The Effect of Sandblasting and Electropolishing on the Surface Roughness and Corrosion Rate of AISI 316L Stainless Steel

Suyitno Suyitno; Ishak Ishak; P. Dewo; R. Dharmastiti; R. Magetsari; U.A. Salim; L. Hidayat

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1123.192

Paper Titles

Synthesis of Biodegradable Plastic Films from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Cellulose
p.173

The Influence of Heat and Two Stages Precipitation in the Process of Natural Polymer Purification from the Byproduct of Bioethanol Process Base on Empty Palm Fruit Bunch
p.177

Preparation of Chitosan-Alginate/PES Pervaporation Membranes for Bioethanol Dehydration
p.182

The Influence of Adding Bio Inhibitor Sarang Semut (Myrmecodia pendans) to Carbon Steel API 5L Grade B in Solution of HCl 1 M
p.187

The Effect of Sandblasting and Electropolishing on the Surface Roughness and Corrosion Rate of AISI 316L Stainless Steel
p.192

The Effect of the Wall Thickness on Wear of an UHMWPE Acetabular Liner
p.196

Sputtering of Titanium in Co-Cr-Mo Alloys for Orthopedic Implant Materials
p.201

Comparison between Conventional and Ultrasonic Preparation of Chitosan from Shrimp Shells Waste
p.205

Synthesis of Isopropyl Esters from Jatropha Curcas Oil at Short Time Reaction
p.209

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 1123The Effect of Sandblasting and Electropolishing on...

The Effect of Sandblasting and Electropolishing on the Surface Roughness and Corrosion Rate of AISI 316L Stainless Steel

Abstract:

The aim of this work is to investigate the effect of sandblasting and electropolishing on roughness and corrosion rate of AISI 316L stainless steel. The equipment used was sandblasting machine with a working pressure of 5-7 kg/cm2 with a duration of 10 minutes. The silica sand was used with size of 500-800 μm. The equipment used in the electropolishing process is the DC power supply with a maximum output of 2x100A. Anode and cathode material were AISI 316L stainless steel. Electrolyte solution consisted of 96% mass fraction of sulfuric acid and 85% mass fraction of phosphoric acid with a ratio of 1. The parameters used in the electropolish process were voltage, electrodes distance and electropolishing duration process. The combination of sandblasting and electropolishing cause the decrease in surface roughness by more than 28 times, from 3.17 to 0.11 μm. The decrease in the rate of corrosion on specimens that have been treated sandblasting and electropolishing by 37%. The optimum parameters for testing surface roughness and corrosion rate contained in the sandblasting process electropolishing for 10 minutes with a distance of 1 cm, duration 20 minutes and voltage 8V.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advanced Materials Science and Technology II

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 1123)

Pages:

192-195

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1123.192

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2015

Authors:

Suyitno Suyitno*, Ishak Ishak, P. Dewo, R. Dharmastiti, R. Magetsari, U.A. Salim, L. Hidayat

Keywords:

316L Stainless Steel, Corrosion, Electropolishing, Roughness, Sandblasting

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] D. B. Bombac, P. Fajfar, F. Kosel, R. Turk, Review of materials in medical applications, RMZ-Materials and Geoenvironment. 54 (2007) 471-499.

Google Scholar

[2] V.K. Ganesh, K. Ramakrisna, D.N. Ghista, Biomechanics of bone-fracture fixation by stiffness-graded plates in comparison with stainless-steel plates, Bio Med. Eng. Online, 4 (2005) 1-15.

DOI: 10.1186/1475-925x-4-46

Google Scholar

[3] E.D. Heras, D.A. Egidi, P. Corengia, D. Gonzalez-Santamaria, A. Garcia-Luis, M. Brizuela, G.A. Lopez, M.F. Martinez, Duplex surface treatment of an aisi 316l stainless steel; microstructure and tribological behaviour, Surf. & Coatings Tech., 202 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.10.037

Google Scholar

[4] G.E. Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy, S1 Metric edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, London, United Kingdom, (1988).

Google Scholar

[5] S.J. Lee, J.J. Lai, The effects of electropolishing (EP) process parameters on corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel, J. of Mater. Proc. Tech., 140 (2003) 206-210.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00785-4

Google Scholar

[6] T. Hryniewicz, K. Rokosz, M. Filippi, Biomaterial studies on AISI 316L stainless steel after magnetoelectropolishing, J. of Mater., 2 (2009) pp.129-145.

DOI: 10.3390/ma2010129

Google Scholar

[7] A. Parsapour, M.H. Fathi, M. Salehi, A. Saatchi, M. Mehdikhani, The effect of surface treatment on corrosion behavior of surgical 316l stainless steel implant, Inter. J. of ISSI, 4 (2007) 34-38.

Google Scholar

[8] A. Kosmac, Electropolishing Stainless Steels", Mater. and App. Series, 11 (2010).

Google Scholar

[9] M. Multigner, E. Frutos, J.L. González, J.A. Carrasco, P. Marín, P. Ibáñez, Influence of the sandblasting on the subsurface microstructure of 316LVM stainless steel: implications on the magnetic and mechanical properties, Mater. Sci. and Eng. C, 29 (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2008.11.002

Google Scholar

[10] S. Bhashyam, Comparison of electropolishing and buffered chemical polishing-a literature review, Fermilab, Batavia, (2003).

Google Scholar

[11] D.Y. Li, and L. Wang, Mechanical, electrochemical and tribological properties of nanocrystalline, Surface and Coatings Tech., 167 (2003) 188–196.

Google Scholar

[12] X.P. Jiang, X.Y. Wang, J.X. Li, D.Y. Li, C. -S. Manc, M.J. Shepard, T. Zhai, Enhancement of fatigue and corrosion properties of pure ti by sandblasting, Mater. Sci. and Eng. A, 429 (2006) 30-35.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.04.024

Google Scholar