Technology Evolution of Lower Extremity Exoskeleton from the Patent Perspective

Article Preview

Abstract:

Lower extremity exoskeleton is a mechanical device mainly for augmenting the performance of a healthy person or assisting the people with lower limb pathology. In this study technology evolution of lower extremity exoskeletons was analyzed from the patent perspective. Patent citation analysis based on a specific patent issued by USPTO in 2011 was carried out to trace the evolution of technology concepts in the past four decades. The technologies of control system, sensor, actuator and mechanism applied were compared from the viewpoint of hip, knee and ankle movement, and the most or relatively more cited patents were selected as the representatives of technology. Several trends of design concept with respect to the hip, knee and ankle movement were presented in the paper. For example, for the design of subsystem hip joint, the considerations were taken gradually from prevention of subluxation or dislocation of hip joint alone at the early days to reducing metabolic energy associated with walking/running as well as reducing the incidence of falls caused by the insufficient leg thrust recently. For the design of subsystem knee joint, articulated splints with hinge pivot, articulate notch or spring at the beginning were replaced by the piston and cylinder assemblies with adjustable valves to resist the flexion and extension of the joint, and later by the damping member with control unit for detecting the force, knee angle and acceleration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

536-541

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] E. Guizzo, H. Goldstein, The rise of the body bots, IEEE Spectrum, 42 (2005) 10, 50-56.

DOI: 10.1109/mspec.2005.1515961

Google Scholar

[2] A. Chu, H. Kazeroni, A. Zoss, On the Biomimetic Design of the Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (BLEEX), Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2005, pp.4356-4363.

DOI: 10.1109/robot.2005.1570789

Google Scholar

[3] B. Dellon, Y. Matsuoka, Prosthetics, Exoskeletons, and Rehabilitation, IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, March (2007) 30-34.

DOI: 10.1109/mra.2007.339622

Google Scholar

[4] H. Herr, Exoskeletons and Orthoses: classification, design challenges and future directions, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 6 (2009) 21, http: /www. jneuroengrehab. com/content/6/1/21.

DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-21

Google Scholar

[5] T. Black, Business Bet on Iron Man-Like Exoskeletons, Bloomberg Businessweek, March 28, 2013, http: /www. businessweek. com/articles/2013-03-28/businesses-bet-on-iron-man-like- exoskeletons.

Google Scholar

[6] Information on http: /www. cyberdyne. jp/english.

Google Scholar

[7] Honda Begins Monitor Leasing of Walking Assist Device in Japan, news released on 5/28/2013, http: /www. honda. com/newsandviews/article. aspx?g=innovation&id=7220-en.

Google Scholar

[8] Information on http: /www. eksobionics. com/ekso.

Google Scholar

[9] A.B. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg, M.S. Fogarty, The Meaning of Patent Citations: Report on the NBER/Case-Western Reserve Survey of Patentees, in: A. B. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg (Eds. ), Patents, Citations, and Innovations : A Window on the Knowledge Economy, The MIT Press, 2002, pp.379-401.

DOI: 10.3386/w7631

Google Scholar

[10] M. Roach, W.M. Cohen, Lens or Prism? Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows from Public Research, Management Science, 59 (2013) 2, 504-525.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1644

Google Scholar

[11] J. Alcácer, M. Gittelman, Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: the influence of examiner citations, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88 (2006) 4, 774-779.

DOI: 10.1162/rest.88.4.774

Google Scholar

[12] E. Duguet, M. MacGarvie, How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14 (2005)5, 375-393.

DOI: 10.1080/1043859042000307347

Google Scholar

[13] M.P. Carpenter, F. Narin, P. Woolf, Citation Rates to Technologically Important Patents, World Patent Information, 3 (1981) 4, 160-163.

DOI: 10.1016/0172-2190(81)90098-3

Google Scholar

[14] H. Kazerooni, N.H. Harding, R. Angold, US Patent 7, 947, 004. (2011).

Google Scholar