Adobe Bricks: The Best Eco-Friendly Building Material

Djamil Benghida

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1105.386

Paper Titles

Improvement and Control of Cement Slurry Formulation Resistant to the Critical Conditions HPHT
p.339

Fly Ash/Blast Furnace Slag Geopolymer Repair System as a Sustainable Solution for the Maintenance of an Existing Bridge: Materials Design and Influence on Shear Capacity under Seismic Conditions
p.346

Enhancement of Surface Properties on Films of Waterborne-Polyurethane Hybridized by Highly Dispersed and Aluminate-Modified Silica Sol
p.355

Utilization of Geosynthetic Material Interfaces for Reduction of Cyclic Motion Induced Accelerations
p.361

Use of Graphene Oxide as a Bitumen Modifier: An Innovative Process Optimization Study
p.365

Geometrically Non-Linear Free Vibration of Fully Clamped FGM Skew Plates Using Homogenization Technique
p.370

Notcheffect on J and Amplification of Anisotropic Stress Concentration Factor in a Laminated Plate Subjected to Tensile Load
p.381

Adobe Bricks: The Best Eco-Friendly Building Material
p.386

Evaluation of SEE on a 32-bit Microprocessor by Laser Test and Heavy Ion Test
p.391

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 1105Adobe Bricks: The Best Eco-Friendly Building...

Adobe Bricks: The Best Eco-Friendly Building Material

Abstract:

Durable, renewable, and affordable are the three characteristics of the adobe brick, one of the widely used construction material in human civilization, but is always neglected. Traditionally, price has been the foremost consideration when comparing similar materials or materials designated for the same function. That is why by the post-war period, the concrete was adopted as a universal building material in response of the massive housing demand. The intergovernmental concerns never took into consideration both the sustainability factor and the cultural one, not until the 1990s when research on climate change expanded and the sustainable development took an important place in the different academic cross fields: engineering, biology, technology and architecture. The main focus by then was the reduction the CO₂ gas emissions emitted by the building sector which is now approximately 30% of the global energy-related. Researchers are focusing on creating a completely new green eco-material an alternative to the concrete, but in this paper, I will demonstrate why is it worth to reinvigorate centuries-old eco-construction material. Adobe bricks are currently the best choice to built affordable housings in response to the chronicle demand. Not only they have a track record that makes their thermal mass performance easier to evaluate, but also they can last 400 years or more when properly maintained. Comparatively, new technologies require testing over time to determine their long-range effectiveness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 1105)

Pages:

386-390

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1105.386

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2015

Authors:

Djamil Benghida*

Keywords:

Adobe Bricks, Affordable Housing, Clay, Earth Architecture, Eco-Materials, Embodied Energy, Energy Efficiency, Local Materials, Mud Bricks, Natural Building, Sustainable Building

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Minke, G., Manual de construcción para viviendas antisísmicas de tierra. Forschungslabor für Experimentelles Bauen , Universidad de Kassel, Germany, (2001).

Google Scholar

[2] Zhai, Z., Previtali, J. M., Ancient vernacular architecture: Characteristics categorization and energy performance evaluation. Energy and Buildings 42, 357-365, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.10.002

Google Scholar

[3] Sheweka, S., Using Bricks as a Temporary Solution for Gaza Reconstruction, Energy Procedia, Elsevier Ltd, 236-240, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.05.027

Google Scholar

[4] Bentz D , Quenard D, Kunzel H, Baruchel J, Martys N, Garboczi E. Microstructure and transport properties of porous building materials. Three-dimensional X-ray tomographic studies. J. Mater. Struct., 33 : 147-153, (2000).

DOI: 10.1007/bf02479408

Google Scholar

[5] Clifton, J. R., Robbins, C. R., Brown P. W., Adobe. II: Factors Affecting the Durability of Adobe Structures, Studies in Conservation, Maney Publishing. 24, No. 1 : 23-39. (1979).

DOI: 10.1179/sic.1979.003

Google Scholar

[6] Clifton, J. R., Robbins, C. R., Brown P. W., Adobe. I: The Properties of Adobe, Studies in Conservation, Maney Publishing. 23, No. 4: 139-146, (1978).

DOI: 10.1179/sic.1978.019

Google Scholar

[7] Morton, T., Stevenson, F., Taylor, B., Smith, N. C., Low Cost Earth Brick Construction Monitoring and Evaluation, Arc. Architects, UK, (2005).

Google Scholar