Study of Unipolar and Bipolar Hip Prostheses Using Finite Element Simulation: Contact Stress Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

One of phenomena which cannot be avoided in the hip prosthesis due to sliding contact as a product of human activity is wear on the surface of contact interaction Wear in the bipolar model is more complicated than the unipolar model. There are two contact interaction in the bipolar model, while the unipolar model has only one contact interaction. Wear on the liner and cup surfaces of the bipolar model itself can be early estimated by investigation the contact stresses due to their contact interactions. The contact stress on the liner surface of unipolar model can be estimated using analytical method. However, the estimation of contact stress on the liner and cup surface of the bipolar model using analytical method still need to consider. The aiming of this paper is to study the contact stresses on the liner and cup surfaces in the bipolar model of hip prosthesis using the finite element simulation. There are three model of hip prostheses which are simulated in this research, i.e. the unipolar, bipolar and big head unipolar models. The result showed that the maximum contact stress on the liner surface of bipolar model is higher than the unipolar model. The maximum contact stress on the cup surface of the bipolar model is lower than the big head unipolar model. Based on this results, it can be concluded that the contact stress on the liner and cup surfaces of the bipolar model cannot be estimated using analytical method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

96-102

Citation:

Online since:

June 2017

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C.V. Sikes, L.P. Lai, M. Schreiber, M.A. Mont, R.H. Jinnah and T.M. Seyler: J. Arthroplasty Vol. 23 (2008), pp.59-63.

DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.032

Google Scholar

[2] J.M. Cuckler: Seminars in Arthroplasty 22 (2011), pp.98-99.

Google Scholar

[3] M.T. Hummel, A.L. Malkani, M.R. Yakkanti and D.L. Baker: J. Arthroplasty Vol. 24 (2009), pp.73-76.

Google Scholar

[4] E. Saputra, I.B. Anwar, J. Jamari and E. van der Heide: Procedia Eng. Vol. 68 (2013), pp.102-108.

Google Scholar

[5] E. Saputra, I.B. Anwar, R. Ismail, J. Jamari and E. van der Heide: Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering) Vol. 66 (2014), pp.53-58.

Google Scholar

[6] E. Saputra, I.B. Anwar, J. Jamari and E. van der Heide: Adv. Mat. Res. Vol. 1123 (2015), pp.164-168.

Google Scholar

[7] R. Ismail, E. Saputra, M. Tauviqirrahman, A.B. Legowo, I.B. Anwar and J. Jamari: Appl. Mech. Mater. Vol. 493 (2014), pp.426-431.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.493.426

Google Scholar

[8] J. Jamari, R. Ismail, E. Saputra, S. Sugiyanto and I.B. Anwar: Adv. Mat. Res. Vol. 896 (2014), pp.272-275.

Google Scholar

[9] J.F. Archard: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 24 (1953), pp.981-988.

Google Scholar

[10] D. Dowson, B. Jobbins and A. Seyed-Harraf: Wear 162–164 (1993), p.880–889.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(93)90090-9

Google Scholar

[11] J.J. Kauzlarich and J.A. Williams: Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. Vol. 215 (2001), p.387−403.

Google Scholar

[12] H. Hertz: J. Reine und Angewandte Mathematik Vol. 92 (1882), pp.156-171.

Google Scholar

[13] K.L. Johnson: Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1985).

Google Scholar

[14] D.L. Bartel, A.H. Burstein, M.D. Toda, D.L. Edwards: J. Biomech. Eng. Vol. 107 (1985), pp.193-199.

Google Scholar

[15] F.D. Puccio, L. Mattei: World J. Orthop. Vol. 6 (2015), pp.77-94.

Google Scholar

[16] E. Saputra, I.B. Anwar, R. Ismail, J. Jamari and E. van der Heide: AIP Conf. Proc. Vol. 1725 (2016), p.020075.

Google Scholar