistance of both SS was evaluated by electrochemical techniques in sodium phosphate buffer solution (PBS) at 37°C. The AISI 316L SS was also tested under the same conditions for comparison reasons. SS samples tested showed passive behaviour in the electrolyte, but they also presented susceptibility to pitting. The best pitting resistance was associated to the PM2000 whereas the 17-4PH PIM showed the highest pitting susceptibility among the tested steels. The results pointed out that the PM2000 SS might be considered a potential candidate for substitution of high cost magnetic alloys used in dental prosthesis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 660-661)

Pages:

617-622

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.660-661.617

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2010

Authors:

Rogério Albuquerque Marques, Adonis M. Saliba-Silva, Sizue Ota Rogero, Maria de Fátima Montemor, Isolda Costa

Keywords:

17.4PH PIM, Dental Prosthesis, PM2000

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

References

[1] A.D. Walmsley and J.W. Frame: J. Dentistry Vol. 25 (1997), p. S43.

Google Scholar

[2] T.R. Jackson and K.W. Healey: Quint. Int Vol 18(1987), p.41.

Google Scholar

[3] S.M. Parel , P.I. Branemark, A. Tjellstrom and G. Gion: J Prosthet Dent Vol. 55 (1986), p.600.

Google Scholar

[4] J. L. González-Carrasco, M. C. García-Alonso, M. A. Montealegre, M. L. Escudero and J. Chao: Oxid. Met. Vol. 55 (2001), p.209.

Google Scholar

[5] M.S. Flores, G. Ciapetti, J.L. Gonzalez-Carrasco, M.A. Montealegre, M. Multigner, S. Pagani and G. Rivero: J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. Vol. 15 (2004), p.559.

Google Scholar

[6] D. A. Flores, L. K. Choi, J. M. Caruso, J.L. Tomlinson, G. E. Scott, and M. T. Jeiroudi: The Angle Orthodontist Vol. 64 (1994), p.283.

Google Scholar

[7] ISO document (1992) 10993-5 Biological evaluation of medical devices, Part 5, Tests for cytotoxicity: in vitro methods.

Google Scholar

[8] S.O. Rogero, O. Z. Higa, M. Saiki, O.V. Correa and I. Costa: Toxicol. in Vitro Vol. 14 (2000), p.497.

Google Scholar

[9] I. Costa, O.V. Correa, S.O. Rogero and M. Saiki: XVI CBECIMAT- 2004, Porto Alegre CD.

Google Scholar