The Compatibility Research of the Organic Montmorillonites with SEBS

Chen Jie Shi; Xiao Yan Li; Xia Wang; Yuan Wen Wang; Zhen Lu; Ling Ling Xie

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1044-1045.128

Paper Titles

Study on Mechanical Properties and Mechanism of Sisal Fiber Cement Mortar
p.111

Study on Preparation and Properties of Foam Rubber from Natural Rubber Ribbed Smoked Sheet Using Salt of Amino Alcohol and Carbonic Acid as Foaming Agent
p.115

Synthesis and Effect of DCCA on the Ambient Pressure Dried, TEOS-Based Silica Aerogel
p.119

Synthesis of Zeolite from Blast Furnace Slag Using Alkali Fusion with Addition of EDTA
p.124

The Compatibility Research of the Organic Montmorillonites with SEBS
p.128

The Compositional Effect of Water-Soluble POSS Hybrid PNIPA Nanocomposite Hydrogels
p.133

The Effect of Polymerization Mode on the POSS Hybrid PVA Hydrogels
p.137

The Effect of Reaction Parameters on the Structural NaYF₄ Microcrystals
p.141

The Effect of Water-Soluble POSS on the Swelling Behavior of Hybrid PDMAEMA Nanocomposite Hydrogels
p.145

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 1044-1045The Compatibility Research of the Organic...

The Compatibility Research of the Organic Montmorillonites with SEBS

Abstract:

To improve the compatibility of montmorillonite (MMT) with polymer. A kind of organic intercalation agent was applied in the intercalating organic modification of montmorillonite (OMMT) through ion exchange method, and a kind of silane coupling agent was further used to do the organic treatment. The SEBS/OMMTs composites were also prepared by melt blending. Structure and characterization of the modified MMTs were investigated by Fourier Transform infrared (FT-IR), wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXRD), and the thermal stability were characterized by Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The dispersion status of MMTs were evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the composites were tested by universal material testing machine. The FTIR results initial displayed that OMMTs had the absorption peak of organic functional groups. The XRD results showed that compared to Na⁺-MMT(1.47 nm), the layer spacing of H-OMMT increased to 3.27 nm, the above two results showed the organic modification of MMT had succeed. The results of TGA showed that OMMTs had a weight loss of organics. The SEM demonstrated that H-OMMT had the best dispersion status in SEBS matrix, and Na⁺-MMT was the worst.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1044-1045)

Pages:

128-132

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1044-1045.128

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2014

Authors:

Chen Jie Shi, Xiao Yan Li*, Xia Wang, Yuan Wen Wang, Zhen Lu, Ling Ling Xie

Keywords:

Compatibility, Mmt, Organic Modification, SEBS

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] X. Lu, X. Qiao, H. Watanabe, X. Gong, T. Yang, W. Li, K. Sun, M. Li, K. Yang, H. Xie, Q. Yin, D. Wang and X. Chen. Rheologica Acta. Vol. 51 (2012) 1, 37.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Kim, M. Paglicawan and M. Balasubramanian. Macromolecular Research. Vol. 14 (2006) 3, 365.

Google Scholar

[3] F. Merusi, F. Giuliani, S. Filippi and G. Polacco. Materials and Structures. Vol. 47 (2014) 5, 819.

Google Scholar

[4] K. R. V. Mahesh, H. N. N. Murthy, B. E. Kumaraswamy, N. Raghavendra, R. Sridhar, M. Krishna, N. Pattar, R. Pal and B. S. Sherigara. Frontiers of Chemistry in China. Vol. 6 (2011) 2, 153.

DOI: 10.1007/s11458-011-0239-4

Google Scholar

[5] J. Zheng, Q. Su, C. Wang, G. Cheng, R. Zhu, J. Shi and K. Yao. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. Vol. 22 (2011) 4, 1063.

Google Scholar

[6] L. Dun and G. S. Sur. Macromolecular Research. Vol. 19 (2011) 10, 1035.

Google Scholar

[7] F. C. Chiu, S. M. Lai, I. C. Hsieh, T. M. Don and C. Y. Huang. Journal of Polymer Research. Vol. 19 (2012) 2, 1.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Hwang, S. Kim, D. Oh, Y. Hong and S. Nam. Macromolecular Research. Vol. 19 (2011) 1, 84.

Google Scholar

[9] K. D. Min, M. Y. Kim, K. -Y. Choi, J. H. Lee and S. -G. Lee. Polymer Bulletin. Vol. 57 (2006) 1, 101.

Google Scholar

[10] D. Bozdoğan, G. Kibarer and Z. O. Rzayev. Polymer Bulletin. Vol. 70 (2013) 11, 3185.

Google Scholar

[11] V. Kaganer, B. Jenichen and K. Ploog. Physica B: Condensed Matter. Vol. 283 (2000) 1, 268.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4526(99)01995-x

Google Scholar

[12] V. Aristov, A. Erko, A. Y. Nikulin and A. Snigirev. Optics communications. Vol. 58 (1986) 5, 300.

Google Scholar

[13] J. Ren, Y. Huang, Y. Liu and X. Tang. Polymer testing. Vol. 24 (2005) 3, 316.

Google Scholar

[14] Z. Hu, G. He, Y. Liu, C. Dong, X. Wu and W. Zhao. Applied Clay Science. (2013).

Google Scholar