Is there a Limit to Nanoscale Mechanical Machining?

Article Preview

Abstract:

The Moores law which predicts that the number of transistors which can be integrated on the computer chip will double every 24 months and which has been the guiding principle for the advancement of the computer industry, is gradually reaching its limit. This is due to the limitations imposed by the laws of physics. Similarly, in the machining sector, Taniguchi predicted an increasing achievable machining precision as a function of time in the 1980s and this prediction is still on course. The question also is, is there a limit to machining and to material removal processes; and how far can this prediction be sustained In this paper, the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was employed to investigate this limit in the nanomachining of a copper workpiece with a diamond tool. The variation of the depth of cut used was from 0.01nm to 0.5nm. The Embedded Atom Method (EAM) potential was used for the copper-copper interactions in the workpiece; the Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential was used for the copper-carbon (workpiece-tool interface) interactions and the tool (carbon-carbon interactions) was modelled as deformable by using the Tersoff potential. It was observed from the simulation results that no material removal occurred between 0.01nm 0.25nm depth. At the depth of cut of 0.3nm, a layer of atoms appears to be removed or ploughed through by the tool. At a depth of cut less than 0.3nm, the other only phenomenon observed was the squeezing of the atom. The 0.3nm depth of cut is around the diameter of the workpiece-copper atom. So, it may be suggested that the limit of machining may be the removal of the atom of the workpiece.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

316-321

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

[1] C. Senthilkumar, G. Ganesan and R. Karthikeyan: Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China Vol. 21 (2011), p.2294.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Ruszaj , M. Zybura, R. Zurek and G. Skrabalak: Journal of Engineering Manufacture Vol. 217 (2003), p.1365.

Google Scholar

[3] N. Taniguchi: Annals of the CIRP Vol. 32 (1983), p.573.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Lee, E.F. Haaselbrink, J.L. Bull and A.J. Hunt: Proceedings of the SPIE Vol. 6400 (2006), p. 64000B.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Ali, T. Wagner, M. Shakoor and P.A. Molian: Journal of Laser Applications Vol. 20 (2008), p.169.

Google Scholar

[6] A. O. Oluwajobi and X. Chen: Int. J. of Automation and Computing Vol. 8 No 3 (2011), p.326.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Oluwajobi and X. Chen: Key Engineering Materials Vol. 496 (2012), p.241.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Cai, X. Li and M. Rahman: International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology Vol. 28 No 1 (2007), p.2.

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Guo, Y, Liang, M. Chen, Q. Bai and L. Lu: Science China Technological Sciences Vol. 53 No 3 (2010), p.870.

Google Scholar

[10] W.C.D. Cheong, L. Zhang and H. Tanaka: Key Engineering Materials Vol. 196 (2001), p.31.

Google Scholar

[11] Z. -C. Lin, Z. -D. Chen and J. -C. Huang: International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Vol. 33 No. 5-6 (2007), p.425.

Google Scholar

[12] L.A. Girifalco and V.G. Weizer: Phys. Rev. Vol. 114 (1959), p.687.

Google Scholar

[13] J. Tersoff: Physical Review B Vol. 38 No 14 (1988), p.9902.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Raffi-Tabar and G.A. Mansoori, in: Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, edited by H.S. Nalwa, American Scientific Publishers, Vol X, (2003), p.1.

Google Scholar

[15] S.J. Plimpton: Journal Comp. Phys. Vol. 117 (1995), p.1 and www. lammps. sandia. gov.

Google Scholar

[16] Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD), http: /www. ks. uiuc. edu/Research/vmd.

Google Scholar

[17] V.K. Jain, A. Sidpara, M.R. Sankar and M. Das: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mech. Eng. Sciences (2011), 0954406211426948.

Google Scholar