Improving the Deposition Rate of Multicomponent Coating by Controlling Substrate Table Rotation in a Magnetron Sputtering Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Physical Vapour Deposition (PVD) technology, particularly magnetron sputtering process, enjoys the competitive advantages of depositing different new generation coatings (e.g., multicomponent, multilayer, graded, composite etc.) on three-dimensional objects (substrate) with excellent mechanical and tribological properties. In an industrial-scale sputtering chamber with a limited number of active magnetron sources (target) on the chamber wall, the density of coating species from different sources would not be uniform everywhere around the chamber. As a result, at a constant speed of rotating substrate table in a single revolution, the instantaneous deposition rate will be highest in front of the active targets and lowest when the substrate moves away from the active targets. In this work, a method of controlling the rotational speed (i.e., slower speed in front of active targets and faster speed in front of inactive targets in a revolution) of a substrate table installed in a magnetron sputtering chamber has been developed in order to improve the deposition rate of a multicomponent TiN+MoSx coating. The mechanical and tribological properties of TiN+MoSx coating have also been characterised to assess the beneficial effects of adding solid lubricant (MoS2) in hard TiN coating.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 83-86)

Pages:

977-984

Citation:

Online since:

December 2009

Export:

Price:

[1] C. Eisenmenger-Sittner: Vacuum Vol. 61 (2001), p.183.

Google Scholar

[2] H.A. Jehn and B. Rother: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 112 (1999), p.103.

Google Scholar

[3] B. Rother, G. Ebersbach and H.M. Gabriel: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 116-119 (1999), p.694.

Google Scholar

[4] B. Rother, H.A. Jehn and H.M. Gabriel: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 86-87 (1996), p.207.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Panjan, M. Čekada, P. Panjan, A. Zalar and T. Peterman: Vacuum Vol. 82 (2008), p.158.

DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2007.07.053

Google Scholar

[6] V. Fox, A. Jones, N.M. Renevier and D. G. Teer: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 125 (2000), p.347.

Google Scholar

[7] R. Goller, P. Torri, M.A. Baker, R. Gilmore and W. Gissler: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 120-121 (1999), p.453.

Google Scholar

[8] R. Gilmore, M.A. Baker, P.N. Gibson, W. Gissler, M. Stoiber, P. Losbichler and C. Mitterer: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 108-109 (1998), p.345.

DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(98)00602-1

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Li and S. Kim: Rare Metals, Vol. 25 (2006), p.326.

Google Scholar

[10] J. Haider, M. Rahman, B. Corcoran and M.S.J. Hashmi: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 200 (2005), p.1080.

Google Scholar

[11] G. Xu, Z. Zhou, J. Liu and X. Ma: Wear Vol. 225-229 (1999), p.46.

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Jing, J. Luo and S. Pang: Thin Solid Films Vol. 461 (2004), p.288.

Google Scholar

[13] D.G. Teer: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 39-40 (1989), p.565.

Google Scholar

[14] J. -P. Hirvonen, J. Koskinen, J.R. Jervis and M. Nastasi: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 80 (1996), p.139.

Google Scholar