[1]
W. Liu, W.L. Johnson, J. Mater. Res., 11 (1996) 2388.
Google Scholar
[2]
K. Amiya, A. Inoue, Mater. Trans. JIM, 41 (2000) 1460.
Google Scholar
[3]
S. Linderoth, N.H. Pryds, M. Ohnuma, A.S. Pedersen, M. Eldrup, N. Nishiyama, A. Inoue, Mat. Sci. Eng., A304-306 (2001) 656.
Google Scholar
[4]
H. Ma, E. Ma, J. Xu, J. Mater. Res., 18 (2003) 2288.
Google Scholar
[5]
Z. Kovacs, A. Castellero, A.L. Greer, J. Lendvai, M. Baricco, Mater. Sci. Eng., A387-389 (2004) 1012.
Google Scholar
[6]
J.L. Soubeyroux, S. Puech, J.J. Blandin, Mat. Sci. Eng. A, RQ12 proceedings (2005).
Google Scholar
[7]
A. Inoue, Acta Mater. 48 (2000) 279.
Google Scholar
[8]
D.B. Miracle, Nat. Mater., 3 (2004) 697.
Google Scholar
[9]
A. Zhu, G.J. Shiflet, D.B. Miracle, Scripta Materialia, 50 (2004) 987-991.
Google Scholar
[10]
D. Kim, B.J. Lee, N.J. Kim, Intermetallics, 12 (2004) 1103-1107.
Google Scholar
[11]
D. Kim, B. -J. Lee, N.J. Kim, Scripta Materialia, 52 (2005) 969-972.
Google Scholar
[12]
COST2 - TCOST507 Light Alloys Database (Version 2. 1), provided by TCSAB, 1999/(2003).
Google Scholar
[13]
E.S. Park, D.H. Kim, W.T. Kim, Appl. Phys. Lett., 86 (2005) 61907.
Google Scholar
[14]
X.K. Xi, D.Q. Zhao, M.X. Pan, W.H. Wang, Intermetallics, 13 (2005) 638.
Google Scholar
[15]
H. Men, W. T; Kim, D.H. Kim, J. Of Non-Cryst. Solids, 337 (2004) 29-35.
Google Scholar
[16]
A. Inoue, T. Masumoto, Mat. Sci. And Eng., A173 (1993) 1.
Google Scholar
[17]
N.H. Pryds, M. Eldrup, M. Ohnuma, A.S. Pedersen, J. Hattel, S. Linderoth, Mat. Trans., JIM, 41 (2000) 1435.
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans1989.41.1435
Google Scholar
[18]
Z.P. Lu, C.T. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91 (2003) 115505.
Google Scholar
[19]
H. Ma, Q. Zheng, J. Xu, Y. Li, E. Ma, J. Mater. Res., 20 (2005) 2252.
Google Scholar
[20]
E.S. Park, D.H. Kim, J. Mater. Res., 20 (2005).
Google Scholar
[19]
58, 5 30, 5 11 429 498 69 735 782 47 0, 5837 0, 4112 9.
Google Scholar
[6]
58, 5 30, 5 11 422 496 74 729 762 33 0, 5789 0, 4189 9.
Google Scholar
[19]
58 30 12 426 494 68 730 771 41 0, 5836 0, 4127 9 51 34 15 439 497 58 732 781 49 0, 5997 0, 4074 5 45 37 18 444 499 55 732 829 97 0, 6066 0, 3920 5 At. % Mg At. % Cu At. % Gd Tg (K) Tx (K) ΔΤ (Κ) Tmi (K) Tmf (K) ΔTm (K) Trg γ Dc (mm) Reference 72 20 8 411 454 43 673 745 72 0, 6107 0, 3927 6 65 25 10 413 473 60 695 739 44 0, 5942 0, 4106 7 65 25 10 423 484 61 679 740 61 0, 6230 0, 4162 8.
Google Scholar
[20]
58, 5 30, 5 11 426 490 64 709 753 44 0, 6008 0, 4156 9.
Google Scholar
[6]
58 30 12 424 485 61 705 755 50 0, 6014 0, 4114 9 51 34 15 432 494 62 711 747 36 0, 6076 0, 4190 6 45 37 18 441 495 54 705 785 80 0, 6255 0, 4038 5 Figure 2: Projected onset driving forces for the Mg-Cu-Y ternary system. xCu and xMg are respectively the mole fraction of copper and magnesium. Iso-ODF" lines are displayed gradually from high values (red) to low values (dark blue). The line is a guide for the eye for the region of ODF, s minima. Black dots are the experimental points of this study. Red dots (empty circles) are the points for Mg65Cu25Y10 and Mg60Cu30Y10, compounds known as good glass formers. Figure 3: X-ray diffraction patterns of the MgxCuxGdz BMG alloys obtained at different sections of the conical samples. Fig. 4a: DSC traces of the MgxCuyYz BMG alloys obtained at 10K/min. Fig. 4b: DSC traces of the MgxCuyGdz BMG alloys obtained at 10K/min. Fig. 5: γ parameter and critical diameter as a function of gadolinium content. The lines are a guide for the eyes. Full circles are experimental points for γ of this study; triangles are critical diameters; the circle point is from.
Google Scholar
