Bacterial Cellulose Synthesis in Kombucha by Gluconacetobacter sp and Saccharomyces sp

Article Preview

Abstract:

Strain Gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC1671 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae CGMCC1670 were applied to make traditional Kombucha with pure cultures to search for the optimum parameters of major factors affecting the yields and productivities of Bacterial cellulose (BC) in the beverage. Three culture factors were examined. The yields and productivities of BC and sugar consumed were measured after cultured statically for 22 days. After single factor test factors affecting the yields and productivities of BC have been optimized by response surface methodology (RSM). The quadratic polynomial regression equation reflecting BC yield and affecting factors was build up with Box-Behnken design principle. The optimal values of 10.37% inoculum, initial pH 4.96 and medium volume 77.13 mL in 250 mL flask were obtained with theoretical BC yield 300.093mg/g. BC yield of 279.579 mg/g was obtained with 6.84% deviation by validation test with the optimal parameters. The co-culture of pure strains of traditional Kombucha technique can be used to provide both high quality and high yield of BC in addition to producing high quality Kombucha beverage.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 554-556)

Pages:

1000-1003

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

[1] X.F. Fang: What is the Kombucha (Chinese) Vol. 12(1951), pp.113-115

Google Scholar

[2] B.L. Duan: Kombucha: friends of health. Beijing: Science Popularization Press (Chinese) (1982)

Google Scholar

[3] C.H. Liu, W.H. Hsu, F.L. Lee, et al: Food Microbiol Vol. 13(1996), pp.407-415

Google Scholar

[4] K. Wang, X.H. Gan, X.Y. Tang, et al: J Chromatogr B Vol. 878(2010), pp.371-374

Google Scholar

[5] D.J. Brenner, N.R. Krieg, J.T. Staley: Springer-Verlag (New York) Vol. 2(2003), p.41~44

Google Scholar

[6] A.M. Barreiro, D.O. Recouvreux, D. Hotza, et al: J mater sci Vol. 45(2010), pp.5252-5256

Google Scholar

[7] D.P. Romanov, Y.G. Baklagina, G.N. Gubanova, et al: (2010) Glass Physics and Chemistry Vol. 36(2010), pp.484-493

Google Scholar

[8] P.R. Iyer, S.M. Geib, J. Catchmark, et al: J Bacteriol Vol. 192(2010), pp.4256-4257.

Google Scholar

[9] H.J. Son, H.G. Kim, K.K. Kim, et al: Bioresource Technol Vol. 86(2003), pp.215-219

Google Scholar

[10] D. Dutta, R. Gachhui: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol Vol. 57(2007), pp.353-357.

Google Scholar

[11] S.A. Hutchens, R.V. Leon, H.M. O'Neill, et al: Lett Appl Microbiol Vol. 44(2007), pp.175-180

Google Scholar

[12] V.T. Nguyen, F. Bernadine, J. Michael, et al: Curr Microbiol Vol. 57(2008), pp.449-453

Google Scholar

[13] O. Shezad, S. Khan, T. Khan, et al: Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 26(2009), pp.1689-1692

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Zhou, L.L Tan, X.Y. Tang: Science and technology of food industry (Chinese) Vol. 33(2012), pp.255-257

Google Scholar

[15] D. Thompson: Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, Vol. 6(1982), pp.155-188

Google Scholar

[16] K. Wang, X.H. Gan, X.Y. Tang, et al: Food and Fermentation industries (Chinese) Vol. 33(2007), p.24~27

Google Scholar

[17] S. Wang, K. Wang, X. Gan, et al: Food and fermentation industries (Chinese) Vol. 34(2008), pp.95-97

Google Scholar

[18] D.I. Iurkevich, V.P. Kutyshenko: (2002) Biofizika Vol. 47(2002), pp.1116-112

Google Scholar