Detection of Kaiser Effect in Marbles under Brazilian Tests

Article Preview

Abstract:

Kaiser effect was noticed while submitting marble samples to Brazilian tests. An automatic data acquisition system was applied by means of analog to digital conversion, upon recording analog signals of stress, strain and acoustic emission (AE) emitted from Portuguese marble specimens under diametrical loadings in different loading cycles. Results confirm that the Kaiser effect was pronounced and was easy to be detected under Brazilian tests with a felicity ratio varied from 0.92 to 1.09. This means it is possible to measure the pre-existing stresses in rocks under complex states of stress by means of other tests besides uniaxial compression. Results also show that cumulative AE events vs. stress curve is more suitable for Kaiser effect recognition than cumulative AE energy vs. stress curve as every event has different scales of energy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 152-153)

Pages:

37-43

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

[1] Kaiser J., Erkenntnisse und folgerungen aus der messung von geräuschen bei zugbeanspruchung von metallischen werkstoffen. Archiv fur das Eisenhuttenwesen, 1953. 24: pp.43-45.

DOI: 10.1002/srin.195301381

Google Scholar

[2] Obert L., The Microseismic Method: Discovery and Early History. Proceedings First Conference on Acoustic Emission/Microseismic Activity in Geologic Structures and Materials. The Pennsylvania State University, June 1975, Trans Tech Publications, Clausthal, Germany, 1977: pp.11-12.

Google Scholar

[3] Lavrov A., The Kaiser effect in rocks: principles and stress estimation techniques. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2003. 40(2): pp.151-171.

DOI: 10.1016/s1365-1609(02)00138-7

Google Scholar

[4] Kanagawa T. and Nakasa H., Method of estimating ground pressure, U.S. Patent, Editor. (1978).

Google Scholar

[5] Hardy H.R., Acoustic Emission/Microseismic Activity, Volume 1 – principles, Techniques, and Geotechnical Applications, ed. S.Z. B.V. 2003, Lisse, Netherland: A.A. Balkema Publications.

DOI: 10.1201/9780203971109

Google Scholar

[6] Holcomb D.J., Using acoustic emission to determine in-situ stress: problems and promise. in Proceedings Geomechanics. 1983. Houston, Texas, USA, ASME: Applied Mechanics Division.

Google Scholar

[7] Li C. and Nordlund E., Experimental-Verification of the Kaiser Effect in Rocks. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 1993. 26(4): pp.333-351.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01027116

Google Scholar

[8] Lavrov A., Vervoort A., Wevers M., et al., Experimental and numerical study of the Kaiser effect in cyclic Brazilian tests with disk rotation. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2002. 39(3): pp.287-302.

DOI: 10.1016/s1365-1609(02)00038-2

Google Scholar

[9] Lavrov A., Kaiser effect observation in brittle rock cyclically loaded with different loading rates. Mechanics of materials, 2001. 33(11): pp.669-677.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6636(01)00081-3

Google Scholar

[10] Hamstad M.A., Discussion of the basic understanding of the Felicity effect in fiber composites[J]. Journal of Acoustic Emission, 1986. 5(2): pp.95-102.

Google Scholar

[11] Yoneda K. and Ye J., Crack propagation and acoustic emission behavior of silver-added Dy123 bulk superconductor. Physica C: Superconductivity, 2006. 445-448: pp.371-374.

DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2006.06.032

Google Scholar

[12] Yoshikawa S. and Mogi K., Experimental studies on the effect of stress history on acoustic emission activity—a possibility for estimation of rock stress. Journal of Acoust Emission, 1989. 8(4): pp.113-123.

Google Scholar